Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Donald Trump’s Epstein Mess Keeps Getting Worse

Donald Trump’s Epstein Mess Keeps Getting Worse

A billboard in Times Square calls for the release of the Epstein files on July 23, 2025, in New York City. Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed President Donald Trump in May on the Justice Department's review of the documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, telling him that his name appeared in the files.

Adam Gray/Getty Images/TCA

First, he said the late sex-trafficking pervert Jeffrey Epstein was “terrific.” Then he “wasn’t a fan of his.”

First, he wanted a “full investigation.” Then it was nothing more than a “hoax” and a “scam.”


Donald Trump’s 180-degree turn on Epstein over the years has been a saga of self-preservation, useful distraction, and false appeasement as the base he conditioned to Demand Answers has refused to let it go.

Now, with the government reopened and Congress back to work, the rubber finally meets the road.

A group of Republican House members, led by Rep. Thomas Massie, is following through with promises to vote to bring legislation to the floor that would compel the Justice Department to release all of its Epstein files, which Attorney General Pam Bondi has thus far refused to do — presumably at the request of Trump himself.

Massie’s got some help, and from some of Trump’s most loyal adherents. Reps. Lauren Boebert, Nancy Mace and Marjorie Taylor Greene, have all said they’ll vote to release. And they’re not hiding from their decisions.

“I honestly believe it’s not only the right thing to do for the victims but it’s also the right thing to do for the country,” Greene said on Wednesday. “Americans deserve transparency.”

Said Mace: “I stand with all survivors….The Epstein vote will be for you too.”

The vote takes place next week, but it’s not a fait accompli that we’ll all finally get to see whatever’s in those files — from a potentially damning client list to details about his prison suicide. After the House votes, it will need the Senate to vote to release, and then the president — the one who’s now calling the investigation a hoax — would have to sign it into law.

Massie has some very important advice and strong words for Republicans who are contemplating voting Trump’s way to keep the files suppressed.

“I would remind my colleagues that this vote is gonna be on your record for longer than Trump is gonna be president. And what are you gonna do in 2028 and 2030 when you’re in a debate either with a Republican or a Democrat and they say, ‘How can we trust you? You covered up for a pedophile back in 2025.’ ”

Republicans are going to have to answer for countless acts of cowardice, from acquitting Trump of impeachable offenses to defending Jan. 6. History, I have faith, will judge them correctly and harshly.

But this may be the most perilous of all. Who wants to spend the rest of their careers having to explain why they fought so hard to protect a convicted pedophile and all of his accomplices just because their favorite president — a criminal himself — may have been implicated in the process?

Massie thinks plenty of others will see the stakes in a similar way. According to Politico, “Senior Republicans privately believe dozens of Republicans will vote for it, possibly 100 or more.”

The latest batch of Epstein emails, unexpectedly released by House Democrats and Republicans this week, will undoubtedly give them an extra push if they need one. In them, Epstein boasts that he knew how “dirty Donald” was, and describes one woman as his “20-year-old girlfriend in 93, that after two years i gave to donald.” He also says Trump “spent hours at my house” with someone simply referred to in the redacted documents as “Victim,” and that “Of course [Trump] knew about the girls.”

Trump has responded predictably, with projection and veiled threats.

“The Democrats are trying to bring up the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax again because they’ll do anything at all to deflect on how badly they’ve done on the Shutdown, and so many other subjects. Only a very bad, or stupid, Republican would fall into that trap,” he wrote on Truth Social.

He’s also been calling Republican lawmakers like Boebert to try to pressure them not to vote to release.

If it were just a meaningless hoax, Trump wouldn’t care if the files were released. He wouldn’t have spent years stoking dark conspiracy theories about the files, only to suddenly conclude there was nothing in them. He wouldn’t have switched from backing a “full investigation” to impeding one. He wouldn’t have had Epstein’s convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell moved to a lower-security prison after “testifying” to one of Trump’s favorite lawyers that Trump did nothing wrong. He wouldn’t need to call lawmakers to change their votes. He wouldn’t need to fire off threatening social media posts.

And now it feels like the walls are closing in. It’s not just Democrats pushing for transparency, but Republicans, too. And his MAGA base is in fact demanding it. How much longer can Teflon Don withstand the calls coming from inside the house?


S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.

Donald Trump’s Epstein Mess Keeps Getting Worse was originally published by the Tribune Content Agency and is republished with permission.


Read More

Bad Bunny Super Bowl Clash Deepens America’s Cultural Divide

Bad Bunny performs on stage during the Debí Tirar Más Fotos world tour at Estadio GNP Seguros on December 11, 2025 in Mexico City, Mexico.

(Photo by Emma McIntyre/Getty Images)

Bad Bunny Super Bowl Clash Deepens America’s Cultural Divide

On Monday, January 26th, I published a column in the Fulcrum called Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show Sparks National Controversy As Trump Announces Boycott. At the time, I believed I had covered the entire political and cultural storm around Bad Bunny’s upcoming Super Bowl performance.

I was mistaken. In the days since, the reaction has only grown stronger, and something deeper has become clear. This is no longer just a debate about a halftime show. It is turning into a question of who belongs in America’s cultural imagination.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman typing on her laptop.

North Carolina's Project Kitty Hawk, an online program-management system built by the government, has been beset by difficulties and slow to grow despite good intentions.

Getty Images, Igor Suka

Online Learning Works Best When Markets Lead, Not Governments. Project Kitty Hawk Shows Why.

North Carolina’s Project Kitty Hawk is a grand experiment. Can a government entity build an online program-management system that competes with private providers? With $97 million in taxpayer funding, the initiative seemed promising. But, despite good intentions, the project has been beset by difficulties and has been slow to grow.

A state-chartered, university-affiliated online program manager may sound visionary, but in practice, it’s expensive, inefficient, and less adaptable than private solutions. In a new report for the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal, I examined the experience of Project Kitty Hawk and argued that online education needs less government and more free markets.

Keep ReadingShow less
medical expenses

"The promise of AI-powered tools—from personalized health monitoring to adaptive educational support—depends on access to quality data," writes Kevin Frazier.

Prapass Pulsub/Getty Images

Your Data, Your Choice: Why Americans Need the Right to Share

Outdated, albeit well-intentioned data privacy laws create the risk that many Americans will miss out on proven ways in which AI can improve their quality of life. Thanks to advances in AI, we possess incredible opportunities to use our personal information to aid the development of new tools that can lead to better health care, education, and economic advancement. Yet, HIPAA (the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act), FERPA (The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act), and a smattering of other state and federal laws complicate the ability of Americans to do just that.

The result is a system that claims to protect our privacy interests while actually denying us meaningful control over our data and, by extension, our well-being in the Digital Age.

Keep ReadingShow less
A mother and daughter standing together.

Becky Pepper-Jackson and her mother, Heather Jackson, stand in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

Courtesy of Lambda Legal

The trans athletes at the center of Supreme Court cases don’t fit conservative stereotypes

Conservatives have increasingly argued that transgender women and girls have an unfair advantage in sports, that their hormone levels make them stronger and faster. And for that reason, they say, trans women should be banned from competition.

But Lindsay Hecox wasn’t faster. She tried out for her track and field team at Boise State University and didn’t make the cut. A 2020 Idaho bill banned her from a club team, anyway.

Keep ReadingShow less