Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

An Open Letter to Speaker Johnson: Real Patriots Don’t Fear Democracy

Opinion

A crowd protesting.
A crowd gathered for a “No Kings” protest on October 18, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska.
Hasan Akbas/Anadolu via Getty Images

Dear Speaker Johnson,

Well, the so-called “Hate America Rally” came and went, and it turns out the only hate anyone could find was the kind directed at it—mostly from you and the Trump regime. You might’ve been disappointed, Mike. No violence. No mass arrests. No Marxist uprising. No hordes of rabid anarchists plotting the downfall of Western civilization. Just ordinary Americans in the streets, marching and singing, reminding their government that we still don’t crown politicians in this country.


Nationwide, as many as eight million people came out, making it one of the largest coordinated protests in modern U.S. history. You wouldn’t know that from your little pre-game speech, though. You climbed onto your rickety soapbox and “warned” the nation about “radical leftists,” “antifa people,” and “pro-Hamas agitators,” which, frankly, reads like you fed a box of scary nouns into a teleprompter and hit shuffle. You tried to paint anyone protesting Trump’s authoritarian habits as extremists with blue hair and Che Guevara flags. Adorable—and about as effective as a wet sparkler on the Fourth of July.

For the record, Mike, I attended the march in Austin, Texas, where more than twenty thousand people filled the streets from the Capitol to Auditorium Shores. So did a lot of my friends — many of them veterans and former Republicans whose loyalty lies with the Constitution, not a party brand or personality cult. We’re fairly boring people, haircut-wise. My hair, for instance, has largely recused itself from the proceedings. When I did have it, it was never blue.

And while I can’t swear there weren’t a few “super-scary anarchist types” hiding somewhere in a crowd that size, I didn’t notice them. They were probably lost behind the thousands of ordinary people thanking police officers, handing out water, and helping strangers beat the heat—clergy, union members, veterans in faded ball caps, families pushing strollers, teachers, nurses, students, even a few dogs in red, white, and blue bandanas. Nobody hating America. If anything, it was the most patriotic thing I’ve seen in years: regular citizens standing up for democracy itself.

I don’t play the veteran card often, Mike, but when someone like you starts slinging fear and trying to convince people they shouldn’t stand next to these so-called “radical, freedom-hating Marxists,” or whatever, I’ll show it. Your goal is obvious: convince us to stay home, keep quiet, and be good little citizens while you and your friends cosplay as patriots on TV. But here’s what you miss: when you mock the protesters, you’re mocking us too.

A lot of combat veterans like me were in those crowds—men and women who’ve worn the uniform, put their lives on the line, and still believe the oath doesn’t expire. You and Trump never served, and that’s fine. Military service isn’t mandatory, and not everyone is cut out for the warrior class anyway. But maybe have the humility not to question the love of country of those who did.

I know plenty of veterans disagree with me, and I don’t pretend to speak for them. Many are my friends and brothers. We may argue and debate, but I’d never disrespect their service by suggesting they “hate America” just because we see things differently. That kind of cheap, desperate move is best left to politicians like you.

That’s the thing, Mike. Disagreement isn’t disloyalty. You talk like you’ve forgotten that somewhere between your oath and your press releases. But that’s not how America works. The First Amendment doesn’t say “free speech, unless it hurts Mike’s or Donny’s feelings.” Your own bio lists law and politics, so maybe skip the purity tests for people exercising the rights you also swore to uphold. October 18 didn’t look like a hateful mob. It looked like a civics lesson someone forgot to brief you on. What you called a “Hate America Rally” was a peaceful, diverse, multigenerational crowd that emphasized nonviolence, de-escalation, and following the law. That’s democracy in action in a free country.

Can we be honest for a minute, Mike? I know truth isn’t exactly your strong suit—or the president’s—but let’s give it a shot. The real reason you demonized these protests is because you’re scared. The turnout alone showed how hollow your rhetoric really is. Millions of ordinary Americans gathering in defense of democracy shatter the illusion that Trump has some kind of national mandate. He doesn’t. In fact, he won the presidency with barely a third of eligible Americans casting a vote for him, while roughly two-thirds either voted against him or didn’t vote at all. That’s a plurality, not a mandate. Most Americans aren’t buying what you’re selling, and those crowds made it painfully obvious.

If you’d looked at the marches across the country, you’d have seen plenty of freedom-loving Americans—veterans, teachers, nurses, and neighbors who still believe in democracy. We brought the American flags, the facts, and the kind of patriotism that doesn’t need permission. You brought the fearmongering and empty talking points. America can decide which one looks more like love of country.

Ever since you took the gavel in 2023, the theatrical outrage has been nonstop. This latest performance is especially flimsy. If your grand strategy is to claim that everyone who disagrees with you and your boss “hates America,” that’s not leadership or governance. It’s not even clever or original. It’s a sad, desperate little tantrum, a last-ditch attempt to steer the narrative.

But we aren’t going anywhere, Speaker Johnson. No matter how many slurs or threats you throw our way, we’ll be in the streets—loud, visible, and peaceful—because that’s what Americans do when we see our country drifting toward something that looks a lot like a totalitarian state. We speak out. We stand on the right side of history. You should take notes.

Anyway, Mike, I just wanted you to know that your little strategy of manufactured outrage and feigned ignorance isn’t working. Trying to turn dissent into disloyalty and paint protest as treason is as transparent as it is tired. The people who love this country will keep raising their voices and calling out the authoritarian bullshit you so eagerly hitched your pathetic little wagon to. Every time you try to shame us into silence, you only remind us why it matters to keep speaking up.

I yield back the remainder of my time.


Nick Allison is a college dropout, combat veteran, and writer based in Austin, Texas. He’s not a journalist or a pundit—just a political independent, unaffiliated with any party, who still believes the Constitution is worth defending. Nick’s essays and poems have appeared in HuffPost, CounterPunch, The Chaos Section, The Shore, Eunoia Review, New Verse News, and elsewhere.


Read More

People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 02, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

Getty Images, Contributor

Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

For those old enough to remember the first Gulf War, the scenes feel painfully familiar: smoke rising over Tehran. Babies carried out of a bombed-out hospital in incubators. Missiles striking cities across the Middle East. Oil markets in turmoil as Iran threatens to close the Strait of Hormuz. The war of choice that began with Israeli and American strikes on Iran is widening by the hour, pulling in multiple countries, including NATO allies, and producing casualties that mount by the day.

Much of the early discussion has focused on obvious questions. How far will the conflict spread? How many people will die? What will it cost the United States in money, lives, and global stability?

Keep ReadingShow less