Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: $2.50 for America’s 250th Act

News

A close up of American coins.

Congress is considering a bipartisan bill to mint a new $2.50 coin for America’s 250th anniversary, reviving a historic 1926 design and separate from the debated Trump coin.

Getty Images, Taalulla

Items priced at exactly $2.50 include a mug reading "Major League Grandpa," a water bottle saying "Proud Military," and a New Orleans Saints 3D magnet.

What the bill does


The $2.50 for America’s 250th Act would create a new $2.50 coin for the Declaration of Independence’s upcoming milestone anniversary in 2026.

Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL4) introduced the House version on September 30, while Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) introduced the Senate version that same day.

Unrelated to the reported Trump coin

A recent controversial draft design would depict President Donald Trump on a potential new $1 coin, also tied to the Declaration’s upcoming 250th anniversary. To clarify: this legislation is bipartisan and completely separate from that.

Five years ago, Congress enacted the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, which allowed the government to mint a new $1 coin design for the Declaration’s anniversary in 2026. However, Congress didn’t specify who or what this design would depict, leaving the decision up to the Treasury.

Trump’s U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach confirmed the leaked drafts depicting Trump himself were real and under consideration, though no final decision has yet been made on whether to depict him after all.

This bill is distinct in two ways: it relates to a potential new $2.50 coin rather than the $1 coin, plus the actual designs are specified in the legislative language.

The design

So, if enacted, what would the $2.50 coin depict?

The coin’s design would replicate the 1926 design used a century ago during the Declaration’s 150th anniversary. The front depicted Lady Liberty holding the Declaration in one hand and a torch in the other, while the back depicted Philadelphia’s Independence Hall, where the document was originally signed.

That coin was also worth $2.50, even though it marked the Declaration’s 150th anniversary, rather than the 250th. (It was worth a lot more then than the current version would be, though: $2.50 back in 1926 would be worth approximately $46 today.)

Indeed, the $2.50 coin actually has a long history, though it’s now little known outside the numismatics community. A $2.50 coin was minted for more than half the country’s duration, from 1796 to 1929. For example, a 1925 design for the $2.50 coin depicted a Native American man in traditional headdress on the front and an eagle on the back.

What supporters say

Supporters argue that a new coin would help encourage patriotism and national pride during an important upcoming anniversary.

“The signing of the Declaration of Independence was a turning point in the history of the United States and the world, one that warrants national recognition,” Rep. Aderholt said in a press release. “[This bill] recognizes this importance through a meaningful coin that links our nation’s past to its present and future.”

“As America’s 250th birthday approaches, my legislation revives a 100-year-old tradition that celebrates our founding principles and joins a new generation of Americans with those who celebrated our nation’s founding 100 years ago,” Sen. Lummis said in a separate press release. “[The bill would] celebrate the values we hold so dear and create a lasting tribute families can treasure for generations.”

Odds of passage

The House version has attracted 45 cosponsors: 26 Republicans and 19 Democrats. It awaits a potential vote in the House Financial Services Committee.

The Senate version has attracted five bipartisan cosponsors: three Republicans and two Democrats. It awaits a potential vote in the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.

The Fulcrum was unable to locate any explicit statements of opposition. The aforementioned Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, which allowed for a new $1 coin in 2026, passed without objection in the House and by unanimous consent in the Senate.

Similar bills

The Fulcrum recently covered another congressional bill related to the Declaration’s upcoming 250th anniversary celebration: legislation for Congress to meet on July 2, 2026, at Philadelphia’s Independence Hall, where the Declaration was originally signed.

The Fulcrum also covered recent bills to make changes to coins or money, including legislation to suspend both penny and nickel production for 10 years, and to put President Trump’s face on a potential new $250 bill.



Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with The Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on The Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: The Charlie Kirk Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Department of War Restoration Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: No Social Media at School Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Make Entertainment Great Again (MEGA) Act, Renaming Kennedy Center to Trump Center


Read More

 Medical Vial Vaccine on Shelf Table

Peptides like BPC-157, MOTS-c and Semax are surging in popularity despite limited human evidence. Here’s why FDA regulation, research and safety matter.

skaman306/Getty Images

Millions Using Unapproved Peptides as FDA Debates Regulation

Peptides, the short chains of amino acids that help regulate biological functions, have become the latest obsession in health, fitness, and longevity.

Online clinics and wellness influencers promote them as ways to heal injuries, reduce inflammation, improve metabolism, sharpen thinking, and slow aging.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less