• Home
  • Opinion
  • Quizzes
  • Redistricting
  • Sections
  • About Us
  • Voting
  • Events
  • Civic Ed
  • Campaign Finance
  • Directory
  • Election Dissection
  • Fact Check
  • Glossary
  • Independent Voter News
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Subscriptions
  • Log in
Leveraging Our Differences
  • news & opinion
    • Big Picture
      • Civic Ed
      • Ethics
      • Leadership
      • Leveraging big ideas
      • Media
    • Business & Democracy
      • Corporate Responsibility
      • Impact Investment
      • Innovation & Incubation
      • Small Businesses
      • Stakeholder Capitalism
    • Elections
      • Campaign Finance
      • Independent Voter News
      • Redistricting
      • Voting
    • Government
      • Balance of Power
      • Budgeting
      • Congress
      • Judicial
      • Local
      • State
      • White House
    • Justice
      • Accountability
      • Anti-corruption
      • Budget equity
    • Columns
      • Beyond Right and Left
      • Civic Soul
      • Congress at a Crossroads
      • Cross-Partisan Visions
      • Democracy Pie
      • Our Freedom
  • Pop Culture
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
  • events
  • About
      • Mission
      • Advisory Board
      • Staff
      • Contact Us
Sign Up
  1. Home>
  2. Newsletter>
  3. newsletter>

Where down-ballot races can have a real impact this year

The Fulcrum
July 14, 2022



Where control of state legislatures is up for grabs: Part 1

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

John Roberts’ Supreme Court has handed more power to the states in recent years (most notably on abortion this summer) and may grant legislatures increased authortiy over elections later this year.

With state lawmakers gaining power, legislative elections are increasingly important. So The Fulcrum has decided to examine which state legislatures are most likely to see a power shift this fall. Reya Kumar kicks off the series this week with a look at Alaska, Connecticut and New Hampshire, where one chamber could change control.

  • In Alaska, Republicans control the most seats but don’t run the House because a bipartisan coalition handed power to Democrats. If the GOP wins enough seats, Republicans would have the trifecta (control over both chambers as well as the governor’s mansion).
  • Republicans hope to break up the Democratic trifecta in Connecticut by capturing the Senate.
  • And Democrats want to end the GOP trifecta in New Hampshire by taking control of the 400-person House.

Read more about what’s at stake and the likelihood of any of these chambers flipping.

The weekly series will continue next Wednesday.

RCV and approval voting go head-to-head in Seattle

The ranked-choice voting people have New York City, Maine, Alaska, San Francisco and dozens of other cities. The folks pushing approval voting have secured Fargo and St. Louis. Until this summer, everyone seemed willing to stay out of each other’s way, happy to see voting reforms happen in some form.

But now Seattle offers a rare battleground, where RCV and approval voting are facing off to see which one voters prefer. The city council has already granted a ballot question on approval voting, but RCV backers are trying to get a question of their own in front of voters in November.

Quick primer:

  • In an approval voting system, people can vote for as many candidates as they want and whoever gets the most votes wins (or advances, in the case of a primary).
  • In an RCV system, voters rank candidates and if no one gets a majority of first-place votes, the person with the fewest is eliminated. That candidate’s support is redistributed, with ballots allocated to voters’ second choice. The process continues until someone has a majority.

Read more.

Additional reading: The next political revolution is hiding in plain sight

Podcast: Why the baby boomers rule American politics

Millennials and Gen Z represent an increasingly diverse American populace, but the baby boomers continue to dominate congressional leadership and the presidency.

"The Science of Politics" podcast welcomed guest Penn State political scientist Kevin Munger, who believes generational conflict is inevitable as the baby boomers retire but maintain their political influence against much more diverse, less religious, and more liberal rising generations.

Listen.

Also in the news

Young Voters Are Fed Up With Their (Much) Older Leaders (The New York Times)

Essential Politics: Why are Democrats buying ads for far-right candidates? (Los Angeles Times)

Trump’s 2020 outrage drives fear of ‘insider’ election threats (The Hill)

Great-Power Competition Is Bad for Democracy (Foreign Affairs)

As Faith Flags in U.S. Government, Many Voters Want to Upend the System (The New York Times)

Upcoming events

Briefing on Recent FixUS Patriotism Poll Results - Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget - July 14

Briefing- Recall Report - Ballotpedia - July 14

Skills for Bridging the Divide - Braver Angels - July 16

Supreme Court: Justice for the Party or the People? - Crossing Party LInes - July 17

newsletter

Want to write
for The Fulcrum?

If you have something to say about ways to protect or repair our American democracy, we want to hear from you.

Submit
Get some Leverage Sign up for The Fulcrum Newsletter
Follow
Contributors

Reform in 2023: Leadership worth celebrating

Layla Zaidane

Two technology balancing acts

Dave Anderson

Reform in 2023: It’s time for the civil rights community to embrace independent voters

Jeremy Gruber

Congress’ fix to presidential votes lights the way for broader election reform

Kevin Johnson

Democrats and Republicans want the status quo, but we need to move Forward

Christine Todd Whitman

Reform in 2023: Building a beacon of hope in Boston

Henry Santana
Jerren Chang
latest News

Reframing judicial elections — not “who should we elect,” but “why should we elect them at all?”

Alexander Vanderklipp
16h

Seven Days in March

Lawrence Goldstone
17h

Video: Modernizing Congress: The business case to upgrade government

Our Staff
18h

Something is horribly, horribly wrong

Debilyn Molineaux
15 March

Virtue’s place in our politics

Kevin Frazier
15 March

D.C. voter suppression by the Federal Government

David Butler
14 March
Videos

Video: What would happen if Trump was a third-party candidate in 2024?

Our Staff

Video: How the Federal Reserve is the shadow branch of the government

Our Staff

Video: 2023 National Week of Conversation

Our Staff

Video: Bipartisan lunch with lawmakers: Making elections work better in PA

Our Staff

Video: Antisemitism and its impacts

Our Staff

Video: We the people’s forum - Social media and the First Amendment

Our Staff
Podcasts

Podcast: A tricky dance

Our Staff
14 March

Podcast: Kevin, Tucker and wokism, oh my!

Debilyn Molineaux
David Riordan
13 March

Podcast: Civic learning amid the culture wars

Our Staff
13 March

Podcast: Winning legislative majorities

Our Staff
09 March
Recommended
Reframing judicial elections — not “who should we elect,” but “why should we elect them at all?”

Reframing judicial elections — not “who should we elect,” but “why should we elect them at all?”

Judicial
Seven Days in March

Seven Days in March

Threats to democracy
Video: Modernizing Congress: The business case to upgrade government

Video: Modernizing Congress: The business case to upgrade government

Congress
Something is horribly, horribly wrong

Something is horribly, horribly wrong

Big Picture
Virtue’s place in our politics

Virtue’s place in our politics

Big Picture
Video: What would happen if Trump was a third-party candidate in 2024?

Video: What would happen if Trump was a third-party candidate in 2024?