Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

I Watched the State of the Union Address: Everyone is “Winning” Except Child Care

Opinion

I Watched the State of the Union Address: Everyone is “Winning” Except Child Care

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers the State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber at the Capitol on February 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

During Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, we heard repeatedly that America is “winning.” The message was clear and consistent. But when it came to child care, there was only a single mention, briefly noted during a guest recognition for a woman in the audience who balances work and family responsibilities.

That was it.


The Institute for Child Success reports that the child care crisis costs the United States $172 billion each year. Why is no one listening? When child care appeared only once, in passing, it underscored just how absent it remains from national priorities.

Since January, we have seen ongoing and intentional pressure on the child care sector, including a funding freeze affecting five states. Any delay in child care funding, regardless of length, threatens both the stability of the child care infrastructure and the livelihoods of working families. Without reliable care, families cannot work. Without reliable funding, child care businesses cannot operate.

Research consistently shows that a lack of dependable child care leads to lost wages, stalled careers, and long-term financial consequences for parents. It also contributes to workforce instability and broader economic disruption. At the same time, polls show that voters prioritize the economy above nearly every other issue. It is time to treat child care as the economic issue it is.

The child care sector contributes approximately $152 billion to the economy and generates a thirteen percent return on investment. Yet the system continues to operate under sustained strain.

Across the country, child care businesses are being pushed into crisis. Many are reducing services or considering closure. Families are losing access to care, often with little notice and few alternatives. These impacts are not isolated. They are affecting entire communities.

Family child care educators are central to this conversation. They provide flexible hours, mixed-age care, and long-standing relationships with families. In many communities, especially rural and low-access areas, they are the primary source of care. According to the NAFCC Annual Survey Report, 87 percent of family child care educators offer care outside of standard business hours. When these programs close, there are often no immediate replacements.

These programs operate on margins so thin they cannot absorb sudden funding disruptions or prolonged uncertainty. Educators still face rent or mortgage payments, food costs, utilities, insurance, and staffing expenses regardless of whether payments are delayed.

It is true that the FY2026 funding bill includes increases for key programs such as the Child Care and Development Block Grant, Head Start, and Preschool Development Grants, Birth through Five. These investments matter. However, their impact must be viewed in the context of sustained inflation and rising operating costs.

Over the past several years, child care business owners have experienced significant increases in food, utilities, insurance, staffing, and compliance expenses. When adjusted for these realities, current funding levels largely maintain existing capacity rather than expand it. In practice, this means preventing further decline rather than strengthening the system.

If we are serious about strengthening the economy, then child care must be seen as an economic issue, a policy issue, not a family issue. Funding should align with the true cost of care, account for inflation, and provide stability for both educators and families.

As someone who has spent a career building early childhood systems and who directly benefited from early learning opportunities, such as Head Start, Family Friend and Neighbor care, and Family Child Care, I understand what is at stake. Early investment shaped my life. Every child deserves that same opportunity.

So before we celebrate all the “winning,” let’s remember: America does not win without working families, and that doesn’t happen without child care.

Eboni Delaney is the Director of Policy and Movement Building at the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC), and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project in Partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.


Read More

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Cost of Fear: What Immigration Enforcement Is Doing to Our Clinics

Hands holding a heart

Picture provided by Latino News Network

The Cost of Fear: What Immigration Enforcement Is Doing to Our Clinics

He was supposed to come in three months ago. When he finally returned to the clinic, it was not for routine follow-up. Instead, it was because he could no longer feel his feet, and his vision had begun to blur. He told us he had missed his appointments out of fear. Immigration enforcement activity in his neighborhood and rumors of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) near clinics made him afraid to be seen entering a healthcare space. So he stayed home. He rationed his insulin until it ran out. Now he sat before us with uncontrolled diabetes, worsening nerve damage, and worsening vision concerning diabetic retinopathy.

Stories like this are becoming increasingly common. In Minneapolis, recent ICE raids have sent shockwaves through immigrant communities, with reports of enforcement agents present in or near healthcare settings, including exam rooms. Families describe being too afraid to leave their homes, even to see a doctor, or choosing the most ill child to bring to urgent care because bringing multiple children would be too risky. Clinics meant to serve as places of healing are being transformed into sites of fear.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person grabbing a gallon of milk from an aisle.

New U.S. dietary guidelines from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brooke Rollins promote more milk in schools—but widespread Lactose Intolerance raises questions about equity and nutrition policy.

Getty Images, Theerawit Jirattawevut

Lactose Intolerant? You’re Not Alone

Last month, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins announced new dietary guidelines for Americans that were a major reset of federal nutrition policy. Among the new recommendations: drink more milk, eat more yogurt and cheese. While nutritionists continue to debate the scientific basis of the recommendations, changes in federal meal programs, including school meals, are already in the works.

Any school that participates in federal meal programs must offer milk with every meal, and new guidelines support whole milk in addition to 2% and skim milk already available in schools. While there is debate about the level of saturated fats in whole milk, there’s a deeper problem with the dairy recommendation for school lunches: the widespread prevalence of lactose intolerance. The vast majority of people on this planet, approximately 70%, are lactose intolerant. While it is estimated that only about 35% of the US population is lactose intolerant, that number is much higher depending on your ancestral history: 75% of African Americans; 90% of Asian Americans; 50% of Latinos; 50% of Ashkenazi Jews; and 70-90% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. For school districts with large populations of descendant groups, the recommendation to just drink more milk doesn’t work for millions of kids.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why ICE's Aggressive Tactics are a Public Health Crisis

Following killings in Minneapolis, ICE operations reignite concerns over overpolicing, racial profiling, and the mental health toll on Black communities nationwide.

Getty Images, David Berding

Why ICE's Aggressive Tactics are a Public Health Crisis

Following the recent killings of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents continue to conduct operations across the country. In recent weeks, under-the-radar sweeps have been reported in communities from California to North Carolina.

ICE’s use of targeted policing, harassment, and excessive force has pushed the issue of overpolicing to the forefront again. For many in Black communities across the U.S., these patterns feel painfully familiar, especially considering the agents are charged with infiltrating communities of color to detain “illegal immigrants.” And while some cases of aggressive policing make headlines, there are countless others that never make the news. Nevertheless, the harm is real, affecting the collective mental health of communities of color and others as well.

Keep ReadingShow less