Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Empowering Independent Voters Can Fix Primary Elections

A person at a voting booth.

Independent voters now make up the largest voting bloc in the U.S., yet many are excluded from primaries and debates. Why reforming primary elections requires empowering independents.

Getty Images, LPETTET

Not long ago, almost no one talked about the rules and culture of primary elections. Today, there is a growing recognition that the way we run primary elections isn’t working. They’re too partisan. Too low turnout. Too dominated by ideological activists. My organization, Open Primaries, has spent years pushing this conversation into the mainstream.

But we won’t fix primaries purely by tweaking rules. Their dysfunction is a symptom of a larger problem: the systemic exclusion of independent voters from our political life. To truly reform them, we have to start with an honest discussion about why so many Americans are leaving the parties- and what it would take to empower them as full participants in our democracy.


As Gallup reported last month, independents are now, at 45%, the largest group of voters in the country. They are a majority of Gen Z voters (56%) and millennial voters (54%) alike. They are the largest group of registered voters in ten states — blue states like Massachusetts, red states like Alaska, and purple states like North Carolina. They are liberal, conservative, moderate, and everything in between.

And growing. Every week, 10,000 Americans change their voter registration status from Democrat or Republican to independent.

Yet independent voters in America are treated as second-class citizens. Their very existence is downplayed by political scientists who insist they are actually “partisan leaners.” They are denied meaningful participation in candidate selection, shut out of debates, marginalized in media coverage, ignored in policymaking, and locked out of primaries. They are told: join a party, or have your influence diminished.

It simply will not be possible to achieve lasting reform of primary elections without an honest discussion of and attention to the role of independent voters in our democracy.

To mark this moment on the 250th anniversary of our country’s founding, when independents are surging, and Americans across the political spectrum are demanding a new path forward, Open Primaries has released the Declaration of Independents: a broad call for full voter empowerment. It asserts that independents deserve equal participation across the full spectrum of political activity - not just primaries, but debates, ballots, media coverage, policymaking, and candidate access itself.

As the Declaration declares: We hold it to be self-evident that voters should be equal in voice, equal in dignity, and equal in political rights; that no citizen’s participation should depend upon allegiance to a party; and that government exists to serve the people, not the factions that compete to control it.

Closed primaries remain the most visible symptom of this inequality. The most partisan candidates are rewarded because “base” voters dominate - and independents are legally barred from voting in many states. Primaries are low-turnout affairs by design. Candidates know all this, and they campaign and govern accordingly. Policies, messaging, and campaign promises are all calibrated to cater to the few at the expense of the many. The result is polarization, dogmatic agendas, and politics that prioritize party loyalty over the public good.

But primaries are only one part of the exclusion. Ballot-access rules favor party nominees, imposing steep hurdles on independent candidates. Debate rules and media coverage reinforce a red-versus-blue framework. Redistricting maps maximize partisan advantage (and have all but eliminated general election competition). Fundraising networks, endorsements, and political infrastructure overwhelmingly favor party-affiliated actors. Across every level of politics, independents are treated as peripheral- their voices heard only when convenient, their influence constrained by rules designed to protect partisan power.

This is structural, not accidental. Rules have been written and defended by party insiders to preserve institutional control. The system rewards loyalty to parties over loyalty to principles. And still, every week, 10,000 Americans leave the parties not out of apathy, but out of principle. Many reject a system that demands adherence to labels and frames every issue as a tribal conflict. Independence allows voters to judge candidates on merit, weigh issues individually, and put the common good above partisan identity.

For that choice, they are penalized.

The Declaration of Independents charts the path forward: full empowerment for independents across elections, campaigns, and political life. It is a blueprint for a democracy that values principles over labels, inclusion over exclusion, and citizens above all else. Give independents equal voice, equal access, and real influence over candidates, policies, and government, and elections, campaigns, and governance finally serve the people - not the factions that claim to represent them.

Primary elections in America today are not working because voters are unequal.

And we must address that inequality if we are going to breathe more health into our democracy.


Jeremy Gruber, JD, is the senior vice president of Open Primaries, a national election reform organization and the author of “Let All Voters Vote: Independents and the Expansion of Voting Rights in the United States.”


Read More

Election Officials Have Been Preparing for AI Cyberattacks

People voting at a polling station

Brett Carlsen/Getty

Election Officials Have Been Preparing for AI Cyberattacks

Since ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence systems first became widely available, the Brennan Center and other experts have warned that this technology may lead to more cyberattacks on elections and other critical infrastructure. Reports that Anthropic’s new AI model, Claude Mythos, can pinpoint software vulnerabilities that even the most experienced human experts would miss underline the urgency of those risks. Fortunately, election officials have been preparing for cyberattacks and have made significant progress in securing their systems over the past decade, incorporating improved cybersecurity practices at every step of the election process.

Anthropic claims that its new model can autonomously scan for vulnerabilities in software more effectively than even expert security researchers. If given access to this new model, amateurs would theoretically be capable of identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities in a way that previously only sophisticated actors, such as nation-states, could do. For this reason, Anthropic chose not to release the Mythos model publicly. Instead, under an initiative Anthropic is calling Project Glasswing, it has offered access to Mythos to a number of high-profile tech firms and critical infrastructure operators so that these companies can proactively identify and address vulnerabilities in their own systems. Although Anthropic is currently controlling access to its model to prevent misuse, experts believe it is only a matter of time before tools advertising similar capabilities are broadly available.

Keep ReadingShow less
2026 Brennan Legacy Awards Celebrate Champions of Democracy

Superhero revealing American flag

BrianAJackson/Getty Images

2026 Brennan Legacy Awards Celebrate Champions of Democracy

The founders of our 18th‑century republic were acutely aware of how fragile their experiment in self‑government might prove, and one can easily imagine them welcoming a modern guardian like the Brennan Center for Justice. Within the wide canopy of organizations devoted to defending our democracy, the Center has emerged as a rare and unmistakable jewel.

For over 20 years, the Center has been dedicated to defending our democratic institutions and the rule of law, while protecting our civil liberties in the face of mounting authoritarian winds.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lessons Learned from “Lullabies from the Axis of Evil”

Residents sit amid debris in a residential building that was hit in an airstrike earlier this morning on March 30, 2026 in the west of Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Lessons Learned from “Lullabies from the Axis of Evil”

There has been much commentary on the dark side of President Trump’s character and the lack of leadership at other high levels of government. These events and the American president's statements should not go unchallenged. His efforts to dehumanize an opponent and trivialize bombing campaigns as they are part of a video game are unfathomable and inconsistent with most of American history. We must never forget that America is killing people, many innocent civilians, with apparently little remorse.

The war in Iran has brought back a memory from when my son was born nearly 20 years ago. A friend of my wife’s, an anthropologist and college professor, sent us a baby gift. It was a CD of music titled “Lullabies from the Axis of Evil.” The term “Axis of Evil” was first used in President George W. Bush’s 2002 State of the Union speech. He was referring to three countries that make up the axis: Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. Putting aside, for the moment, our complicated relationship with those three countries, the lullabies CD reminds us that, despite our geopolitical differences, these countries are home to human beings. They work, love, eat, drink, and practice religion as we do – and they sing lullabies to their babies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beyond the Politics: The Human Cost Behind the Israel–Iran Conflict

An Israeli and US flag is seen near the border with Southern Lebanon, as seen from a position on the Israeli side of the border on April 29, 2026 in Northern Israel, Israel.

(Photo by Amir Levy/Getty Images)