Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

How Ranchers and Grassroots Organizers Are Shaping Democracy in Wyoming

News

The 50 is a four-year multimedia initiative led by The Fulcrum, traveling to communities in every state to uncover what motivated Americans to vote in the 2024 presidential election. Through in-depth storytelling, the project examines how the Donald Trump administration is responding to those hopes and concerns—and highlights civic-focused organizations that inform, educate, and empower the public to take action.

Cheyenne, Wyoming—proudly serving as the state capital—is both a geographic and symbolic gateway to the American frontier, where rugged heritage meets enduring civic pride.


Founded in 1867 amid the westward expansion of the Union Pacific Railroad, the city earned its nickname—“Magic City of the Plains”—for its rapid rise as a center of cattle, commerce, and rail. Its legacy as a crossroads of movement and identity continues to shape its civic character today.

In the 2024 presidential election, Cheyenne—anchored in Laramie County—voted decisively Republican. Reflecting Wyoming’s distinction as the most GOP-leaning state in the nation, Donald Trump secured a resounding statewide victory with over 71% of the vote—the highest percentage ever received by a presidential nominee in Wyoming’s history.

In the windswept capital, two seemingly disparate organizations—the Wyoming Stock Growers Association (WSGA) and the Wyoming Independent Citizens Coalition (WICC)—are redefining what civic engagement looks like in the American West. Though their missions differ in scope and style, both groups are deeply rooted in Wyoming’s democratic fabric, championing participation, advocacy, and community resilience.

- YouTube youtu.be

Ranching Roots, Political Reach

Founded in 1872, the Wyoming Stock Growers Association has long been a cornerstone of the state’s political and cultural identity. Formed initially to standardize cattle branding and protect ranching interests, WSGA quickly evolved into a powerful political force. In fact, historians have dubbed it the “de facto territorial government” during Wyoming’s early statehood.

Today, WSGA continues to wield influence—not through backroom deals, but through robust civic participation. The association regularly hosts legislative receptions, such as its annual event during the Wyoming Legislature’s General Session, where ranchers meet directly with lawmakers to discuss land use, water rights, and regulatory policy. These gatherings are more than symbolic; they are forums where rural voices shape state policy.

"Things have changed over time, but we're still, I believe, relatively influential in the state," said Jim Magagna, EVP, Wyoming Stock Growers Association. "At one time, ranching, agriculture was the number one revenue producer in the state of Wyoming. Today we're number three. But, we're the foundation or the building block upon which the others exist. And recreation, tourism are successful because ranching has maintained the wide open spaces."

WSGA also invests in the next generation of civic leaders through scholarships and youth programs, reinforcing a culture of stewardship and democratic responsibility. Their quarterly publication, CowCountry, reaches over 1,200 readers statewide and offers updates on legislation, land conservation, and civic opportunities.

Grassroots Power and Public Art

The Wyoming Independent Citizens Coalition is building civic power from the ground up. Founded in 2021, WICC is a Cheyenne-based nonprofit that empowers underserved communities through advocacy, education, and creative expression.

“We don’t just talk change—we create space for it,” reads WICC’s mission statement. That space includes everything from voter registration drives to public murals that celebrate identity and resilience. Their work is especially vital in a state where rural isolation and political polarization can dampen participation.

The state’s small population presents an ongoing challenge to ensuring meaningful representation of marginalized communities. Through initiatives like Capitol Collaboration Day, WICC equips underserved communities with tools for advocacy, education, and civic participation.

"We bring Latinos and Native Americans. We bring them to the capital. They listen to the sessions. We get a couple of legislators to talk to them," explains Carla Gregorio, President of the Wyoming Independent Citizens Coalition. "We want people to start seeing us in the capital. We want those young people to start seeing they can make a difference."

WICC reaches audiences often overlooked by traditional political outreach. Their efforts echo Wyoming’s legacy as the first state to grant women the right to vote—a history WICC proudly invokes in its programming.

Bridging the Divide

While WSGA and WICC may occupy different ends of the civic spectrum—ranchers advocating for land rights and grassroots organizers mobilizing marginalized voices—they share a commitment to local democracy. Both groups understand that civic engagement isn’t confined to the ballot box; it’s cultivated in town halls, on ranches, and in neighborhood parks.

As Wyoming continues to navigate questions of identity, equity, and resilience, these organizations offer a nuanced portrait of civic life—one that transcends partisanship and embraces participation.

Other Episodes To Watch:

Advancing Voting Rights and Civic Engagement in Nebraska

From Enforcement to Empowerment: Milwaukee’s Public Safety Reimagined

Connecticut: Democracy, Innovation, and Economic Resilience

Empowering Citizens in Illinois: How Community Television Strengthens Democratic Voices

Community Policing in New Jersey Strengthens Trust With the Public

Improving Infrastructure In Washington To Benefit Both People and Nature

Concern Over Education and Family Services in Rhode Island

In Swing-State Pennsylvania, a Latino-Majority City Looks Back at the 2024 Election

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum. He is also the publisher of the Latino News Network.


Read More

The Future of DEI in Higher Education: Unpacking Recent Federal Restrictions
A group of people standing in a circle with their hands together

The Future of DEI in Higher Education: Unpacking Recent Federal Restrictions

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs serve diverse student populations at colleges and universities across the nation. DEI programs in higher education have traditionally supported first-generation college students, students with disabilities, veterans, low-income students, and racial and ethnic minorities through offices, scholarships, cultural centers, and accessibility services.
  • Federal initiatives, such as TRIO or the Full-Service Community Schools program, are facing cuts to funding due to DEI-related federal policy, affecting students across the nation.

Defining DEI

From debates surrounding race-conscious admission policies to questions about the role and funding of identity-based student centers, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) has become a widely debated topic in higher education policy. DEI refers to institutional policies and programs–such as mentorship opportunities, cultural centers, and support programs–which improve campus climate and student access for underrepresented groups. Though many colleges and universities across the United States have developed DEI initiatives aimed at shaping student access and institutional priorities, recent legal and policy developments have raised questions about how these efforts align with federal law.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view of teenage boy walking with arm around friends

Why many young men feel politically and socially adrift, how changing gender roles affect masculinity, self-esteem, relationships, and the future of society.

Maskot / Getty Images

Lost Boys - What Is the Role of a Man in Today's Society?

A recent New York Times article stated that young males who provided an important swing vote for Trump in 2024 are discouraged by what Trump has done and not done while in office. But they are nevertheless not particularly inclined to vote Democratic because they don't see the Party as welcoming their view of masculinity and they don't know where they fit in this society.

These young men assume that because the Party supports equality for women in the workplace and because many young women no longer have marriage and having children at the top of their agenda, the Party would not be a welcoming home for them. They see themselves as striving for the masculinity of their fathers' or grandfathers' day, where the man was the breadwinner in the family and had respect and authority. Not the weaker half in relationships with women.

Keep ReadingShow less
Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

NECHAMA volunteers in Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene.

Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

As the Atlantic hurricane season officially began on June 1, disaster response organizations across the country are preparing for the next storm. That preparation includes coordinating logistics, purchasing supplies, training volunteers, and strengthening partnerships. It now also requires planning for an environment shaped by misinformation, distrust, and competing narratives.

A recent 60 Minutes segment examining extremist groups in disaster zones highlighted how quickly public perceptions can form after a disaster. Recovery efforts are now followed by outside groups and online networks attempting to influence how events are understood while communities are still in crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less
How State Courts Can Help Deflect the Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Multiracial Democracy

Black and white illustration of voters

State Court Report

How State Courts Can Help Deflect the Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Multiracial Democracy

With its April ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court delivered yet another blow to the Voting Rights Act, specifically Section 2, which governs race in redistricting. The decision was sad and utterly predictable, but still nothing short of astonishing. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the Court’s conservative supermajority, stealthily setting aside 40 years of legal precedent under Section 2 largely on the belief that racism is a thing of the past and extreme partisan gerrymandering is, in effect, a fundamental right of state lawmakers. Callais had a tortured path to the Court, a feature of the case that has undoubtedly been eclipsed by the lawless nature of the ruling itself, all of which reveals that the Supreme Court represents the gravest threat to multiracial democracy in the United States. (I argued as much in a law review article, predicting the outcome and analyzing the ways a Court gone rogue might get to that ruling.)

What’s more? In recent years, the Court has played fast and loose with a “principle” purportedly meant to limit chaos around elections, known as Purcell. But instead of limiting chaos, the Court’s Purcell jurisprudence will hasten and aggrandize the already-problematic impact of the Callais ruling. As the nation’s redistricting wars inevitably continue — in this election season, the 2028 presidential campaign, and even the next decade — state courts can help stave off democratic erosion by resisting the urge to invoke Purcell.

Keep ReadingShow less