Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Conservatives opposing drive for early voting in Connecticut

Prominent conservatives in Hartford are lobbying state Senate Republicans to abandon legislation making Connecticut the 40th state with at least some early voting, which has boosted turnout in almost every place it's been instituted.

"Once you get away from the idea that there's an Election Day, then you get on a constant slippery slope," former Sen. Joe Markley, the GOP nominee last year for lieutenant governor, told the Hartford Courant.


The state House overwhelmingly approved an early voting measure this year, but it won't pass unless five of 14 Republicans in the Senate join the 22 Democrats to form a two-thirds majority. If that happens, voters statewide would have the final say in a 2020 referendum.

Democrats originally proposed just three days of advance balloting, but in a compromise with the GOP the current measure would only authorize state legislators to set the specifics once the public backs concept.

Prospects for the bill, which failed four years ago, seem to have been improved by Election Day chaos last year in New Haven, where a surge in last-minute registrations led to long lines at the polls.

"When voting becomes a hassle, the democratic process falls by the wayside," said Democratic Sen. Will Haskell, at 22 the youngest member of the legislature. "The right to vote means nothing without the opportunity to vote."


Read More

U.S. Rep. David Valadao (R-CA)

U.S. Rep. David Valadao (R-CA) at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. House Republicans

(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Democrats Gerrymandered David Valadao’s District. Did It Backfire?

GOP US Rep. David Valadao has never won his seat in Congress on Republican votes alone because too few Republicans live in the district where he was raised, lives, and runs his family farm.

- YouTube youtu.be

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

Getty Images

Birthright Citizenship Explained: History, SCOTUS Rulings & Executive Orders

Birthright citizenship has been part of American law for more than 150 years. As the American public continues to see challenges against its constitutionality, brought on by the Trump administration, it is important to remember why.

After the Civil War, Congress adopted the 14th Amendment in 1868 to overturn Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had denied citizenship to Black Americans, dampening their federal protections. While the 13th amendment had abolished slavery a few years earlier, Free Black Americans were considered noncitizens by many, and thus had to work around a separate set of laws, meaning they could never be fully integrated as members of American society. In response to this issue, the 14th Amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scales of justice
a golden scale with an eagle on top of it

A Real Test for “Lawfare” Must Protect Allies and Enemies Alike

“Lawfare” is becoming a word that ends arguments instead of clarifying them. When Donald Trump or his allies are prosecuted, many on the right call the case political. When the Trump administration investigates critics, many on the left call it retaliation or “score-settling.” Sometimes those accusations are justified. Sometimes they are partisan reflexes. A label that changes with the identity of the defendant is not a rule of law.

The hard cases are not the ones with a public order to punish an enemy. They are cases with mixed facts: a real investigative predicate, a politically active target, disputed timing, later changes in treatment, and no contemporaneous record the public can inspect. Those cases require something better than “trust the prosecutors” or “trust the accused.” They require an auditable standard.

Keep ReadingShow less