Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Lactose Intolerant? You’re Not Alone

Opinion

A person grabbing a gallon of milk from an aisle.

New U.S. dietary guidelines from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brooke Rollins promote more milk in schools—but widespread Lactose Intolerance raises questions about equity and nutrition policy.

Getty Images, Theerawit Jirattawevut

Last month, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins announced new dietary guidelines for Americans that were a major reset of federal nutrition policy. Among the new recommendations: drink more milk, eat more yogurt and cheese. While nutritionists continue to debate the scientific basis of the recommendations, changes in federal meal programs, including school meals, are already in the works.

Any school that participates in federal meal programs must offer milk with every meal, and new guidelines support whole milk in addition to 2% and skim milk already available in schools. While there is debate about the level of saturated fats in whole milk, there’s a deeper problem with the dairy recommendation for school lunches: the widespread prevalence of lactose intolerance. The vast majority of people on this planet, approximately 70%, are lactose intolerant. While it is estimated that only about 35% of the US population is lactose intolerant, that number is much higher depending on your ancestral history: 75% of African Americans; 90% of Asian Americans; 50% of Latinos; 50% of Ashkenazi Jews; and 70-90% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. For school districts with large populations of descendant groups, the recommendation to just drink more milk doesn’t work for millions of kids.


Why are so many people lactose intolerant? Well, in a nutshell, because it’s normal.

At birth, human babies produce an enzyme in their guts known as lactase that breaks down the sugar (lactose) in milk. When kids are weaned, the gut stops producing the enzyme. The result is that adults are unable to digest the lactose, resulting in bloating and, oftentimes, significant gastrointestinal distress and cramping. For those who are lactose intolerant, it’s a feeling that is not only unpleasant but can be downright painful.

Adults who can digest lactose are genetic mutants. At least six genetic mutations have been identified that are associated with continued production of the lactase enzyme into adulthood, also known as lactase persistence (LP). These mutations are found in populations with long histories of dairying and in their descendant populations: northern Europe, western Africa, the Middle East, and parts of South Asia. This group of genetic mutants is relatively small, consisting of only about 30% of the world population.

We can trace the appearance of LP in the archaeological record. In Europe, residues from pottery and evidence of milking from animal bone analysis indicate that the earliest farmers were milking sheep, goats, and cattle by 8000 years ago. However, a single mutation is responsible for lactase persistence in these populations and only appeared 3500 years ago. Before this, everyone on the planet was lactose intolerant! This mutation also wasn’t widespread in northern European populations until over a thousand years later. Given the long evolutionary history of humans on the planet, all of these mutations are relatively recent.

What were early farmers doing with their milk since they were lactose intolerant? At first, they were likely using it to supplement young children’s diets. One of the most critical times in pre-industrial societies was in the first few years of life. Childhood mortality was very high and often related to various pathogens, diarrhea, and resulting dehydration. Sheep, goat, and cow’s milk consist mostly of water and are relatively pathogen-free. Given the fat and other nutrients, non-human mammal milk may have been an important nutritional additive that helped babies survive into childhood. This practice lasted a long time – there are even 3000-year old sippy cups with milk residues found in archaeological sites throughout Europe.

When milk is fermented into yogurt and cheese, the lactose in the milk breaks down, making it digestible for adults too. This is why many lactose-intolerant people today can consume yogurt, kefir, and cheese – particularly hard cheeses – without problems. Making milk into yogurt and cheese is not a new technique: residues on ancient pottery show people were already making cheese and yogurt 7500 years ago. Cheese is also nutritionally dense and easier to store and transport, making it an ideal addition to the diets of small-scale farmers, and finding it on special pottery indicates it was also important for ritual use.

Dairying clearly has a long and important history that includes diversifying the foods humans ate and genetic changes in some human populations. The implementation of new dietary guidelines should honor this history. Current estimates suggest that between 35-50% of the school-aged children participating in national school lunch programs are lactose intolerant, and parents have been asking for lactose-free options for their school kids for years. While lactose-free milk is on the USDA list of “fluid milk requirements” for schools, it is imperative that it be available without the current obstacles, such as requiring a doctor’s note. Lactose intolerance is not abnormal – rather, it is lactase persistence, the ability to digest lactose beyond weaning, that is unusual. In the past, the USDA has not invested in lactose-free milk at schools, despite its wide and growing availability. If DHHS and the USDA wish to increase dairy consumption for the federal programs, they are better served by increasing the availability of lactose-free milk, along with promoting yogurt and cheeses to students. By doing so, more kids from diverse backgrounds will gain the nutritional benefits they seek to provide.

Sarah McClure is an environmental archaeologist, Professor of Anthropology, and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project at UC Santa Barbara, with over 20 years of research on early farming societies and the history of dairying.


Read More

Why ICE's Aggressive Tactics are a Public Health Crisis

Following killings in Minneapolis, ICE operations reignite concerns over overpolicing, racial profiling, and the mental health toll on Black communities nationwide.

Getty Images, David Berding

Why ICE's Aggressive Tactics are a Public Health Crisis

Following the recent killings of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents continue to conduct operations across the country. In recent weeks, under-the-radar sweeps have been reported in communities from California to North Carolina.

ICE’s use of targeted policing, harassment, and excessive force has pushed the issue of overpolicing to the forefront again. For many in Black communities across the U.S., these patterns feel painfully familiar, especially considering the agents are charged with infiltrating communities of color to detain “illegal immigrants.” And while some cases of aggressive policing make headlines, there are countless others that never make the news. Nevertheless, the harm is real, affecting the collective mental health of communities of color and others as well.

Keep Reading Show less
Native Americans Are Dying From Pregnancy. They Want a Voice To Stop the Trend.

Native Americans have been working with state and federal officials to boost tribal participation and leadership in maternal mortality review committees to better track and address pregnancy-related deaths. (Oona Zenda/KFF Health News)

Oona Zenda/KFF Health News

Native Americans Are Dying From Pregnancy. They Want a Voice To Stop the Trend.

Just hours after Rhonda Swaney left a prenatal appointment for her first pregnancy, she felt severe pain in her stomach and started vomiting.

Then 25 years old and six months pregnant, she drove herself to the emergency room in Ronan, Montana, on the Flathead Indian Reservation, where an ambulance transferred her to a larger hospital 60 miles away in Missoula. Once she arrived, the staff couldn’t detect her baby’s heartbeat. Swaney began to bleed heavily. She delivered a stillborn baby and was hospitalized for several days. At one point, doctors told her to call her family. They didn’t expect her to survive.

Keep Reading Show less
William H Foege standing next to a bust of Hygeia.

Former Centers for Disease Control (CDC) director William H Foege standing next to a bust of Hygeia, the Greek goddess of health, 1985. Image courtesy Centers for Disease Control.

Getty Images, Smith Collection/Gado

Bill Foege: One of Humanity’s Heroes

At a time when public health is under attack in America, and people without medical expertise are making decisions that are having negative consequences globally, we would do well to remember those who helped achieve what had been remarkable progress in world health. One such person was Dr. William “Bill” Foege, a giant in the public health sector who died recently at the age of 89.

Among his many achievements is the role he played in eradicating smallpox, a disease that had been the scourge of humanity, killing as many as 500 million people. Like many contagious diseases, smallpox remained intractable in parts of the world that lacked effective healthcare systems.

Keep Reading Show less
WHO Withdrawal and Trump’s Transactional Approach to Global Health Policy
boy in white tank top with face mask
Photo by Oscar Nolasco on Unsplash

WHO Withdrawal and Trump’s Transactional Approach to Global Health Policy

On January 22, the United States finalized its exit from the World Health Organization. This move did not come as a surprise. The process began more than a year earlier, the day after President Trump took his oath of office for a second term. His dislike for the world body and its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic is well known, as is his deal-making approach in foreign policy.

Trump’s logic is driven by self-interest and the notion of “What’s in it for us?” This transactional approach became even more apparent in December, when the U.S. Government signed 14 bilateral health agreements with African nations totaling US$ 16 billion.

Keep Reading Show less