Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

FEMA Review Council Proposes Long List of Reforms to Federal Disaster Assistance

News

FEMA Review Council Proposes Long List of Reforms to Federal Disaster Assistance

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Headquarters Building in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — Nearly a year after President Donald Trump threatened to abolish the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a review council he appointed released a final report on Thursday to overhaul the agency by reducing administrative costs and shifting responsibility for disaster response to states.

The review council was created in January 2025 through Executive Order 14180. According to the order, the council, led by Homeland Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, was tasked with evaluating and improving the agency's efficacy and disaster response.


Last year, Trump described FEMA as “not a very successful experiment” and “extremely expensive.” He originally called to abolish FEMA outright, but later hedged.

“We want to wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it back to the state level,” the president said in the Oval Office in June.

However, the council approved a report on May 7 that would preserve the agency but ask Congress to downsize personnel and raise the threshold for disaster aid. The report heads to Trump for review. Many recommendations would need congressional approval.

“We need to refocus FEMA and get it back on its mission that it originally was,” Mullin said. Mullin assumed the role of co-chair after former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem was fired.

FEMA, part of the Department of Homeland Security, coordinates federal response efforts before, during, and after natural disasters. It aims to reduce risks and support communities before, during, and after these disasters, including providing financial assistance for response efforts such as debris removal and infrastructure repairs.

The report advised reducing administrative costs and transferring responsibility for disaster response to states and local territories, with FEMA taking on a supporting role.

It recommends, for example, that FEMA abandon efforts to help survivors secure long-term housing, saying the agency should instead help temporarily house people whose homes are uninhabitable.

FEMA’s support should “only be reserved for truly significant events,” said Kevin Guthrie, the director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management and a member of the review council.

Florida, along with Louisiana and Texas, has received the largest share of FEMA assistance since 2015, according to Axios. In the meantime, states like Illinois and California say FEMA isn’t delivering aid efficiently.

Thousands of survivors of the 2024 Los Angeles Fires, for example, still await more than $30 billion in federal aid for rebuilding homes and infrastructure.

In the 1990s, it took less than two weeks, on average, for a governor’s request for a major disaster declaration to be approved by the president. It now takes more than a month under the Trump administration, according to analysis from the Associated Press.

This new recommendation to overhaul FEMA under the Trump administration raised concerns for activist groups, which say FEMA is critical for disaster assistance. An advocacy organization called Sabotaging Our Safety, composed of disaster experts and former FEMA employees, criticized the president for deep cuts to the workforce.

“The agency Americans rely on when disaster strikes is measurably less prepared than at any point in recent memory,” the organization said in a report.

The group opposed the council's recommendations.

“Slashing the workforce in half and putting the burden of disaster recovery on the states would not save money. It would cost lives,” according to the report.

The Trump administration implemented, early on, a policy requiring top-level approval for FEMA contracts over $100,000. This policy, aimed at rooting out “waste, fraud and abuse,” delayed $17 million in federal disaster funds in January, according to The New York Times.

When Mullin took over as DHS secretary, he lifted the policy to speed up FEMA grants and reimbursements. Following this decision, more than $1 billion in backlogged funding was released.

FEMA under the partial government shutdown

During the 76-day partial government shutdown, FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund was reduced from nearly $10 billion to roughly $3 billion, forcing the agency to prioritize lifesaving and immediate relief, according to a press release from FEMA.

Non-essential activities, like rebuilding projects and funding for mitigation, were halted. Roughly 4,000 FEMA employees were furloughed, and another 1,600 worked without pay, according to the same press release.

Funding for the Disaster Relief Fund was reinstated on April 30, when the shutdown ended, but the agency faces a backlog of delayed projects.

Samantha Freeman is a graduate of politics, policy, and foreign affairs journalism student at Northwestern University Medill School of Journalism.


Read More

Tensions were High as Representatives Debated Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center

Members of the House Judiciary Committee during the hearing on the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Credit: Olivia Ardito

Tensions were High as Representatives Debated Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing last Wednesday examining claims that the Southern Poverty Law Center had funded the very hate groups the center aims to dismantle. Tensions were high as Republicans and Democrats fired back at each other. Noticeably absent was a representative from the center, a non-profit that since 1971 has fought for racial justice and against white supremacy.

The hearing came after the Texas Attorney General Ken Pax­ton announced last Monday that he was investigating the center. The U.S. Justice Department indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center in April for allegedly funneling money to people associated with violent extremist groups. The group has flatly rejected the accusations. While Republicans backed these claims, Democrats viewed the allegations as part of the Trump-backed efforts to hinder “DEI” and other racial justice initiatives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Is Protecting Insurrectionists But Not Your Kids

An analysis of gun violence, political extremism, Islamophobia, and community resilience in America after the San Diego Islamic Center shooting.

GemaIbarra / Getty Images

Trump Is Protecting Insurrectionists But Not Your Kids

Last Monday, two teenage gunmen opened fire outside the Islamic Center of San Diego, murdering three Muslim men. Unfortunately, this is the type of horror Americans have been conditioned to expect. After years of political stagnation on gun safety and ongoing hateful acts of violence, our president has signaled once again to children, to the Muslim community, and to everyone else: he does not care if you get shot.

Gun violence has been on the rise in the United States for too long. Perhaps the most harrowing consequence is that gun violence is now the leading cause of death among children. Whether from school shootings, homicides, suicides, or accidents, the gun-death rate for children is nearly five in every 100,000. In fact, the number of domestic deaths due to gun violence is about as many as U.S. military deaths in every war since World War I combined. More children have been lost to gun violence since 2020 than troops lost since 9/11. Yet even with such a striking death toll—and one affecting children no less—happening on our own soil, Vice President J.D. Vance calls it a “fact of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
The dome of the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., stands tall against a blue sky with the American flag waving proudly

Congress faces growing pressure to pass redistricting reform as lawmakers debate banning gerrymandering, independent commissions, and mid-decade map changes amid renewed national controversy over fair elections.

Getty Images, aire images

Congress's Missed Opportunities on Redistricting Reform

On April 29, Issue One posted an image on Facebook and Instagram: CONGRESS CAN FIX THIS WITH THREE SIMPLE STEPS:

  1. Establish Clear National Criteria for Fair Maps
  2. Require Independent Redistricting Commissions in Every State
  3. Ban Mid-Decade Redistricting.

Issue One added below: “… but it needs 60 Senate votes to do it.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less