I understand your anger. And that anger is justified. I, too, am angry at the Democratic Party for turning away from its traditional role as the supporter of the American worker.
After having been neglected and disappointed by Democratic politicians for decades, you responded to Donald Trump's full-voiced support for your grievances against the government like someone starving for food. His rage was empowering; you felt vindicated. So you have voted for Donald Trump and fervently stood behind him through thick and thin.
But how well has Trump done by you? The time has come to ask yourself that question.
What were your grievances? First and foremost, you complained about the financial impact of job losses and wage stagnation caused by globalization. Your financial status as a solidly middle-class person was stolen from you.
Second, to make matters worse, prices for food and everyday products, as well as housing, have skyrocketed while your wages stagnated. The combination has done a double whammy on your ability to provide for yourself and your family.
Third, while you were suffering and feeling neglected, you saw the programs Democrats fought for to benefit the poor, Blacks, and women. Worst of all, minority groups and women were given preferential treatment in hiring to reverse the harm of past discrimination. To fix one wrong, they created another.
These were all valid grievances—not just personally but structurally. The American worker is the backbone of this nation. If he is not financially secure, the country is not financially secure, regardless of how well the stock market and major corporations are doing.
To address your grievances, Trump promised you that he would bring back good jobs, that he would cut the cost of living, and that he would end the government's special treatment of minorities, the poor, and women.
I ask you: Are you better off now than you were before Trump? Have prices come down? Have jobs come back? Have your wages risen? Do you have more money in your pocket?
Let's look at what Trump has actually done to help you.
In his first term, Trump did nothing that helped you. The main benefit of his tax cut went to the super-rich, who saved millions of dollars; you got small change. Trump promised that his trade war with China would bring back jobs and lower prices. Instead, jobs did not come back, and prices rose.
His second term has been more of the same. In his flurry of executive orders since taking office, Trump has taken only one action that addresses your grievances. ALL of his other orders were designed to either benefit big business and the rich or to throw red meat to the Right’s culture warriors.
Trump said that by stopping illegal immigration, more jobs would be available and the country would be safer. But illegal immigrants take jobs that you would never even think of seeking, and government data shows they don't decrease safety; they actually commit fewer crimes than US citizens.
He has ordered federal agencies to review their policies to reduce consumer prices, but they have no control over prices. His rolling back of environmental and other regulations benefit big business and corporate agriculture—corporations see this as an opportunity to increase profits, not reduce prices..
Trump has once again gone on the warpath with his tariffs. And once again, the tariffs have not only raised prices you pay at the store but also caused China to retaliate by refusing to buy any American soybeans, creating a disaster for America's farmers.
By cutting Medicaid and not renewing subsidies for Obamacare premiums, health care costs for the middle and working class and the poor will rise substantially; Trump is harming tens of millions of Americans. Did you know that the majority of people living in poverty are White?
Trump has drastically cut the Federal workforce and funding going to the states. This is bound to have a negative impact because some of you will find yourselves out of work, and many will be affected by a reduction in the government services you use.
The one thing he has done that sounds like it will help some of you—his white male supporters—is his orders concerning DEI (diversity, equality, inclusiveness). But since the Supreme Court had already declared affirmative action unconstitutional, Trump's removal of programs that support greater diversity will not make much of a difference.
Bottom line, Trump is first and foremost a traditional Republican, not in his demeanor, but in his main client being corporate America and the rich, and they have benefited handsomely from his actions. Despite his forceful language in support of your grievances, he has done nothing to help his middle- and working-class supporters other than ending DEI efforts.
You and I agree that to make America great again, one of the things needed is to return the American worker to the middle-class status he worked so hard to achieve. That means that jobs must be available at an appropriate wage.
"OK," you may say, "let's say all that you state is true, and I'm not better off than I was before Trump. Why should I vote for Democrats who abandoned me?"
That's a good question. The reason why I keep voting Democrat despite being disappointed by them time and time again is that the Republican Party is definitely not now nor has it ever been the Party of the working man.
Throughout the 20th century, it was the Democrats who fought for the working man—improving his financial status, his health care, and his educational opportunities. The Republicans, on the other hand, were consistently against anything that improved the lot of the working man. They were even against Social Security and Medicare!
Republicans will do nothing to address your issues. When Republicans say they are the party of the people, of the working man, their noses should grow as long as Pinocchio’s. They are hypocrites.
But the Democratic Party made two terrible mistakes in the decades since Ronald Reagan was elected President. First, they assumed that the American worker was safe after all the work Democrats had done, and they could divert their attention to support the poor, Blacks, and women. They were never against you; they just neglected you. They did not follow the devastation that globalization was causing among middle-class workers.
The second mistake is that they saw the money flowing from corporate America and the rich to the Republican Party. As the cost of elections skyrocketed, they wanted some of that support for themselves. And so they started paying attention to corporate interests, especially in banking and multinational corporations. They accepted economists' assurances that free trade agreements would ultimately benefit the American worker and ignored warnings from unions and others.
The Trump election, however, has taught Democrats a painful lesson. They understand now that they have strayed and neglected their historic base and what that has cost, not just them but the country. I'm sure that I will never be completely happy with what the Party does, but voting Democrat is the best option.
Suppose I want to see America be great again, with the rights of average Americans being protected, the right of all to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" being advanced, jobs at an appropriate wage for the American worker, and a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people" fulfilling its role of "securing" their rights by adopting policies and programs that provide equal opportunity to pursue those rights. In that case, there is no better option than to vote for the Democratic Party.
If you want to improve your life and that of your family, there is no better option than to vote for the Democratic Party.
Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com




















A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.