Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ghislaine Maxwell’s DOJ Meetings Spark New Scrutiny Over Epstein Files

News

Ghislaine Maxwell’s DOJ Meetings Spark New Scrutiny Over Epstein Files

Ghislaine Maxwell, September 20, 2013

(Photo by Paul Zimmerman/WireImage)

Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, has met twice this week with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche—a move that’s raising eyebrows across Washington and reigniting public demands for transparency in the Epstein saga.

Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence in a Florida federal prison, reportedly initiated the meetings herself. According to her attorney, David Oscar Markus, she answered “every single question” posed by DOJ officials over the course of nine hours of interviews. Sources indicate that she was granted limited immunity, which allowed her to speak freely without fear of self-incrimination.


The meetings come amid mounting pressure on the Trump administration, which has faced backlash for walking back earlier promises to release all Epstein-related documents. Reports from The Wall Street Journal and CNN indicate that Donald Trump’s name appears multiple times in the Epstein files, though officials stress that being named does not imply wrongdoing.

The House Oversight Committee has now subpoenaed Maxwell to testify remotely in August, potentially opening the door to public revelations about Epstein’s network and its ties to powerful figures. Legal experts believe her testimony could shed light on the alleged “client list,” travel arrangements for underage victims, and whether influential individuals—including politicians and celebrities—were involved.

While the DOJ has stated that no further charges are expected and that no client list exists, critics argue that Maxwell’s cooperation suggests otherwise. As Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz put it, “She is the Rosetta Stone. She knows everything”.

Whether these developments lead to new indictments or deepen public mistrust remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: Maxwell’s voice is no longer silent, and Washington is bracing for what she might say next.

Trump has responded with a mix of deflection, denial, and strategic distancing.

Speaking to reporters outside the White House before departing for Scotland, Trump said he had “nothing to do with the guy,” referring to Epstein, despite years of documented social ties between the two. He dismissed questions about Maxwell’s cooperation with the DOJ, stating, “I haven’t thought about a pardon,” though he acknowledged he was “allowed to do it”.

Critics have pointed to the conflict of interest in Blanche’s role, given his past ties to Trump. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the private interviews “glaring corruption,” while others questioned whether the DOJ’s outreach was a genuine pursuit of justice or a political maneuver.

Trump, meanwhile, shifted focus to other figures linked to Epstein, including Bill Clinton and Larry Summers, saying, “You should focus on them. I sure as hell didn’t live with Epstein”. He also denied sending a lewd birthday letter to Epstein in 2003, calling it “another fake news story” and suing The Wall Street Journal for libel.

The White House communications team has dismissed reports that Trump’s name appears “multiple times” in the Epstein files as “fake news,” despite Attorney General Pam Bondi allegedly briefing him on the matter in May.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and is the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards
a hand holding a deck of cards in front of a christmas tree
Photo by Luca Volpe on Unsplash

Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards

Donald Trump has repeatedly used the phrase “holding the cards” during his tenure as President to signal that he, or sometimes an opponent, has the upper hand. The metaphor projects bravado, leverage, and the inevitability of success or failure, depending on who claims control.

Unfortunately, Trump’s repeated invocation of “holding the cards” embodies a worldview where leverage, bluff, and dominance matter more than duty, morality, or responsibility. In contrast, leadership grounded in duty emphasizes ethical obligations to allies, citizens, and democratic principles—elements strikingly absent from this metaphor.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability
campbells chicken noodle soup can

Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability

Most customers carry a particular image of Campbell's Soup: the red-and-white label stacked on a pantry shelf, a touch of nostalgia, and the promise of a dependable bargain. It's food for snow days, tight budgets, and the middle of the week. For generations, the brand has positioned itself as a companion to working families, offering "good food" for everyday people. The company cultivated that trust so thoroughly that it became almost cliché.

Campbell's episode, now the subject of national headlines and an ongoing high-profile legal complaint, is troubling not only for its blunt language but for what it reveals about the hidden injuries that erode the social contract linking institutions to citizens, workers to workplaces, and brands to buyers. If the response ends with the usual PR maneuvers—rapid firings and the well-rehearsed "this does not reflect our values" statement. Then both the lesson and the opportunity for genuine reform by a company or individual are lost. To grasp what this controversy means for the broader corporate landscape, we first have to examine how leadership reveals its actual beliefs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

When ego replaces accountability in the presidency, democracy weakens. An analysis of how unchecked leadership erodes trust, institutions, and the rule of law.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

When Leaders Put Ego Above Accountability—Democracy At Risk

What has become of America’s presidency? Once a symbol of dignity and public service, the office now appears chaotic, ego‑driven, and consumed by spectacle over substance. When personal ambition replaces accountability, the consequences extend far beyond politics — they erode trust, weaken institutions, and threaten democracy itself.

When leaders place ego above accountability, democracy falters. Weak leaders seek to appear powerful. Strong leaders accept responsibility.

Keep ReadingShow less
Leaders Fear Accountability — Why?
Protesters hold signs outside a government building.
Photo by Leo_Visions on Unsplash

Leaders Fear Accountability — Why?

America is being damaged not by strong leaders abusing power, but by weak leaders avoiding responsibility. Their refusal to be accountable has become a threat to democracy itself. We are now governed by individuals who hold power but lack the character, courage, and integrity required to use it responsibly. And while everyday Americans are expected to follow rules, honor commitments, and face consequences, we have a Congress and a President who are shielded by privilege and immunity. We have leaders in Congress who lie, point fingers, and break ethics rules because they can get away with it. There is no accountability. Too many of our leaders operate as if ethics were optional.

Internal fighting among members of Congress has only deepened the dysfunction. Instead of holding one another accountable, lawmakers spend their energy attacking colleagues, blocking legislation, and protecting party leaders. Infighting reveals a failure to check themselves, leaving citizens with a government paralyzed by disputes rather than focused on solutions. When leaders cannot even enforce accountability within their own ranks, the entire system falters.

Keep ReadingShow less