I understand your anger. And that anger is justified. I, too, am angry at the Democratic Party for turning away from its traditional role as the supporter of the American worker.
After having been neglected and disappointed by Democratic politicians for decades, you responded to Donald Trump's full-voiced support for your grievances against the government like someone starving for food. His rage was empowering; you felt vindicated. So you have voted for Donald Trump and fervently stood behind him through thick and thin.
But how well has Trump done by you? The time has come to ask yourself that question.
What were your grievances? First and foremost, you complained about the financial impact of job losses and wage stagnation caused by globalization. Your financial status as a solidly middle-class person was stolen from you.
Second, to make matters worse, prices for food and everyday products, as well as housing, have skyrocketed while your wages stagnated. The combination has done a double whammy on your ability to provide for yourself and your family.
Third, while you were suffering and feeling neglected, you saw the programs Democrats fought for to benefit the poor, Blacks, and women. Worst of all, minority groups and women were given preferential treatment in hiring to reverse the harm of past discrimination. To fix one wrong, they created another.
These were all valid grievances—not just personally but structurally. The American worker is the backbone of this nation. If he is not financially secure, the country is not financially secure, regardless of how well the stock market and major corporations are doing.
To address your grievances, Trump promised you that he would bring back good jobs, that he would cut the cost of living, and that he would end the government's special treatment of minorities, the poor, and women.
I ask you: Are you better off now than you were before Trump? Have prices come down? Have jobs come back? Have your wages risen? Do you have more money in your pocket?
Let's look at what Trump has actually done to help you.
In his first term, Trump did nothing that helped you. The main benefit of his tax cut went to the super-rich, who saved millions of dollars; you got small change. Trump promised that his trade war with China would bring back jobs and lower prices. Instead, jobs did not come back, and prices rose.
His second term has been more of the same. In his flurry of executive orders since taking office, Trump has taken only one action that addresses your grievances. ALL of his other orders were designed to either benefit big business and the rich or to throw red meat to the Right’s culture warriors.
Trump said that by stopping illegal immigration, more jobs would be available and the country would be safer. But illegal immigrants take jobs that you would never even think of seeking, and government data shows they don't decrease safety; they actually commit fewer crimes than US citizens.
He has ordered federal agencies to review their policies to reduce consumer prices, but they have no control over prices. His rolling back of environmental and other regulations benefit big business and corporate agriculture—corporations see this as an opportunity to increase profits, not reduce prices..
Trump has once again gone on the warpath with his tariffs. And once again, the tariffs have not only raised prices you pay at the store but also caused China to retaliate by refusing to buy any American soybeans, creating a disaster for America's farmers.
By cutting Medicaid and not renewing subsidies for Obamacare premiums, health care costs for the middle and working class and the poor will rise substantially; Trump is harming tens of millions of Americans. Did you know that the majority of people living in poverty are White?
Trump has drastically cut the Federal workforce and funding going to the states. This is bound to have a negative impact because some of you will find yourselves out of work, and many will be affected by a reduction in the government services you use.
The one thing he has done that sounds like it will help some of you—his white male supporters—is his orders concerning DEI (diversity, equality, inclusiveness). But since the Supreme Court had already declared affirmative action unconstitutional, Trump's removal of programs that support greater diversity will not make much of a difference.
Bottom line, Trump is first and foremost a traditional Republican, not in his demeanor, but in his main client being corporate America and the rich, and they have benefited handsomely from his actions. Despite his forceful language in support of your grievances, he has done nothing to help his middle- and working-class supporters other than ending DEI efforts.
You and I agree that to make America great again, one of the things needed is to return the American worker to the middle-class status he worked so hard to achieve. That means that jobs must be available at an appropriate wage.
"OK," you may say, "let's say all that you state is true, and I'm not better off than I was before Trump. Why should I vote for Democrats who abandoned me?"
That's a good question. The reason why I keep voting Democrat despite being disappointed by them time and time again is that the Republican Party is definitely not now nor has it ever been the Party of the working man.
Throughout the 20th century, it was the Democrats who fought for the working man—improving his financial status, his health care, and his educational opportunities. The Republicans, on the other hand, were consistently against anything that improved the lot of the working man. They were even against Social Security and Medicare!
Republicans will do nothing to address your issues. When Republicans say they are the party of the people, of the working man, their noses should grow as long as Pinocchio’s. They are hypocrites.
But the Democratic Party made two terrible mistakes in the decades since Ronald Reagan was elected President. First, they assumed that the American worker was safe after all the work Democrats had done, and they could divert their attention to support the poor, Blacks, and women. They were never against you; they just neglected you. They did not follow the devastation that globalization was causing among middle-class workers.
The second mistake is that they saw the money flowing from corporate America and the rich to the Republican Party. As the cost of elections skyrocketed, they wanted some of that support for themselves. And so they started paying attention to corporate interests, especially in banking and multinational corporations. They accepted economists' assurances that free trade agreements would ultimately benefit the American worker and ignored warnings from unions and others.
The Trump election, however, has taught Democrats a painful lesson. They understand now that they have strayed and neglected their historic base and what that has cost, not just them but the country. I'm sure that I will never be completely happy with what the Party does, but voting Democrat is the best option.
Suppose I want to see America be great again, with the rights of average Americans being protected, the right of all to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" being advanced, jobs at an appropriate wage for the American worker, and a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people" fulfilling its role of "securing" their rights by adopting policies and programs that provide equal opportunity to pursue those rights. In that case, there is no better option than to vote for the Democratic Party.
If you want to improve your life and that of your family, there is no better option than to vote for the Democratic Party.
Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com












Ben Droz
Ben Droz







U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Pinnacle Bank Expo Center on the Nebraska State Fairgrounds on October 05, 2026 in Grand Island, Nebraska.
The President Invited Iran to Bomb My Home
I was driving home to San Diego from Los Angeles on Monday night when I heard that the President of the United States had offered both cities up to Iran as bomb targets. At a rally in Nebraska, defending his war, Trump told the crowd, “let [Iran] take out Los Angeles, let ‘em take out San Diego.” It was, he said, “a very small price to pay.”
I was coming from a Bernie Sanders rally for Proposition 40, the one-time tax on California billionaires that would send 90% of its revenue to healthcare. We desperately need it to pass because, in order to give tax breaks to billionaires, Trump signed a law that will strip health coverage from 10 million Americans; this tax will make sure we can still cover Californians. Call me crazy, but I think taxing billionaires one time so we can make sure kids in California get to see a doctor is a very small price to pay. I also think that even if Trump were joking, it is indefensible to make jokes about the potential destruction of so many lives. Human life is never a small price to pay. Human life is priceless.
Plus, the reality is: here in San Diego, we’re already paying the price for Trump’s actions, and it’s not small at all. He has gutted FEMA, tried to kill climate resiliency programs, and destroyed public health standards, while his signature law is set to cut off health insurance and food support for hundreds of thousands of San Diegans. Like plenty of American cities, San Diego is already busy finding local solutions to respond to the problems this president has recklessly created.
Not to mention, at least 19 American service members have been killed in this war already. Human rights monitors have documented more than 3,600 dead in Iran by April alone. Here at home, gas is sitting just pennies below its all-time record. Taxpayers have already spent more than $45 billion on the war, while Trump’s oil and gas portfolio has grown by roughly $15.5 million this year alone. Of course anything is a “small price” to someone paying free.99 for this war, and profiting from it. Meanwhile, We the People are paying twice: first for the war, and then for the consequences of that war. But now he wants San Diego to pay a third time, flippantly offering us up to Iran.
It is worth noticing which cities he thought to name. Were San Diego and Los Angeles strategically chosen to signify something to his audience, or were they simply the first cities that came to mind as expendable places? Either way, the effect is to normalize—-and to gauge a crowd’s reaction to–the idea of massive violence in major California cities, suitable targets because of their perceived liberal lean. So what if Iran needs to bomb a little bit of America before the war can be over? Who cares, says Trump, if they target Los Angeles and San Diego?
By the way, why didn’t he offer up San Francisco, the free-love hippie-town MAGA loves to hate (and also my birthplace)? Could it be because that’s where the tech titans live? The same ones who joined Trump for Xi Jinping’s state dinner, a guest list worth a combined $2.4 trillion?
San Diego may have fewer billionaires, but it is home to more than 115,000 active-duty service members and 230,000 veterans. One in six active-duty sailors–in the entire Navy–is stationed here. So is one in four Marines. You cannot throw a rock in this county without hitting a military family: brats and spouses and veterans are among us. I got out of the Navy last year after ten years, and eight of those were here in San Diego. When Trump says “let ‘em take out San Diego,” he’s talking about the backbone of the United States military. He’s also talking about the people fighting his war.
San Diego has not been watching this war from the sidelines. Today, the USS Abraham Lincoln returns to North Island after an almost yearlong deployment to the Middle East that featured food shortages, broken toilets, and mold in the showers after 286 days at sea without a single port call. Eight sailors in the Lincoln’s strike group attempted suicide, but in August, when a reporter asked whether the deployment had gone on too long, Trump said “not nearly long enough.” Now he has told a crowd in Nebraska that we should let Iran take out the city those sailors call home. These are sociopathic sentiments.
Last week at Quantico, Pete Hegseth closed his address to the force by telling them, “President Trump has your back and so do I.” To the contrary, President Trump has put one of the biggest military towns in the country forward as a target for our adversaries. With friends like these, the “domestic” in “against all enemies, foreign and domestic” starts to sound a lot less hypothetical.
San Diego is home to Naval Air Station North Island, Naval Base San Diego, Naval Amphibious Base Coronado, the Point Loma submarine base, Camp Pendleton, and Miramar (and I have been permanently stationed at or trained at all of them). If Iran bombed San Diego and Los Angeles, aside from the devastating loss of life, it would cripple an immense share of our national security readiness.
And for what, exactly? Trump says the war is “essentially almost over with.” This is the same man who claimed in June 2025 that Iran’s nuclear program had been “obliterated,” then launched a war over it anyway on February 28. More than seven months later, he wants us to believe two things at once: that we’ve basically won, and that we might need to sacrifice an American city or two to finish winning. If the war is almost over, why does anybody need to take out San Diego?
I wonder if Trump’s endorsed candidate for California’s 48th District here in San Diego County will respond to these remarks. He recently said “no pain, no gain,” when referring to the gas prices San Diegans are paying. Jim Desmond, would you apply that same mindset if we were bombed? Or do you have the moral courage to stand up for the people you’re running to represent?
Last November, six Democratic members of Congress, all veterans, including Senator Mark Kelly, recorded a video reminding troops of their duty to disobey unlawful orders, restating the law that says so. Trump called it “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH,” and then his Justice Department went looking for an indictment, which a grand jury refused. The president treated reading the law out loud to the troops as a capital offense, but then he himself invited a foreign enemy to destroy two American cities, possibly as a punchline. Is anyone calling the latter sedition? Who is demanding accountability?
Calling our lives a small price to pay affirms a moral bankruptcy, as well as an obvious dereliction of duty to the office he holds. While we can’t impeach him or invoke the 25th Amendment ourselves, we must stop being so quiet about what we’re paying already. We can make our voices heard by calling our representatives, writing op-eds, knocking doors, phone banking, and voting in defiance of the man who threatens the safety of our city. Ballots are already arriving in mailboxes. Vote, and vote yes on 40 (and no on 41 and 42).
Trump has been harming our cities for a while, but now he is inviting our military adversaries to join him in the harm. If we have any self-respect as Americans, we must not tolerate our leaders disregarding the dignity of lives in this way. We must fight for our home.
Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.