Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Lactose Intolerant? You’re Not Alone

Opinion

A person grabbing a gallon of milk from an aisle.

New U.S. dietary guidelines from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brooke Rollins promote more milk in schools—but widespread Lactose Intolerance raises questions about equity and nutrition policy.

Getty Images, Theerawit Jirattawevut

Last month, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins announced new dietary guidelines for Americans that were a major reset of federal nutrition policy. Among the new recommendations: drink more milk, eat more yogurt and cheese. While nutritionists continue to debate the scientific basis of the recommendations, changes in federal meal programs, including school meals, are already in the works.

Any school that participates in federal meal programs must offer milk with every meal, and new guidelines support whole milk in addition to 2% and skim milk already available in schools. While there is debate about the level of saturated fats in whole milk, there’s a deeper problem with the dairy recommendation for school lunches: the widespread prevalence of lactose intolerance. The vast majority of people on this planet, approximately 70%, are lactose intolerant. While it is estimated that only about 35% of the US population is lactose intolerant, that number is much higher depending on your ancestral history: 75% of African Americans; 90% of Asian Americans; 50% of Latinos; 50% of Ashkenazi Jews; and 70-90% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. For school districts with large populations of descendant groups, the recommendation to just drink more milk doesn’t work for millions of kids.


Why are so many people lactose intolerant? Well, in a nutshell, because it’s normal.

At birth, human babies produce an enzyme in their guts known as lactase that breaks down the sugar (lactose) in milk. When kids are weaned, the gut stops producing the enzyme. The result is that adults are unable to digest the lactose, resulting in bloating and, oftentimes, significant gastrointestinal distress and cramping. For those who are lactose intolerant, it’s a feeling that is not only unpleasant but can be downright painful.

Adults who can digest lactose are genetic mutants. At least six genetic mutations have been identified that are associated with continued production of the lactase enzyme into adulthood, also known as lactase persistence (LP). These mutations are found in populations with long histories of dairying and in their descendant populations: northern Europe, western Africa, the Middle East, and parts of South Asia. This group of genetic mutants is relatively small, consisting of only about 30% of the world population.

We can trace the appearance of LP in the archaeological record. In Europe, residues from pottery and evidence of milking from animal bone analysis indicate that the earliest farmers were milking sheep, goats, and cattle by 8000 years ago. However, a single mutation is responsible for lactase persistence in these populations and only appeared 3500 years ago. Before this, everyone on the planet was lactose intolerant! This mutation also wasn’t widespread in northern European populations until over a thousand years later. Given the long evolutionary history of humans on the planet, all of these mutations are relatively recent.

What were early farmers doing with their milk since they were lactose intolerant? At first, they were likely using it to supplement young children’s diets. One of the most critical times in pre-industrial societies was in the first few years of life. Childhood mortality was very high and often related to various pathogens, diarrhea, and resulting dehydration. Sheep, goat, and cow’s milk consist mostly of water and are relatively pathogen-free. Given the fat and other nutrients, non-human mammal milk may have been an important nutritional additive that helped babies survive into childhood. This practice lasted a long time – there are even 3000-year old sippy cups with milk residues found in archaeological sites throughout Europe.

When milk is fermented into yogurt and cheese, the lactose in the milk breaks down, making it digestible for adults too. This is why many lactose-intolerant people today can consume yogurt, kefir, and cheese – particularly hard cheeses – without problems. Making milk into yogurt and cheese is not a new technique: residues on ancient pottery show people were already making cheese and yogurt 7500 years ago. Cheese is also nutritionally dense and easier to store and transport, making it an ideal addition to the diets of small-scale farmers, and finding it on special pottery indicates it was also important for ritual use.

Dairying clearly has a long and important history that includes diversifying the foods humans ate and genetic changes in some human populations. The implementation of new dietary guidelines should honor this history. Current estimates suggest that between 35-50% of the school-aged children participating in national school lunch programs are lactose intolerant, and parents have been asking for lactose-free options for their school kids for years. While lactose-free milk is on the USDA list of “fluid milk requirements” for schools, it is imperative that it be available without the current obstacles, such as requiring a doctor’s note. Lactose intolerance is not abnormal – rather, it is lactase persistence, the ability to digest lactose beyond weaning, that is unusual. In the past, the USDA has not invested in lactose-free milk at schools, despite its wide and growing availability. If DHHS and the USDA wish to increase dairy consumption for the federal programs, they are better served by increasing the availability of lactose-free milk, along with promoting yogurt and cheeses to students. By doing so, more kids from diverse backgrounds will gain the nutritional benefits they seek to provide.

Sarah McClure is an environmental archaeologist, Professor of Anthropology, and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project at UC Santa Barbara, with over 20 years of research on early farming societies and the history of dairying.


Read More

Medicaid Cuts Could Threaten Key Student Services at IL Schools

Monique McClure is a single parent to four children, two of whom rely on Medicaid-funded school services.

Photo courtesy of Monique McClure

Medicaid Cuts Could Threaten Key Student Services at IL Schools

Medicaid-funded school services are a lifeline and financial necessity for Monique McClure, a single mother of four, and her two children with learning disabilities.

Trent and Trenity, McClure’s 9-year-old twins, participate in a range of Medicaid-funded programs at their respective schools in Belleville, including speech, occupational, and developmental therapies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Focused athlete performing lateral raises with dumbbells, building shoulder muscles in a modern fitness center

This Mental Health Awareness Month essay explores Black masculinity, emotional wellness, HYROX training, therapy, and healing through movement.

zamrznutitonovi / Getty Images

Mental Strength Is More Than Toughness

May is Mental Health Awareness Month, but awareness alone cannot save us. Men of color are already painfully aware that something is wrong. We feel it in our sleeplessness. In our blood pressure. In the marriages that strain under emotional distance. In the fathers who never learned how to say “I’m not okay.” In the sons trying to inherit manhood from men who never permitted tenderness.

The crisis is not merely psychological. It is cultural, historical, spiritual, and physiological all at once. African Americans, particularly men, occupy one of the most paradoxical spaces in American life. We are hyper-visible in sports and entertainment. We are present in politics and public discourse. Yet we are emotionally invisible in matters of vulnerability, grief, anxiety, and depression. We are celebrated for resilience, but denied rest. Our toughness is admirable, while we are punished for transparency.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pregnant woman holding her belly during a prenatal exam.

Americans are questioning whether they have enough resources and support to raise a family in the nation's current political landscape. Julie Roland examines the contradictions of "pro-family" politics in America today and the kind of care mothers are owed to safely and successfully raise children.

Getty Images, Drs Producoes

The Trump Administration Has a Mommy Problem

My mother, who died of breast cancer when I was 18, had me when she was 32. This past Sunday, I turned 33, childless. As I officially fall behind her timeline, with no plans to have kids anytime soon, I look at the landscape of 2026 America and have to ask: Who can blame me?

The decision to start a family is a difficult one. J.D. Vance said on his first day as Vice President that he wants “more babies in America,” but many Americans simply can’t afford to have kids anymore. Perhaps that’s one reason why this administration is offering $5,000 “baby bonuses” just to incentivize birth, while also banning abortion in every way they can. But becoming a mother should be a choice. I was the result of an unplanned pregnancy–and I’m lucky my mom decided to have me and that she turned out to be the best mom ever–but as Miriam Rabkin, MD, MPH, put it: “if you want mom to be happy and healthy, she needs access to contraception so she can choose if and when to get pregnant!” Instead, this administration seems to think that if women won’t elect to have children, they should try paying them, and if that doesn’t work, then they should just force them.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Women Will Die’: How the Mifepristone Ban Will Affect Women across the Country

In this photo illustration, packages of Mifepristone tablets are displayed at a family planning clinic.

(Photo illustration by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

‘Women Will Die’: How the Mifepristone Ban Will Affect Women across the Country

WASHINGTON–Maternal health advocates and a Virginia state legislator warned that women’s health would suffer even in states that allow abortions if the Supreme Court fails to block a ban on mail deliveries of mifepristone, a drug used in abortions.

Jennifer McClellan, a representative for the state of Virginia and long-time advocate for reproductive rights, experienced a high-risk pregnancy and an emergency C-section 9 weeks before her due date. She said that she worried about the risks to individuals if they lose easy access to Mifepristone for abortions, miscarriages, or other reasons.

Keep ReadingShow less