Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats

From pardons to filibuster fights, MAGA strategies intensify efforts to undermine free and fair elections across states and Congress.

Opinion

MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats

A deep dive into ongoing threats to U.S. democracy—from MAGA election interference and state voting restrictions to filibuster risks—as America approaches 2026 and 2028.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Tuesday, November 4, demonstrated again that Americans want democracy and US elections are conducted credibly. Voter turnout was strong; there were few administrative glitches, but voters’ choices were honored.

The relatively smooth elections across the country nonetheless took place despite electiondenial and anti-voting efforts continuing through election day. These efforts will likely intensify as we move toward the 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential election. The MAGA drive for unprecedented mid-decade, extreme political gerrymandering of congressional districts to guarantee their control of the House of Representatives is a conspicuous thrust of their campaign to remain in power at all costs.


The White House’s promise that yet another Presidential order on elections will soon be issued also indicates that the MAGA campaign against voting rights remains a central priority. The next order is likely to focus on stifling voting by mail and requiring hand counting of ballots, among other matters. That will be on top of the extraordinarily overreaching March 25 Presidential Executive Order (EO 14248) and other actions affecting elections.

Trump’s “full, complete and unconditional” pardon on November 7 of “all American citizens” for their conduct in creating fake slates of Electoral College delegates in the 2020 presidential election conspiracy – as well as anyone’s efforts to expose "voting fraud and vulnerabilities” in that election is blanket impunity and encouragement for supporters to falsely reject MAGA losses in 2026 and 2028. Taken together with Trump’s pardon of approximately 1,500 January 6 rioters , the warning is clear.

The call to eliminate the Senate’s filibuster rule is a dramatic threat to genuine elections.

President Trump emphasized to Republican Senators on November 5 that eliminating the filibuster is a goal beyond ending the government shutdown. He told them: “[T]he biggest thing is the filibuster,” adding that after its elimination, “We will pass legislation at levels you've never seen before, and it will be impossible to beat us.” That fits with his infamous quote to supporters that “we’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not going to have to vote.”

Abolishing the filibuster would open the floodgates to passage of draconian laws regulating the “times, places and manner” of holding federal elections. Under the cover of that phrase from the Constitution’s Election Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1) Congress could implement extreme measures without the challenges facing presidential orders, and MAGA members of the House are promoting further voting rights restrictions that are in tune with White House’s election overreach.

There are significant reasons for both parties to keep the filibuster, and the proposed government funding deal postpones the immediate issue until January 30. In the meantime, something that everyone can do is contact Republican Senators, urging them to preserve the filibuster.

State legislation is another MAGA arena for undermining free and fair elections.

According to a recent Brennan Center report, as of early October, 16 states enacted 29 restrictive voting laws, which is on par with 2021’s record-setting numbers (32 laws in 17 states). Of course, 2021 measures were driven by false claims about the 2020 election being stolen. As the 2026 and 2028 national tests of whether the MAGA movement can retain federal power come into focus, legislative changes of election law at the state level will also likely further intensify.

That highlights the importance of monitoring proposed state legislation and mobilizing to protect credible elections.

The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security are further weaponizing against voting and honest election administration.

The MAGA top-down, bottom-up approach to subverting credible elections is revealed by the recent addition to key positions in the Department of Justice and at Homeland Security of more 2020 election credibility deniers, bridging institutional and grassroots mobilization.

The DOJ’s sweeping efforts to gather state voter lists, despite privacy concerns, foreshadows creation of a spurious, de facto national voter registry, countering the states’ electoral authority. Public confidence in voting systems technology, challenged by certification provisions of EO 14248, could face further subversion under the guise of decertifying voting systems.

Election system cyber security and general safety of election workers is being undermined as the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) turns away from assisting election administration. Yet, artificial intelligence challenges and human threats are both serious threats. The Brennan Center reports that CISA may even become a source of misinformation on election security, which places pressure on states to develop mutual assistance measures to enhance election security,

The toxic political environment in the US is likely to intensify as the 2026 and 2028 elections approach. Potentials for political violence, unfortunately, may not diminish, and threats against election workers as well as judges, who are essential to credibly resolving electoral related legal disputes, will continue. Citizens who are committed to credible elections should step forward and volunteer as election workers to help address high election worker turnover. And, efforts by groups like the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) and the Article III Coalition will be all the more important.

As the mid-terms and presidential elections approach, each of us will face the challenge of finding accurate information to make informed political choices and to defend credible elections. We also will have to decide how to use our voices, donate our time, and provide financial support that we can afford to protect elections and safeguard democracy.

Publications, including Democracy Docket, Election Law Blog, and VoteBeat, shed light on challenges to credible elections and efforts to combat threats. Organizations that defend credible elections through the courts deserve support, like Democracy Forward, ACLU, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Public Citizen, as do groups like VoteRiders and others focused on voter registration and mobilization. Nonetheless, supporting candidates and parties whose policies and actions advance American democracy is the key to its defense.

Credible elections are the means of ensuring that our democracy can be preserved and advanced, while our participation is its prerequisite.


Pat Merloe provides strategic advice to groups focused on democracy and trustworthy elections in the U.S. and internationally. He has engaged with election monitors and democracy advocates in 65 countries.


Read More

Stickers with the words "I Voted Today."

Virginia is on its way to be the 19th jurisdiction to adopt the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, bringing the U.S. closer to electing presidents by the national popular vote.

Getty Images, EyeWolf

Virginia On The Path to Join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

NPVIC is an agreement among U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to the presidential ticket that wins the overall popular vote in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It is considered a pragmatic, voluntary state-based initiative because it aims to ensure the winner of the national popular vote wins the presidency without requiring a constitutional amendment, operating instead within the existing Electoral College framework by utilizing states' constitutional authority to appoint electors. If enough states join the NPVIC to reach a total of 270 electoral votes, the United States will effectively shift from a winner-take-all (WTA) regime to a national popular vote system for electing the President.

With Virginia's adoption, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact will be adopted by eighteen states and the District of Columbia, collectively holding 222 electoral votes. The compact requires 270 electoral votes (a majority of the 538 total) to take effect. It currently needs forty-eight more electoral votes to become active.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less