Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Voting Rights Act Is Under Attack in the South

Opinion

A person putting on an "I Voted" sticker.

Major redistricting cases in Louisiana and Texas threaten the Voting Rights Act and the representation of Black and Latino voters across the South.

Getty Images, kali9

Under court order, Louisiana redrew to create a second majority-Black district—one that finally gave true representation to the community where my family lives. But now, that district—and the entire Voting Rights Act (VRA)—are under attack. Meanwhile, here in Texas, Republican lawmakers rammed through a mid-decade redistricting plan that dramatically reduces Black and Latino voting power in Congress. As a Louisiana-born Texan, it’s disheartening to see that my rights to representation as a Black voter in Texas, and those of my family back home in Louisiana, are at serious risk.

Two major redistricting cases in these neighboring states—Louisiana v. Callais and Texas’s statewide redistricting challenge, LULAC v. Abbott—are testing the strength and future of the VRA. In Louisiana, the Supreme Court is being asked to decide not just whether Louisiana must draw a majority-Black district to comply with Section 2 of the VRA, but whether considering race as one factor to address proven racial discrimination in electoral maps can itself be treated as discriminatory. It’s an argument that contradicts the purpose of the VRA: to ensure all people, regardless of race, have an equal opportunity to elect candidates amid ongoing discrimination and suppression of Black and Latino voters—to protect Black and Brown voters from dilution.


If the Supreme Court adopts Louisiana’s and the Trump administration’s extreme view that any protections for minority voters are unconstitutional, the consequences would be devastating. If the Court sides with those seeking to dismantle Section 2, it would create a dangerous precedent, enabling racial discrimination and rolling back years of civil rights advocacy tied to the VRA.

Additionally, a bad ruling here could result in yet another round of redistricting, on top of the racial gerrymandering Texas just experienced. It would eviscerate Black and Latino representation in Congress and at every level of government. More specifically, this case could jeopardize the seats of nearly 30% of the Congressional Black Caucus and 11% of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

Earlier this year, in a separate case, a federal judge in Houston ruled that Spring Branch ISD’s system for electing school board trustees violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by diluting the Hispanic vote within the district. Rulings such as this emphasize the necessity of the VRA, not just in statewide cases but in ensuring fair local representation.

For both Texans and Louisianans, these decisions aren’t random arguments—they determine how power and resources are distributed among neighborhoods. Fighting for fair maps isn’t just about elections–it’s about having access to disaster recovery funding, equitable healthcare, and policies that accurately reflect our communities.

The thought of redistricting that disproportionately impacts people who look like me is both infuriating and scary, to say the least. Often at tabling events and connecting with community members, I hear, My voice doesn’t matter, why should I vote?" But, if that were truly the case, there wouldn’t be so many tactics used to control who gets to vote and where that vote can be cast. It’s time we start prioritizing not being silenced.

To get involved in these redistricting efforts, you can: speak out against unfair redistricting and in favor of legislation revitalizing the Voting Rights Act through legislation like the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act or a state-level statute like the Barbara Jordan Voting Rights Act, and spread the word regarding the Louisiana v. Callais case, a decision which is expected by July 2026.


La’Dereka Christian is the Voting Rights Outreach Coordinator at the Texas Civil Rights Project. She is a licensed political Social Worker who is passionate about advocating for historically marginalized communities through voting rights. The Texas Civil Rights Project is a non-partisan nonprofit organization that advocates for the civil rights of all Texans through voting rights, immigrants’ rights, and criminal justice reform throughout the state.


Read More

Republican, Democratic and independent checkboxes, with the third one checked

Analysis of California’s open primary system, political reform, and voter empowerment amid gubernatorial tensions and calls to restore party control.

zimmytws/Getty Images

California Schemin’

Both before and after Eric Swalwell’s resignation, the California Gubernatorial race has partisan insiders screaming that California’s innovative, voter-friendly, open primary system should be scrapped. Why? Seven Democrats and two Republicans are running. If all the Democrats stay in the race, and none surges, there is a statistical possibility that the two Republicans advance to the general election.

The attacks are pure opportunism, from people who oppose open primaries, period. Never mind that seven million independent voters have been enfranchised and elections are much more competitive, according to these critics, the fact that the Gubernatorial race might feature two Republicans is absolute proof that the old system needs to be restored.

Keep ReadingShow less
Official ballots with a chain and lock over them, and the USA flag behind them.

The impact of election fraud claims and voting laws on democracy in the United States. Daniel O. Jamison examines voter suppression concerns, mail-in ballot policies, and the broader political struggle over election integrity.

Getty Images, JJ Gouin

If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It

For nearly ten years, claims that our elections are riddled with fraud have threatened the foundation of our democratic republic.

It is alleged that Democrats have flooded the country with illegal immigrants who then illegally vote for Democrats. Purportedly to protect the country from this, Republicans seek legislation that would, among other provisions, restrict vote-by-mail, require potentially expensive and onerous proof of citizenship to register to vote, and require potentially expensive photo identification to vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Fahey Q&A with Elizabeth Rasmussen

An in-depth interview with Elizabeth Rasmussen of Better Boundaries on Utah’s redistricting battle, Proposition 4, and the fight to protect ballot initiatives, fair maps, and democratic accountability.

The Fahey Q&A with Elizabeth Rasmussen

Since organizing the Voters Not Politicians 2018 ballot initiative that put citizens in charge of drawing Michigan's legislative maps, Fahey has been the founding executive director of The People, which is forming statewide networks to promote government accountability. She regularly interviews colleagues in the world of democracy reform for The Fulcrum.

Elizabeth Rasmussen is the Executive Director for Better Boundaries, a Utah-based organization fighting for fair maps, defending the citizen initiative process, preserving checks and balances, and building a better future. Currently making headlines in the state, Better Boundaries is working to protect Proposition 4, and with it, the rights of Utah voters.

Keep ReadingShow less
A sign that reads, "Voter Registration," hanging from the cieling, pointing to an office with the words, "Voter registration," above its doorway.

The voter registration office at the Nueces County Courthouse in Corpus Christi, Texas on Sept. 11, 2024. Voting rights groups are challenging the state's use of a federal database to check the citizenship status of people on the state's voter roll.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Voting Rights Groups Challenge Texas’ Removal of Potential Noncitizens From the Voter Roll

What happened?

Voting rights groups are suing the Texas Secretary of State’s Office and some county election officials to prevent the removal of voters from the state’s voter roll based on use of a federal database to verify citizenship. They also claim the state failed to crosscheck its own records for proof of citizenship it already possessed before seeking to remove voters.

Keep ReadingShow less