Can bipartisanship survive the rise of the independent voter?

Top Stories

Home>

        Video: Can bipartisanship survive the rise of the independent voter?
    
play icon
By The FulcrumMar 29, 2023
The Fulcrum
The Fulcrum staff.
 See More Writings by author 
America is going independent. Both major parties are hemorrhaging members as voters-including growing numbers of people of color-increasingly see both parties as self interested and self perpetuating, not as engines for progress and policy innovation. 
Can traditional notions of bipartisanship be restored in this environment, or does the growing dissatisfaction with “traditional politics” demand something new? 
Dr. Benjamin Chavis is a long-time civil rights leader, entrepreneur, businessman, educator, and author. He began his career in 1963 as a statewide youth coordinator for Dr. Reverend Martin Luther King Jr, and has been fighting racial injustice and wrongful imprisonment across the country ever since.

Join a growing community committed to civic renewal.
Subscribe to The Fulcrum and be part of the conversation.

        Confirm that you are not a bot.
      

        ×
      
Latest news
Civic Engagement & Education
        Washington March Unites Japanese American Survivors and Latino Immigrant Advocates
    
Alex Segura
3m
Civic Engagement & Education
        Welcoming Youth Voters Into Democracy
    
Andrew Wilkes
23h
Elections
        The Surge of Independent Voters: Why Open Primaries Are Democratically Necessary
    
Hugo Balta
23h
Civic Engagement & Education
        A Divide in the Nation: Will the People Save the Republic?
    
Carolyn  Goode
23h

The Top 5

Discover More

America is going independent. Both major parties are hemorrhaging members as voters-including growing numbers of people of color-increasingly see both parties as self interested and self perpetuating, not as engines for progress and policy innovation.

Can traditional notions of bipartisanship be restored in this environment, or does the growing dissatisfaction with “traditional politics” demand something new?

Dr. Benjamin Chavis is a long-time civil rights leader, entrepreneur, businessman, educator, and author. He began his career in 1963 as a statewide youth coordinator for Dr. Reverend Martin Luther King Jr, and has been fighting racial injustice and wrongful imprisonment across the country ever since.

From Your Site Articles

Read More
Faith in America, a coalition of faith and civic groups, invites you to Praying for America on Nov. 1 to honor voting as a sacred right ahead of Nov. 3.

        Getty Images / Hill Street Studios
    

        Protecting the Sacred Right to Vote and America’s Democratic Future
    
Cheryl Graeve
Mark Beckwith
Brian Clancy
Oct 26, 2026
Beneath all the chaos, clamor, confusion, and endless attempts to tell the American electorate how to vote is the commitment, enshrined in the Constitution, that we have the right to vote. The freedom to vote is the foundation of American democracy, and exercising that right sustains it. Shortly after he was first elected President, Ronald Reagan called voting the “most sacred right of free men and women.” In that same speech on November 7, 1981, he remarked: “For this nation to remain true to its principles, we cannot allow any American’s vote to be denied, diluted, or defiled. The right to vote is the crown jewel of American liberties, and we will not see its luster diminished.” 
We sanctify our values and bolster our democracy when we vote. The right to vote gives the electorate power. It is the power to choose – freely and fairly. America introduced this power to the world two and a half centuries ago, and it has both transformed the operational dynamics of many other countries and has helped shape a more hopeful future, not just for America but for the entire world. We cannot take this power for granted. And it needs to be protected. 
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended
Governance & Legislation
        Trump's and Hegseth’s Officer Firings Put Pentagon Stability at Risk
    
Steve Corbin
11 May
Democracy
        Balance – The Golden Mean
    
Amy Lockard
19 May 2025
Glossary
        Redistricting
    
The Fulcrum
01 January 2025
Pop Culture
        It’s All About Soul — And the Future of American Democracy
    
David L. Nevins
23 April
Governance & Legislation
        What Will It Take To Truly Negotiate Paid Leave? Getting to "Yes" on Three Questions
    
Vicki Shabo
09 May
Ethics & Leadership
        A President in Sheep’s Clothing and a Democracy in Decline
    
Carolyn  Goode
16 March
After October 7, Israeli volunteers became the state’s largest operating division. Here’s what that civic model can teach angry, distrustful Americans.

        Vanessa Nunes/Getty Images
    

        When Citizens Stop Waiting
    
Mark Ginsberg
Oct 26, 2026
Jordan Karp wrote recently in these pages about anger at Washington, and the piece has stayed with me, less for the anger itself than for the level underneath it: the quiet, unglamorous work that happens when citizens stop waiting for national institutions to function. I have spent three years watching that level operate at national scale. Israel's war years produced a case study in what citizens can build when they conclude, reasonably, that no one else is coming, and some of it travels directly to the American moment Karp describes.
The Vacuum and the VolunteersWithin days of October 7, the Israeli state, like every state struck that hard, was overwhelmed: evacuated towns to house, farmers without Thai workers, reservists' families without income, a flood of needs no ministry was built to absorb. What filled the gap was not spontaneous kindness alone but something more interesting: organized citizens. Reporting on the period describes volunteer organizations stepping into the space between need and state capacity, neighbors delivering care to neighbors at a scale the formal system could not reach. WhatsApp groups became logistics networks. Synagogue bulletins became supply chains. The country's world-famous tech sector bent its tools to the task, and its ordinary citizens bent their schedules, and for a period the volunteer layer was, functionally, the state's largest operating division.
Keep ReadingShow less
Person holding "Vote" sign.

        Photo provided
    

        Latino Voters Shift Ahead of Midterm Elections
    
Latino News Network
Oct 26, 2026
Two years after providing historic levels of support that helped propel Donald Trump back to the White House, Latino voters are shifting rapidly away from the Republican Party. The realignment is driven by a potent combination of persistent economic anxieties and a sharp backlash against the administration’s aggressive domestic immigration crackdowns. A landmark national poll conducted by NBC News and Telemundo reveals that the President’s approval rating among registered Latino voters has plummeted to just 27%, signaling deep political turbulence for the GOP on the eve of critical midterm elections.
When asked by reporters outside the White House about the plunging numbers, President Trump angrily dismissed the data, labeling the findings as “fake news.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Person placing ballot in voting box

        Getty Images
    

        Who Gave the Federal Government the Right to Decide Who Can Vote?
    
Dr. Michael A. Soderstrand
Oct 25, 2026
The Trump administration is pressing to remove noncitizens from voter rolls across the country. Yet an important question seems to be missing from the debate: Where, exactly, does the federal government get the authority to impose a citizenship requirement on federal elections? The Constitution does not make citizenship a universal qualification for voting. Instead, Article I, Section 2, Clause 1 states: “The Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.” At the same time, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 explicitly grants Congress authority over the conduct of federal elections: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.” In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court distinguished Congress’s power to regulate how federal elections are conducted from the states’ authority to determine voter qualifications, explaining that Congress may regulate the “Times, Places and Manner” of elections, “but not who may vote in them.” For much of American history, noncitizens voted in elections in at least 22 states and territories, and some historical research suggests the number may have been as high as 40. Today, certain noncitizens are still permitted to vote in local elections in California, Maryland, Vermont and the District of Columbia. If the Constitution leaves voter qualifications to the states, what gives the federal government the authority to demand otherwise?
A Long History of State Decisions
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More