Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The War against DEI Is Gonna Kill Us

Opinion

Pete Hegseth walking in a congressional hallway
Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee to be defense secretary, and his wife, Jennifer, make their way to a meetin with Sen. Ted Budd on Dec. 2.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Almost immediately after being sworn in again, President Trump fired the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, a Black man.

Chairman Brown, a F-16 pilot, is the same General who in 2021 spoke directly into the camera for a recruitment commercial and said: “When I’m flying, I put my helmet on, my visor down, my mask up. You don’t know who I am—whether I’m African American, Asian American, Hispanic, White, male, or female. You just know I’m an American Airman, kicking your butt.” He got kicked off his post. The first-ever female Chief of Naval Operations was fired, too.


These were the warning shots. Now, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has fired or blocked the promotions of at least two dozen military leaders at the highest level. It is unprecedented and highly troubling.

Of course, these actions undermine the military’s credibility as an apolitical force for good. But critically, they also come at a time when our military already faces recruitment challenges and a declining public trust. The Army fell short of its recruitment goal by 10,000 soldiers in 2023, while the Navy and Air Force also missed their targets. The public’s confidence in the military is at its lowest level in two decades, and only about 10% of young people express any interest in enlisting. The vast majority of Americans want the military to remain apolitical, and deploying troops to American cities can’t have helped that image. Meanwhile, at great cost to the taxpayer, Hegseth recently rallied hundreds of generals and admirals to assemble for a speech where he made it clear they could get on board or get out.

Unless you’re a straight white male with an anti-woke agenda, good luck. A new memo on shaving standards is a thinly veiled attempt to disqualify Black men, about 60% of whom face a medical condition that can lead to painful irritation from shaving. Despite past efforts to improve recruitment and retention of women, the likelihood of separation for women is 28% higher than for men, largely attributed to sexual assault, family planning, and childcare, which are inherently DEI issues. And because one sailor performed on an aircraft carrier in drag once, Hegseth stripped the commander of that carrier of his nomination to be vice admiral and commander of Seventh Fleet. Therefore, since June, at a time when our Pacific presence is more important than ever, no commander has been designated next for the largest overseas force in the Navy.

For the most racially and ethnically diverse generation in U.S. history, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are increasingly seen as essential values in the workplace. According to Forbes, “brands that make inclusivity part of their core mission…will win the hearts and minds of a new generation of citizens.” The flip side of the coin is that 76% of millennial workers would leave a job if DEI initiatives were not offered, and 75% of Gen Z workers might not even apply to a company lacking sufficient DEI efforts.

For all those kids who are the least bit different, turning 18, observing military leadership, and wondering if there might be a future for them among the ranks, this Administration is hitting them with a resounding no. When the next class of recruits generationally are pro-DEI, it’s a miscalculation for the Department of War to be at war with DEI.

On a personal level, meeting people from so many backgrounds was one of my favorite parts of being in the Navy. I do believe diversity is a force multiplier and a “critical component of being successful on a global scale.” That being said, as a queer, Jewish, female Naval aviator who got a law degree in my free time while active duty, I got out of the military after ten years this June because I didn’t think my other-ness would last much longer with this new leadership.

Even if it wasn’t proven that diverse teams perform better, it still might actually be useful to embrace diversity for the sake of keeping numbers up. The year General Brown released the “helmet” video, it was one of the most-viewed videos on the Air Force and Space Force recruiting channel, and the Air Force’s top recruiter called it a slam dunk. Instead, current anti-DEI actions threaten to affect recruitment, retention, and overall readiness negatively. Hegseth and Trump are playing fast and loose with our country’s defense in the “fight” against “woke.” We must fight back.

The American people can push for accountability and transparency. We can pressure Congress to hold oversight hearings, establish an independent oversight committee, call for a review of promotion and removal criteria, and vote for representatives who support these ideas. We can also speak out against a press policy that serves to exclude investigative journalism from properly covering the military. If anti-DEI animus is what’s really driving decision-making, we can expose it. Then we can steer the military back toward standards that actually keep this country safe and strong.

Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less
United States Capitol building and blurred American flag against blue sky

America’s aging Congress has no maximum age limit. Could a constitutional amendment create age limits for lawmakers and better represent younger voters?

TGI /Tetra Images

Congress Has an Age Floor and No Ceiling. That's Backwards for Gen Z.

Senator Dianne Feinstein's visible decline in her final years in office. Senator Lindsey Graham's sudden death. Senator Mitch McConnell's own recent hospitalization, and his halting explanation of it afterward. Three senators, three separate incidents, no obvious connection between them, except that the saga of these three senators is really one story about the problem of not knowing when to step down. That framing asks the right question of individual leaders. But it assumes the problem is a matter of personal judgment, each senator, in his or her own time, finding the wisdom to recognize the moment has passed. I think that gets the American version of this problem backwards. Congress's age problem is not a string of individual judgment calls. It is a structural feature of the Constitution itself, and it is quietly reshaping who gets represented in American government.

The Constitution sets a floor for federal office and no ceiling. A representative must be at least twenty-five. A senator must be at least thirty. A president must be at least thirty-five. Nothing in the document says how old is too old. Combine that asymmetry with the enormous advantages of incumbency, better name recognition, fundraising networks, committee seniority, and the result is predictable: a Congress that can start young but can never age out. It can only age up. The 119th Congress is now the third oldest in American history, with an average member age of nearly fifty-nine and a Senate averaging in the mid-sixties. This is not a temporary blip. It is the natural output of a system with a gate on one end and no gate on the other.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first
a large white building with a flag on top of it

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the third and final installment of our series on “Article the first.” Previous parts examined the history of the single inverted word that turned an intended floor into a ceiling and its impact on the amendment’s failed ratification. This concluding part outlines the path forward for enlarging the House today.

Part 3 — The Path Forward

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

Painting from 1856 by Junius Brutus Stearns of George Washington at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the second of a three-part series on the First Amendment proposed by Congress in 1789—often called “Article the first”—which was never ratified. Part 1 explained how a single inverted word in the text created a mathematical absurdity that has been misread for 237 years. This second part explores the untold history of how that defect affected the original ratification process in state legislatures.

Part 2 — The Untold History

Keep ReadingShow less