Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Saturated Fat Fallacy: RFK Jr.’s Dietary Crusade Endangers Public Health

Public health leaders condemn Kennedy’s dietary shift as reckless and unsupported by evidence.

Opinion

​Former Republican presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Former Republican presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. listens during a campaign rally for Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump at Desert Diamond Arena on August 23, 2024 in Glendale, Arizona.

Getty Images, Rebecca Noble

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s recent embrace of saturated fats as part of a national health strategy is consistent with much of Kennedy’s health policy, which is often short of clinical proven data and offers opinions to Americans that are potentially outright dangerous.

By promoting butter, red meat, and full-fat dairy without clear intake guidelines or scientific consensus, Kennedy is not just challenging dietary orthodoxy. He’s undermining the very institutions tasked with safeguarding public health.


Kennedy has publicly praised saturated fats, claiming they’ve been “unfairly demonized” and suggesting Americans need more of them—not less. He suggests that Americans should follow a carnivore-style diet and has hinted that new federal guidelines under his leadership will reflect this shift.

Yet he has failed to specify a safe upper limit for saturated fat intake, ignoring decades of research linking it to elevated LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease.

Kennedy’s statements contradict the American Heart Association's recommendation to keep saturated fat below 6% of daily calories and the U.S. Dietary Guidelines' cap of 10%.

The risks of saturated fats are clear, as illustrated in this chart:

As saturated fat intake rises from 5% to 25% of daily calories, LDL cholesterol climbs from 100 to 160 mg/dL. The risk of heart disease more than doubles.

These aren’t abstract numbers—they represent lives shortened, families disrupted, and billions in preventable healthcare costs.

Kennedy's rhetoric may appeal to populist instincts. Still, it erodes trust in science and weakens the government's constitutional duty to "promote the general welfare." Public health policy must be grounded in evidence, not ideology. When the Secretary of Health and Human Services ignores science and promotes half-baked ideas, the health of millions of Americans is put at risk.

Kennedy’s framing of saturated fat as a victim of elite misinformation weaponizes distrust at a time when civic cohesion is already fraying. Dangerous medical narratives from the top health official in the federal government cannot be ignored.

This is not the first time Kennedy has promoted unscientific, potentially dangerous health practices. Kennedy's tenure as Secretary of Health has focused on debunked claims such as vaccines being linked to autism, the unfounded linkages of acetaminophen (Tylenol) use in children and pregnant women to autism, citing unverified studies, to name a few.

Kennedy has urged Americans to "stop trusting experts" and instead "do their own research," a stance that has drawn criticism from public health leaders.

The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is the chief executive of the federal agency responsible for protecting the health of all Americans and providing essential human services. The Secretary oversees major public health institutions, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). His role includes setting national health policy, managing public health emergencies, regulating food and drug safety, advancing medical research, and administering programs that serve vulnerable populations, as well as playing a critical role in shaping federal responses to issues like pandemics, opioid addiction, mental health, and health equity.

In a joint statement in early October from six former Surgeons General (including Vivek Murthy, Jerome Adams, Richard Carmona, David Satcher, Joycelyn Elders, and Antonia Novello)

“The actions of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are endangering the health of the nation. Never before have we issued a joint public warning like this.”

The person in this position must advocate policy rooted in science, not personal opinions or sentiment.


David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

A doctor and patient holding hands.

Trust in America’s doctors has hit historic lows. This story explores how decades of missed opportunities, rising costs, and systemic inertia eroded the doctor-patient bond — and what it will take to restore confidence in modern medicine.

Getty Images, thianchai sitthikongsak

The Collapse of Patient Trust: How U.S. Healthcare Lost Its Way

Just as the political health of a nation requires trust in elected officials, the physical and mental health of Americans depends on the trust embedded in the doctor-patient relationship.

For most of the past century, that bond was ironclad. Now, that relationship is fraying.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jennifer Greenfield Speaks Out for Colorado Families

Jennifer Greenfield Speaks Out for Colorado Families

When Jennifer Greenfield wrote an op-ed in The Denver Post warning that proposed federal budget cuts would devastate Coloradans who rely on programs like Medicaid and SNAP, she hoped her words might help change the conversation—and the outcome. Her piece drew a wave of responses, including appreciation from state leaders and an invitation to speak at a local event. Although the GOP’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” ultimately became law, Greenfield continues to warn about its long-term consequences. She spoke with SSN about the ripple effects of her op-ed and shared advice for fellow scholars who want their research to make a difference. The following conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

Q&A with Jennifer Greenfield

You recently wrote an op-ed about the GOP’s budget bill. What message were you hoping to get across?

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Debate on Health Secretary Kennedy’s Vaccine Panelists

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., January 29, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

Understanding the Debate on Health Secretary Kennedy’s Vaccine Panelists

Summary

On June 9, 2025, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), dismissed all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Secretary Kennedy claimed the move was necessary to eliminate “conflicts of interest” and restore public trust in vaccines, which he argued had been compromised by the influence of pharmaceutical companies. However, this decision strays from precedent and has drawn significant criticism from medical experts and public health officials across the country. Some argue that this shake-up undermines scientific independence and opens the door to politicized decision-making in vaccine policy.

Background: What Is ACIP?

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is a federal advisory group that helps guide national vaccine policy. Established in 1964, it has over 60 years of credibility as an evidence-based body of medical and scientific experts. ACIP makes official recommendations on vaccine schedules for both children and adults, determining which immunizations are required for school entry, covered by health insurance, and prioritized in public health programs. The committee is composed of specialists in immunology, epidemiology, pediatrics, infectious disease, and public health, all of whom are vetted for scientific rigor and ethical standards. ACIP’s guidance holds national weight, shaping both public perception of vaccines and the policies of institutions like schools, hospitals, and insurers.

Keep ReadingShow less
This isn’t the first time moms have been blamed for their kids’ autism

There are echoes of mother-blaming in how President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are now talking about autism, pregnancy and vaccines.

(Getty Images)

This isn’t the first time moms have been blamed for their kids’ autism

JJ Hanley can still remember the pediatrician’s words.

It was the early ’90s, and the mother of two in suburban Chicago had begun to worry that her toddler-age son, Tim, was showing language delays and other behaviors that didn’t align with his older brother’s development. Hanley turned to her son’s doctor, who declared: “There’s nothing wrong with him. What’s wrong with him is you.”

Keep ReadingShow less