Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Blank Checks and Empty Promises: The Collapse of Congressional Fiscal Power

Opinion

Blank Checks and Empty Promises: The Collapse of Congressional Fiscal Power

A politician counting money in front of the US Capitol Building.

Getty Images, fStop Images - Antenna

From Governing to Grandstanding

There was a time—believe it or not—when Congress actually passed budgets the old-fashioned way: through debate, compromise, and the occasional all-night session, not theatrics designed to appeal to cable news and social media. The process, while messy, followed a structure: hearings, markups, votes, and compromises. That structure—known as regular order—wasn’t just congressional tradition. It was the scaffolding of democratic accountability. It has also been steadily torn down.

Deadlines and dysfunction better define today’s Congress. Instead of the back-and-forth of healthy deliberation, Congress relies on continuing resolutions and last-minute omnibus bills. Budget gimmicks that were once used only during fiscal emergencies—backloaded cuts, timing shifts, reconciliation sleight-of-hand—are now the rule, not the exception. Congress has shifted from prioritizing policy to prioritizing the message and crafting political narratives.


Driving this breakdown is a Republican Party shaped not by governing principles but by its loyalty to President Trump. House Speaker Mike Johnson’s caucus should be asserting its constitutional power of the purse. Instead, it has abandoned regular order in favor of placating a base animated more by grievance than governance. The result is a budget process that functions like performance art—and legislators that no longer legislate. This development spells long-term trouble for American democracy.

Into this legislative breakdown walks Donald Trump. Again. The void left by a Congress that no longer governs is exactly the kind of chaos he thrives in. And one cannot help but wonder: was this the plan all along?

Project 2025: The Blueprint Behind the Breakdown

This is nothing short of a fundamental reshaping of political control that mirrors the blueprint set forth in Project 2025. The plan calls for a significant expansion of executive power, aiming to centralize control over the federal government and diminish the role of Congress in policymaking. By abandoning regular order and enabling executive overreach, Congress is following Project 2025 more than the Constitution.

The GOP, having discovered that theatrics keep the base agitated and Fox News profitable, has largely abandoned the tedious business of actual governance. Why slog through negotiation or accountability when it’s easier to grab headlines by railing against wokeness or staging floor votes with the flair of a reality show challenge? This is no longer the party of policy memos and fiscal restraint—where Paul Ryan once diagrammed tax reform on a whiteboard, it’s the party where Marjorie Taylor Greene now delivers performance art in committee hearings.

A Budget That Punishes the Poor and Rewards the Rich

While spectacle plays well on right-wing media, the real-world consequences are disastrous. Government agencies—those actually tasked with carrying out the laws Congress no longer bothers to pass—are forced to run under stopgap funding or arbitrary cuts. Programs with broad public support, from food assistance to medical research, are being defunded. And long-term planning? Forget it. Agencies can’t hire, invest, or innovate when they don’t know if they’ll have money in six weeks.

When a continuing resolution expires and families lose access to childcare subsidies or small businesses cannot get SBA loans, there’s no hearing, no apology—just another round of blame roulette. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) can release projections showing millions will lose Medicaid or food assistance, and the House majority’s response is a shrug and a recycled talking point about "wasteful spending."

In May, the nonpartisan CBO issued a stark analysis of the House’s budget proposal, projecting that the lowest-income households would see their household budgets shrink by up to 4% by 2033, due to cuts to Medicaid and SNAP. Meanwhile, the wealthiest Americans would see their household resources rise by a similar margin, thanks to tax cuts. It's not just a lopsided budget—it’s a stealthy act of redistribution, carried out behind the curtain, without hearings, debate, or even much public notice. What looks like dysfunction is a calculated method of governing without accountability.

The Way Back: Deliberation, Not Drama

The consequences stretch far beyond the spreadsheet. It seeps into public trust. When people see that Congress can’t—or won’t—do its most basic job of funding the government responsibly, they naturally tune out. That vacuum becomes fertile ground for executive overreach and cynicism about democratic institutions.

Right now, we’re speeding in the wrong direction—with no one at the wheel.

So how do we turn things around?

Restoring regular order in budgeting may not produce headlines, but it’s essential. Even Republicans like Senator John Thune agree. That means rejecting manufactured crises and recommitting to the slow, steady work of debate, deliberation, and compromise.

It also means reclaiming Congress’s constitutional duty to manage the nation’s finances—not perform in a never-ending political reality show.

Democrats may not have the votes to fix this alone. But they can still lead by example—and remind voters what responsible governing actually looks like.


Robert Cropf is a professor of political science at Saint Louis University. Follow on LinkedIn

.


Read More

Elon Musk’s new ‘trillionaire’ status is a good thing, actually

SpaceX, Twitter and electric car maker Tesla CEO Elon Musk attends an event during the Vivatech technology startups and innovation fair at the Porte de Versailles exhibition centre in Paris, on June 16, 2023.

(Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Elon Musk’s new ‘trillionaire’ status is a good thing, actually

I am not a huge fan of Elon Musk as a political activist or commentator. I think he’s made Twitter — sorry, X — worse. His support for the nationalist right in Europe has been ugly. His tenure leading the Department of Government Efficiency mostly amounted to a missed opportunity and often descended into little more than performative vandalism. His personal life is not exactly consonant with my preference for bourgeois family values. Though, one can hardly accuse him of being a deadbeat dad.

On the other hand, I am a huge fan of his accomplishments in business and engineering. He helped create the foundations of the digital economy with PayPal. At the helm of Tesla, he made the electric car into a viable industry (something climate activists once lionized him for). Starlink, his internet satellite business, has been transformative. And, finally, there’s SpaceX, which went public last week. It’s a testament to human ingenuity, immigrant success and American greatness, on a scale that is hard to describe.

Keep ReadingShow less
America's Political War Is Costing Trillions: An American Union Could Fix It

The skyline of Austin, Texas.

(adamkaz / Getty Images)

America's Political War Is Costing Trillions: An American Union Could Fix It

America’s long-standing political conflicts increasingly carry an economic cost that is rarely discussed. Research on economic policy uncertainty suggests that sustained political instability can readily reduce national economic output by 1–2 percent or more of GDP through reduced investment, hiring delays, and lower productivity.

In an economy the size of the United States, that represents hundreds of billions of dollars every year — roughly the economic output of an entire mid-size U.S. state.

Keep ReadingShow less
Michigan group pushes to get big money out of politics

According to the Federal Election Commission, the 2024 election cycle saw billions spent on campaigns, with PACs alone raising more than $15 billion.

(Pexels)

Michigan group pushes to get big money out of politics

A new push to limit corporate money in Michigan politics appears to be gaining traction.

There is strong bipartisan support for restricting political contributions from regulated monopolies and companies seeking government contracts, according to a survey commissioned by supporters of the proposal. Supporters said the measure would increase transparency and reduce “pay-to-play” politics, where political donations can influence government decisions.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reducing the Influence of Money in Presidential Politics is Within Our Reach, from where we Least Expect it: the Electoral College

American flag funnel with money

Illustration provided

Reducing the Influence of Money in Presidential Politics is Within Our Reach, from where we Least Expect it: the Electoral College

Reducing the influence of money pouring into presidential politics since the 2010 Citizens United decision may actually be possible by addressing the "winner-take-all" (WTA) structure of the Electoral College. By changing how electoral votes are allocated, the incentive to concentrate money in a few swing states could be reduced.

The winner-take-all (WTA) feature of the Electoral College narrows the focus of massive campaign expenditures in a “Funnel Effect”* to a handful of closely divided battleground states. Because candidates have little to gain from spending in states where they are comfortably ahead or hopelessly behind, they concentrate all their financial resources on 15 or 16 states, or in some cycles, as few as seven key swing states. All this could change if the "battleground state" phenomenon were taken away from the wealthy, as the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) would accomplish.

Keep ReadingShow less