Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Poll: Democrats In Crisis Amid Shifting Voter Sentiment

News

Poll: Democrats In Crisis Amid Shifting Voter Sentiment

democrat donkey

Getty Images

“Democrats Get Lowest Rating From Voters in 35 Years” — the Wall Street Journal’s recent headline has sent ripples through the political landscape, highlighting a dramatic erosion in public perception of the Democratic Party.

According to the Journal’s poll, 63% of voters now hold an unfavorable view of the party, marking the lowest approval rating since 1990.


The poll paints a stark picture:

  • Only 33% of voters view Democrats favorably, with just 8% expressing a “very favorable” opinion.
  • Democrats are now viewed less favorably than both President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, despite their own poor ratings.
  • Voters increasingly describe the party as “weak,” “out of touch,” and lacking a clear economic message.

Despite widespread voter concerns over Trump’s and GOP’s economic policies—including inflation, tariffs, and foreign policy—a majority still trust Republicans more than Democrats to address these issues in Congress.

Polling shows disapproval of the administration’s inflation management outweighs approval by 11 points. Yet Republicans hold a 10-point advantage over Democrats as the party voters trust most to tackle inflation.

Democratic pollster John Anzalone bluntly stated, “The Democratic brand is so bad that they don’t have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party”.

The WSJ poll follows the sobering poll from Unite the Country, a Democratic super PAC, revealing a deepening crisis of confidence in the Democratic Party among voters — a trend that has intensified since the 2024 election.

According to the poll, conducted between May and June and obtained by The Hill, voters increasingly view the party as “out of touch,” “woke,” and “weak”.

These descriptors reflect a growing disconnect between Democratic messaging and the concerns of key constituencies, including white men, Hispanic men, and working-class voters — all of whom now rate the party below 35% favorability.

The Democratic Party’s losses in the 2024 presidential, House, and Senate races have left it in a state of strategic disarray. Despite efforts to regroup through focus groups, internal polling, and strategy sessions, the Unite the Country survey suggests the party has yet to recover its footing. Enthusiasm among Democratic voters remains low, and donors have reportedly pulled back support due to a perceived lack of vision.

Democratic strategists like Rodell Mollineau, senior adviser to Unite the Country, argue that the party must “meet voters where they are” — prioritizing economic issues like healthcare, education, and housing over ideological battles. The poll also suggests that the party’s emphasis on defending democracy, while resonant internally, may not be enough to win back swing voters.

Steve Schale, CEO of Unite the Country, expressed frustration over missed opportunities to counter the Trump administration’s agenda, including the rollout of the so-called “big, beautiful bill.” He emphasized the need for a “different kind of vision” that speaks to voters’ material concerns.

With the 2026 midterms looming, Democratic leaders face a pivotal moment. Rebuilding trust with voters — especially working-class and minority communities — will be essential. As DNC Chair Ken Martin put it, “When you hit rock bottom, there’s only one direction to go, and that’s up”.

Whether this marks a temporary dip or a long-term shift in the political tide remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the Democratic Party must recalibrate its message, reconnect with its base, and redefine its role in a rapidly evolving electorate.

While The Wall Street Journal’s polling shows Donald Trump’s favorability rating remaining steady early in his second term, other recent surveys indicate significantly lower approval numbers for the president.

The Wall Street Journal surveyed 1,500 registered voters via landline and cellphone from July 16–20. The poll has a margin of error of ±2.5 percentage points.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum, and the publisher of the Latino News Network.


Read More

Baltazar Enríquez: Perspectives from Little Village Community Council President

Baltazar Enriquez stands with "ICE OUT OF CHICAGO" sign in Chicago's Little Village neighborhood

Teresa Ayala Leon

Baltazar Enríquez: Perspectives from Little Village Community Council President

Baltzar Enríquez was born in Michoacán, Mexico, and moved to Chicago at the age of three. Little Village, often called “The Mexico of the Midwest,” became his new home, a community he has grown to love and serve. In 2008, Enríquez joined the Little Village Community Council, a nonprofit organization originally founded in 1957. Upon becoming a member, he noticed the lack of participation and limited community programs available for residents. In 2020, he was named president of the council and began expanding, introducing initiatives such as Equal Education for Latinos, among other resources for the Little Village community. Enríquez reflected on his years of involvement and how he has navigated leading the council amid the current political climate.

Question: What inspired you most to get involved in the council?

Keep ReadingShow less
Freezing Child Care Funding Throws the Baby Out with the Bathwater
boy's writing on book

Freezing Child Care Funding Throws the Baby Out with the Bathwater

In the South, there is an idiom that says, “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.” It means not discarding something valuable while trying to eliminate something harmful. The Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) proposed response to unsubstantiated child care fraud allegations in Minnesota risks doing exactly that.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has frozen child care and family assistance grants in five states, and reports indicate that this action may be extended nationwide. Fraud at any level is wrong and should be thoroughly investigated, and once proven to be true, addressed. However, freezing child care payments and family assistance grants based on the views of a single social media “influencer” is an overcorrection that threatens the stability of child care programs and leaves families without care options through no fault of their own.

Across the nation, Americans rely heavily on child care. According to the Center for American Progress, nearly 70 percent of children under age six had all available parents in the workforce in 2023, underscoring how essential child care is to family and economic stability.

Child care funding, therefore, is not optional. It is a necessity that must remain stable and predictable.

Without consistent funding, child care operations are forced to significantly reduce capacity, and some are forced to close altogether. In 2025, a longtime family child care owner made the difficult decision to close her business after state budget cuts eliminated critical child care funding. While this example reflects a state-level funding failure, the impact is the same. When funding becomes unreliable, as is the case with the current funding freeze, child care business owners, employees, parents, and children all suffer.

The economic consequences extend well beyond families. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, when parents cannot find or afford child care, they are pushed out of the workforce, and businesses lose skilled employees. Child care gaps disrupt staffing across industries and cost states an estimated $1 billion annually in lost economic activity.

Child care is no longer just a family issue. It is an economic issue. It is one of the few sectors that directly affects every other industry. At a time when women are being encouraged to have more children, a strong support system must also exist, and that includes consistent, reliable child care funding.

Misuse of government funds is not a new concept. During the COVID-19 pandemic, more than $200 billion in federal relief funding across programs was reportedly misused. Fraud occurs in every industry, and no system is immune to it.

If allegations of child care fraud are substantiated, safeguards should absolutely be implemented to prevent future misuse; however, freezing child care funding would further delay payments to a sector already plagued by late reimbursements, disrupt services for children and families, and destabilize small businesses that operate on thin margins.

The solution is straightforward. Strengthen oversight to mitigate risk, without punishing the entire field. We must acknowledge that the vast majority of child care programs operate in good faith and in compliance with the law, providing care to millions of children nationwide. According to a 2020 report by the United States Government Accountability Office, only seven states since 2013 have had errors in more than 10 percent of their child care fund payments.

Yes, accountability matters, but solutions must be precise and measured. Sweeping actions based on unsubstantiated claims destabilize the entire child care system. When child care collapses, families lose care, caregivers lose income, small businesses close, and the economy suffers.

We can strengthen safeguards without dismantling the system that families and the economy depend on. We can address misuse if and where it exists. But we cannot afford to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Eboni Delaney is the Director of Policy and Movement Building at the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC), and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project in Partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

Keep ReadingShow less
It’s The Democracy, Stupid!

Why democracy reform keeps failing—and why the economy suffers as a result. A rethink of representation and political power.

Getty Images, Orbon Alija

It’s The Democracy, Stupid!

The economic pain that now defines everyday life for so many people is often treated as a separate problem, something to be solved with better policy, smarter technocrats, or a new round of targeted fixes. Wages stagnate, housing becomes unreachable, healthcare bankrupts families, monopolies tighten their grip, and public services decay. But these outcomes are not accidents, nor are they the result of abstract market forces acting in isolation. They are the predictable consequence of a democratic order that has come apart at the seams. Our deepest crisis is not economic. It is democratic. The economy is merely where that crisis becomes visible and painful.

When democracy weakens, power concentrates. When power concentrates, it seeks insulation from accountability. Over time, wealth and political authority fuse into a self-reinforcing system that governs in the name of the people while quietly serving private interests. This is how regulatory agencies become captured, how tax codes grow incomprehensible except to those who pay to shape them, how antitrust laws exist on paper but rarely in practice, and how labor protections erode while corporate protections harden. None of this requires overt corruption. It operates legally, procedurally, and efficiently. Influence is purchased not through bribes but through campaign donations, access, revolving doors, and the sheer asymmetry of time, expertise, and money.

Keep ReadingShow less
Washington Loves Blaming Latin America for Drugs — While Ignoring the American Appetite That Fuels the Trade
Screenshot from a video moments before US forces struck a boat in international waters off Venezuela, September 2.
Screenshot from a video moments before US forces struck a boat in international waters off Venezuela, September 2.

Washington Loves Blaming Latin America for Drugs — While Ignoring the American Appetite That Fuels the Trade

For decades, the United States has perfected a familiar political ritual: condemn Latin American governments for the flow of narcotics northward, demand crackdowns, and frame the crisis as something done to America rather than something America helps create. It is a narrative that travels well in press conferences and campaign rallies. It is also a distortion — one that obscures the central truth of the hemispheric drug trade: the U.S. market exists because Americans keep buying.

Yet Washington continues to treat Latin America as the culprit rather than the supplier responding to a demand created on U.S. soil. The result is a policy posture that is both ineffective and deeply hypocritical.

Keep ReadingShow less