Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Fulcrum Roundtable: Militarizing U.S. Cities

Opinion

Fulcrum Roundtable: Militarizing U.S. Cities
The Washington Monument is visible as armed members of the National Guard patrol the National Mall on August 27, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Welcome to the Fulcrum Roundtable.

The program offers insights and discussions about some of the most talked-about topics from the previous month, featuring Fulcrum’s collaborators.


Consistent with the Fulcrum's mission, the Fulcrum Roundtable strives to share many perspectives to widen our audience’s viewpoints.

The Trump Administration’s use of National Guard deployments and intensified ICE raids has redrawn the contours of immigration enforcement in the United States. Touted by supporters as essential for national security and condemned by critics as a breach of civil liberties, these tactics have ignited lawsuits, stirred fear, and galvanized communities into action.

To explore the implications of these federal strategies, I spoke with:

Debilyn Molineaux, a storyteller, collaborator, and connector. For 20 years, she led cross-partisan organizations. Her accolades include being a co-founder of the Bridge Alliance and a former co-publisher of The Fulcrum.

Rachel Hoopsick, an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project and the University of Illinois.

Edward Saltzberg is the Executive Director of the Security and Sustainability Forum and writes The Stability Brief.

- YouTube youtu.be

In the column, We Are Chicago, Debilyn asked: Is it law and order when ICE are patrolling American neighborhoods hunting undocumented people—or part of a larger authoritarian play to use SWAT-style takedowns and raids to scare people into surrendering their civil rights?

In Guarding What? The Moral Cost of Militarizing Our Cities, Rachel wrote about deploying National Guard troops to engage with civilian populations, carries deep consequences—for both the communities involved and the soldiers tasked with the mission.

Edward wrote: Democracy depends on courage: the willingness of people with something to lose to speak when it matters most. Some institutions still hold. But others are buckling.

He continued the conversation he started with his column, Courage Is Contagious.

The writers offered essential perspectives on the moral costs of militarizing our cities, the challenge to civil rights, and the critical role of courage in sustaining democracy when institutions are tested.

I invite you to read their columns and those of all of The Fulcrum's contributors. It's time well spent.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.


Read More

The Trump Administration’s Plan for Protecting Consumers? Politely Ask Companies to Behave.

Russell Vought, the acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, testified before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs in July.

Samuel Corum/Sipa USA via AP Images

The Trump Administration’s Plan for Protecting Consumers? Politely Ask Companies to Behave.

In mid-July testimony before Congress, Russell Vought boasted that, as the acting head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, he’d refashioned the agency’s approach to pursuing banks and other financial companies accused of exploiting Americans — the role Congress had created for the agency after the 2008 economic crash.

Vought had spent the first 18 months of the new Trump administration trying to dismantle the bureau, much as he and other appointees had done with the U.S. Agency for International Development. At CFPB, he’d ordered mass layoffs, tried to choke off the bureau’s funding and ended the lease on its headquarters, attempting to make good on his vow to put civil servants “in trauma.” But federal courts blocked Vought’s efforts to close the CFPB, with a judge at one point saying the administration had acted with “complete disregard” for Congress.

Keep ReadingShow less
A man walks with a ship behind him

man walks near the Punta Cardon refinery, on Jan. 23, 2026. Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world with an estimated 303 billion barrels.

(Jesus Vargas/dpa via ZUMA Press/TNS)

Americans should be concerned about the fine print on Trump’s new oil deal

So, it was a war for oil after all.

On social media Friday, President Trump announced that the United States and Venezuela have struck an agreement for “THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY.”

Keep ReadingShow less
​Teal shoes are displayed outside Naval Medical Center Portsmouth

Teal shoes are displayed outside Naval Medical Center Portsmouth in April 2018 as part of Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.

Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Kris R. Lindstrom/U.S. Navy

Military Sexual Trauma Survivors Can’t Sue the Government. A New Bill Could Change That.

When Mayra Diaz opened the door of her Army barracks room in 2022, she didn’t realize it was the beginning of the end of her military career.

She had never met the soldier standing in front of her, Sgt. Greville Clarke. She didn’t know he had sexually assaulted three other women on base over the past 15 months, including one he threatened at knifepoint.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Horizontal photo of a DEMOCRATIC PARTY FLAG

Horizontal photo of a DEMOCRATIC PARTY FLAG with a stylized DONKEY with 3 white stars on blue top of donkey and two red feet. Flag is laying on top of a red, white, and blue American Flag.

Getty Images

How to Define the Democratic Party - Left or Centrist?

Labels can be misleading and misused. The label "Centrist" is empowering because it signifies you are mainstream, not extreme, a place where all people can come together. To be labeled "Left" is to place you outside the mainstream, extreme; left connotes a kind of kookiness as well as—horror of horrors—Socialism.

But are the labels accurate? For most of the 20th century, the Democratic Party was, without question, the party that championed the working man, the average person—the people. But they were nevertheless firm capitalists—they were not Socialists.

Keep ReadingShow less