Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Who’s To Blame: Epstein Files Scandal Reveals Racism and Classism in U.S. Anti-Trafficking Discourse

Opinion

Who’s To Blame: Epstein Files Scandal Reveals Racism and Classism in U.S. Anti-Trafficking Discourse

A billboard in Times Square calls for the release of the Epstein files on July 23, 2025 in New York City. Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed President Donald Trump in May on the Justice Department's review of the documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, telling him that his name appeared in the files.

Getty Images, Adam Gray

The past several weeks have produced a 24/7 churn of speculation surrounding the lack of transparency from the White House on President Donald Trump’s relationship to the late convicted pedophile and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

The scandal dominating the news cycle and social media appears for the first time to have driven a wedge between members of the MAGA community and elected Republicans.


In the swirl of media denials and accusations, political gaslighting, plus analysis by pundits and experts, there is a notable gap in discourse around the racist, classist realities of sex trafficking law enforcement-led operations in the U.S. today.

Research shows the anti-trafficking movement has its roots in moral panic surrounding the fear of “white slavery” during the era of the suffragette. This movement is led by middle-class and wealthy women centered on men of color coming for the virginity of white women, the luring of innocents to city life, and the arrival of new immigrant populations they viewed as a threat.

The prohibition of vice in the U.S., namely alcohol, opium, and sex work, has been tied to classist, racist, and xenophobic public policy and enforcement.

As evidenced by the lack of survivor involvement in decision-making around the release of the Epstein files, the current outrage is less about the desire to save the children or seek justice for survivors and more a bipartisan political stunt in the pursuit of power.

This leveraging of victims’ stories for political gain is not unique and is a distinct marker in many aspects of the anti-trafficking movement. Michael Flynn, former National Security Advisor, posted on X, “Regardless of what class of society abuses and commits crimes against CHILDREN, it is NEVER acceptable.”

Perhaps Flynn touched on classist immunity for exploiters that needs to be understood in mainstream discussion. Still, the lack of historical awareness is a major flaw in the anti-trafficking movement.

Human trafficking is often conflated with sex work and erases the reality of labor trafficking. This erasure ignores exploitation of groups of people through targeted, systemic sexual assault, forced labor, xenophobia, and genocide.

This is ongoing and historic, a replaying of historical systems of sex, labor, and marriage exploitation. The United States laws, systems, and culture are responsible for creating the conditions that have led to the current sexual violence crisis.

Anti-trafficking organizations, law enforcement, and celebrities frequently use data that is anecdotal, sensationalistic, and lacks the scrutiny of proof of the source applied to evidence-based practices.

The underground nature of both sex trafficking and consensual sex work makes it difficult to track or verify numbers, especially considering how many organizations and individuals have made careers based on these suspect data points. One concern by sex worker rights advocates reveals that law enforcement released data on trafficking “rescues” are most often vice stings and raids on consensual sex workers.

Arrests for prostitution-related offenses outnumber those for sex trafficking by nearly 38 to 1. The FBI defines sex trafficking as "inducing a person by force, fraud, or coercion to participate in commercial sex acts, or in which the person induced to perform such act(s) has not attained 18 years of age.”

Much like the 1980s war on drugs, the penalties associated with BIPOC or poor white offenders in relation to sex crimes reveal a similar inequity in discourse and the impact of criminalization. The war on drugs was focused on the criminalization of Black men. Today, racist and classist policing of BIPOC people in relation to sex work erases the history of human trafficking into slavery historically.

Between 2005 and 2015, 57% of defendants in U.S. federal minor sex trafficking trials were Black, yet only about 13% of the U.S. population is African-American. On average, Black people convicted of sex trafficking minors are sentenced for 39 months longer than white people, according to 2020 research.

Whether or not the Epstein files reveal Trump was involved in trafficking and exploitation of people, it is happening now in mass deportation efforts, further development of U.S. slave trade through mass incarceration, and the development of concentration camps like Alligator Alcatraz that are rooted in a sordid, racist, and xenophobic past.

The United States created the conditions for sex, marriage, and labor trafficking with its public policy, then propped itself up as a savior and rescuer for the issue it created. This was meant to drive more spending on law enforcement, gentrification efforts, and unscrupulous, coercive “anti-trafficking” NGOs.

Apart from racialized men as the focus of law enforcement-led trafficking operations, new research from the Critical Trafficking and Sex Work Studies Research Cluster out of York University shows evidence that young women of color, who are often victims themselves, are being charged as co-conspirators in sex trafficking cases.

Within this “anti-trafficking” landscape, research shows there is a co-opting of racial justice language by NGOs that say they are addressing “modern slavery,” while upholding the interests of the state and corporations.

What remains clear in the Epstein case, after seeing news clips of white, blonde women and girls made vulnerable to exploitation through poverty, and then sexually coerced, forced, assaulted, and sold by the billionaire and his associates, is that this MAGA retelling is that they are the perfect victim, the virginal white young girl or woman.

While many survivors are white, hundreds of thousands of survivors do not fit that mold.

In a two-year review done by the FBI of all suspected human trafficking incidents, 40% of victims of sex trafficking were African American. A 2015 survey of Black transwomen found that 53% have experienced sexual violence. Nearly half of all Black/African/African American transgender people, 47%, have been incarcerated, and incarcerated transgender individuals are 10 times as likely to be sexually assaulted by their fellow inmates and five times as likely to be sexually assaulted by staff.

All survivors have long-lasting traumatic effects. Research from the American Psychological Association shows that the effects of human trafficking on survivors are severe depression, suicidal ideation, and PTSD.

Dealing with the crisis of sex trafficking as a nation, it is urgent to finally wake up to the realities of what victims in this country face under the pressure of being silenced by those in power.

This is about the erasure of the less-understood stories about systemic, state-sanctioned human trafficking under the guise of public safety. Transparency of the systems in place could inform how to move forward with survivor protection for everyone in the future.

Soma Snakeoil is Executive Director/Cofounder of The Sidewalk Project, which specializes in resources for street-based sex workers and survivors. She is a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project.

Read More

As the Earth Rumbles, the Sky Calls, LaLu, the Eagle, Wants To Speak!

A reflection on freedom, democracy, and moral courage in America, urging citizens to stand up before our values fly away.

Getty Images, James Gilbert

As the Earth Rumbles, the Sky Calls, LaLu, the Eagle, Wants To Speak!

As a professional dancer, I’ve always been grounded, but the earth is rumbling, and I am uncharacteristically unsteady. I’m not alone in this feeling. Shifting cultural values are rattling our sense of moral integrity. Unfathomable words (calling a congresswoman and the people “garbage”), acts of cruelty (killing survivors stranded in the ocean), or calling a journalist “piggy,” are playfully spun as somehow normal. Our inner GPS systems are not able to locate the center.

I’m climbing trees these days in order to get up off the earth. At the age of 74, it is frankly exhilarating – I am more cognizant of the danger, so I must be attentive. All my senses are buzzing as I negotiate the craggy shape of a giant, catalpa tree. I settle into a large, gently curving limb, which hugs my body like a nest. My cries enter the vastness of the universe, and the birds sing me to sleep. I’m trying to locate myself again. Dreams are vivid up in the air.

Keep ReadingShow less
Social media apps on a phone

A Pentagon watchdog confirms senior officials shared sensitive military plans on Signal, risking U.S. troops. A veteran argues accountability is long overdue.

Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto via Getty Images

There’s No Excuse for Signalgate

The Defense Department Inspector General just announced that information shared by Defense Secretary Hegseth in a Signal chat this spring could have indeed put U.S. troops, their mission, and national security in great peril. To recap, in an unforced error, our Defense Secretary, National Security Advisor, and Vice President conducted detailed discussions about an imminent military operation against Houthi targets in Yemen over Signal, a hackable commercial messaging app (that also does not comply with public record laws). These “professionals” accidentally added a journalist to the group chat, which meant the Editor-in-Chief of the Atlantic received real-time intelligence about a pending U.S. military strike, including exactly when bombs would begin falling on Yemeni targets. Had Houthi militants gotten their hands on this information, it would have been enough to help them better defend their positions if not actively shoot down the American pilots. This was a catastrophic breakdown in the most basic protocols governing sensitive information and technology. Nine months later, are we any safer?

As a veteran, I take their cavalier attitude towards national security personally. I got out of the Navy as a Lieutenant Commander after ten years as an aviator, a role that required survival, evasion, resistance, and escape training before ever deploying, in case I should ever get shot down. To think that the Defense Secretary, National Security Advisor, and Vice President could have so carelessly put these pilots in danger betrays the trust troops place in their Chain of Command while putting their lives on the line in the service of this country.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democrat's Plan for Ending the War in Gaza
An Israeli airstrike hit Deir al-Balah in central Gaza on Jan. 1, 2024.
Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A Democrat's Plan for Ending the War in Gaza

Trump's 21-point peace plan for Gaza has not and will not go anywhere, despite its adoption by the UN Security Council. There are two reasons. One is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ultra-orthodox nationalist allies will not agree to an eventual Palestinian state in the occupied territories. The other is that Hamas will not stand down and give up its arms; its main interest is the destruction of Israel, not the creation of a home for the Palestinian people.

Democrats should operate as the "loyal opposition" and propose a different path to end the "war" and establish peace. So far, they have merely followed the failed policies of the Biden administration.

Keep ReadingShow less
How the Unprecedented Redistricting War Is Harming Election Officials, Politicians, and Voters

The Indiana State House is the site of the latest political fight over new congressional maps for the 2026 election.

Lee Klafczynski for Chalkbeat

How the Unprecedented Redistricting War Is Harming Election Officials, Politicians, and Voters

The redrawing of states’ congressional districts typically happens only once per decade, following the release of new U.S. Census data. But we’re now up to six states that have enacted new congressional maps for the 2026 midterms; that’s more than in any election cycle not immediately following a census since 1983-84. Even more are expected to join the fray before voters head to the polls next year. Ultimately, more than a third of districts nationwide could be redrawn, threatening to confuse and disenfranchise voters.

The truly unusual thing, though, is that four of those states passed new maps totally voluntarily. Texas, Missouri, and North Carolina all redrew their districts after President Donald Trump urged them to create more safe seats for Republicans to help the GOP maintain control of the House of Representatives next year, and California did so in order to push back against Trump and create more safe seats for Democrats. (The other two states redrew for more anodyne reasons: Utah’s old map was thrown out in court, and Ohio’s was always set to expire after the 2024 election.) To put that in perspective, only two states voluntarily redistricted in total in the 52 years from 1973 to 2024, according to the Pew Research Center.

Keep ReadingShow less