Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats

From pardons to filibuster fights, MAGA strategies intensify efforts to undermine free and fair elections across states and Congress.

Opinion

MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats

A deep dive into ongoing threats to U.S. democracy—from MAGA election interference and state voting restrictions to filibuster risks—as America approaches 2026 and 2028.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Tuesday, November 4, demonstrated again that Americans want democracy and US elections are conducted credibly. Voter turnout was strong; there were few administrative glitches, but voters’ choices were honored.

The relatively smooth elections across the country nonetheless took place despite electiondenial and anti-voting efforts continuing through election day. These efforts will likely intensify as we move toward the 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential election. The MAGA drive for unprecedented mid-decade, extreme political gerrymandering of congressional districts to guarantee their control of the House of Representatives is a conspicuous thrust of their campaign to remain in power at all costs.


The White House’s promise that yet another Presidential order on elections will soon be issued also indicates that the MAGA campaign against voting rights remains a central priority. The next order is likely to focus on stifling voting by mail and requiring hand counting of ballots, among other matters. That will be on top of the extraordinarily overreaching March 25 Presidential Executive Order (EO 14248) and other actions affecting elections.

Trump’s “full, complete and unconditional” pardon on November 7 of “all American citizens” for their conduct in creating fake slates of Electoral College delegates in the 2020 presidential election conspiracy – as well as anyone’s efforts to expose "voting fraud and vulnerabilities” in that election is blanket impunity and encouragement for supporters to falsely reject MAGA losses in 2026 and 2028. Taken together with Trump’s pardon of approximately 1,500 January 6 rioters , the warning is clear.

The call to eliminate the Senate’s filibuster rule is a dramatic threat to genuine elections.

President Trump emphasized to Republican Senators on November 5 that eliminating the filibuster is a goal beyond ending the government shutdown. He told them: “[T]he biggest thing is the filibuster,” adding that after its elimination, “We will pass legislation at levels you've never seen before, and it will be impossible to beat us.” That fits with his infamous quote to supporters that “we’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not going to have to vote.”

Abolishing the filibuster would open the floodgates to passage of draconian laws regulating the “times, places and manner” of holding federal elections. Under the cover of that phrase from the Constitution’s Election Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1) Congress could implement extreme measures without the challenges facing presidential orders, and MAGA members of the House are promoting further voting rights restrictions that are in tune with White House’s election overreach.

There are significant reasons for both parties to keep the filibuster, and the proposed government funding deal postpones the immediate issue until January 30. In the meantime, something that everyone can do is contact Republican Senators, urging them to preserve the filibuster.

State legislation is another MAGA arena for undermining free and fair elections.

According to a recent Brennan Center report, as of early October, 16 states enacted 29 restrictive voting laws, which is on par with 2021’s record-setting numbers (32 laws in 17 states). Of course, 2021 measures were driven by false claims about the 2020 election being stolen. As the 2026 and 2028 national tests of whether the MAGA movement can retain federal power come into focus, legislative changes of election law at the state level will also likely further intensify.

That highlights the importance of monitoring proposed state legislation and mobilizing to protect credible elections.

The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security are further weaponizing against voting and honest election administration.

The MAGA top-down, bottom-up approach to subverting credible elections is revealed by the recent addition to key positions in the Department of Justice and at Homeland Security of more 2020 election credibility deniers, bridging institutional and grassroots mobilization.

The DOJ’s sweeping efforts to gather state voter lists, despite privacy concerns, foreshadows creation of a spurious, de facto national voter registry, countering the states’ electoral authority. Public confidence in voting systems technology, challenged by certification provisions of EO 14248, could face further subversion under the guise of decertifying voting systems.

Election system cyber security and general safety of election workers is being undermined as the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) turns away from assisting election administration. Yet, artificial intelligence challenges and human threats are both serious threats. The Brennan Center reports that CISA may even become a source of misinformation on election security, which places pressure on states to develop mutual assistance measures to enhance election security,

The toxic political environment in the US is likely to intensify as the 2026 and 2028 elections approach. Potentials for political violence, unfortunately, may not diminish, and threats against election workers as well as judges, who are essential to credibly resolving electoral related legal disputes, will continue. Citizens who are committed to credible elections should step forward and volunteer as election workers to help address high election worker turnover. And, efforts by groups like the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) and the Article III Coalition will be all the more important.

As the mid-terms and presidential elections approach, each of us will face the challenge of finding accurate information to make informed political choices and to defend credible elections. We also will have to decide how to use our voices, donate our time, and provide financial support that we can afford to protect elections and safeguard democracy.

Publications, including Democracy Docket, Election Law Blog, and VoteBeat, shed light on challenges to credible elections and efforts to combat threats. Organizations that defend credible elections through the courts deserve support, like Democracy Forward, ACLU, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Public Citizen, as do groups like VoteRiders and others focused on voter registration and mobilization. Nonetheless, supporting candidates and parties whose policies and actions advance American democracy is the key to its defense.

Credible elections are the means of ensuring that our democracy can be preserved and advanced, while our participation is its prerequisite.


Pat Merloe provides strategic advice to groups focused on democracy and trustworthy elections in the U.S. and internationally. He has engaged with election monitors and democracy advocates in 65 countries.

Read More

Let's End Felony Disenfranchisement. Virginia May Lead the Way

Virginia Governor-elect Abigail Spanberger promises major reforms to the state’s felony disenfranchisement system.

Getty Images, beast01

Let's End Felony Disenfranchisement. Virginia May Lead the Way

When Virginia’s Governor-Elect, Abigail Spanberger, takes office next month, she will have the chance to make good on her promise to do something about her state’s outdated system of felony disenfranchisement. Virginia is one of just three states where only the governor has the power to restore voting rights to felons who have completed their prison terms.

It is the only state that also permanently strips a person’s rights to be a public notary or run for public office for a felony conviction unless the governor restores them.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s resignation highlights the Primary Problem—tiny slivers of voters deciding elections. Here’s why primary reform and open primaries matter.

Getty Images, Anna Moneymaker

Marjorie Taylor Greene Resigns: The Primary Problem Exposes America’s Broken Election System

The Primary Problem strikes again. In announcing her intention to resign from Congress in January, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) became the latest politician to quit rather than face a primary challenge from her own party.

It’s ironic that Rep. Greene has become a victim of what we at Unite America call the "Primary Problem," given that we often point to her as an example of the kind of elected official our broken primary system produces. As we wrote about her and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, “only a tiny sliver of voters cast meaningful votes that elected AOC and MTG to Congress – 7% and 20%, respectively.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Jolt Initiative Hits Back at Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in Fight Over Voter Registration

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate, speaks at an event in Lubbock on Oct 7, 2025. Paxton is seeking to shut down Jolt Initiative, a civic engagement group for Latinos, alleging that it's involved in illegal voter registration efforts. The group is fighting back.

Trace Thomas for The Texas Tribune

Jolt Initiative Hits Back at Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in Fight Over Voter Registration

Jolt Initiative, a nonprofit that aims to increase civic participation among Latinos, is suing Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to block his efforts to shut the organization down.

Paxton announced Monday that he was seeking to revoke the nonprofit’s charter, alleging that it had orchestrated “a systematic, unlawful voter registration scheme.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A person putting on an "I Voted" sticker.

Major redistricting cases in Louisiana and Texas threaten the Voting Rights Act and the representation of Black and Latino voters across the South.

Getty Images, kali9

The Voting Rights Act Is Under Attack in the South

Under court order, Louisiana redrew to create a second majority-Black district—one that finally gave true representation to the community where my family lives. But now, that district—and the entire Voting Rights Act (VRA)—are under attack. Meanwhile, here in Texas, Republican lawmakers rammed through a mid-decade redistricting plan that dramatically reduces Black and Latino voting power in Congress. As a Louisiana-born Texan, it’s disheartening to see that my rights to representation as a Black voter in Texas, and those of my family back home in Louisiana, are at serious risk.

Two major redistricting cases in these neighboring states—Louisiana v. Callais and Texas’s statewide redistricting challenge, LULAC v. Abbott—are testing the strength and future of the VRA. In Louisiana, the Supreme Court is being asked to decide not just whether Louisiana must draw a majority-Black district to comply with Section 2 of the VRA, but whether considering race as one factor to address proven racial discrimination in electoral maps can itself be treated as discriminatory. It’s an argument that contradicts the purpose of the VRA: to ensure all people, regardless of race, have an equal opportunity to elect candidates amid ongoing discrimination and suppression of Black and Latino voters—to protect Black and Brown voters from dilution.

Keep ReadingShow less