• Home
  • Opinion
  • Quizzes
  • Redistricting
  • Sections
  • About Us
  • Voting
  • Events
  • Civic Ed
  • Campaign Finance
  • Directory
  • Election Dissection
  • Fact Check
  • Glossary
  • Independent Voter News
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Subscriptions
  • Log in
Leveraging Our Differences
  • news & opinion
    • Big Picture
      • Civic Ed
      • Ethics
      • Leadership
      • Leveraging big ideas
      • Media
    • Business & Democracy
      • Corporate Responsibility
      • Impact Investment
      • Innovation & Incubation
      • Small Businesses
      • Stakeholder Capitalism
    • Elections
      • Campaign Finance
      • Independent Voter News
      • Redistricting
      • Voting
    • Government
      • Balance of Power
      • Budgeting
      • Congress
      • Judicial
      • Local
      • State
      • White House
    • Justice
      • Accountability
      • Anti-corruption
      • Budget equity
    • Columns
      • Beyond Right and Left
      • Civic Soul
      • Congress at a Crossroads
      • Cross-Partisan Visions
      • Democracy Pie
      • Our Freedom
  • Pop Culture
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
  • events
  • About
      • Mission
      • Advisory Board
      • Staff
      • Contact Us
Sign Up

Mark Rush

    FollowUnfollowFollowing
    Balance of Power

    Congress needs to fix plenty of things, but not the Supreme Court

    Mark Rush
    September 29, 2020
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Drew Angerer/Getty Images
    Rush is a professor of politics and law and director of the center for international education at Washington and Lee University.
    Keep ReadingShow less
    supreme court

    Join an Upcoming Event

    View All Events
    Voting

    Saving the Voting Rights Act: Virginia as a case study for reform

    Mark Rush
    April 15, 2020
    Virginia Capitol

    Lawmakers in the Virginia Capitol have an opportunity to transform the quality of elections, according to Washington and Lee University professor Mark Rush.

    matejphoto/Getty Images

    Rush is a professor of politics and law and director of the center for international education at Washington and Lee University.

    Enactment of the Voting Rights Act in 1965 remains a celebrated landmark in American history. It's time to celebrate the law's potential anew by making some big changes in how state legislatures are elected. My home state of Virginia illustrates the merits of doing so.

    First, a quick refresher course: The law enacted 55 years ago put an end to literacy tests, poll taxes and a host of other discriminatory practices that had kept minority voters from gaining access to the polls. To protect them from being gerrymandered out of power, Section 2 forbade discriminatory redistricting or other practices that would deny minority voters an equal opportunity "to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice."

    Section 2 has generally been implemented through what can best be described as the "affirmative gerrymandering" of election districts to include enough minority voters that their candidate of choice would win.

    On the one hand, this represents nothing less than retributive justice: Districts across the country had been drawn for decades to make sure minority voters could not elect their preferred candidates, so redrawing them to enhance minority representation was a way to redress the impact of that discrimination. On the other hand, in assuring the election of more minority legislators, the country — courts, legislators, litigators and experts — took away perhaps the greatest promise of the Voting Rights Act: to give minority voters a choice on Election Day. This was because the switch worked only because newly gerrymandered, winner-take-all elections ensured minority representation opportunities.

    Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

    Keep ReadingShow less
    voting rights act
    Get some Leverage Sign up for The Fulcrum Newsletter
    Follow
    Get some Leverage Sign up for The Fulcrum Newsletter
    Follow
    Contributors

    Reform in 2023: Leadership worth celebrating

    Layla Zaidane

    Two technology balancing acts

    Dave Anderson

    Reform in 2023: It’s time for the civil rights community to embrace independent voters

    Jeremy Gruber

    Congress’ fix to presidential votes lights the way for broader election reform

    Kevin Johnson

    Democrats and Republicans want the status quo, but we need to move Forward

    Christine Todd Whitman

    Reform in 2023: Building a beacon of hope in Boston

    Henry Santana
    Jerren Chang
    latest News

    Your Take: Religious beliefs

    Our Staff
    11h

    Remembering the four chaplains eighty years later

    Rabbi Charles Savenor
    11h

    Podcast: Anti-racism: The pro-human approach

    Our Staff
    11h

    Ron DeSantis and the rise of political racism

    Lawrence Goldstone
    02 February

    Curriculum regulations and book bans: Modern day anti-literacy laws?

    Katherine Kapustka
    02 February

    Podcast: 2024 Senate: Democrats have a lot of defending to do

    Our Staff
    02 February
    Videos

    Video: The dignity index

    Our Staff

    Video: The Supreme Court and originalism

    Our Staff

    Video: How the baby boom changed American politics

    Our Staff

    Video: What the speakership election tells us about the 118th Congress webinar

    Our Staff

    Video: We need more bipartisan commitment to democracy: Pennsylvania governor

    Our Staff

    Video: Meet the citizen activists championing primary reform

    Our Staff
    Podcasts

    Podcast: Anti-racism: The pro-human approach

    Our Staff
    11h

    Podcast: 2024 Senate: Democrats have a lot of defending to do

    Our Staff
    02 February

    Podcast: Collage: The promise of Black History Month

    Our Staff
    01 February

    Podcast: Separating news from noise

    Our Staff
    30 January
    Recommended
    Your Take: Religious beliefs

    Your Take: Religious beliefs

    Your Take
    Remembering the four chaplains eighty years later

    Remembering the four chaplains eighty years later

    Civic Ed
    Podcast: Anti-racism: The pro-human approach

    Podcast: Anti-racism: The pro-human approach

    Podcasts
    Video: The dignity index

    Video: The dignity index

    Ron DeSantis and the rise of political racism

    Ron DeSantis and the rise of political racism

    Big Picture
    Curriculum regulations and book bans: Modern day anti-literacy laws?

    Curriculum regulations and book bans: Modern day anti-literacy laws?

    Big Picture