Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats

From pardons to filibuster fights, MAGA strategies intensify efforts to undermine free and fair elections across states and Congress.

Opinion

MAGA Gerrymandering, Pardons, Executive Actions Signal Heightened 2026 Voting Rights Threats

A deep dive into ongoing threats to U.S. democracy—from MAGA election interference and state voting restrictions to filibuster risks—as America approaches 2026 and 2028.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Tuesday, November 4, demonstrated again that Americans want democracy and US elections are conducted credibly. Voter turnout was strong; there were few administrative glitches, but voters’ choices were honored.

The relatively smooth elections across the country nonetheless took place despite electiondenial and anti-voting efforts continuing through election day. These efforts will likely intensify as we move toward the 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential election. The MAGA drive for unprecedented mid-decade, extreme political gerrymandering of congressional districts to guarantee their control of the House of Representatives is a conspicuous thrust of their campaign to remain in power at all costs.


The White House’s promise that yet another Presidential order on elections will soon be issued also indicates that the MAGA campaign against voting rights remains a central priority. The next order is likely to focus on stifling voting by mail and requiring hand counting of ballots, among other matters. That will be on top of the extraordinarily overreaching March 25 Presidential Executive Order (EO 14248) and other actions affecting elections.

Trump’s “full, complete and unconditional” pardon on November 7 of “all American citizens” for their conduct in creating fake slates of Electoral College delegates in the 2020 presidential election conspiracy – as well as anyone’s efforts to expose "voting fraud and vulnerabilities” in that election is blanket impunity and encouragement for supporters to falsely reject MAGA losses in 2026 and 2028. Taken together with Trump’s pardon of approximately 1,500 January 6 rioters , the warning is clear.

The call to eliminate the Senate’s filibuster rule is a dramatic threat to genuine elections.

President Trump emphasized to Republican Senators on November 5 that eliminating the filibuster is a goal beyond ending the government shutdown. He told them: “[T]he biggest thing is the filibuster,” adding that after its elimination, “We will pass legislation at levels you've never seen before, and it will be impossible to beat us.” That fits with his infamous quote to supporters that “we’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not going to have to vote.”

Abolishing the filibuster would open the floodgates to passage of draconian laws regulating the “times, places and manner” of holding federal elections. Under the cover of that phrase from the Constitution’s Election Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1) Congress could implement extreme measures without the challenges facing presidential orders, and MAGA members of the House are promoting further voting rights restrictions that are in tune with White House’s election overreach.

There are significant reasons for both parties to keep the filibuster, and the proposed government funding deal postpones the immediate issue until January 30. In the meantime, something that everyone can do is contact Republican Senators, urging them to preserve the filibuster.

State legislation is another MAGA arena for undermining free and fair elections.

According to a recent Brennan Center report, as of early October, 16 states enacted 29 restrictive voting laws, which is on par with 2021’s record-setting numbers (32 laws in 17 states). Of course, 2021 measures were driven by false claims about the 2020 election being stolen. As the 2026 and 2028 national tests of whether the MAGA movement can retain federal power come into focus, legislative changes of election law at the state level will also likely further intensify.

That highlights the importance of monitoring proposed state legislation and mobilizing to protect credible elections.

The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security are further weaponizing against voting and honest election administration.

The MAGA top-down, bottom-up approach to subverting credible elections is revealed by the recent addition to key positions in the Department of Justice and at Homeland Security of more 2020 election credibility deniers, bridging institutional and grassroots mobilization.

The DOJ’s sweeping efforts to gather state voter lists, despite privacy concerns, foreshadows creation of a spurious, de facto national voter registry, countering the states’ electoral authority. Public confidence in voting systems technology, challenged by certification provisions of EO 14248, could face further subversion under the guise of decertifying voting systems.

Election system cyber security and general safety of election workers is being undermined as the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) turns away from assisting election administration. Yet, artificial intelligence challenges and human threats are both serious threats. The Brennan Center reports that CISA may even become a source of misinformation on election security, which places pressure on states to develop mutual assistance measures to enhance election security,

The toxic political environment in the US is likely to intensify as the 2026 and 2028 elections approach. Potentials for political violence, unfortunately, may not diminish, and threats against election workers as well as judges, who are essential to credibly resolving electoral related legal disputes, will continue. Citizens who are committed to credible elections should step forward and volunteer as election workers to help address high election worker turnover. And, efforts by groups like the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) and the Article III Coalition will be all the more important.

As the mid-terms and presidential elections approach, each of us will face the challenge of finding accurate information to make informed political choices and to defend credible elections. We also will have to decide how to use our voices, donate our time, and provide financial support that we can afford to protect elections and safeguard democracy.

Publications, including Democracy Docket, Election Law Blog, and VoteBeat, shed light on challenges to credible elections and efforts to combat threats. Organizations that defend credible elections through the courts deserve support, like Democracy Forward, ACLU, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Public Citizen, as do groups like VoteRiders and others focused on voter registration and mobilization. Nonetheless, supporting candidates and parties whose policies and actions advance American democracy is the key to its defense.

Credible elections are the means of ensuring that our democracy can be preserved and advanced, while our participation is its prerequisite.


Pat Merloe provides strategic advice to groups focused on democracy and trustworthy elections in the U.S. and internationally. He has engaged with election monitors and democracy advocates in 65 countries.


Read More

California Voters Don’t Like Either Party. Good Thing the Primary Doesn’t Belong to The Parties.

California voters increasingly distrust both major parties. Here's why the state's Top Two primary gives independent voters more power to shape elections.

Image: Duncan Shelby on Alamy.

California Voters Don’t Like Either Party. Good Thing the Primary Doesn’t Belong to The Parties.

SAN DIEGO, Calif. - California voters have already received ballots for the June 2 primary, and the message they have going into these elections may not be what the political class wants to hear: They are not thrilled with either major party.

A recent analysis from the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) found that majorities of likely voters have unfavorable views of both parties—61% unfavorable toward the Democratic Party and 70% unfavorable toward the Republican Party.

Keep ReadingShow less
How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

President Lyndon B. Johnson, Martin Luther King Jr., Clarence Mitchell Jr., Patricia Roberts Harris, and other guests at the signing of the Voting Rights Act on August 6, 1965.

Yoichi Okamoto - Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum

How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

In 2002, U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla, a Republican, nearly lost his South Texas seat to Democrat Henry Cuellar. So when the GOP used its newfound majority in the state Legislature to redraw the voting maps the next year, they sawed through Cuellar’s hometown of Laredo and scattered Latino voters, who tended to vote Democratic, into other districts.

Latino advocacy groups sued under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the cornerstone provision of the law that prevents government bodies from diluting the voting power of specific groups. The Supreme Court found Texas lawmakers had taken away Latino voting power “because they were about to exercise it.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A group of people wait in line to get their ballots to vote in the election.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could reshape presidential elections as Midwest states debate Electoral College reform, political polarization, and the future of winner-take-all voting in America.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

700+ Proposed Amendments Failed, Midwest Voters Can Succeed

The Midwest served as the vanguard and ideological heartland of the Progressive Era, acting as a crucial laboratory for political, social, and economic reforms that later adopted national significance. Midwestern states (the cradle of the movement) pioneered anti-monopoly efforts, democratic, and social improvements.

After 770+ failed proposed U.S. Constitutional Amendments (the most on record for one issue) to remedy the factionalism (21st century polarization) feared by the Framers of the U.S. Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
“We Can’t Afford It” Is Never an Acceptable Excuse To Deny Independents a Vote

DC voting rights advocate Lisa D.T. Rice criticized the DC City Council for failing to fund Initiative 83’s semi-open primary system, leaving 85,000 independent voters unable to participate in taxpayer-funded primaries despite overwhelming voter approval in 2024.

Photo by Getty Images on Unsplash.

“We Can’t Afford It” Is Never an Acceptable Excuse To Deny Independents a Vote

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Lisa D.T. Rice spoke before the DC City Council during a Budget Oversight Hearing on May 1 to talk about Initiative 83, the semi-open primary and ranked choice voting measure she proposed that was approved by 73% of voters in 2024.

- YouTube youtu.be

Keep ReadingShow less