Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Are FAA Staff Cuts Causing Current Airport Delays?

News

people waiting at airport in departure lounge.

People waiting at airport in departure lounge.

Getty Images, simonkr

How many employees were laid off from the FAA due to DOGE budget cuts?

In February 2025, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) laid off approximately 400 employees as part of federal workforce reductions initiated by the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). These layoffs primarily targeted probationary employees—those with less than one year of service—and included roles such as maintenance mechanics, aeronautical information specialists, aviation safety assistants, and administrative staff. Although the Department of Transportation stated that no air traffic controllers or critical safety personnel were affected, unions and aviation experts expressed concern that the terminations impacted essential support roles necessary for maintaining aviation safety.


Subsequently, a federal judge ruled that the mass firings violated regulations due to the absence of individual performance assessments. As a result, the FAA reinstated 132 of the laid-off probationary employees, providing them with back pay and returning them to their positions in March 2025.

Did any of these cuts have an impact on the current delays at Newark Airport?

Staffing shortages have played a role in the ongoing delays at Newark Liberty International Airport, though it remains unclear whether these shortages are related to the DOGE budget cuts or whether they are related to broader factors. The delays are most directly caused by a shortage of air traffic controllers, ongoing runway construction, and challenges posed by outdated technology. In addition, a reported walkout by more than 20% of the airport’s assigned air traffic controllers has further strained operations.

Did more than 20% of Newark’s air traffic controllers walk off the job?

The assertion that over 20% of Newark Liberty International Airport's air traffic controllers "walked off the job" is a mischaracterization of the situation. According to the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA), the controllers did not engage in an unauthorized walkout but instead took authorized leave under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act. This leave was prompted by a traumatic incident on April 28, 2025, when a burnt copper wire caused a 90-second outage in radar and communication systems, leaving controllers unable to see or communicate with aircraft—a situation that qualifies as traumatic under federal guidelines.

How has United Airlines responded to the problem at Newark Airport?

United Airlines has taken decisive action in response to the ongoing operational challenges at Newark Liberty International Airport. Citing severe staffing shortages and repeated failures in the FAA’s air traffic control systems, United announced the cancellation of 35 daily round-trip flights from Newark, effective the weekend of May 3, 2025. This reduction represents approximately 10% of the airline's operations at the airport, which is a major hub for the airline.

In a letter to customers, United CEO Scott Kirby expressed that the airline had "no other choice in order to protect our customers." He relayed that he had spoken with Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy and is optimistic about the plan that the new administration has put together—a proposal for a large, systemwide investment in FAA technology, infrastructure, and staffing.

What has Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy said about the Newark Airport air traffic problem?

U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has acknowledged the severe air traffic control issues at Newark Liberty International Airport, describing them as indicative of broader systemic challenges within the nation's aviation infrastructure. “You’re starting to see cracks in the system,” Duffy said in a press conference last Thursday. “It‘s our job to actually see over the horizon what the issues are and fix it before there is an incident that we will seriously regret.”

In response to the staffing shortages and technological failures contributing to the disruptions at Newark, Secretary Duffy announced a comprehensive initiative aimed at bolstering the air traffic control workforce and modernizing the FAA's infrastructure. Key components of this plan include:

  • Hiring 2,000 new air traffic controller trainees in 2025.
  • Offering financial incentives such as $5,000 bonuses for academy graduates and $10,000 for those assigned to hard-to-staff facilities.
  • Providing a 20% lump-sum payment to retirement-eligible controllers under the age of 56 who choose to continue working.
  • Streamlining the hiring process by reducing it from eight steps to five, thereby accelerating the onboarding of qualified candidates.

Additionally, Secretary Duffy has proposed a significant investment in modernizing the FAA's aging technology infrastructure, including upgrades to radar systems, communication equipment, and ground sensors.

How is Secretary Sean Duffy securing the funding to invest in FAA technology, infrastructure, and staffing?

On April 30, 2025, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee approved a budget reconciliation proposal allocating $12.5 billion through 2029 to modernize the nation's air traffic control (ATC) system. This funding aims to replace aging Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) facilities, including air traffic control towers, radar systems, and telecommunications infrastructure, as well as to address staffing shortages by hiring additional air traffic controllers. The original proposal earmarked $15 billion for these initiatives, but the amount was reduced due to adjustments in the bill's revenue provisions, such as the elimination of a proposed national vehicle fee.

Have Democrats blamed the Trump administration for the problems at Newark Airport?

No, Democratic leaders have not explicitly blamed the Trump administration for the recent air traffic control issues at Newark Liberty International Airport, though they have highlighted longstanding systemic problems and recent budget cuts as contributing factors.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has called for an investigation into the flight disruptions at Newark, attributing them to outdated air traffic control technology and a shortage of controllers.

Democratic New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy described the delays as "completely and utterly unacceptable" and expressed confidence in Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy's commitment to hiring more air traffic controllers.

In a separate incident involving a runway collision at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in April, Democratic Representatives Gregory Meeks and Josh Gottheimer criticized recent aviation budget cuts associated with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative linked to cost-cutting measures. They argued that such cuts weaken public safety and underscored the urgent need for increased FAA funding.

While these statements do not directly assign blame to the Trump administration for the Newark disruptions, they reflect broader concerns among Democratic leaders about the impact of budgetary decisions and staffing shortages on the nation's air traffic control system.

Kristina Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two groups of glass figures. One red, one blue.

Congressional paralysis is no longer accidental. Polarization has reshaped incentives, hollowed out Congress, and shifted power to the executive.

Getty Images, Andrii Yalanskyi

How Congress Lost Its Capacity to Act and How to Get It Back

In late 2025, Congress fumbled the Affordable Care Act, failing to move a modest stabilization bill through its own procedures and leaving insurers and families facing renewed uncertainty. As the Congressional Budget Office has warned in multiple analyses over the past decade, policy uncertainty increases premiums and reduces insurer participation (see, for example: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61734). I examined this episode in an earlier Fulcrum article, “Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis,” as a case study in congressional paralysis and leadership failure. The deeper problem, however, runs beyond any single deadline or decision and into the incentives and procedures that now structure congressional authority. Polarization has become so embedded in America’s governing institutions themselves that it shapes how power is exercised and why even routine governance now breaks down.

From Episode to System

The ACA episode wasn’t an anomaly but a symptom. Recent scholarship suggests it reflects a broader structural shift in how Congress operates. In a 2025 academic article available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), political scientist Dmitrii Lebedev reaches a stark conclusion about the current Congress, noting that the 118th Congress enacted fewer major laws than any in the modern era despite facing multiple time-sensitive policy deadlines (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5346916). Drawing on legislative data, he finds that dysfunction is no longer best understood as partisan gridlock alone. Instead, Congress increasingly exhibits a breakdown of institutional capacity within the governing majority itself. Leadership avoidance, procedural delay, and the erosion of governing norms have become routine features of legislative life rather than temporary responses to crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less