Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories
Governor Cox’s Prayer Wasn’t Just Misguided—It Was Dangerous

Governor Cox’s Prayer Wasn’t Just Misguided—It Was Dangerous

Charlie Kirk’s Death Sparks Martyrdom Narrative Amid Rising Political Violence

Charlie Kirk’s Death Sparks Martyrdom Narrative Amid Rising Political Violence

Donald Trump and the Rise of Political Violence

Donald Trump and the Rise of Political Violence

"Vote Here" sign

Trump Targets Voting Rights and Suppresses Voting

Supreme Court

MAGA Supreme Court Justices Show Their True Colors by Joining Trump’s Attack on the Federal Judiciary

Just the Facts: Are FAA Staff Cuts Causing Current Airport Delays?

people waiting at airport in departure lounge.

People waiting at airport in departure lounge.

Getty Images, simonkr
Kristina Becvar
By Kristina BecvarMay 07, 2025
Kristina Becvar

In her role as co-publisher of The Fulcrum and Executive Director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, she is a driving force behind collaborative efforts to transform our democracy. Recognizing that no single idea or organization can address our complex challenges in isolation, Kristina excels in blending intuitive leadership with data-driven insights. Her extensive background in operations and change management, coupled with her M.S. in data analytics and research methods, equips her with a powerful skill set. Kristina brings a focused approach to the essential work required for a thriving democratic republic.

See More Writings by author

How many employees were laid off from the FAA due to DOGE budget cuts?

In February 2025, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) laid off approximately 400 employees as part of federal workforce reductions initiated by the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). These layoffs primarily targeted probationary employees—those with less than one year of service—and included roles such as maintenance mechanics, aeronautical information specialists, aviation safety assistants, and administrative staff. Although the Department of Transportation stated that no air traffic controllers or critical safety personnel were affected, unions and aviation experts expressed concern that the terminations impacted essential support roles necessary for maintaining aviation safety.

Subsequently, a federal judge ruled that the mass firings violated regulations due to the absence of individual performance assessments. As a result, the FAA reinstated 132 of the laid-off probationary employees, providing them with back pay and returning them to their positions in March 2025.

Did any of these cuts have an impact on the current delays at Newark Airport?

Staffing shortages have played a role in the ongoing delays at Newark Liberty International Airport, though it remains unclear whether these shortages are related to the DOGE budget cuts or whether they are related to broader factors. The delays are most directly caused by a shortage of air traffic controllers, ongoing runway construction, and challenges posed by outdated technology. In addition, a reported walkout by more than 20% of the airport’s assigned air traffic controllers has further strained operations.

Did more than 20% of Newark’s air traffic controllers walk off the job?

The assertion that over 20% of Newark Liberty International Airport's air traffic controllers "walked off the job" is a mischaracterization of the situation. According to the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA), the controllers did not engage in an unauthorized walkout but instead took authorized leave under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act. This leave was prompted by a traumatic incident on April 28, 2025, when a burnt copper wire caused a 90-second outage in radar and communication systems, leaving controllers unable to see or communicate with aircraft—a situation that qualifies as traumatic under federal guidelines.

How has United Airlines responded to the problem at Newark Airport?

United Airlines has taken decisive action in response to the ongoing operational challenges at Newark Liberty International Airport. Citing severe staffing shortages and repeated failures in the FAA’s air traffic control systems, United announced the cancellation of 35 daily round-trip flights from Newark, effective the weekend of May 3, 2025. This reduction represents approximately 10% of the airline's operations at the airport, which is a major hub for the airline.

In a letter to customers, United CEO Scott Kirby expressed that the airline had "no other choice in order to protect our customers." He relayed that he had spoken with Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy and is optimistic about the plan that the new administration has put together—a proposal for a large, systemwide investment in FAA technology, infrastructure, and staffing.

What has Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy said about the Newark Airport air traffic problem?

U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has acknowledged the severe air traffic control issues at Newark Liberty International Airport, describing them as indicative of broader systemic challenges within the nation's aviation infrastructure. “You’re starting to see cracks in the system,” Duffy said in a press conference last Thursday. “It‘s our job to actually see over the horizon what the issues are and fix it before there is an incident that we will seriously regret.”

In response to the staffing shortages and technological failures contributing to the disruptions at Newark, Secretary Duffy announced a comprehensive initiative aimed at bolstering the air traffic control workforce and modernizing the FAA's infrastructure. Key components of this plan include:

  • Hiring 2,000 new air traffic controller trainees in 2025.
  • Offering financial incentives such as $5,000 bonuses for academy graduates and $10,000 for those assigned to hard-to-staff facilities.
  • Providing a 20% lump-sum payment to retirement-eligible controllers under the age of 56 who choose to continue working.
  • Streamlining the hiring process by reducing it from eight steps to five, thereby accelerating the onboarding of qualified candidates.

Additionally, Secretary Duffy has proposed a significant investment in modernizing the FAA's aging technology infrastructure, including upgrades to radar systems, communication equipment, and ground sensors.

How is Secretary Sean Duffy securing the funding to invest in FAA technology, infrastructure, and staffing?

On April 30, 2025, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee approved a budget reconciliation proposal allocating $12.5 billion through 2029 to modernize the nation's air traffic control (ATC) system. This funding aims to replace aging Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) facilities, including air traffic control towers, radar systems, and telecommunications infrastructure, as well as to address staffing shortages by hiring additional air traffic controllers. The original proposal earmarked $15 billion for these initiatives, but the amount was reduced due to adjustments in the bill's revenue provisions, such as the elimination of a proposed national vehicle fee.

Have Democrats blamed the Trump administration for the problems at Newark Airport?

No, Democratic leaders have not explicitly blamed the Trump administration for the recent air traffic control issues at Newark Liberty International Airport, though they have highlighted longstanding systemic problems and recent budget cuts as contributing factors.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has called for an investigation into the flight disruptions at Newark, attributing them to outdated air traffic control technology and a shortage of controllers.

Democratic New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy described the delays as "completely and utterly unacceptable" and expressed confidence in Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy's commitment to hiring more air traffic controllers.

In a separate incident involving a runway collision at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in April, Democratic Representatives Gregory Meeks and Josh Gottheimer criticized recent aviation budget cuts associated with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative linked to cost-cutting measures. They argued that such cuts weaken public safety and underscored the urgent need for increased FAA funding.

While these statements do not directly assign blame to the Trump administration for the Newark disruptions, they reflect broader concerns among Democratic leaders about the impact of budgetary decisions and staffing shortages on the nation's air traffic control system.

Kristina Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Latest news

A globe resting on the very edge of a risen plank.
Democracy

What in the World Is Going On?

Bernie Sanders Still Believes in the Democratic Party. Why?
Democracy

Bernie Sanders Still Believes in the Democratic Party. Why?

Why Fed Independence Is a Cornerstone of Democracy—and Why It’s Under Threat
Governance & Legislation

Why Fed Independence Is a Cornerstone of Democracy—and Why It’s Under Threat

An oil drilling platform with a fracking rig.
Governance & Legislation

Trump Says America’s Oil Industry Is Cleaner Than Other Countries’. New Data Shows Massive Emissions From Texas Wells.

Read More

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Health Care

U.S. President Donald Trump takes the stage during a reception for Republican members of the House of Representatives in the East Room of the White House on July 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump thanked GOP lawmakers for passing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

Just the Facts: Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Health Care

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What are the new Medicaid work requirements, and are they more lenient or more restrictive than what previously existed?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Constitution
Imagining constitutions
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

A Bold Civic Renaissance for America’s 250th

Every September 17, Americans mark Constitution Day—the anniversary of the signing of our nation’s foundational charter in 1787. The day is often commemorated with classroom lessons and speaking events, but it is more than a ceremonial anniversary. It is an invitation to ask: What does it mean to live under a constitution that was designed as a charge for each generation to study, debate, and uphold its principles? This year, as we look toward the semiquincentennial of our nation in 2026, the question feels especially urgent.

The decade between 1776 and 1787 was defined by a period of bold and intentional nation and national identity building. In that time, the United States declared independence, crafted its first national government, won a war to make their independence a reality, threw out the first government when it failed, and forged a new federal government to lead the nation. We stand at a similar inflection point. The coming decade, from the nation’s semiquincentennial in 2026 to the Constitution’s in 2037, offers a parallel opportunity to reimagine and reinvigorate our American civic culture. Amid the challenges we face today, there’s an opportunity to study, reflect, and prepare to write the next chapters in our American story—it is as much about the past 250 years, as it is about the next 250 years. It will require the same kind of audacious commitment to building for the future that was present at the nation’s outset.

Keep ReadingShow less
© Copyright 2025