Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Watchdog That Won’t Bark – How FEC Dysfunction Threatens Democracy

Opinion

The Watchdog That Won’t Bark – How FEC Dysfunction Threatens Democracy
a close up of an american flag on a piece of paper
Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

The American people are being asked to trust a democracy that is, at its core, unguarded.

Right now — in the middle of a national election cycle — the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has just three active commissioners out of six. That makes it legally unable to act on violations, issue rules, or even respond to urgent questions about election law. It’s not just gridlock; it’s institutional paralysis — and it’s happening on purpose.


As of August 2025, the remaining three commissioners are:

  • Dara Lindenbaum (Democrat)
  • Shana M. Broussard (Democrat)
  • Trey Trainor (Republican)

Former Commissioner Ellen Weintraub, also a Democrat, is no longer voting and is not listed as active. With no fourth member, the Commission lacks a quorum, meaning it cannot legally take action — including appointing new commissioners.

The FEC is supposed to be the referee that keeps our elections fair, transparent, and accountable. Instead, it’s been sidelined by years of intentional neglect, partisan obstruction, and political self-interest. And who benefits? Those who are willing to bend or break the rules to stay in power.

A System Designed to Fail

Congress created the FEC after Watergate to serve as a nonpartisan watchdog. But it has a fatal flaw: it requires four votes to take any action. With six commissioners split evenly between the two major parties, all it takes is one party refusing to play ball to stop enforcement entirely.

What we have today is worse: just three commissioners are seated. This means:

  • No investigations of illegal campaign donations
  • No rulings on dark money disclosures
  • No enforcement of super PAC coordination violations
  • No action at all

And with no quorum, there’s no way to even confirm new commissioners. This is not oversight; it’s sabotage.

How This Connects to Gerrymandering

The dysfunction of the FEC is precisely why, in The People’s Redistricting Act of 2025, I refused to entrust them with oversight. Instead, the Act proposes a new citizen-approved model that uses nonpartisan AI to generate district maps, which are then voted on directly by the people.

In contrast to the FEC’s gridlocked model, this process:

  • Requires no partisan appointees
  • Operates transparently and publicly
  • Returns power to voters rather than to entrenched elites

The lesson is clear: we cannot protect democracy using broken institutions. We must build new ones rooted in accountability and simplicity.

A Call for Structural Reform

If we’re serious about safeguarding our elections, we must:

  1. Reform the structure of the FEC to eliminate the built-in deadlock.
  2. Ensure timely appointments through fast-track confirmation procedures.
  3. Expand the role of nonpartisan agencies, such as the Election Assistance Commission, to ensure continuity when the FEC fails.

But more than that, we need to listen to the growing cry from the American people: They are tired of being shut out, gerrymandered, and governed by systems that protect power instead of public trust.

We Can’t Wait

Every day the FEC remains broken is a day we accept an election system without referees. That is not democracy. That is a slow descent into democratic decay.

We don’t have to accept this. We can reform it. We can build something better.

Let's start by urging Congress to pass The People’s Redistricting Act — and by demanding that our institutions work for us, not against us.

Keith Davenport is a candidate for U.S. Congress, NC-06.


Read More

Fulcrum Roundtable: Militarizing U.S. Cities
The Washington Monument is visible as armed members of the National Guard patrol the National Mall on August 27, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Fulcrum Roundtable: Militarizing U.S. Cities

Welcome to the Fulcrum Roundtable.

The program offers insights and discussions about some of the most talked-about topics from the previous month, featuring Fulcrum’s collaborators.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Bill Spotlight: Remove the Stain Act

A deep look at the fight over rescinding Medals of Honor from U.S. soldiers at Wounded Knee, the political clash surrounding the Remove the Stain Act, and what’s at stake for historical justice.

Getty Images, Stocktrek Images

Congress Bill Spotlight: Remove the Stain Act

Should the U.S. soldiers at 1890’s Wounded Knee keep the Medal of Honor?

Context: history

Keep ReadingShow less
The Recipe for a Humanitarian Crisis: 600,000 Venezuelans Set to Be Returned to the “Mouth of the Shark”

Migrant families from Honduras, Guatemala, Venezuela and Haiti live in a migrant camp set up by a charity organization in a former hospital, in the border town of Matamoros, Mexico.

(Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

The Recipe for a Humanitarian Crisis: 600,000 Venezuelans Set to Be Returned to the “Mouth of the Shark”

On October 3, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to end Temporary Protected Status for roughly 600,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, effective November 7, 2025. Although the exact mechanisms and details are unclear at this time, the message from DHS is: “Venezuelans, leave.”

Proponents of the Administration’s position (there is no official Opinion from SCOTUS, as the ruling was part of its shadow docket) argue that (1) the Secretary of DHS has discretion to determine designate whether a country is safe enough for individuals to return from the US, (2) “Temporary Protected Status” was always meant to be temporary, and (3) the situation in Venezuela has improved enough that Venezuelans in the U.S. may now safely return to Venezuela. As a lawyer who volunteers with immigrants, I admit that the two legal bases—Secretary’s broad discretion and the temporary nature of TPS—carry some weight, and I will not address them here.

Keep ReadingShow less
For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

Praying outdoors

ImagineGolf/Getty Images

For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

The American experiment has been sustained not by flawless execution of its founding ideals but by the moral imagination of people who refused to surrender hope. From abolitionists to suffragists to the foot soldiers of the civil-rights movement, generations have insisted that the Republic live up to its creed. Yet today that hope feels imperiled. Coarsened public discourse, the normalization of cruelty in policy, and the corrosion of democratic trust signal more than political dysfunction—they expose a crisis of meaning.

Naming that crisis is not enough. What we need, I argue, is a recovered ethic of humaneness—a civic imagination rooted in empathy, dignity, and shared responsibility. Eric Liu, through Citizens University and his "Civic Saturday" fellows and gatherings, proposes that democracy requires a "civic religion," a shared set of stories and rituals that remind us who we are and what we owe one another. I find deep resonance between that vision and what I call humane theology. That is, a belief and moral framework that insists public life cannot flourish when empathy is starved.

Keep ReadingShow less