Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: $2.50 for America’s 250th Act

News

A close up of American coins.

Congress is considering a bipartisan bill to mint a new $2.50 coin for America’s 250th anniversary, reviving a historic 1926 design and separate from the debated Trump coin.

Getty Images, Taalulla

Items priced at exactly $2.50 include a mug reading "Major League Grandpa," a water bottle saying "Proud Military," and a New Orleans Saints 3D magnet.

What the bill does


The $2.50 for America’s 250th Act would create a new $2.50 coin for the Declaration of Independence’s upcoming milestone anniversary in 2026.

Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL4) introduced the House version on September 30, while Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) introduced the Senate version that same day.

Unrelated to the reported Trump coin

A recent controversial draft design would depict President Donald Trump on a potential new $1 coin, also tied to the Declaration’s upcoming 250th anniversary. To clarify: this legislation is bipartisan and completely separate from that.

Five years ago, Congress enacted the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, which allowed the government to mint a new $1 coin design for the Declaration’s anniversary in 2026. However, Congress didn’t specify who or what this design would depict, leaving the decision up to the Treasury.

Trump’s U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach confirmed the leaked drafts depicting Trump himself were real and under consideration, though no final decision has yet been made on whether to depict him after all.

This bill is distinct in two ways: it relates to a potential new $2.50 coin rather than the $1 coin, plus the actual designs are specified in the legislative language.

The design

So, if enacted, what would the $2.50 coin depict?

The coin’s design would replicate the 1926 design used a century ago during the Declaration’s 150th anniversary. The front depicted Lady Liberty holding the Declaration in one hand and a torch in the other, while the back depicted Philadelphia’s Independence Hall, where the document was originally signed.

That coin was also worth $2.50, even though it marked the Declaration’s 150th anniversary, rather than the 250th. (It was worth a lot more then than the current version would be, though: $2.50 back in 1926 would be worth approximately $46 today.)

Indeed, the $2.50 coin actually has a long history, though it’s now little known outside the numismatics community. A $2.50 coin was minted for more than half the country’s duration, from 1796 to 1929. For example, a 1925 design for the $2.50 coin depicted a Native American man in traditional headdress on the front and an eagle on the back.

What supporters say

Supporters argue that a new coin would help encourage patriotism and national pride during an important upcoming anniversary.

“The signing of the Declaration of Independence was a turning point in the history of the United States and the world, one that warrants national recognition,” Rep. Aderholt said in a press release. “[This bill] recognizes this importance through a meaningful coin that links our nation’s past to its present and future.”

“As America’s 250th birthday approaches, my legislation revives a 100-year-old tradition that celebrates our founding principles and joins a new generation of Americans with those who celebrated our nation’s founding 100 years ago,” Sen. Lummis said in a separate press release. “[The bill would] celebrate the values we hold so dear and create a lasting tribute families can treasure for generations.”

Odds of passage

The House version has attracted 45 cosponsors: 26 Republicans and 19 Democrats. It awaits a potential vote in the House Financial Services Committee.

The Senate version has attracted five bipartisan cosponsors: three Republicans and two Democrats. It awaits a potential vote in the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.

The Fulcrum was unable to locate any explicit statements of opposition. The aforementioned Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, which allowed for a new $1 coin in 2026, passed without objection in the House and by unanimous consent in the Senate.

Similar bills

The Fulcrum recently covered another congressional bill related to the Declaration’s upcoming 250th anniversary celebration: legislation for Congress to meet on July 2, 2026, at Philadelphia’s Independence Hall, where the Declaration was originally signed.

The Fulcrum also covered recent bills to make changes to coins or money, including legislation to suspend both penny and nickel production for 10 years, and to put President Trump’s face on a potential new $250 bill.



Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with The Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on The Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: The Charlie Kirk Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Department of War Restoration Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: No Social Media at School Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Make Entertainment Great Again (MEGA) Act, Renaming Kennedy Center to Trump Center


Read More

U.S. Capitol.
Ken Burns’ The American Revolution highlights why America’s founders built checks and balances—an urgent reminder as Congress, the courts, and citizens confront growing threats to democratic governance.
Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

Partial Shutdown; Congress Asserts Itself a Little

DHS Shutdown

As expected, the parties in the Senate could not come to an agreement on DHS funding and now the agency will be shut down. Sort of.

So much money was appropriated for DHS, and ICE and CBP specifically, in last year's reconciliation bill, that DHS could continue to operate with little or no interruption. Other parts of DHS like FEMA and the TSA might face operational cuts or shutdowns.

Keep ReadingShow less
Criminals Promised, Volume Delivered: Inside ICE’s Enforcement Model

An ICE agent holds a taser as they stand watch after one of their vehicles got a flat tire on Penn Avenue on February 5, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

(Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

Criminals Promised, Volume Delivered: Inside ICE’s Enforcement Model

Donald Trump ran on a simple promise: focus immigration enforcement on criminals and make the country safer. The policy now being implemented tells a different story. With tens of billions of dollars directed toward arrests, detention, and removals, the enforcement system has been structured to maximize volume rather than reduce risk. That design choice matters because it shapes who is targeted, how force is used, and whether public safety is actually improved.

This is not a dispute over whether immigration law should be enforced. The question is whether the policy now in place matches what was promised and delivers the safety outcomes that justified its scale and cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

USA Election Collage With The State Map Of Utah.

Getty Images

NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

On Wednesday, February 11, the National Redistricting Foundation (NRF) asked a federal court to join a newly filed lawsuit to protect Utah’s new, fair congressional map and defend our system of checks and balances.

The NRF is a non‑profit foundation whose mission is to dismantle unfair electoral maps and create a redistricting system grounded in democratic values. By helping to create more just and representative electoral districts across the country, the organization aims to restore the public’s faith in a true representative democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Voter registration in Wisconsin

Michael Newman

A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Imagine there was a way to discourage states from passing photo voter ID laws, restricting early voting, purging voter registration rolls, or otherwise suppressing voter turnout. What if any state that did so risked losing seats in the House of Representatives?

Surprisingly, this is not merely an idle fantasy of voting rights activists, but an actual plan envisioned in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 – but never enforced.

Keep ReadingShow less