Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Lactose Intolerant? You’re Not Alone

Opinion

A person grabbing a gallon of milk from an aisle.

New U.S. dietary guidelines from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brooke Rollins promote more milk in schools—but widespread Lactose Intolerance raises questions about equity and nutrition policy.

Getty Images, Theerawit Jirattawevut

Last month, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins announced new dietary guidelines for Americans that were a major reset of federal nutrition policy. Among the new recommendations: drink more milk, eat more yogurt and cheese. While nutritionists continue to debate the scientific basis of the recommendations, changes in federal meal programs, including school meals, are already in the works.

Any school that participates in federal meal programs must offer milk with every meal, and new guidelines support whole milk in addition to 2% and skim milk already available in schools. While there is debate about the level of saturated fats in whole milk, there’s a deeper problem with the dairy recommendation for school lunches: the widespread prevalence of lactose intolerance. The vast majority of people on this planet, approximately 70%, are lactose intolerant. While it is estimated that only about 35% of the US population is lactose intolerant, that number is much higher depending on your ancestral history: 75% of African Americans; 90% of Asian Americans; 50% of Latinos; 50% of Ashkenazi Jews; and 70-90% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. For school districts with large populations of descendant groups, the recommendation to just drink more milk doesn’t work for millions of kids.


Why are so many people lactose intolerant? Well, in a nutshell, because it’s normal.

At birth, human babies produce an enzyme in their guts known as lactase that breaks down the sugar (lactose) in milk. When kids are weaned, the gut stops producing the enzyme. The result is that adults are unable to digest the lactose, resulting in bloating and, oftentimes, significant gastrointestinal distress and cramping. For those who are lactose intolerant, it’s a feeling that is not only unpleasant but can be downright painful.

Adults who can digest lactose are genetic mutants. At least six genetic mutations have been identified that are associated with continued production of the lactase enzyme into adulthood, also known as lactase persistence (LP). These mutations are found in populations with long histories of dairying and in their descendant populations: northern Europe, western Africa, the Middle East, and parts of South Asia. This group of genetic mutants is relatively small, consisting of only about 30% of the world population.

We can trace the appearance of LP in the archaeological record. In Europe, residues from pottery and evidence of milking from animal bone analysis indicate that the earliest farmers were milking sheep, goats, and cattle by 8000 years ago. However, a single mutation is responsible for lactase persistence in these populations and only appeared 3500 years ago. Before this, everyone on the planet was lactose intolerant! This mutation also wasn’t widespread in northern European populations until over a thousand years later. Given the long evolutionary history of humans on the planet, all of these mutations are relatively recent.

What were early farmers doing with their milk since they were lactose intolerant? At first, they were likely using it to supplement young children’s diets. One of the most critical times in pre-industrial societies was in the first few years of life. Childhood mortality was very high and often related to various pathogens, diarrhea, and resulting dehydration. Sheep, goat, and cow’s milk consist mostly of water and are relatively pathogen-free. Given the fat and other nutrients, non-human mammal milk may have been an important nutritional additive that helped babies survive into childhood. This practice lasted a long time – there are even 3000-year old sippy cups with milk residues found in archaeological sites throughout Europe.

When milk is fermented into yogurt and cheese, the lactose in the milk breaks down, making it digestible for adults too. This is why many lactose-intolerant people today can consume yogurt, kefir, and cheese – particularly hard cheeses – without problems. Making milk into yogurt and cheese is not a new technique: residues on ancient pottery show people were already making cheese and yogurt 7500 years ago. Cheese is also nutritionally dense and easier to store and transport, making it an ideal addition to the diets of small-scale farmers, and finding it on special pottery indicates it was also important for ritual use.

Dairying clearly has a long and important history that includes diversifying the foods humans ate and genetic changes in some human populations. The implementation of new dietary guidelines should honor this history. Current estimates suggest that between 35-50% of the school-aged children participating in national school lunch programs are lactose intolerant, and parents have been asking for lactose-free options for their school kids for years. While lactose-free milk is on the USDA list of “fluid milk requirements” for schools, it is imperative that it be available without the current obstacles, such as requiring a doctor’s note. Lactose intolerance is not abnormal – rather, it is lactase persistence, the ability to digest lactose beyond weaning, that is unusual. In the past, the USDA has not invested in lactose-free milk at schools, despite its wide and growing availability. If DHHS and the USDA wish to increase dairy consumption for the federal programs, they are better served by increasing the availability of lactose-free milk, along with promoting yogurt and cheeses to students. By doing so, more kids from diverse backgrounds will gain the nutritional benefits they seek to provide.

Sarah McClure is an environmental archaeologist, Professor of Anthropology, and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project at UC Santa Barbara, with over 20 years of research on early farming societies and the history of dairying.


Read More

Stethoscope, pile of hundred dollar bills and a calculator

A deep dive into America’s healthcare cost crisis, comparing reform to a modern “moonshot.” Explores payment models, rising costs, and lessons from John F. Kennedy’s space race vision to drive systemic change.

IronHeart/Getty Images

The Moonshot America Needs to Solve Its Healthcare Crisis

In 1961, President John F. Kennedy told the nation, “We choose to go to the moon.” It’s often remembered as a moment of national ambition. In reality, the United States was locked in a Cold War with the Soviet Union, and the fear of falling behind in technological dominance made the mission unavoidable.

Today’s space race is driven by a different force. Governments and private companies are investing billions to capture economic advantages, from satellite infrastructure to advanced computing to the next frontier of resource extraction.

Keep ReadingShow less
A billboard that reads, "We've got your six," and "Confidential abortion support for service members, veterans, and their families. You make the appointment, we handle the rest."

Female service members face higher rates of sexual assault, limited reproductive healthcare, and policy barriers shaped by the Hyde Amendment and the Dobbs decision. This piece examines how military and VA policies are failing women in uniform and after service, widening inequality and restricting access to critical care.

All Women Left Behind

Our sisters in arms are facing a life cycle of abandonment. Female service members have a separation rate 28% higher than men, largely attributed to sexual assault, family planning, and childcare—inherently sexist issues that threaten to weaken our force. When women are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by the enemy, with decades of unsuccessful efforts to reduce rape in the ranks, the military is lucky women volunteer to serve at all. But for those who do take the oath, the betrayal only deepens. In states with abortion bans, the uniform offers no protection against healthcare deserts created by Dobbs. Instead of expanding care, the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs have retreated, leaving these women with less access to care than they would have in a federal prison. Their president might be a blue falcon, but We the People are going to have their backs.

Just as the military sees more rapes than the civilian population, it also sees more unplanned pregnancies. Maternal death rates are higher in America than in other developed nations, but they are higher still in states with abortion restrictions. In fact, for women of reproductive age who live there, death rates are higher, independent of pregnancy. Following Dobbs, 40% of female service members saw increased risks to their health and careers, simply by being stationed at one of the 100 military installations housed in one of those states, while Pentagon officials admitted: “there is not much they can do [for them].”

Keep ReadingShow less
Housing Insecurity as a Public Health Crisis: From Framework to Action
white and brown house on brown textile
Photo by Chiara F on Unsplash

Housing Insecurity as a Public Health Crisis: From Framework to Action

For those of us with deep roots in California, we understand better than most that homelessness is layered and complex. It is not a one-off issue, but the result of multiple, intersecting factors that compound over time.

Los Angeles County has taken a critical step in naming the problem. The challenge now lies in operationalizing this framework, translating recognition into coordinated action that addresses the layered and intersecting harms individuals face.

Keep ReadingShow less
Death with Dignity: A Person's Right to Choose Life or Death

Nurse holding hands with elderly patient.

Getty images

Death with Dignity: A Person's Right to Choose Life or Death

There is much debate around the world regarding both physician-assisted dying legislation—often called "Death with Dignity"—and expanding the circumstances in which it is applicable. Eight countries and 19 states already permit it in some form.

It is controversial for many reasons. Part of the controversy stems from our cultural discomfort with death. Part of it results from the medical profession's focus on keeping people alive and its fear of malpractice suits. Part of it is religious.

Keep ReadingShow less