Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

I Watched the State of the Union Address: Everyone is “Winning” Except Child Care

Opinion

I Watched the State of the Union Address: Everyone is “Winning” Except Child Care

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers the State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber at the Capitol on February 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

During Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, we heard repeatedly that America is “winning.” The message was clear and consistent. But when it came to child care, there was only a single mention, briefly noted during a guest recognition for a woman in the audience who balances work and family responsibilities.

That was it.


The Institute for Child Success reports that the child care crisis costs the United States $172 billion each year. Why is no one listening? When child care appeared only once, in passing, it underscored just how absent it remains from national priorities.

Since January, we have seen ongoing and intentional pressure on the child care sector, including a funding freeze affecting five states. Any delay in child care funding, regardless of length, threatens both the stability of the child care infrastructure and the livelihoods of working families. Without reliable care, families cannot work. Without reliable funding, child care businesses cannot operate.

Research consistently shows that a lack of dependable child care leads to lost wages, stalled careers, and long-term financial consequences for parents. It also contributes to workforce instability and broader economic disruption. At the same time, polls show that voters prioritize the economy above nearly every other issue. It is time to treat child care as the economic issue it is.

The child care sector contributes approximately $152 billion to the economy and generates a thirteen percent return on investment. Yet the system continues to operate under sustained strain.

Across the country, child care businesses are being pushed into crisis. Many are reducing services or considering closure. Families are losing access to care, often with little notice and few alternatives. These impacts are not isolated. They are affecting entire communities.

Family child care educators are central to this conversation. They provide flexible hours, mixed-age care, and long-standing relationships with families. In many communities, especially rural and low-access areas, they are the primary source of care. According to the NAFCC Annual Survey Report, 87 percent of family child care educators offer care outside of standard business hours. When these programs close, there are often no immediate replacements.

These programs operate on margins so thin they cannot absorb sudden funding disruptions or prolonged uncertainty. Educators still face rent or mortgage payments, food costs, utilities, insurance, and staffing expenses regardless of whether payments are delayed.

It is true that the FY2026 funding bill includes increases for key programs such as the Child Care and Development Block Grant, Head Start, and Preschool Development Grants, Birth through Five. These investments matter. However, their impact must be viewed in the context of sustained inflation and rising operating costs.

Over the past several years, child care business owners have experienced significant increases in food, utilities, insurance, staffing, and compliance expenses. When adjusted for these realities, current funding levels largely maintain existing capacity rather than expand it. In practice, this means preventing further decline rather than strengthening the system.

If we are serious about strengthening the economy, then child care must be seen as an economic issue, a policy issue, not a family issue. Funding should align with the true cost of care, account for inflation, and provide stability for both educators and families.

As someone who has spent a career building early childhood systems and who directly benefited from early learning opportunities, such as Head Start, Family Friend and Neighbor care, and Family Child Care, I understand what is at stake. Early investment shaped my life. Every child deserves that same opportunity.

So before we celebrate all the “winning,” let’s remember: America does not win without working families, and that doesn’t happen without child care.

Eboni Delaney is the Director of Policy and Movement Building at the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC), and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project in Partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.


Read More

As Temperatures Rise and Federal Funding Falls, Drowning Risks Grow
a group of kids in a pool
Photo by Kevin Paes on Unsplash

As Temperatures Rise and Federal Funding Falls, Drowning Risks Grow

July 25 marked World Drowning Day. More than 4000 people die from unintentional drowning in the United States each year. This translates into an average of 11 drowning deaths per day. Children ages one to four are at greatest risk, making drowning the leading cause of death for that group and the second leading cause of death for children ages five to 14.

Two emerging trends could make those numbers worse: federal funding cuts that have weakened drowning prevention efforts and hotter summers that are driving more people to water to cool off. Together, these trends threaten to deepen long-standing disparities that already place Black, Indigenous, autistic, and low-income communities at greater risk.

Keep ReadingShow less
FDA Sign at its headquarters in Washington DC. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) is a federal agency of the USA.

The FDA’s changing drug approval policies raise concerns about political influence, scientific standards, drug safety, and the future of U.S. pharmaceutical regulation.

JHVEPhoto/Getty Images

FDA Turmoil: Political Interference Threatens Drug Safety Standards

Over the past three decades, drug development in the United States accelerated dramatically. Industry spending increased tenfold between the 1980s and 2019; the number of manufacturers grew; clinical trials became more sophisticated; and new technologies and precision medicines emerged. The Food and Drug Administration kept pace, building processes, standards, and a scientific culture that supported this rapid innovation. It offered pharmaceutical companies a predictable regulatory environment and a level playing field, producing substantial benefits for consumers and researchers alike.

In little more than a year, however, the Trump administration has upended many of these FDA norms. It has tied certain drug approvals to political considerations through a new, opaque program; imposed labeling changes without new scientific evidence; forced out experienced career scientists; replaced respected experts on advisory panels; and promoted unproven therapies. While some of these moves have drawn limited media attention, most have escaped public notice—even though they threaten national health standards and consumer safety. And legal guardrails may be too weak to prevent or limit their effects.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Senior Man Using A Laptop Computer And Paying Bills With Nurse

H.R. 1 could leave millions uninsured, increase healthcare costs, strain hospitals, and affect even Americans with employer-sponsored health insurance.

miniseries/Getty Images

Not All Change Is Good: Medicaid, Medicare Shifts Are Everyone’s Problem

Like 155 million other Americans, I get my health insurance coverage through my employer. The millions like me who are not on Medicaid or Medicare may not be closely tracking the massive changes coming to public insurance programs because of H.R.1 (also known as President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”).

But over the next decade, it’s estimated that up to 10 million people may lose health insurance because of changes to Medicare and Medicaid.

Keep ReadingShow less
The All-America City of San Antonio Collaborates to Address Teen Pregnancy and Other Issues
person in green pants sitting on white textile
Photo by Vanessa on Unsplash

The All-America City of San Antonio Collaborates to Address Teen Pregnancy and Other Issues

San Antonio, TX, has been working to reduce teen pregnancy for over two decades, making considerable progress through collaborations among the city, county, nonprofit organizations, and the University of Texas. A nine-time All-America City, one of San Antonio’s key community collaborations, SA 2020, harnessed civic muscle to create and achieve dozens of measurable goals, including a significant reduction in teen pregnancy.

The San Antonio Teen Pregnancy Collaborative (SATPPC) was formed in 2010 in response to news that Bexar County had one of the highest rates of teen births in the United States. The SATPPC brought together an impressive list of cross-sector organizations, including public entities, community-based organizations, and faith-based and secular institutions. The group’s overall goal was to reduce the Bexar County teen birth rate among females ages 15 to 19 by 15% by 2020, and it exceeded this goal even before that date.

Keep ReadingShow less