Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

FEMA’s disaster relief practices under Biden administration spark legislation

News

FEMA’s disaster relief practices under Biden administration spark legislation

A sign marks the location of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) headquarters building on January 29, 2025, in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, J. David Ake

From 1995 until COVID hit, Scott Harding led student groups to volunteer in areas affected by natural disasters through the National Relief Network (NRN).

Harding, who also founded NRN, said he has taken groups across the country to disaster sites in his time and noticed Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) representatives, a group helping communities in the United States recover from natural disasters. But Harding said what he calls a “Biden Administration phenomenon,” caused by the Democratic culture in the nation’s capital, has politicized the disaster relief process.


“If I am not mistaken, D.C. is probably 95 or more percent Democrat, and there just seems to be a lot of political turmoil,” Harding said.

According to results from the 2024 presidential election, 92.5 percent of D.C. residents voted for Vice President Kamala Harris and 6.6 percent for President Donald Trump.

During efforts to assist those affected by Hurricane Milton and Helene in 2024, FEMA supervisor Marn’i Washington was fired after reports stated she told FEMA workers to skip over houses in Placid, Fla., displaying support for Trump.

As a result, Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody sued former FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell and Washington in November 2024.

“I am taking swift legal action to find out how far this political discrimination reaches and to make sure all Americans who fall victim to devastating storms are served, regardless of their political affiliation,” Moody stated in a press release.

In February 2025, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel filed a Hatch Act complaint against Washington for her actions. The Hatch Act’s purpose is to ensure federal programs are administered in a nonpartisan manner so federal employee's actions are not passed on political merit.

According to a report from the New York Post, an agency official told The Post it was “an open secret” during the Biden administration that FEMA employees avoided “white or conservative-dominated” disaster zones. These orders were “clear guidance” from the official’s supervisors.

Recently, new legislation has been introduced to the House of Representatives. Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) introduced legislation to prohibit discrimination based on political affiliation when granting disaster assistance. Perry, Tracey Mann (R-Kan.), and Sam Graves (R-Mo.) introduced similar legislation during the 118th Congress.

“The blatant disregard of President-elect Trump supporters directly contradicts FEMA’s core mission and values,” the members wrote when introducing the legislation last year.

Although Harding has not volunteered to support people in natural disasters since before COVID-19, he said FEMA supervisors in the nation’s capital can override what local FEMA representatives are doing. One example Harding recalls is FEMA supervisors drawing a line in a community in North Carolina affected by flooding, meaning not all residents received disaster assistance.

“They make decisions in Washington, D.C., which make absolutely no sense for the people on the ground,” Harding said, adding storms do not follow man-made lines.

Harding also said that in American society, he has noticed how people with different political opinions cannot get along now, compared to previous years. According to the Vanderbilt Unity Index, the U.S. is on track to continue increasing political polarization. When Harding used to take students to volunteer in these natural disaster areas, he said he encouraged students to talk with those they were serving.

One example he recalls is bringing a group of students down to Morehead City, N.C. While cleaning out an older man’s house, which was flooded, he brought out a rocking chair to sit on his lawn and watch the volunteers. Harding said he suddenly looked over and noticed six students seated on the ground talking to the man.

Harding said the students learned the man had been born approximately 80 years ago in his now-flooded house, which his father had also built.

“That’s what I think FEMA forgets,” Harding said. “They’re too busy looking at logistics they forget who they are serving.”


Maggie Rhoads is a student journalist attending George Washington University School of Media and Public Affairs. At The Fulcrum, she covers how legislation and policy are impacting communities.

Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less