Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The baking isn’t done only by elected officials. It’s done by citizens​

Opinion

The baking isn’t done only by elected officials. It’s done by citizens​

a view of the capitol building

In November, eight Senate Democrats voted with Republicans to end the longest government shutdown in history, with little to show for the 43-day closure.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), who was not one of the eight, told discouraged Democrats, “We need to remember the battle we’re in….[We need to continue the fight] to defend our country from Trump and MAGA. Two things coming up that are really important,” Whitehouse said, “1) In December, there will be a vote on extending the Affordable Care credits we fought for. That gives us…weeks to hammer the Republicans so hard that we actually get a good Affordable Care credits bill.


“The second,” Whitehouse continued, “this gets a little bit boring, so I won’t go into it in detail, but as the appropriations bill moves forward, we can bake in increases above Trump’s budget, to the agencies we care about, guardrails against Trump’s mischief, and assurances and even hooks to make sure that the funding that we’ve appropriated actually gets spent and not blockaded by [Office of Management and Budget Director] Russ Vought. That we have until January 31st to do, when the current continuing resolution would expire. And then if they haven’t done those things we can go right back to insisting that they have to do them or face another government shutdown.”

The process that Whitehouse called “a little boring” provided an unexpected victory a few days later. Jeremy Lewin, the undersecretary of state for foreign assistance, humanitarian affairs, and religious freedom at the State Department, announced that the United States would provide $4.6 billion to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria over three years. The Global Fund and its partners have saved 70 million lives since 2002. Lewin, a former Elon Musk lieutenant at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), helped oversee the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID,) which was our nation’s primary international aid agency.

The $4.6 billion was smaller than the previous Biden-era pledge. But it represented something important: a reversal by the Trump Administration.

In Trump’s budget for fiscal year 2026 (FY26), the President proposed slashing the Global Fund from the $1.65 billion enacted in FY25 to $800 million for FY26, a cut of more than 50%. Over three years, that would total just $2.4 billion. Instead, the administration nearly doubled that to $4.6 billion. Why?

Because Congress had already begun “baking in” increases above Trump’s proposed cuts, as Sen. Whitehouse called for.

On April 28, 160 House members—led by two Republicans and three Democrats—signed a bipartisan letter urging appropriators to maintain robust FY26 funding for the Global Fund and PEPFAR. They were rejecting the President’s proposed $850 million cut and signaling a clear expectation: hold the line.

The House Appropriations Committee followed through, allocating $1.5 billion for FY26 instead of Trump’s $800 million. Over three years, that totals $4.5 billion—almost exactly the size of the administration’s eventual pledge.

The matter moves next to the Senate, where appropriators often increase the House’s number in global health.

A few days before Lewin’s public announcement, a journalist asked him whether the United States would make a pledge to the Global Fund. Lewin’s answer was revealing: “We are in the midst of active consultations with Congress… we will be making a pledge… in the coming days, after our consultations with Congress.”

There it is—the quiet power Whitehouse was pointing to. The appropriations process may look boring, but it forces administrations to respond to Congress's will. And Congress often responds to its constituents' will.

Because here’s a truth that rarely makes headlines: the baking isn’t done only by elected officials. Citizens do it.

I know volunteers who have spent years and even decades bringing their members of Congress into the kitchen and over to the oven on issues like the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. Most of the 160 House signers entered Congress, never having heard of the Global Fund. It was engaged constituents, doing their homework and getting training, who taught them.

That is transformational advocacy, citizens awakening to their power. And you can join them.

Sam Daley-Harris is the author of “Reclaiming Our Democracy: Every Citizen’s Guide to Transformational Advocacy” and the founder of RESULTS and Civic Courage. This is part of a series focused on better understanding transformational advocacy: citizens awakening to their power.


Read More

US America and China flags on chess king on a chessboard.

USA and China trade relations, cooperation strategy. US America and China flags on chess king on a chessboard.

Getty Images

America’s Gridlock Is Beijing’s Best Argument

Americans tend to treat democracy’s superiority as settled, and the long-run evidence backs them up. A major study by MIT economist Daron Acemoglu and colleagues found that countries that democratize end up about 20 percent richer per person within a generation. But most of the world does not grade governments on long-run studies. For billions of people outside the wealthy West, the test is simpler: does the power stay on, are food prices steady, is there work, and do the roads get built? When the stomach is empty, a ballot can feel like a luxury.

China understands this and sells its model on exactly those terms. Its GDP per capita has climbed from about $300 in 1980 to nearly $15,000 today, by IMF figures, and the World Bank credits it with lifting some 800 million people out of extreme poverty. India, the world’s largest democracy, started from a similar place and sits near $2,800. Beijing’s centralized system, paired with Deng Xiaoping’s market reforms, built power plants, factories and rail lines at a pace India’s more deliberative politics has not matched. Anyone who values liberty will find little to admire in that model. It does explain why the model sells.

Keep ReadingShow less
American soldier in headquarter control center

American soldier in headquarter control center

Getty Images

Why America Must Rethink Its Counterterrorism Strategy in Nigeria

When American forces conducted airstrikes against suspected Islamic State militants in northwest Nigeria on Christmas Day 2025, the operation signaled a renewal of security cooperation between Washington and Abuja. Yet for Nigerians living in communities plagued by terrorism, kidnapping, and armed attacks, a critical question remained: Will these strikes make their daily lives any safer?

That question demands serious consideration in Washington. The United States has spent decades helping Nigeria combat terrorism through military equipment, intelligence sharing, and tactical training. Yet, armed violence continues to disrupt daily life across northern Nigeria, raising doubts about how the effectiveness of American counterterrorism assistance should be measured.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pete Hegseth

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on October 28, 2026.

(Photo by Ezra Acayan/Getty Images)

Pete Hegseth and the High Price of Compromised Governance

Just days after a historic midterm election in which everyday Americans sent a clear, undeniable demand for political accountability and transparency, the halls of Congress have devolved into a new theater of crisis. Republican Representative Thomas Massie’s introduction of eight articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has thrown the Department—and the nation’s fragile democratic norms—into uncharted territory.

Massie, a longtime Trump critic who plans to retire from Congress at the end of the year, accuses Hegseth of bypassing Congress and violating constitutional limits on war powers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of pharmacist hand taking meds from drawer

New federal law already targets PBM pricing and rebate practices. An opinion on why state pharmacy ownership bans go too far, and the freight-rail lesson.

Cris Cantón/Getty Images

State Healthcare Reforms Have Gone Off the Rails

Government generally has two ways to address problems in a marketplace. It can establish clear rules, target harmful conduct and let competition produce better outcomes. Or it can design the market itself by controlling business decisions and dictating how companies must operate. That is the decision facing lawmakers in healthcare today.

America's freight-rail experience shows what is at stake. For decades, the Interstate Commerce Commission controlled railroad rates, restricted routes and made it hard for carriers to shed unprofitable lines. Intended to stabilize an essential industry, the rules instead contributed to bankruptcies and lagging investment.

Keep ReadingShow less