Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Donald Trump is becoming Joe Biden version 2.0

Opinion

Donald Trump is becoming Joe Biden version 2.0

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio (L) speaks during a Cabinet meeting alongside U.S. President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth in the Cabinet Room of the White House on Dec. 2, 2025 in Washington, D.C.

(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images/TCA)

In the year since Democrats lost the 2024 election, with Donald Trump beating then President Biden in all seven swing states, they’ve struggled to admit exactly what went wrong.

It wasn’t one thing. For starters, Biden got precipitously older in the last two years of his presidency, often leading to moments that seemed to concern voters more than it did those closest to Biden and Dems in leadership, who insisted he was in perfect health.


Then there were several problems of their own making. Biden’s decision to end Trump’s Remain-in-Mexico immigration policy opened our borders to millions of asylum-seekers without the resources to match, breeding resentment and fear in cities and towns across the country over the crush of a new population explosion.

Dems’ soft-on-crime policies in cities like San Francisco, Chicago and Portland — from ending cash bail to sentencing reform and defund the police rhetoric — inarguably made voters feel less safe, and resulted in the ouster of numerous Dem mayors and DAs for failing their cities.

Other problems were inherited or unexpected, like a post-COVID-19 economy and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, respectively.

But the biggest problem was that Dems seemed totally out of touch with Americans’ problems. Though voters were telling them over and over again that they were worried about the economy, crime and immigration, Democrats looked them straight in the eye and said: the economy is strong as hell, crime is down, and immigration isn’t a crisis.

It was a recipe for disaster, and disaster is what they got. Republicans now control the courts, the House, the Senate, and the White House, and Trump got a second chance at wrecking our democracy.

Now, with a year before midterm elections that will tell Republicans and Trump in fairly definitive terms what voters think of them, the shoe appears to be on the other foot.

Trump’s obvious cognitive and physical decline — falling asleep in Cabinet meetings, rambling incoherently in press conferences, unexplained medical issues — should be worrisome to Republicans and those in Trump’s inner circle.

Then there are the problems of Republicans’ and Trump’s own making. His definitively dumb tariffs have made the cost of goods more expensive, the cost of operating business more expensive, and unemployment rise. Even as they try to walk tariffs back, the uncertainty he’s created has led to less foreign investment in the U.S., which trickles down to consumers.

Likewise, Trump’s failure to produce the Epstein files, as he promised, has divided MAGA influencers, and has frustrated his base; sloppy and ineffectual DOGE cuts felt unstrategic and pointless; the longest government shutdown in history felt unnecessarily punitive; and Trump’s foreign adventuring — threatening a war with Venezuela, striking Iran’s nukes, bailing out Argentina — felt like anything but America First.

But worst of all, Trump is making Biden’s fatal mistake. He’s telling voters they’re wrong about how they feel.

Polling shows Trump with an abysmal 36% approval rating in the latest Gallup poll, a new second-term low. And even more ominous, a CNN/SSRS poll last month found 61% of Americans believe Trump’s policies “have worsened economic conditions in this country.” Voters, including many of his own, are putting the blame squarely on him.

Trump’s befuddling and dangerous response has been to tell them affordability — the issue they care the most about — is a Democratic “hoax,” “scam,” and “con job.”

During last week’s Cabinet meeting, he sounded a lot like Biden when he insisted, “Our country is wealthy again and secure again.”

His surrogates are similarly brushing off voter concerns. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on one of the Sunday shows, “The economy has been better than we thought,” and “I think, next year, we’re going to move on to prosperity.”

Speaker Mike Johnson said everyone needs to “relax.”

“We are exactly on the trajectory of where we’ve always planned to be. Steady at the wheel, everybody, it’s going to be fine. Our best days are ahead of us. Americans are going to be feeling a lot better in the early part of next year.”

But the early part of next year is around the corner. And so are midterm elections. If Johnson’s not worried, his members certainly are. And they’re starting to talk openly about the party’s failure to sharpen its messaging.

“If we don’t do that, we would be morons, because the economy is very much on people’s minds,” said Rep. Tony Gonzales.

Other lawmakers worry it’s not just a messaging problem, but a policy problem, and they’re right to.

But Trump seems either oblivious to or unbothered by the pain. And he’s repeating all the mistakes Dems made in 2024. If Republicans don’t turn things around, and quick, they’ll surely suffer the same fate.

S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.

Read More

After the Ceasefire, the Violence Continues – and Cries for New Words

An Israeli army vehicle moves on the Israeli side, near the border with the Gaza Strip on November 18, 2025 in Southern Israel, Israel.

(Photo by Amir Levy/Getty Images)

After the Ceasefire, the Violence Continues – and Cries for New Words

Since October 10, 2025, the day when the US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was announced, Israel has killed at least 401 civilians, including at least 148 children. This has led Palestinian scholar Saree Makdisi to decry a “continuing genocide, albeit one that has shifted gears and has—for now—moved into the slow lane. Rather than hundreds at a time, it is killing by twos and threes” or by twenties and thirties as on November 19 and November 23 – “an obscenity that has coalesced into a new normal.” The Guardian columnist Nesrine Malik describes the post-ceasefire period as nothing more than a “reducefire,” quoting the warning issued by Amnesty International’s secretary general Agnès Callamard that the ”world must not be fooled” into believing that Israel’s genocide is over.

A visual analysis of satellite images conducted by the BBC has established that since the declared ceasefire, “the destruction of buildings in Gaza by the Israeli military has been continuing on a huge scale,” entire neighborhoods “levelled” through “demolitions,” including large swaths of farmland and orchards. The Guardian reported already in March of 2024, that satellite imagery proved the “destruction of about 38-48% of tree cover and farmland” and 23% of Gaza’s greenhouses “completely destroyed.” Writing about the “colossal violence” Israel has wrought on Gaza, Palestinian legal scholar Rabea Eghbariah lists “several variations” on the term “genocide” which researchers found the need to introduce, such as “urbicide” (the systematic destruction of cities), “domicide” (systematic destruction of housing), “sociocide,” “politicide,” and “memoricide.” Others have added the concepts “ecocide,” “scholasticide” (the systematic destruction of Gaza’s schools, universities, libraries), and “medicide” (the deliberate attacks on all aspects of Gaza’s healthcare with the intent to “wipe out” all medical care). It is only the combination of all these “-cides,” all amounting to massive war crimes, that adequately manages to describe the Palestinian condition. Constantine Zurayk introduced the term “Nakba” (“catastrophe” in Arabic) in 1948 to name the unparalleled “magnitude and ramifications of the Zionist conquest of Palestine” and its historical “rupture.” When Eghbariah argues for “Nakba” as a “new legal concept,” he underlines, however, that to understand its magnitude, one needs to go back to the 1917 Balfour Declaration, in which the British colonial power promised “a national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, even though just 6 % of its population were Jewish. From Nakba as the “constitutive violence of 1948,” we need today to conceptualize “Nakba as a structure,” an “overarching frame.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards
a hand holding a deck of cards in front of a christmas tree
Photo by Luca Volpe on Unsplash

Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards

Donald Trump has repeatedly used the phrase “holding the cards” during his tenure as President to signal that he, or sometimes an opponent, has the upper hand. The metaphor projects bravado, leverage, and the inevitability of success or failure, depending on who claims control.

Unfortunately, Trump’s repeated invocation of “holding the cards” embodies a worldview where leverage, bluff, and dominance matter more than duty, morality, or responsibility. In contrast, leadership grounded in duty emphasizes ethical obligations to allies, citizens, and democratic principles—elements strikingly absent from this metaphor.

Keep Reading Show less
Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability
campbells chicken noodle soup can

Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability

Most customers carry a particular image of Campbell's Soup: the red-and-white label stacked on a pantry shelf, a touch of nostalgia, and the promise of a dependable bargain. It's food for snow days, tight budgets, and the middle of the week. For generations, the brand has positioned itself as a companion to working families, offering "good food" for everyday people. The company cultivated that trust so thoroughly that it became almost cliché.

Campbell's episode, now the subject of national headlines and an ongoing high-profile legal complaint, is troubling not only for its blunt language but for what it reveals about the hidden injuries that erode the social contract linking institutions to citizens, workers to workplaces, and brands to buyers. If the response ends with the usual PR maneuvers—rapid firings and the well-rehearsed "this does not reflect our values" statement. Then both the lesson and the opportunity for genuine reform by a company or individual are lost. To grasp what this controversy means for the broader corporate landscape, we first have to examine how leadership reveals its actual beliefs.

Keep Reading Show less
Donald Trump

When ego replaces accountability in the presidency, democracy weakens. An analysis of how unchecked leadership erodes trust, institutions, and the rule of law.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

When Leaders Put Ego Above Accountability—Democracy At Risk

What has become of America’s presidency? Once a symbol of dignity and public service, the office now appears chaotic, ego‑driven, and consumed by spectacle over substance. When personal ambition replaces accountability, the consequences extend far beyond politics — they erode trust, weaken institutions, and threaten democracy itself.

When leaders place ego above accountability, democracy falters. Weak leaders seek to appear powerful. Strong leaders accept responsibility.

Keep Reading Show less