Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Congress: Do Your Job

Opinion

Congress: Do Your Job
white concrete building during daytime

One of President Trump’s 111 record-setting executive actions, 25 proclamations, and 27 memoranda called for election security. Our 535 congressional delegates should have initiated such an action, but didn’t. Seeing Trump 2.0 in action, Congress should have clarified the meaning of the Alien Enemies Act, but they didn’t. The list goes on regarding Congress’s inaction.

Since Jan. 20, Congress has only managed to pass a limited number of bills. Given the critical issues facing our country, it’s not surprising that only 27 percent of Americans approve of Congress (Feb. 3-16 Gallup poll).

The Trump administration is well aware of our do nothing Congress and is testing the waters to see how far they can go even when many actions are alleged to be illegal and/or anti-constitutional (witness 162 lawsuits against Trump 2.0 since Jan. 20). So far, Mr. Trump is not worried since Congress has been sitting on their duff watching chaos and uncertainty reign with small business owners, corporate CEOs, 340 million citizens and all of our heretofore allies.

With our do-nothing Congress and Mr. Trump, Elon Musk, JD Vance, and 15 Cabinet members ripping apart our federal agencies, it’s no wonder a majority of Americans believe we’re in a Constitutional crisis (Economist/YouGov polling).

Trump has already fulfilled his presidential campaign promise to prosecute his rivals, punish critical media, limit citizen’s free speech rights, pardon over 1,500 Jan. 6 convicted criminals – who assaulted 140 Capitol police officers -- and fire ~54,000 civil servants, which came straight out of the right-wing extremist Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 playbook for Trump to implement.

It’s time to suggest some actions our 535 Congressional representatives should take to preserve our democracy. In a Jan. 30 article in Emissary, titled “Congress can check the president on foreign policy-even under Trump,” the following were among several recommended actions:

First, Congress should clarify that the 1807 Insurrection Act does not authorize the president to use the military to enforce immigration laws.

Secondly, Democratic members of Congress should support Republican members of Congress when they oppose unproductive or dangerous executive orders of President Trump. As one example, they should explicitly support traditional Reagan-like GOP Senators Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Roger Wicker (Miss.), Lyndsey Graham (S.C.), John Thune (S.D.), and Mike Rogers (Mich.), who support the role of foreign aid (i.e., USAID). USAID is the foremost tool of American soft power, counter terrorism, and bolsters food security and public health in 160 countries. Trump has abolished 83 percent of USAID’s contracts and $50 billion in humanitarian assistance worldwide.

Other suggestions our do nothing Congress should do to preserve our democracy came from three AI-powered internet search engines (i.e., Google, ChatGPT, and Perplexity). Some suggestions include:

  • First, and of paramount importance, under federal law, Congress can cancel national emergencies declared by the President. On April 2, Trump imposed tariffs on 184 countries, saying there was a national emergency and that he was invoking his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. The conservative-based Wall Street Journal editorial board took a swipe at Trump by stating “Trump’s tariffs are no emergency” and the law “doesn’t give him power to impose sweeping tariffs.” Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz stated that “virtually all economists” believe Trump’s tariff policy will harm the U.S. and global economy, citing inflationary effects and reduced economic growth (The Century Foundation). Hence, Congress: do your job.
  • Secondly, Congress should pass legislation to limit executive powers.
  • Third, Congress should pass anti-corruption legislation to impose stricter financial disclosure requirements on elected officials.
  • Fourth, while it cannot directly limit the President's constitutional pardon power, it should pass laws to regulate the process surrounding clemency petitions and consider any other constitutional issues.
  • Fifth, Congress should pass laws strengthening the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects citizens’ freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and right to petition the government.
  • Sixth, Congress should investigate any member of the federal government who violates the Hatch Act, enacted in 1939, to ensure the non-partisan administration of federal programs, protect federal employees from political coercion in the workplace, and ensure that federal employees are advanced based on merit, not political affiliation.
  • Finally, Congress should advocate for judicial authority to issue nationwide injunctions against unconstitutional executive actions.

If registered voters continue to see that Congress is not doing its job, remember that 435 Representatives can be replaced come November 3, 2026. Thirty-three of the Senate seats will also be up for grabs; 13 currently held by Democrats and 20 held by Republicans.

And of course, take action. If you are reading this op-ed in digital form, forward it to your Senators and Representative, or simply print it and send it to your most favored legislator at the U.S. Capitol (Senate zip code 20510 and House zip code 20515). Or, call your Congressional delegates (Capitol switchboard: 202-224-3121) with a simple message: do your job.

Steve Corbin is a Professor Emeritus of Marketing, University of Northern Iowa.

Read More

Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us
Provided

Yes, They Are Trying To Kill Us

In the rush to “dismantle the administrative state,” some insist that freeing people from “burdensome bureaucracy” will unleash thriving. Will it? Let’s look together.

A century ago, bureaucracy was minimal. The 1920s followed a worldwide pandemic that killed an estimated 17.4–50 million people. While the virus spread, the Great War raged; we can still picture the dehumanizing use of mustard gas and trench warfare. When the war ended, the Roaring Twenties erupted as an antidote to grief. Despite Prohibition, life was a party—until the crash of 1929. The 1930s opened with a global depression, record joblessness, homelessness, and hunger. Despair spread faster than the pandemic had.

Keep ReadingShow less
Millions Could Lose Housing Aid Under Trump Plan

Photo illustration by Alex Bandoni/ProPublica. Source images: Chicago History Museum and eobrazy

Getty Images

Millions Could Lose Housing Aid Under Trump Plan

Some 4 million people could lose federal housing assistance under new plans from the Trump administration, according to experts who reviewed drafts of two unpublished rules obtained by ProPublica. The rules would pave the way for a host of restrictions long sought by conservatives, including time limits on living in public housing, work requirements for many people receiving federal housing assistance and the stripping of aid from entire families if one member of the household is in the country illegally.

The first Trump administration tried and failed to implement similar policies, and renewed efforts have been in the works since early in the president’s second term. Now, the documents obtained by ProPublica lay out how the administration intends to overhaul major housing programs that serve some of the nation’s poorest residents, with sweeping reforms that experts and advocates warn will weaken the social safety net amid historically high rents, home prices and homelessness.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Ultimatums and the Erosion of Presidential Credibility

Donald Trump

YouTube

Trump’s Ultimatums and the Erosion of Presidential Credibility

On Friday, October 3rd, President Donald Trump issued a dramatic ultimatum on Truth Social, stating this is the “LAST CHANCE” for Hamas to accept a 20-point peace proposal backed by Israel and several Arab nations. The deadline, set for Sunday at 6:00 p.m. EDT, was framed as a final opportunity to avoid catastrophic consequences. Trump warned that if Hamas rejected the deal, “all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas,” and that its fighters would be “hunted down and killed.”

Ordinarily, when a president sets a deadline, the world takes him seriously. In history, Presidential deadlines signal resolve, seriousness, and the weight of executive authority. But with Trump, the pattern is different. His history of issuing ultimatums and then quietly backing off has dulled the edge of his threats and raised questions about their strategic value.

Keep ReadingShow less
From Fragility to Resilience: Fixing America’s Economic and Political Fault Lines

fractured foundation and US flag

AI generated

From Fragility to Resilience: Fixing America’s Economic and Political Fault Lines

This series began with a simple but urgent question: What’s gone wrong with America’s economic policies, and how can we begin to fix them? The story so far has revealed not only financial instability but also deeper structural weaknesses that leave families, small businesses, and entire communities far more vulnerable than they should be.

In the first two articles, “Running on Empty” and “Crash Course,” we examined how middle-class families, small businesses, and retirees are increasingly caught in a web of debt and financial uncertainty. We also examined how Wall Street’s speculative excesses, deregulation, and shadow banking have pushed the financial system to the brink. Finally, we warned that Donald Trump’s economic agenda doesn’t address these problems—it magnifies them. Together, these earlier articles painted a picture of a system skating on thin ice, where even small shocks could trigger widespread crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less