Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Don’t Be a Working Class Hero — Just Imagine!

Opinion

Don’t Be a Working Class Hero — Just Imagine!

John Lennon’s “Imagine” comforts, but his forgotten songs like “Working Class Hero” and “Gimme Some Truth” confront power — and that’s why they’ve been buried.

Getty Images, New York Times Co.

Everyone knows John Lennon’s “Imagine.”

It floats through Times Square on New Year’s Eve, plays during Olympic ceremonies, and fills the air at corporate galas meant to celebrate “unity.” Its melody is tender, its message is simple, and its premise is seductive: If only we could imagine a world without possessions, borders, or religion, we would live in peace.


But what’s striking is how this became the Lennon song the world remembers — and how much of his genuinely radical work has been forgotten.

Ask most people about “Working Class Hero,” “Power to the People,” “Gimme Some Truth,” or “I Don’t Wanna Be a Soldier, Mama,” and you’ll likely get blank stares. Those songs burn with class anger, anti-imperialism, and contempt for power. They were written in the same era as “Imagine,” yet they’ve been buried beneath the soft fog of its sentimental idealism.

In “Working Class Hero,” Lennon dismantles the myth of social mobility, describing how capitalist society trains us to obey, to consume, and to mistake conformity for success. “They keep you doped with religion and sex and TV,” he spits, “and you think you’re so clever and classless and free.” It’s not a dream of peace — it’s an autopsy of oppression.

In “Power to the People,” he does something almost unthinkable for a pop icon: He demands collective revolt. It’s a chant, not a prayer — a direct call for working-class empowerment and political participation. And in “Gimme Some Truth,” Lennon channels his fury at the political deceit of the Nixon years: “No short-haired yellow-bellied son of Tricky Dicky gonna mother hubbard soft-soap me.” It’s not polite, and that’s the point.

And then there’s “I Don’t Wanna Be a Soldier, Mama,” one of Lennon’s most underrated political statements. Built around a grinding, repetitive groove, it’s less a song than an act of refusal — a mantra against every institution that turns people into instruments of power and war. “I don’t wanna be a soldier, I don’t wanna die,” he wails, then widens the rejection: “I don’t wanna be a lawyer or a liar.” The repetition becomes defiance itself — a protest against being molded, conscripted, or defined by a system that sees human beings as roles to fill, not lives to live. It’s the sound of exhaustion turned into resistance.

These songs confront the listener; “Imagine” comforts them. One is a hammer, the other a lullaby. And of course, it’s the lullaby that the establishment has chosen to keep alive.

And it’s easy to see why.

“Imagine” offers hope without conflict, empathy without action, peace without politics – and all under the illusion that the statement is radical because it comes from a respected rebel. It takes the rage of the oppressed and converts it into a vague moral wish — a clean anthem for a world that has no intention of changing.

Because in “Imagine,” the problem is not power but belief; not systems of exploitation, but ideas that divide us. The remedy, the song then suggests, is not to organize or resist, but to dream a bit harder. Maybe much harder as the times worsen. In a sense, the song’s utopianism turns revolt into fervent reverie and, in that way, flatters the listener into thinking that moral clarity is somehow a substitute for struggle.

That’s why “Imagine” survives while “Working Class Hero” fades. It’s safe. It doesn’t indict anyone. It doesn’t name enemies. It can be played by a bank, a billionaire, or a government agency because it asks nothing of those who are listening. The same culture that once feared Lennon now packages him as a prophet of contentment — a brand ambassador for harmony.

In the early 1970s, Lennon’s activism was taken so seriously that the U.S. government tried to deport him. The Nixon administration feared his anti-war influence and had the FBI wiretap his phones, tail him, and use a minor drug conviction in Britain as a pretext to deny his green card. (Sounds familiar?) For years, Lennon fought surveillance, harassment, and expulsion — a campaign of intimidation meant to silence a political threat. (After Nixon resigned, the case was dropped, and in 1976 Lennon finally received his green card.)

But now, that same state and the culture that supported that state (the so-called “Silent Majority”) that once saw him as dangerous routinely plays his softest song at public ceremonies.

The irony is that Lennon understood exactly how power works. He sang about propaganda, class exploitation, and the way systems domesticate dissent. But in the end, his one song that has gained iconic cultural status is not a rebellion song but the sound of a rebellious voice neutralized — a once-dangerous voice absorbed into the background music of the very world it meant to change.


Ahmed Bouzid is the co-founder of The True Representation Movement.


Read More

​Bruce Springsteen on stage, holding a microphone in one hand and a sign that reads, "No Kings," in the other hand.

Bruce Springsteen & The E Street Band perform during Land of Hope & Dreams American Tour at Target Center on March 31, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Getty Images,

It’s All About Soul — And the Future of American Democracy

American democracy is experiencing an unparalleled stress test. The headlines churn, the rhetoric hardens, and the daily spectacle can make it feel as if the country is losing its footing. The deeper danger, many observers note, isn’t simply that a political figure says outrageous things — it’s that the public grows accustomed to them. When shock becomes routine, the unacceptable becomes normalized. And once that happens, the standards that define who we are as a nation begin to erode.

When we get used to being shocked, things that should be unacceptable start to seem normal. When that happens, the values that shape our nation begin to fade.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bruce Springsteen Launches Protest Tour as Warning for American Democracy

Bruce Springsteen performs during the "No Kings" Rally Concert at the Minnesota State Capitol on March 28, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

(Photo by Astrida Valigorsky/Getty Images)

Bruce Springsteen Launches Protest Tour as Warning for American Democracy

When Bruce Springsteen spoke out from a Manchester stage in May 2025, many saw it as just another celebrity taking a political swipe. It was anything but. What happened that night and in the weeks that followed now looks less like a moment and more like the opening chapter of something broader. Springsteen wasn't merely criticizing a president; he was diagnosing a democracy in distress.

Now, with the announcement of his upcoming protest tour, he is making that diagnosis impossible to ignore. The protest tour is not just a series of concerts; it is a call to action. By combining music with onstage discussions and inviting local community leaders to each event, Springsteen hopes to inspire citizens to reengage with democratic values and speak out against rising authoritarianism. The tour aims to create spaces where attendees can learn practical ways to get involved, register to vote, and connect with others who care about defending democracy. In short, Springsteen's goal is to transform audience members from bystanders into participants in preserving our republic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Strange Days Indeed: Why ‘Nobody Told Me’ Echoes America Today

Political Polarization and Extremism

Getty Images

Strange Days Indeed: Why ‘Nobody Told Me’ Echoes America Today

I was driving in my car the other day when a familiar song from my youth came on the radio. The opening line of John Lennon’s “Nobody Told Me” immediately hit me with unexpected force . A song I loved fifty years ago suddenly felt like it was written for this very moment.

Nobody told me there’d be days like these. Strange days indeed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jennifer Lawrence speaks during the "Die My Love" press conference at the 78th annual Cannes Film Festival at Palais des Festivals on May 18, 2025 in Cannes, France.

Jennifer Lawrence questions whether celebrity activism still matters in politics. As the 2026 midterms approach, explore the decline of celebrity endorsements, rising polarization, and the evolving role of pop culture in shaping voter behavior.

Getty Images, Pool

Jennifer Lawrence Questions Whether Stars Still Influence Politics

Eight months before the 2026 midterms, one of Hollywood’s most recognizable figures has offered a blunt assessment of her industry’s political influence. Jennifer Lawrence, known for speaking out on issues from gender equality to democratic norms, now questions whether celebrity activism has any real impact.

In a recent interview, Lawrence stated that “celebrities do not make a difference whatsoever in who people vote for.” This is notable both because of her prominence and because it comes at a time when American politics is deeply intertwined with culture and entertainment. She described the Trump era as a time when she felt she was “running around like a chicken with my head cut off,” trying to use her platform to sound alarms. But after years of backlash, polarization, and the sense that celebrity statements only “add fuel to a fire that’s ripping the country apart,” she’s questioning the value of speaking out.

Keep ReadingShow less