Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just facts: Canadian Tariffs

Just facts: Canadian Tariffs

USA Canadian trade relationship crisis as American tariffs conflict with two opposing North American trading partners as an economic import and exports dispute concept.

Getty Images/wildpixel

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

A tariff is a tax imposed by the government of a country or customs territory on imports or exports of goods.


Before President Trump took office, what tariffs, if any, did Canada have on US products exported to Canada from the US?

Before Donald Trump took office, Canada had tariffs on certain U.S. products. Still, these were generally in line with World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). These tariffs were relatively low and applied to specific categories like agricultural products, dairy, and poultry, which are sectors protected under Canada's supply management system. For example, Canada imposed tariffs on U.S. dairy imports to protect its domestic dairy industry.

Before President Trump took office, did the United States impose tariffs on Canadian products imported from Canada?

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Before January 1st, the United States imposed tariffs on certain Canadian products, particularly during trade disputes. For example:

· Steel and Aluminum: In 2018, the U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on Canadian steel and a 10% tariff on aluminum under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, citing national security concerns.

· Softwood Lumber: The U.S. has long imposed duties on Canadian softwood lumber, with rates varying over time due to ongoing trade disputes.

· Dairy Products: While not a tariff, the U.S. restricted imports of certain Canadian dairy products under trade agreements like NAFTA.

Before President Trump took office, what tariffs did Canada impose on U.S. goods, and what percentages were there on various products exported to the US?

Before January 1st, Canada had tariffs on certain U.S. products, primarily in sectors protected under its supply management system. These included:

· Dairy Products: Tariffs ranged from 200% to 300% on items like milk, cheese, and butter to protect Canadian dairy farmers.

· Poultry and Eggs: Similar high tariffs were applied to chicken, turkey, and eggs.

· Grain Products: Some grains faced tariffs, though these were generally lower than those on dairy and poultry.

These tariffs were part of Canada's long-standing trade policies to support domestic industries.

Do US farmers need to export dairy products to make money?

Exports are crucial for the U.S. dairy industry. About one-sixth of all milk produced in the U.S. is destined for international markets, making exports a significant part of the industry's revenue. In 2024, U.S. dairy exports reached $8.2 billion, with key trading partners like Mexico and Canada accounting for over 40% of these exports.

Without access to global markets, U.S. dairy farmers would face challenges like oversupply, lower prices, and reduced profitability. International trade helps balance domestic supply and demand, ensuring farmers can sustain their operations.

Do trade agreements between Canada and the US favor Canada or the US?

Trade agreements between Canada and the United States, such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), are designed to be mutually beneficial. Still, their impact can vary depending on the industry and perspective.

· For the U.S.: The USMCA includes provisions that benefit American farmers, particularly in gaining greater access to Canada's dairy market. It also strengthens rules of origin for automobiles, which supports U.S. manufacturing jobs.

· For Canada: Canada benefits from stable access to its largest trading partner, the U.S., which is crucial for its economy. The agreement also preserves key elements of the previous NAFTA, such as dispute resolution mechanisms, which Canada values.

Overall, the agreements aim to balance interests, but debates often arise about whether one side gains more. For example, some argue that the U.S. benefits more due to its larger economy and leverage, while others highlight Canada's ability to protect critical industries like dairy and cultural sectors.

In 2023 and 2024, was the amount the U.S. imported from Canada greater or less than what the U.S. exported to Canada…i.e., What is the level of trade imbalance?

In both 2023 and 2024, the United States imported more from Canada than it exported to Canada, resulting in a trade deficit:

· 2023: U.S. exports to Canada totaled approximately $354.4 billion, while imports from Canada were about $418.6 billion, leading to a trade deficit of $64.3 billion.

· 2024: U.S. exports to Canada were around $349.4 billion, and imports from Canada reached $412.7 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of $63.3 billion.

This trade imbalance is largely due to the U.S. importing significant energy products from Canada, such as crude oil and natural gas.

Is the size of the US trade imbalance with Canada bad for the US economy?

The trade imbalance between the U.S. and Canada is a nuanced issue. While Canada often exports more to the U.S. than it imports, this isn't necessarily "bad" for the U.S. economy. Here's why:

  1. Integrated Supply Chains: The U.S. and Canada have deeply interconnected economies. Many Canadian exports, like auto parts and energy products, are essential inputs for American industries. This integration supports jobs and economic activity in both countries.
  2. Balanced Trade in Services: While there may be a deficit in goods, the U.S. often runs a surplus in services trade with Canada, which helps offset the imbalance.
  3. Economic Growth: Trade deficits aren't inherently harmful. They can reflect strong consumer demand and economic growth in the U.S. as Americans buy more goods, including those from Canada.

However, some argue that persistent trade deficits could indicate lost opportunities for domestic production or jobs. However, in Canada, the relationship is more about mutual benefit than competition.

All data and information were obtained from Copilot, an AI-powered chatbot owned and operated by Microsoft Corporation.

SUGGESTION:

Just the Facts: Medicaid

Just the Facts: Trade Deficits

Just the Facts: DEI

Just the Facts: The Deficit

David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Figurines of manual workers with stacks of coins

Getty Images/Glow Images

Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Among the international trade issues making headlines is President Trump’s recent announcement to abandon current U.S. law regarding small, low-value packages containing products purchased by Americans from overseas. The initial Executive Order was paused just days later. But the threat remains, making damaging economic repercussions imminent.

The process for such small-dollar shipments is de minimis entry. The term means “pertaining to tiny or trivial things,” emphasizing why its usage only applies to goods under a lower-priced threshold.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?
white and black printer paper

Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?

President Donald Trump has implemented executive orders that some have perceived as targeting Hispanic, Latino communities, particularly in relation to immigration policies, which they argue have contributed to increased tensions and uncertainty among individuals and their families in the United States.

Historically, the Hispanic, Latino community has significant shaped the U.S. economy and culture. As political tensions have escalated in recent weeks, it has led to organized economic activism. One such effort, the Latino Freeze Movement (LFM), has directly responded to Trump’s policies and rhetoric toward the community.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dictionary definition of tariff
Would replacing the income tax with higher tariffs help ‘struggling Americans’?
Devonyu/Getty Images

Could Trump’s tariffs have unintended consequences that hurt America?

The first few weeks of the Trump administration have been head-spinning. President Trump and his team were well-prepared to launch their policy agenda, signing over 50 executive orders, the most in a president's first month in more than 40 years. A major focus has been economic policy, first with immigration raids, which were quickly followed by announcements of tariffs on imports from America’s biggest trade partners.

The tariff announcements have followed a meandering and confusing course. President Trump announced the first tariffs on February 1, but within 24 hours, he suspended the tariffs on Mexico and Canada in favor of “negotiations.” Mexico and Canada agreed to enforce their borders better to stop migrants and fentanyl imports, which the Trump administration called a victory. Despite the triumphalist rhetoric, the enforcement measures were substantially the same as what both countries were already planning to do.

Keep ReadingShow less
Elon Musk's X Factor Won’t Fix Big Government

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk speaks with former president Donald Trump during a campaign event at the Butler Farm Show, Saturday, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pa.

Getty Images, The Washington Post

Elon Musk's X Factor Won’t Fix Big Government

Elon Musk’s reputation as a disruptor, transforming industries like automobiles and space travel with Tesla and SpaceX, will be severely tested as he turns his attention to government reform through the Department of Government Efficiency( DOGE). DOGE lacks official agency status and depends on volunteers, raising concerns about its credibility. Musk claims his team of young techies can slash federal spending by $2 trillion, but history casts serious doubt on private-sector fixes for big government. So far, he has largely avoided legal scrutiny with the GOP-led Congress’ help, while handing sensitive operations to his team of “experts.” What could possibly go wrong?

Musk’s plan involves embedding these techies in federal agencies to find inefficiencies. His confidence comes from past successes, such as cost-cutting at X (formerly Twitter) through drastic measures like layoffs. There’s no denying that private-sector innovation has improved government services before—cloud computing, AI-driven fraud detection, and streamlined procurement have saved billions. But running a government isn’t like running a business. It’s not just about efficiency or profit—it’s about providing essential services, enforcing laws, and balancing competing interests to ensure a measure of fairness.

Keep ReadingShow less