Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

‘Ain’t I a woman?’ Why policing the gender binary hurts all women

Opinion

‘Ain’t I a woman?’ Why policing the gender binary hurts all women
a couple of yellow people standing next to each other
Photo by Marc Stress on Unsplash

As Caster Semenya recently ended her seven-year legal battle to compete as the woman she has always been, I was reminded of being in the Santiago, Chile airport in pre-COVID 2020, on my way to a weeklong trek across Patagonia National Park. Walking into a women’s restroom, I was accosted by a group of women shouting, “¡Es para mujeres!” This is for women!

I am a 5’10” cisgender woman. My hair was short at the time, and I was wearing baggy sweatpants and a sweatshirt. I am also Black. This was not the first time I had been mistaken for a man. Summoning the remnants of my high school Spanish, I shouted back, “¡Yo soy mujer!” I am a woman.


The global rise in transphobia has been tightly coupled with a rigid policing of womanhood and femininity, with calls from both right and left to protect the sanctity of women’s spaces. During last year’s Summer Olympics, Algerian boxer Imane Khelif became the target of vicious online attacks from prominent figures like J.K. Rowling, claiming she was a man and demanding she release her sex test results. In August, a cisgender Minnesota teenager was forced to reveal her breasts to a restaurant server trying to kick her out of a women’s restroom. And French president Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte recently announced they would submit “scientific evidence” and pregnancy photos in response to allegations by rightwing influencer Candace Owens that Brigitte was born a man. These cases share a similar faulty assumption: that womanhood is a biological fact that can be proven or disproven.

Scientific reality is much more complicated. There are certainly male and female biological traits—XY vs XX chromosomes, genitalia, hormone levels—but plenty of women do not possess every “female” trait. Take female athletes who only discover their high testosterone or XY chromosomes (an intersex trait known as androgen insensitivity) after being subject to invasive competition-related medical testing. Many lived and competed their whole lives as women, had external female anatomy, and yet were accused of not being female enough. And what of other supposedly definitive female traits? Are women born without a uterus or women who undergo hysterectomies not female enough? What about those with small breasts or mastectomies, or those who are taller or more muscular than average? The reality is that there is no singular defining biological marker or threshold of womanhood. There is only the societal standard: Thin but curvy in the right places. Fertile. White.

Black and brown women have always had their gender policed and questioned to a higher degree than white women. It is a stereotype that goes back to slavery and colonialism, a justification for the horrific physical labor and violence that women of color were subjected to. Prominent cis Black women such as Michelle Obama and Megan Thee Stallion have been called men or trans and “not real women.” World Athletics has imposed targeted testosterone testing of “suspicious” female athletes – disproportionately women of color, of course – based in part on a since-corrected study showing a relationship between testosterone levels and performance in elite female athletes (the correction found no association). Women targeted by these rules, like runner Annet Negesa, were sometimes coerced into surgical interventions and hormone treatments that derailed their health and careers.

Attempts to enforce a gender binary are scientifically unsound and catastrophically harmful, so why are so many people, including women, so obsessed with trying? The claim is that such efforts protect women. But whom do we need protecting from? Why are trans women seen as a threat when they are even more in need of protection than cis women? Trans women in the U.S. are four times more likely to experience violent crime, with Black trans women at even higher risk. Furthermore, there is no link between trans-inclusive bathrooms and violence against women. In fact, trans-discriminatory bathroom policies put trans youth at higher risk for sexual assault. Meanwhile, while fearmongering about “men competing in women’s sports,” the U.S. administration continues its assault on women’s health, from unsupported claims about Tylenol during pregnancy to reviewing a perfectly safe abortion pill.

If we truly want to protect women, rather than policing who is a woman, we must demand justice for all women, healthcare for all women, and inclusion for all women. Cis athletes should defend the inclusion of trans athletes, following the lead of Simone Biles, who publicly criticized Riley Gaines for her mockery of trans women athletes. Rather than bowing to political pressure, the International Olympic Committee and other sports committees must eliminate testosterone testing for female athletes, as research shows no clear advantage for trans women or women with androgen insensitivity. (In fact, a 2024 study found that trans women athletes may actually be at a competitive disadvantage due to lower relative oxygen consumption and jump height compared to cis women.) World Athletics must abandon its recent misguided screening of female athletes for SRY, a sex-determining gene on the Y chromosome, being used as a marker for biological sex.

Beyond athletics, efforts like the “bathroom bill” signed into law last month by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, which not only bars trans people from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity but also requires prisons to house inmates according to birth sex and excludes trans women from women’s domestic violence shelters, must be repealed. Donate to organizations like the ACLU that are leading the fight against such policies. Write to your local politicians asking them to vote against mounting legislative attacks on trans rights; donate to organizations like Trans Lifeline and The Trevor Project. Be an outspoken ally in your everyday life by challenging transphobic remarks and misinformation, using resources like this guide. Challenge the fear of women who do not appear feminine enough by asking yourself, “What even makes a woman?”

In 1851, speaking to the defeminization of Black women, Sojourner Truth famously asked, “Ain't I a woman?” To women everywhere, of all social and biological backgrounds, the answer must be a resounding yes.

Tania Fabo, MSc is an MD-PhD candidate in genetics at Stanford University, a Rhodes scholar, a Knight-Hennessy scholar, a Paul and Daisy Soros fellow, and a Public Voices fellow of The OpEd Project.


Read More

Washington Murals Tell Stories of Migration, Identity, and Community

Person sits outside building with mural as another person walks by

Washington Murals Tell Stories of Migration, Identity, and Community

Many Latino artists in Seattle use walls as canvases to tell stories and display powerful messages. One of them is Rene Julio Diaz, a muralist from Mexico City who believes mural art must be meaningful to everyone, not just those who share his background.

“I’m not really into decorative arts, because for me, it needs to be relevant.” Diaz said. “Whenever I paint, I try to put something cultural or something that displays current situations. I try to talk about what is happening or what needs to happen. It might look pretty, but I try not to make it just decoration.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Baltazar Enríquez: Perspectives from Little Village Community Council President

Baltazar Enriquez stands with "ICE OUT OF CHICAGO" sign in Chicago's Little Village neighborhood

Teresa Ayala Leon

Baltazar Enríquez: Perspectives from Little Village Community Council President

Baltzar Enríquez was born in Michoacán, Mexico, and moved to Chicago at the age of three. Little Village, often called “The Mexico of the Midwest,” became his new home, a community he has grown to love and serve. In 2008, Enríquez joined the Little Village Community Council, a nonprofit organization originally founded in 1957. Upon becoming a member, he noticed the lack of participation and limited community programs available for residents. In 2020, he was named president of the council and began expanding, introducing initiatives such as Equal Education for Latinos, among other resources for the Little Village community. Enríquez reflected on his years of involvement and how he has navigated leading the council amid the current political climate.

Question: What inspired you most to get involved in the council?

Keep ReadingShow less
Fierce Urgency of Remembering
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. gives a speech

Fierce Urgency of Remembering

The floorboards of American democracy creak under the weight of our collective amnesia. Every January, the image of Martin Luther King Jr. is polished and presented, made to appear harmless and easily shared. This is no more than another federal holiday, with his famous dream reduced to a recurring line or two and an oft-repeated photograph, both stripped of their original challenge. But in 2026, this custom feels different. The air feels tighter. There is a sense that something threatening lies beneath the commemorations—a growing worry that the democracy King strove to protect is not just vulnerable but on the verge of failing, struggling to survive during Trump’s second presidency.

America has always lived in urgent tension with itself. King understood this better than most. His moral and spiritual imagination pierced patriotic veneers, exposing the greed and violence woven into American life, the ways whiteness functioned as inheritance for some and dispossession for many others. Even amid technological marvels and global ambition, the questions King posed half a century ago remain not just unanswered, but pressing: Who belongs? Who bears the cost of our prosperity? Can a genuine moral community exist without truth-telling and repair?

Keep ReadingShow less
Collective Leadership to End Child Abuse: An Ecosystem Approach

child holding a banner with stop single word againd blue background

Getty images

Collective Leadership to End Child Abuse: An Ecosystem Approach

As we approach the holidays, many are concerned about divisive conversations and disruptive moments at family events and neighbourhood gatherings. Joe Palaggi reminds us to seek that place where “no single worldview gets everything it wants, but everybody gets enough stability to keep moving.” At the core of this statement is an acknowledgement that no one perspective holds ultimate expertise. As we close out the year and look ahead to 2026, it may be helpful to consider different approaches to solving our challenges.

Similarly, a recent article from Harvard suggests that it might be time to retire leadership models based on the authority of a single charismatic person or visionary problem solver at the top. “As our world grows increasingly more connected and complex, however, this top-down approach to leadership is becoming increasingly outdated,” suggests the author, noting that many organizations are now shifting towards “new models of collective leadership.”

Keep ReadingShow less