There is no question that Trump is a megalomaniac. Look at the definition: "An obsession with grandiose or extravagant things or actions." Whether it's relatively harmless actions like redecorating the White House with gold everywhere or attaching his name to every building and project he's involved in, or his more problematic king-like assertion of control over the world—Trump is a card-carrying megalomaniac.
First, the relatively harmless things. One recent piece of evidence of this is the renaming of the "Invest in America" accounts that the government will be setting up when children are born to "Trump" accounts. Whether this was done at Trump's urging or whether his Republican sycophants did it because they knew it would please him makes no difference; it is emblematic of one aspect of his psyche.
But while in most other instances one could criticize Trump's passion as tacky, they really did not benefit him in any material way. The "Trump" accounts are a different matter. Here you have an account that the government plans to set up for children when they are born (and at least one philanthropist is planning on adding to) to enable them to partake of the wealth of America, not through their labor but through investment.
Millions of children will forever have these "Trump" accounts, which will make them feel indebted to Trump, and by connection to the Republican Party, not to the government. It's as if Social Security were called FDR Security and Medicare and Medicaid were called LBJ Care/Aid.
The idea is ludicrous. These are all government plans, paid for by taxpayers, that benefit people who need assistance, whether it's the elderly or the poor. The person who was President and pushed for their legislative passage gets credit, but not by having his name attached to it.
When Republicans are no longer in control of Congress, the accounts should be returned to their original name: "Invest in America." Actually, a better name might be "Invest in Children" accounts.
Another recent example is the renaming of the Kennedy Center as the Trump - Kennedy Center to honor Trump. The Center's Board (all Trump appointees, with the one Democrat representative muted out of the vote) voted to make this change. Again, this was not instigated by Trump, rather by allies who wanted to please him, which he was, saying that, "I was honored by it."
While his petty megalomania is probably the least of his faults, it is nevertheless unseemly. It is something one would expect of the president of a "banana republic" or some dictator, not the President of the United States.
Far from petty and potentially harmful to the United States are the aggressive domestic and international actions that flow from his grandiosity. His exalted regard for himself has resulted in taking all domestic power unto himself and exacting retribution against his many perceived political enemies.
Internationally, we have seen this recently in his actions towards Venezuela and his ongoing talk of seizing Greenland; again, his exalted opinion of himself is reflected in his quest for power, his feeling that he is God-like—what he says or thinks is the final word.
The most forthright example of this came in a recent interview with The New York Times. He said that the only limit to his global power was, "My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
Unfortunately, the fact that he is a caricature, a buffoon, will not cost him any votes. As long as his supporters think he is good for them and for America, he will have their support. The New York Times reported that most Republican voters approve of his actions in Venezuela because, although they disapprove of nation-building, they think his actions were good for America because they projected strength while not committing American troops on the ground or costing American lives.
Bottom line, his grandiosity will unlikely cause him any damage politically, unless an action fails embarrassingly (e.g., had the hit command helicopter over Caracas crashed rather than flown on).
When America is ruled by a President who relishes brute power and displays example after example of megalomania, America has fallen in stature, not just in the eyes of the rest of the world, but, more importantly, in the eyes of all Americans who understand the importance of humaneness to what made America great.
What can you, as an individual citizen, do to return our government to one based on reason and respect for others? There are three basic things that the individual can do to protect our democracy: engage in mass peaceful demonstrations; encourage discussion of this issue within your community by suggesting such programs to local organizations and schools; and ultimately to vote in the upcoming midterm elections to return Congress to the control of the Democrats and thus restore the balance of power that the Founding Fathers intended, enabling the people's representatives to put a brake on the unbridled exercise of Presidential power.
It is absolutely critical that masses of individual citizens raise their voices. It shows the President and his supporters that they will pay a price for their actions. It shows the silent majority of Americans who are offended by the President's actions that they are not alone and encourage them to not sit on the sidelines, saying, "What can I do?" And it shows the rest of the world that the President does not speak for many of us; that he has not been given a blank check to govern.
Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com




















Eric Trump, the newly appointed ALT5 board director of World Liberty Financial, walks outside of the NASDAQ in Times Square as they mark the $1.5- billion partnership between World Liberty Financial and ALT5 Sigma with the ringing of the NASDAQ opening bell, on Aug. 13, 2025, in New York City.
Why does the Trump family always get a pass?
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche joined ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday to defend or explain a lot of controversies for the Trump administration: the Epstein files release, the events in Minneapolis, etc. He was also asked about possible conflicts of interest between President Trump’s family business and his job. Specifically, Blanche was asked about a very sketchy deal Trump’s son Eric signed with the UAE’s national security adviser, Sheikh Tahnoon.
Shortly before Trump was inaugurated in early 2025, Tahnoon invested $500 million in the Trump-owned World Liberty, a then newly launched cryptocurrency outfit. A few months later, UAE was granted permission to purchase sensitive American AI chips. According to the Wall Street Journal, which broke the story, “the deal marks something unprecedented in American politics: a foreign government official taking a major ownership stake in an incoming U.S. president’s company.”
“How do you respond to those who say this is a serious conflict of interest?” ABC host George Stephanopoulos asked.
“I love it when these papers talk about something being unprecedented or never happening before,” Blanche replied, “as if the Biden family and the Biden administration didn’t do exactly the same thing, and they were just in office.”
Blanche went on to boast about how the president is utterly transparent regarding his questionable business practices: “I don’t have a comment on it beyond Trump has been completely transparent when his family travels for business reasons. They don’t do so in secret. We don’t learn about it when we find a laptop a few years later. We learn about it when it’s happening.”
Sadly, Stephanopoulos didn’t offer the obvious response, which may have gone something like this: “OK, but the president and countless leading Republicans insisted that President Biden was the head of what they dubbed ‘the Biden Crime family’ and insisted his business dealings were corrupt, and indeed that his corruption merited impeachment. So how is being ‘transparent’ about similar corruption a defense?”
Now, I should be clear that I do think the Biden family’s business dealings were corrupt, whether or not laws were broken. Others disagree. I also think Trump’s business dealings appear to be worse in many ways than even what Biden was alleged to have done. But none of that is relevant. The standard set by Trump and Republicans is the relevant political standard, and by the deputy attorney general’s own account, the Trump administration is doing “exactly the same thing,” just more openly.
Since when is being more transparent about wrongdoing a defense? Try telling a cop or judge, “Yes, I robbed that bank. I’ve been completely transparent about that. So, what’s the big deal?”
This is just a small example of the broader dysfunction in the way we talk about politics.
Americans have a special hatred for hypocrisy. I think it goes back to the founding era. As Alexis de Tocqueville observed in “Democracy In America,” the old world had a different way of dealing with the moral shortcomings of leaders. Rank had its privileges. Nobles, never mind kings, were entitled to behave in ways that were forbidden to the little people.
In America, titles of nobility were banned in the Constitution and in our democratic culture. In a society built on notions of equality (the obvious exceptions of Black people, women, Native Americans notwithstanding) no one has access to special carve-outs or exemptions as to what is right and wrong. Claiming them, particularly in secret, feels like a betrayal against the whole idea of equality.
The problem in the modern era is that elites — of all ideological stripes — have violated that bargain. The result isn’t that we’ve abandoned any notion of right and wrong. Instead, by elevating hypocrisy to the greatest of sins, we end up weaponizing the principles, using them as a cudgel against the other side but not against our own.
Pick an issue: violent rhetoric by politicians, sexual misconduct, corruption and so on. With every revelation, almost immediately the debate becomes a riot of whataboutism. Team A says that Team B has no right to criticize because they did the same thing. Team B points out that Team A has switched positions. Everyone has a point. And everyone is missing the point.
Sure, hypocrisy is a moral failing, and partisan inconsistency is an intellectual one. But neither changes the objective facts. This is something you’re supposed to learn as a child: It doesn’t matter what everyone else is doing or saying, wrong is wrong. It’s also something lawyers like Mr. Blanche are supposed to know. Telling a judge that the hypocrisy of the prosecutor — or your client’s transparency — means your client did nothing wrong would earn you nothing but a laugh.
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.