Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Rising Costs, Chronic Disease and AI: The Fight to Save U.S. Healthcare

A decade of rising costs and worsening chronic illness has left the system at a breaking point — but generative AI could change the trajectory.

Rising Costs, Chronic Disease and AI: The Fight to Save U.S. Healthcare
Sure, political activism is good for the system. It's also good for your health.
Sure, political activism is good for the system. It's also good for your health.

In most industries, leaders can respond quickly when market conditions change. Within months, companies can shrink or expand their workforces, adopt innovative technologies, and reconfigure operations.

Healthcare lacks such flexibility. It takes a decade to train new physicians. Hospitals take years to plan, fund, and build — years longer than it takes for basic infrastructure in other industries.


With timelines like these, course correction in healthcare is inherently slow. Inaction or delays allow manageable threats to grow into crises. And by the time leaders move, it’s impossible to reverse the damage.

Two of the nation’s most pressing healthcare problems now face this reality. To make matters more challenging, we can’t fix one without solving the other.

The Affordability Cliff

Over the past 25 years, the nation’s total healthcare spending has climbed from $2 trillion to $5.3 trillion.

Businesses and the government have played “hot potato” with these rising costs.

To offset ever-higher premiums, employers slowed wage growth and switched to high-deductible health plans. In parallel, Medicare and Medicaid set payment increases well below the cost of delivering care, driving hospitals and physicians to make up the difference by charging higher rates to the privately insured.

The financial impact on families has been devastating. Half of Americans say they cannot afford their out-of-pocket expenses should they experience a major illness.

For everyone, financial challenges are mounting with no relief in sight. Insurance premiums are projected to rise by roughly 9% this year. In 2025, total U.S. medical costs rose more than 7% for the second consecutive year, pushing healthcare’s share of the economy to roughly 18%. Out-of-pocket spending by consumers climbed 7.2%, to exceed $500 billion, as demand for hospital care, prescription drugs, and physician services outpaced insurer projections.

Congressional action (and inaction) has amplified these pressures. December’s expiration of enhanced subsidies on the insurance exchanges is now driving double- and even triple-digit percentage premium increases for roughly 20 million enrollees. And beginning this year, another 8 to 10 million Americans could lose Medicaid coverage as new eligibility restrictions take effect.

Absent major intervention, healthcare spending is projected to exceed $7 trillion by the end of the decade, consuming more than one-fifth of the U.S. economy. At that point, small businesses will likely drop coverage for millions of employees. A major share of the federal spending will go toward paying off interest on the national debt. Funds, in turn, will be diverted from Medicare, Medicaid, and other healthcare programs.

And when the next recession begins (possibly within two years, according to historical analyses), the economic crisis will leave only one option: healthcare rationing.

To solve these financial issues without compromising the nation’s health, we will need to simultaneously address another major threat.

The Chronic Disease Epidemic

In the 21st century, the United States has experienced a scourge of chronic disease.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, roughly 194 million U.S. adults now live with at least one chronic condition such as diabetes, hypertension, or heart failure. About 130 million people report multiple chronic diseases.

You might assume that if the healthcare system could prevent younger generations from developing these conditions, total healthcare spending would fall. But prevention alone will not offset the cumulative burden of chronic disease that’s already embedded in the American population.

To understand why, consider a single condition: diabetes. A patient newly diagnosed with diabetes can usually avoid serious, costly complications through lifestyle changes and relatively low-cost medications.

But when diabetes remains poorly controlled for a decade or more, biological damage accumulates. Each year, the risk of kidney failure or heart attack rises significantly. As a result, the annual cost of caring for a single patient with persistent, uncontrolled diabetes averages over $100,000 (four times more than someone who newly develops the disease). Thus, to offset the medical costs for an individual with a long history of diabetes, our nation would need to prevent four new cases, not just one.

Further complicating matters, effective chronic disease control requires substantial upfront investment, while the financial returns arrive years later.

That makes timing critical: the longer we wait, the fewer viable options remain. According to CDC estimates, acting now (through better prevention and management) could avert up to half of all heart attacks, strokes, cancers, and kidney failures, reducing national healthcare spending by $1 to $1.5 trillion annually. But if policymakers hold off, the required investment will be too large (and the payoff too delayed) to be politically or financially feasible.

Generative AI: The Missing Solution For Both Threats

Rising healthcare costs and chronic disease are not separate crises. They are conjoined. We cannot make healthcare affordable without making Americans healthier.

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini offer a credible path to reverse both threats.

To illustrate what GenAI makes possible, consider hypertension, the leading cause of stroke in the United States. Despite the availability of clear clinical guidelines and inexpensive medications to manage the disease, blood pressure remains uncontrolled in roughly half of Americans who have it.

So, rather than patients relying on three or four office visits a year (the current standard for chronic disease treatment), generative AI would analyze daily readings from home blood pressure monitors, detect early worsening trends, and prompt timely medication adjustments or outreach — before irreversible damage occurs. With GenAI, medical care moves from episodic to continuous.

Ultimately, preventing hundreds of thousands of heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failures (and avoiding vast medical costs) is a far more effective solution than rationing care. The combination of dedicated doctors, empowered patients, and generative AI can accomplish this more easily and reliably than any of the three alone.

We still have the choice and power to act. But the window is closing.


Robert Pearl, the author of “ChatGPT, MD,” teaches at both the Stanford University School of Medicine and the Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is a former CEO of The Permanente Medical Group.


Read More

Political and Economic Pressures Set Up a Healthcare Shift in 2026
man in white dress shirt holding white paper

Political and Economic Pressures Set Up a Healthcare Shift in 2026

Healthcare in 2025 was consumed by chaos, conflict and relentless drama. Yet despite unprecedented political turmoil, cultural division and major technological breakthroughs, there was little meaningful improvement in how care is paid for or delivered.

That outcome was not surprising. American medicine is extraordinarily resistant to change. In most years, even when problems are obvious and widely acknowledged, the safest bet is that the care patients experience in January will look much the same in December.

Keep Reading Show less
The Finish Line Is a Commons
Athletes compete in a hyrox event with puma branding.

The Finish Line Is a Commons

A decade ago, bootcamp workouts had little to do with appearance or chasing personal records. For me, they meant survival. They offered a way to manage stress, process grief, and stay upright beneath the weight of vocation and responsibility. Pastoral leadership, specifically during the time of “parachute church-planting,” often convinces a person that stillness is an unattainable luxury and that exhaustion is a sign of virtue. Eventually, my body defied those assumptions. So I went to the workout and may have discovered the “secret sauce” behind such entrepreneurial success. Then I returned. And kept returning. Mornings meant emerging outdoors at first light. I found myself in empty parking lots, on tracks, inside gyms, and eventually in a neighboring storefront home to BKM Fitness, owned by Braint Mitchell. There was no soundtrack, only measured breath and occasional encouragement called out by someone who hardly knew my name.

I could not have predicted that such spaces would become the most honest civic grounds I occupy. Today, my sense of belonging unfolds less in churches, classrooms, or boardrooms, and more in bootcamp circles, running groups, the leaderboard on Peloton, and, more recently, at a Hyrox start line—a hybrid fitness space where community looks and feels different.

Keep Reading Show less
Freezing Child Care Funding Throws the Baby Out with the Bathwater
boy's writing on book
Photo by Andrew Ebrahim on Unsplash

Freezing Child Care Funding Throws the Baby Out with the Bathwater

In the South, there is an idiom that says, “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.” It means not discarding something valuable while trying to eliminate something harmful. The Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) proposed response to unsubstantiated child care fraud allegations in Minnesota risks doing exactly that.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has frozen child care and family assistance grants in five states, and reports indicate that this action may be extended nationwide. Fraud at any level is wrong and should be thoroughly investigated, and once proven to be true, addressed. However, freezing child care payments and family assistance grants based on the views of a single social media “influencer” is an overcorrection that threatens the stability of child care programs and leaves families without care options through no fault of their own.

Across the nation, Americans rely heavily on child care. According to the Center for American Progress, nearly 70 percent of children under age six had all available parents in the workforce in 2023, underscoring how essential child care is to family and economic stability.

Child care funding, therefore, is not optional. It is a necessity that must remain stable and predictable.

Without consistent funding, child care operations are forced to significantly reduce capacity, and some are forced to close altogether. In 2025, a longtime family child care owner made the difficult decision to close her business after state budget cuts eliminated critical child care funding. While this example reflects a state-level funding failure, the impact is the same. When funding becomes unreliable, as is the case with the current funding freeze, child care business owners, employees, parents, and children all suffer.

The economic consequences extend well beyond families. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, when parents cannot find or afford child care, they are pushed out of the workforce, and businesses lose skilled employees. Child care gaps disrupt staffing across industries and cost states an estimated $1 billion annually in lost economic activity.

Child care is no longer just a family issue. It is an economic issue. It is one of the few sectors that directly affects every other industry. At a time when women are being encouraged to have more children, a strong support system must also exist, and that includes consistent, reliable child care funding.

Misuse of government funds is not a new concept. During the COVID-19 pandemic, more than $200 billion in federal relief funding across programs was reportedly misused. Fraud occurs in every industry, and no system is immune to it.

If allegations of child care fraud are substantiated, safeguards should absolutely be implemented to prevent future misuse; however, freezing child care funding would further delay payments to a sector already plagued by late reimbursements, disrupt services for children and families, and destabilize small businesses that operate on thin margins.

The solution is straightforward. Strengthen oversight to mitigate risk, without punishing the entire field. We must acknowledge that the vast majority of child care programs operate in good faith and in compliance with the law, providing care to millions of children nationwide. According to a 2020 report by the United States Government Accountability Office, only seven states since 2013 have had errors in more than 10 percent of their child care fund payments.

Yes, accountability matters, but solutions must be precise and measured. Sweeping actions based on unsubstantiated claims destabilize the entire child care system. When child care collapses, families lose care, caregivers lose income, small businesses close, and the economy suffers.

We can strengthen safeguards without dismantling the system that families and the economy depend on. We can address misuse if and where it exists. But we cannot afford to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Eboni Delaney is the Director of Policy and Movement Building at the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC), and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project in Partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

Keep Reading Show less
The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

Repealing the ACA’s individual mandate destabilized insurance markets, drove premiums higher, and left families paying the price.

Getty Images

The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

By repealing the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, policymakers allowed healthy Americans to walk away—leaving insurers with risk pools dominated by those most likely to need care. The result was inevitable: premiums soared, markets destabilized, and families were left paying the price.

When Congress passed the ACA, its most controversial feature was the individual mandate—the requirement that all Americans carry health insurance or pay a penalty. Critics called it coercion. In reality, it was the glue holding the system together.

Keep Reading Show less