Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Where’s Athlete Activism During Trump’s Second Term?

News

Where’s Athlete Activism During Trump’s Second Term?

Antoine Bethea #41 and Rashard Robinson #33 of the San Francisco 49ers raise their first during the anthem as Eli Harold #58 while teammates Colin Kaepernick #7 and Eric Reid #35 take a knee, prior to the game against the Dallas Cowboys at Levi Stadium on October 2, 2016 in Santa Clara, California.

(Photo by Michael Zagaris/San Francisco 49ers/Getty Images)

Despite the 2016-17 NFL season featuring Tom Brady and the New England Patriots’ iconic 28-3 comeback over the Atlanta Falcons in the Super Bowl, the retirement of legendary quarterback Peyton Manning, and the emergence of Joey Bosa as one of the top defensive players in the league, one monumental event stands above the rest: Colin Kaepernick kneeling during the national anthem in the heart of Donald Trump’s first term to protest racial injustice and police brutality in the United States.

Kaepernick spawned one of the most talked-about protests in the history of American sports, leading to national conversations about police brutality while earning himself severe backlash in the process.


But seven months into Trump’s second administration — which has vigorously attacked diversity, equity, and inclusion, weaponized ICE to target Black and Brown communities, and has adopted scores of other authoritarian measures — athlete activism is almost nowhere to be seen.

“[Trump is] a lot more powerful this time than he was the last time, and he seems a lot more intent on weaponizing the government this time,” said J.A. Adande, the Director of Sports Journalism at Northwestern University. “He’s placed ⅓ of the justices on the Supreme Court, and he’s got the executive, legislative, and the judicial branch all in his corner.”

With power across the government, Trump has attacked dissent around the country, even threatening to arrest former President Barack Obama on social media.

If former presidents aren’t safe, then athletes definitely won’t be.

To make matters worse, X, the most significant platform for athlete advocacy, has been taken over by Elon Musk to amplify far-right voices and squash left-wing protests.

“A part of this issue is the takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk and the diminishing of that as a form of protest on the left,” Adande said. “It’s now geared to amplify right-wing talking points. The BLM movement really gained momentum on Twitter. There’s no way that would happen today.”

But that’s not to say that athlete advocacy wouldn’t be effective against the Trump administration. Prominent athletes hold some of the biggest platforms in the world. LeBron James — who has been outspoken about many political issues, including the Black Lives Matter movement — holds 159 million followers on Instagram. His silence for the last seven months has prevented millions around the world from being exposed to modern injustices in America.

Athlete advocacy has also been effective in the past, most notably leading to the unprecedented conviction of Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis police officer who murdered George Floyd in 2020.

“The conversation that Kaepernick wanted to initiate in 2016 was the conversation that led to the action in 2020,” Adande said. “It took a while and took an egregious reaction of watching George Floyd be killed on video to get the response that Kaepernick sought.”

2020 became one of the most effective years for protest in American history. With the country locked down due to COVID-19 and blatant instances of police violence being recorded and spread through social media, advocacy gained momentum.

“A lot of that momentum was the pent-up energy during the pandemic, and how things had been laid bare during the pandemic,” Adande said. “COVID was having a vastly disproportionate toll on Black and Brown communities … that meshed with blatantly visible instances of police brutality and the murder of Black people.”

However, that widespread action became an Achilles heel for modern protest movements. Voices were heard, and then were no longer needed.

“You protest if you feel you aren’t being heard,” Adande said. “When the league is taking your slogans and putting it on the court, and signing off on kneeling during the anthem … it took away the momentum from protesting because the protest had been heard.”

With protests already dwindling, combined with the Trump administration shifting the national conversation to immigration, transgender rights, and crime, the activism that dominated the COVID era on the left was gone. With Trump now threatening seemingly everyone who opposes him, athletes now risk their gargantuan salaries to speak out on controversial issues.

But it's their voices that can return the vigor to advocacy.

“Athletes still command the most attention-grabbing product in America,” Adande said. “Live sports and the NFL in particular are the single most popular product and command people's attention in ways that nothing else does in our culture. They have the stage, they have the microphone, they have the attention, it’s just a matter of if they want to use it.”

Jared Tucker is a sophomore at the University of Washington — Seattle studying Journalism and Public Interest Communication with a minor in History. Jared is also a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship, to share his thoughts on what democracy means to him and his perspective on its current health.

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less