Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

How Four Top Officials Can Win Back Public Trust

Opinion

How Four Top Officials Can Win Back Public Trust


Image generated by IVN staff.

Mandate for Change: The Public Calls for a Course Correction

The honeymoon is over. A new national survey from the Independent Center reveals that a plurality of American adults and registered voters believe key cabinet officials should be replaced—a striking rebuke of the administration’s current direction. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are all underwater with the public, especially among independents.

But the message isn’t just about frustration—it’s about opportunity. Voters are signaling that these leaders can still win back public trust by realigning their policies with the issues Americans care about most. The data offers a clear roadmap for course correction.

Health and Human Services: RFK Jr. Is Losing the Middle

Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is emerging as a political liability—not just to the administration, but to the broader independent movement he once claimed to represent. While his favorability ratings are roughly even, the plurality of adults and registered voters now say he should be replaced. This sentiment is especially strong among independents, who once viewed Kennedy as a fresh alternative but now see him as out of step with their values.


Kennedy’s controversial stances on vaccines and public health have eroded trust. 44% of adults say he and his CDC vaccine advisory panel have decreased public confidence in the CDC, compared to just 25% who say he has increased it. His promotion of fringe scientific claims—such as the link between acetaminophen and autism—has failed to gain traction, with less than one-third of adults accepting the claim.

Across the board, Kennedy is underwater with independents, who now view him as more disruptive than constructive. His tendency to issue premature health warnings based on emerging or contested data has led to public confusion and alarm. By a 15-point margin (48% vs. 33%), Americans say he should wait for established scientific consensus before making public health declarations.

The Path to Public Trust: Kennedy must pivot away from alarmism and toward institutional credibility. That means embracing consensus science, rebuilding the CDC’s reputation, and communicating with caution and clarity. Without a sharp course correction, Kennedy risks dragging down the administration’s broader health agenda—and alienating the very voters who once saw him as a symbol of independent reform.

Department of Homeland Security: Moving Past 'Too Harsh'

Secretary Kristi Noem faces a crisis of perception regarding immigration enforcement. A plurality of adults (44%) now believe that the current level of enforcement is “too harsh.” Disapproval of ICE’s tactics is widespread, with double-digit margins expressing concern about overreach.

The Path to Public Trust: Moderation is key. Noem must shift toward targeted, non-disruptive enforcement and visibly rein in ICE’s aggressive tactics to address public concerns.

Department of War: A Name That Undermines Security

Secretary Pete Hegseth’s rebranding of the Department of Defense to the Department of War has backfired. Only 29% support the change, while 51% oppose it. His emphasis on “maximum lethality” is viewed as harmful, with 45% saying it makes the U.S. less safe.

The Path to Public Trust: Hegseth should restore the department’s original name and abandon polarizing rhetoric in favor of a message centered on defense and strategic calm.

Department of Justice: Restoring the Firewall of Independence

Attorney General Pam Bondi is seen as compromising the Justice Department’s independence. 40% of adults say she is less likely to maintain political neutrality, with 22% of independents saying she is “much less likely” to do so.

The Path to Public Trust: Bondi must publicly commit to nonpartisan justice, ensuring investigations and prosecutions are free from political influence.

A Wake-Up Call for Washington

This polling data should serve as a wake-up call. Voters are no longer viewing independents as spoilers—they see them as a fresh start. But that fresh start must be earned. Cabinet officials have a narrow window to recalibrate their approach and reconnect with the public. The message is clear: replace the rhetoric, not just the people.

Cabinet on the Clock: How Four Top Officials Can Win Back Public Trust was first published on Independent Voter News and was republished with permission.

Brett Loyd is President and CEO of The Bullfinch Group.


Read More

U.S. Capitol.
Ken Burns’ The American Revolution highlights why America’s founders built checks and balances—an urgent reminder as Congress, the courts, and citizens confront growing threats to democratic governance.
Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

Partial Shutdown; Congress Asserts Itself a Little

DHS Shutdown

As expected, the parties in the Senate could not come to an agreement on DHS funding and now the agency will be shut down. Sort of.

So much money was appropriated for DHS, and ICE and CBP specifically, in last year's reconciliation bill, that DHS could continue to operate with little or no interruption. Other parts of DHS like FEMA and the TSA might face operational cuts or shutdowns.

Keep ReadingShow less
Criminals Promised, Volume Delivered: Inside ICE’s Enforcement Model

An ICE agent holds a taser as they stand watch after one of their vehicles got a flat tire on Penn Avenue on February 5, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

(Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

Criminals Promised, Volume Delivered: Inside ICE’s Enforcement Model

Donald Trump ran on a simple promise: focus immigration enforcement on criminals and make the country safer. The policy now being implemented tells a different story. With tens of billions of dollars directed toward arrests, detention, and removals, the enforcement system has been structured to maximize volume rather than reduce risk. That design choice matters because it shapes who is targeted, how force is used, and whether public safety is actually improved.

This is not a dispute over whether immigration law should be enforced. The question is whether the policy now in place matches what was promised and delivers the safety outcomes that justified its scale and cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

USA Election Collage With The State Map Of Utah.

Getty Images

NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

On Wednesday, February 11, the National Redistricting Foundation (NRF) asked a federal court to join a newly filed lawsuit to protect Utah’s new, fair congressional map and defend our system of checks and balances.

The NRF is a non‑profit foundation whose mission is to dismantle unfair electoral maps and create a redistricting system grounded in democratic values. By helping to create more just and representative electoral districts across the country, the organization aims to restore the public’s faith in a true representative democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Voter registration in Wisconsin

Michael Newman

A Constitutional Provision We Ignored for 150 Years

Imagine there was a way to discourage states from passing photo voter ID laws, restricting early voting, purging voter registration rolls, or otherwise suppressing voter turnout. What if any state that did so risked losing seats in the House of Representatives?

Surprisingly, this is not merely an idle fantasy of voting rights activists, but an actual plan envisioned in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 – but never enforced.

Keep ReadingShow less