Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

How Ranchers and Grassroots Organizers Are Shaping Democracy in Wyoming

News

The 50 is a four-year multimedia initiative led by The Fulcrum, traveling to communities in every state to uncover what motivated Americans to vote in the 2024 presidential election. Through in-depth storytelling, the project examines how the Donald Trump administration is responding to those hopes and concerns—and highlights civic-focused organizations that inform, educate, and empower the public to take action.

Cheyenne, Wyoming—proudly serving as the state capital—is both a geographic and symbolic gateway to the American frontier, where rugged heritage meets enduring civic pride.


Founded in 1867 amid the westward expansion of the Union Pacific Railroad, the city earned its nickname—“Magic City of the Plains”—for its rapid rise as a center of cattle, commerce, and rail. Its legacy as a crossroads of movement and identity continues to shape its civic character today.

In the 2024 presidential election, Cheyenne—anchored in Laramie County—voted decisively Republican. Reflecting Wyoming’s distinction as the most GOP-leaning state in the nation, Donald Trump secured a resounding statewide victory with over 71% of the vote—the highest percentage ever received by a presidential nominee in Wyoming’s history.

In the windswept capital, two seemingly disparate organizations—the Wyoming Stock Growers Association (WSGA) and the Wyoming Independent Citizens Coalition (WICC)—are redefining what civic engagement looks like in the American West. Though their missions differ in scope and style, both groups are deeply rooted in Wyoming’s democratic fabric, championing participation, advocacy, and community resilience.

- YouTube youtu.be

Ranching Roots, Political Reach

Founded in 1872, the Wyoming Stock Growers Association has long been a cornerstone of the state’s political and cultural identity. Formed initially to standardize cattle branding and protect ranching interests, WSGA quickly evolved into a powerful political force. In fact, historians have dubbed it the “de facto territorial government” during Wyoming’s early statehood.

Today, WSGA continues to wield influence—not through backroom deals, but through robust civic participation. The association regularly hosts legislative receptions, such as its annual event during the Wyoming Legislature’s General Session, where ranchers meet directly with lawmakers to discuss land use, water rights, and regulatory policy. These gatherings are more than symbolic; they are forums where rural voices shape state policy.

"Things have changed over time, but we're still, I believe, relatively influential in the state," said Jim Magagna, EVP, Wyoming Stock Growers Association. "At one time, ranching, agriculture was the number one revenue producer in the state of Wyoming. Today we're number three. But, we're the foundation or the building block upon which the others exist. And recreation, tourism are successful because ranching has maintained the wide open spaces."

WSGA also invests in the next generation of civic leaders through scholarships and youth programs, reinforcing a culture of stewardship and democratic responsibility. Their quarterly publication, CowCountry, reaches over 1,200 readers statewide and offers updates on legislation, land conservation, and civic opportunities.

Grassroots Power and Public Art

The Wyoming Independent Citizens Coalition is building civic power from the ground up. Founded in 2021, WICC is a Cheyenne-based nonprofit that empowers underserved communities through advocacy, education, and creative expression.

“We don’t just talk change—we create space for it,” reads WICC’s mission statement. That space includes everything from voter registration drives to public murals that celebrate identity and resilience. Their work is especially vital in a state where rural isolation and political polarization can dampen participation.

The state’s small population presents an ongoing challenge to ensuring meaningful representation of marginalized communities. Through initiatives like Capitol Collaboration Day, WICC equips underserved communities with tools for advocacy, education, and civic participation.

"We bring Latinos and Native Americans. We bring them to the capital. They listen to the sessions. We get a couple of legislators to talk to them," explains Carla Gregorio, President of the Wyoming Independent Citizens Coalition. "We want people to start seeing us in the capital. We want those young people to start seeing they can make a difference."

WICC reaches audiences often overlooked by traditional political outreach. Their efforts echo Wyoming’s legacy as the first state to grant women the right to vote—a history WICC proudly invokes in its programming.

Bridging the Divide

While WSGA and WICC may occupy different ends of the civic spectrum—ranchers advocating for land rights and grassroots organizers mobilizing marginalized voices—they share a commitment to local democracy. Both groups understand that civic engagement isn’t confined to the ballot box; it’s cultivated in town halls, on ranches, and in neighborhood parks.

As Wyoming continues to navigate questions of identity, equity, and resilience, these organizations offer a nuanced portrait of civic life—one that transcends partisanship and embraces participation.

Other Episodes To Watch:

Advancing Voting Rights and Civic Engagement in Nebraska

From Enforcement to Empowerment: Milwaukee’s Public Safety Reimagined

Connecticut: Democracy, Innovation, and Economic Resilience

Empowering Citizens in Illinois: How Community Television Strengthens Democratic Voices

Community Policing in New Jersey Strengthens Trust With the Public

Improving Infrastructure In Washington To Benefit Both People and Nature

Concern Over Education and Family Services in Rhode Island

In Swing-State Pennsylvania, a Latino-Majority City Looks Back at the 2024 Election

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum. He is also the publisher of the Latino News Network.


Read More

Happy teacher asking girl with hand raised sitting in classroom at elementary school

Trump's education policies are reshaping public schools. Learn how Department of Education cuts, school boards, and local elections could shape children's futures.

Maskot / Getty Images

When It Comes to Our Children’s Education, Trump Gets An ‘F’

When grading a government, there should be no metric more telling than how the kids are doing. It may come as no surprise that they are not doing well–but if the kids are failing, it is because Trump has failed them. The United States has the highest child poverty rate of any wealthy nation, yet the president continues to systematically abandon children: stripping away vital affordability protections, dismantling public education infrastructure, and cutting Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Plus, there’s the ongoing threat of gun violence in schools, the cruel realities facing migrant kids in detention centers, and now new threats to digital safety and youth mental health–an intersectional crisis that desperately requires federal attention while Trump is actively trying to prevent states from stepping up in the meantime. Each of these issues deserves its own op-ed, but today let’s talk about the silver bullet for addressing inequality and building a resilient, inclusive society: public education. Its days may be numbered, but you can help.

In a move characteristically devoid of compassion, President Trump signed an executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education (DOE), mandated that federal funding would be conditional on cutting all diversity, equity, or inclusion programs, and urged Congress to abolish the DOE outright. Following suit, Congress proposed and enacted budget cuts to reduce essential funding for programs supporting low-income students, students with disabilities, and otherwise vulnerable populations. The Supreme Court decision to allow mass layoffs at the Department of Education only worsens this crisis, reducing the department’s ability to assist schools during these challenging times. These combined federal actions will have far-reaching consequences for children and communities across the country. School’s out for summer? School might be out forever.

Keep ReadingShow less
How My Benzodiazepine Experience Impacted the Trust I Have in the Healthcare System
a doctor showing a patient something on the tablet
Photo by Nappy on Unsplash

How My Benzodiazepine Experience Impacted the Trust I Have in the Healthcare System

During my junior year of high school, I was prescribed my first benzodiazepine, called lorazepam, at 16 years of age. At the time, my parents and I did not understand the potential consequences of long-term use of benzos. Like so many other patients out there, we trusted that the healthcare system would not only provide treatment and correct guidance to move forward with my prescriptions, but I never realized they would be the force that would ruin my future and so many dreams I had for my young adulthood.

What followed was a years-long struggle with severe medication dependence and withdrawal that fundamentally changed my life for the worse.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitution of the United State with the U.S. flag in the background.

The Framers designed a republic with the intention to manage factionalism through deliberate compromise and institutional guardrails, whereas 21st-century polarization often treats compromise as a moral failing.

Douglas Sacha, Getty Images

Our Framers on 21st Century Primaries and Polarization

The Framers would view 21st-century closed primaries and political polarization as the exact manifestation of "factionalism" they spent the 1787 Constitutional Convention trying to prevent. They would argue these systems force candidates to appeal to ideological extremes rather than the broad, moderate consensus required for stable governance.

The Danger of Factionalism: In Federalist No. 10, James Madison defined a "faction" as a group of citizens united by a passion or interest adverse to the rights of others. He argued that while factions are inevitable, their effects must be controlled. The Framers would recognize 21st-century hyper-polarization as the dominance of unyielding factions that prioritize absolute ideological purity over democratic compromise.

Keep ReadingShow less