Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

‘Ain’t I a woman?’ Why policing the gender binary hurts all women

Opinion

‘Ain’t I a woman?’ Why policing the gender binary hurts all women
a couple of yellow people standing next to each other
Photo by Marc Stress on Unsplash

As Caster Semenya recently ended her seven-year legal battle to compete as the woman she has always been, I was reminded of being in the Santiago, Chile airport in pre-COVID 2020, on my way to a weeklong trek across Patagonia National Park. Walking into a women’s restroom, I was accosted by a group of women shouting, “¡Es para mujeres!” This is for women!

I am a 5’10” cisgender woman. My hair was short at the time, and I was wearing baggy sweatpants and a sweatshirt. I am also Black. This was not the first time I had been mistaken for a man. Summoning the remnants of my high school Spanish, I shouted back, “¡Yo soy mujer!” I am a woman.


The global rise in transphobia has been tightly coupled with a rigid policing of womanhood and femininity, with calls from both right and left to protect the sanctity of women’s spaces. During last year’s Summer Olympics, Algerian boxer Imane Khelif became the target of vicious online attacks from prominent figures like J.K. Rowling, claiming she was a man and demanding she release her sex test results. In August, a cisgender Minnesota teenager was forced to reveal her breasts to a restaurant server trying to kick her out of a women’s restroom. And French president Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte recently announced they would submit “scientific evidence” and pregnancy photos in response to allegations by rightwing influencer Candace Owens that Brigitte was born a man. These cases share a similar faulty assumption: that womanhood is a biological fact that can be proven or disproven.

Scientific reality is much more complicated. There are certainly male and female biological traits—XY vs XX chromosomes, genitalia, hormone levels—but plenty of women do not possess every “female” trait. Take female athletes who only discover their high testosterone or XY chromosomes (an intersex trait known as androgen insensitivity) after being subject to invasive competition-related medical testing. Many lived and competed their whole lives as women, had external female anatomy, and yet were accused of not being female enough. And what of other supposedly definitive female traits? Are women born without a uterus or women who undergo hysterectomies not female enough? What about those with small breasts or mastectomies, or those who are taller or more muscular than average? The reality is that there is no singular defining biological marker or threshold of womanhood. There is only the societal standard: Thin but curvy in the right places. Fertile. White.

Black and brown women have always had their gender policed and questioned to a higher degree than white women. It is a stereotype that goes back to slavery and colonialism, a justification for the horrific physical labor and violence that women of color were subjected to. Prominent cis Black women such as Michelle Obama and Megan Thee Stallion have been called men or trans and “not real women.” World Athletics has imposed targeted testosterone testing of “suspicious” female athletes – disproportionately women of color, of course – based in part on a since-corrected study showing a relationship between testosterone levels and performance in elite female athletes (the correction found no association). Women targeted by these rules, like runner Annet Negesa, were sometimes coerced into surgical interventions and hormone treatments that derailed their health and careers.

Attempts to enforce a gender binary are scientifically unsound and catastrophically harmful, so why are so many people, including women, so obsessed with trying? The claim is that such efforts protect women. But whom do we need protecting from? Why are trans women seen as a threat when they are even more in need of protection than cis women? Trans women in the U.S. are four times more likely to experience violent crime, with Black trans women at even higher risk. Furthermore, there is no link between trans-inclusive bathrooms and violence against women. In fact, trans-discriminatory bathroom policies put trans youth at higher risk for sexual assault. Meanwhile, while fearmongering about “men competing in women’s sports,” the U.S. administration continues its assault on women’s health, from unsupported claims about Tylenol during pregnancy to reviewing a perfectly safe abortion pill.

If we truly want to protect women, rather than policing who is a woman, we must demand justice for all women, healthcare for all women, and inclusion for all women. Cis athletes should defend the inclusion of trans athletes, following the lead of Simone Biles, who publicly criticized Riley Gaines for her mockery of trans women athletes. Rather than bowing to political pressure, the International Olympic Committee and other sports committees must eliminate testosterone testing for female athletes, as research shows no clear advantage for trans women or women with androgen insensitivity. (In fact, a 2024 study found that trans women athletes may actually be at a competitive disadvantage due to lower relative oxygen consumption and jump height compared to cis women.) World Athletics must abandon its recent misguided screening of female athletes for SRY, a sex-determining gene on the Y chromosome, being used as a marker for biological sex.

Beyond athletics, efforts like the “bathroom bill” signed into law last month by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, which not only bars trans people from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity but also requires prisons to house inmates according to birth sex and excludes trans women from women’s domestic violence shelters, must be repealed. Donate to organizations like the ACLU that are leading the fight against such policies. Write to your local politicians asking them to vote against mounting legislative attacks on trans rights; donate to organizations like Trans Lifeline and The Trevor Project. Be an outspoken ally in your everyday life by challenging transphobic remarks and misinformation, using resources like this guide. Challenge the fear of women who do not appear feminine enough by asking yourself, “What even makes a woman?”

In 1851, speaking to the defeminization of Black women, Sojourner Truth famously asked, “Ain't I a woman?” To women everywhere, of all social and biological backgrounds, the answer must be a resounding yes.

Tania Fabo, MSc is an MD-PhD candidate in genetics at Stanford University, a Rhodes scholar, a Knight-Hennessy scholar, a Paul and Daisy Soros fellow, and a Public Voices fellow of The OpEd Project.

Read More

Why Democracy Doesn’t Serve Me as a Latina
people holding us a flag during daytime
Photo by Dyana Wing So on Unsplash

Why Democracy Doesn’t Serve Me as a Latina

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

We asked Jessica Meza , a Journalism & Advertising and Public Relations student at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, to share her thoughts on what democracy means to her and her perspective on its current health.

Keep ReadingShow less
A child alone.

America’s youth face a moral and parental crisis. Pauline Rogers calls for repentance, renewal, and restoration of family, faith, and responsibility.

Getty Images, Elva Etienne

The Aborted Generation: When Parents and Society Abandon Their Post

Across America—and especially here in Mississippi—we are witnessing a crisis that can no longer be ignored. It is not only a crisis of youth behavior, but a crisis of parental absence, Caregiver absence, and societal neglect. The truth is hard but necessary to face: the problems plaguing our young people are not of their creation, but of all our abdication.

We have, as a nation, aborted our responsibilities long after the child was born. This is what I call “The Aborted Generation.” It is not about terminating pregnancies, but about terminating purpose and responsibilities. Parents have aborted their duties to nurture, give direction, advise, counsel, guide, and discipline. Communities have aborted their obligation to teach, protect, redirect, be present for, and to provide. And institutions, from schools to churches, have aborted their prophetic role to shape moral courage, give spiritual guidance, stage a presentation, or have a professional stage presence in the next generation.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rediscovered 1945 Speech on Interfaith Unity Offers Urgent Lessons

In 1945, Angelo Paterno delivered a moving speech on unity, faith, and equality in postwar America. Eight decades later, his timeless call for compassion and justice still echoes powerfully today.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

Rediscovered 1945 Speech on Interfaith Unity Offers Urgent Lessons

Eighty years ago this week (October 25, 1945), Angelo Paterno rose to speak to an audience in New York City. World War II had concluded just weeks earlier. The awful scope of some of man’s greatest atrocities was still not fully understood. A mighty struggle against overt Fascism and Authoritarianism abroad had set the world ablaze. At home, the United States had avoided the lure of Fascist impulses that had drawn many of its fellow citizens to an ideology of open intolerance.

Angelo Paterno was a World War I veteran who returned to a country at a time of overt bigotry. Jim Crow laws were common, and laws were passed to limit immigrants from certain parts of the world. Being Italian and Catholic in the 1920s and 30s required facing ethnic and religious prejudice that was still a long way from easing.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Violence We Refuse to See

Students demonstrate for stricter gun control legislation as part of a March for Our Lives rally at the Iowa state capitol building on January 08, 2024 in Des Moines, Iowa.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

The Violence We Refuse to See

The news ticker denotes yet another shooting and fire, this time at a Latter-day Saint church in Michigan. This tragic incident occurred only weeks after the massacre at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, a tragedy whose shock had barely begun to fade from public memory. Each headline was a fresh rupture in our collective psyche, each one a new entry in the ever-lengthening register of loss. I felt the same fatigue—the hollow, tightening ache of resignation. How many times can we say “not again” before the words' meaning dissipates?

America has a peculiar way of justifying sin and bearing her scars. Our country’s response to violence is not just inadequate; it is complicit. We have constructed a body politic that tolerates, even sanctifies, these acts through legislative inertia and a distorted interpretation of constitutional rights. The sacred text of our republic has become a shield for the status quo, with lawmakers and justices hiding behind its language to justify inaction. Leaders at every level offer only platitudes, as if thoughts and prayers could bind wounds that legislation refuses to heal.

Keep ReadingShow less