Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Republican scheming backfires in Texas election

Opinion

Republican scheming backfires in Texas election

Texas Senate candidate James Talarico (D-TX) addresses supporters on election night on March 3, 2026, in Austin, Texas. Texans went to the polls to vote for Democratic and Republican primary candidates ahead of November's midterm elections.

(John Moore/Getty Images/TCA)

On Sept. 9, 2025, a little-known 36-year-old former middle school teacher and seminarian named James Talarico announced he was jumping into a crowded Texas Senate race, joining several other Democrats vying for GOP Sen. John Cornyn’s seat.

He’d first made news by flipping a Trump-leaning state legislative district in 2018, and became something of a rising star inside Texas Democratic circles. Outside of Texas, however, he still had work to do.


But he was smart — over the next seven years he started going where ambitious and savvy young Dems go to reach new voters, places like Joe Rogan’s podcast and Pod Save America. He gained more national attention during the Texas redistricting battle in 2025 when Texas Dems decided to leave the state in protest.

But when he entered the Senate race, he was still very much an underdog. He told Politico at the time, “[M]y life has always shown me that it’s a good idea to bet on the underdog.”

But Talarico wasn’t looking like such a good bet. When media-darling Rep. Jasmine Crockett jumped in the race in December, it looked like his bid was all but done. If he’d been a rising star, she was, for many Dems, the North Star, with regular appearances on cable news, “The View” and Jimmy Kimmel, and even presidential buzz swirling around her.

Leading up to the Democratic primary, as recently as Feb. 22, Crockett was leading Talarico by as many as 18 points.

Cut to Tuesday night, where Talarico pulled off an impressive win against Crockett, beating her by more than 7 points. He’ll face the winner of the Republican runoff, either Cornyn or Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, in the general.

So what happened? How did Talarico go from underdog down by double digits to a convincing win? Two words: Stephen Colbert.

On Feb. 16, a little more than two weeks before the primary, Talarico got a huge boost when Colbert accused CBS of blocking an interview with him from airing, a decision Colbert implied was out of fear of the Trump administration’s crackdown on media outlets he deemed unfriendly.

The fracas ate up the national airwaves, and Colbert posted the interview on YouTube instead, where it gained 5 million views in just two days. The Talarico campaign said he raised $2.5 million in 24 hours. Suddenly Talarico was the frontrunner.

Just like it had Sen. Mark Kelly and independent journalist Don Lemon, the Trump administration had targeted Talarico for censorship and intimidation and inadvertently made him a resistance hero, boosting his name ID, his fundraising, and his future prospects.

To be sure, Republicans wanted to face Crockett in the general, figuring their chances in Texas were better against a progressive Black woman rather than a Presbyterian white man.

And their calculus was probably right. But Trump’s GOP, in its bloodlust for lefty scalps, still doesn’t realize it keeps handing the opposition giant gifts — if Kelly wants to run for president, if Lemon wants to compete with corporate media, if Talarico wants to become the first Texas Democrat to win the Senate in three decades, they all got a lot closer to their goals thanks to Trump’s hamfisted attempts at censoring them.

He’s failed all three times — a grand jury would not indict Kelly, Lemon is almost certainly going to be acquitted, and now Talarico is poised to give Republicans a run for their money in November, especially if the scandal-plagued Paxton is the nominee.

These are embarrassing own goals that Republicans simply can’t afford. And they make clear that Trump is no longer the effective dragon-slayer he once was. Good news for the left.

(S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.)


Read More

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Ranked Choice Voting for All Elections

Woman casts vote.

Image: Getty Images on Unsplash. Unsplash+ license obtained by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths.

Wisconsin Lawmakers Propose Ranked Choice Voting for All Elections

BELOIT, Wis. — State Senator Mark Spreitzer (D-Beloit) and Representative Clinton Anderson (D-Beloit) introduced LRB-5709 on March 5, legislation that would implement ranked choice voting for state, federal, and local elections in Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin legislation would also eliminate the need for February primaries in nonpartisan elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Foreign Influence vs. Foreign Interference in Elections

Person wearing a hoodie, typing on a computer in the dark.

Xijian/Getty

Foreign Influence vs. Foreign Interference in Elections

Working alongside election denier activists, the Trump administration is reportedly exploring how to use the power of the federal government to take over elections from the states. One of the justifications for this takeover is based on allegations of foreign interference in the 2020 presidential race.

Experts agree that there is no evidence of foreign interference in 2020, although there were instances of influence by countries such as Russia and Iran. Subsequent elections have been subject to a range of foreign influence efforts. Influence and interference are not the same, but President Trump and his supporters conflate the two concepts when raising the specter of foreign meddling in U.S. elections. This confusion is evident in a purported draft executive order that outlines how the administration may seek to violate the Constitution and federalize the administration of elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules
A close up of a window with a sticker on it
Photo by Zach Wear on Unsplash

Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules

Last week, I wrote a column in the Fulcrum entitled “Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits.” The facts presented in that writing made it clear that the U.S. Constitution does not require voter ID and left almost all election administration—including voter qualifications—to the states. However, over time, constitutional amendments and federal statutes have restricted states’ ability to impose discriminatory voting rules, but they have never mandated voter ID.

The SAVE America Act

The national debate over voter ID has entered a new phase with the introduction of the SAVE America Act, the most sweeping federal voter‑identification and citizenship‑documentation proposal in modern history. For more than two centuries, voter eligibility rules—ID included—have been primarily a matter of state authority, bounded by constitutional protections against discrimination. The SAVE America Act would shift that balance by imposing federal requirements for both photo identification and documentary proof of citizenship in federal elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Primaries Are Already Shaping the 2026 Election – Here’s What We’re Seeing So Far
a person is casting a vote into a box

Primaries Are Already Shaping the 2026 Election – Here’s What We’re Seeing So Far

Primary elections are already underway across the United States, and this year’s contests are giving early clues about what voters may prioritize in the general election.

Several states have recently held high-profile primary races that could influence the balance of power in Congress over the next two years, in both state-wide and local elections. Many of these races involve open seats or competitive districts, making the outcomes especially significant as parties prepare for November.

Keep ReadingShow less