Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Just the Facts: Canada-U.S. Tariff Update- What’s Changed Since March 2025?

From Steel to Dairy: What’s Changed in Canada-U.S. Trade and Why It Matters Now

Just the Facts: Canada-U.S. Tariff Update- What’s Changed Since March 2025?

US Canada tariff battle

AI generated

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What is a tariff?

A tariff is a tax imposed by a government on imports or exports of goods, often used to protect domestic industries or respond to trade disputes.


What tariffs does Canada currently impose on U.S. products?

As of August 2025, Canada has significantly reduced its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. On September 1, Canada will lift most of the 25% counter-tariffs it imposed in March on $29.8 billion worth of U.S. imports.. However, tariffs remain in place for strategic sectors:

  • Steel and Aluminum: 25% tariffs remain on U.S. steel and aluminum imports.
  • Automobiles: Canadian tariffs on U.S. automobiles remain in effect.
  • Lumber and Copper: These sectors continue to face targeted duties.

Goods covered under the USMCA (Canada’s CUSMA) are now largely tariff-free, reflecting a renewed commitment to free trade.

What tariffs does the United States currently impose on Canadian products?

The U.S. maintains a mixed tariff regime:

  • Steel and Aluminum: In August, the U.S. raised tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum to 35% for non-USMCA-compliant goods.
  • Energy and Critical Minerals: A 10% tariff applies to Canadian exports in these categories.
  • Autos and Lumber: These remain subject to U.S. duties, pending further negotiations.

Despite these measures, over 85% of Canada-U.S. trade is now tariff-free, and the average U.S. tariff rate on Canadian goods stands at 5.6%—the lowest among U.S. trading partners.

What U.S. goods are no longer subject to Canadian tariffs?

Starting September 1, Canada will remove tariffs on a wide range of U.S. consumer and agricultural goods, including:

  • Dairy and Poultry: Milk, cheese, butter, chicken, turkey, and eggs.
  • Grains and Produce: Wheat, rice, citrus fruits, berries, and melons.
  • Beverages and Alcohol: Coffee, tea, wine, beer, and spirits.
  • Cosmetics and Toiletries: Perfumes, soaps, toothpaste, and deodorants.
  • Miscellaneous: Condiments, protein powders, plastic building materials, and more.

These removals signal a strategic pivot toward restoring trade relations and aligning with USMCA provisions.

How has the trade war impacted Canadian purchases of U.S. goods?

Canadian imports of U.S. goods have declined notably in 2025. From January to June, total imports from the U.S. fell by approximately $2.86 billion compared to the same period in 2024—a 1.5% drop. The decline is most pronounced in:

  • Automotive Parts & Vehicles: Tariffs on autos and components have disrupted supply chains, leading to procurement delays and cost volatility.
  • Steel & Aluminum: Canadian manufacturers are facing higher input costs due to U.S. tariffs, prompting some to shift sourcing to non-U.S. suppliers.
  • Consumer Electronics & Packaged Goods: Retailers report longer lead times and rising costs, with many pivoting to private-label or Canadian-made alternatives.
  • Agricultural Products: Tariffs on dairy, pork, and beef have led to reduced imports, especially outside USMCA quota limits.

Retailers and manufacturers are responding by staging inventory in the U.S., renegotiating vendor contracts, and exploring offshore sourcing to avoid tariff exposure.

Are Canadians traveling to the United States less in 2025?

Yes, and dramatically so. Canadian travel to the U.S. has plummeted in 2025, with steep declines across all modes of transportation:

  • Automobile Travel: Down 33% in June compared to June 2024, following a 38% drop in May.
  • Air Travel: Declined 22% year-over-year in June, marking the sixth consecutive month of double-digit declines.
  • Same-Day Excursions: Fell by 40.3% in May, with overnight travel down 34.3%.

Both economic and political factors drive this downturn:

  • Tariff Sentiment: Over half of Canadians who had planned U.S. trips in early 2025 changed their plans due to tariff announcements and political rhetoric.
  • Border Tensions: Reports of Canadian tourists being detained at U.S. border crossings have further dampened travel enthusiasm.
  • Economic Impact: The U.S. tourism industry is projected to lose up to $29 billion in 2025, with Canadian travelers accounting for a significant portion of that shortfall.

Canadians are increasingly choosing alternative destinations like Mexico and the Caribbean, reshaping North American tourism flows.

Do U.S. farmers still rely on exports to Canada?

Yes. In 2025, Canada remains a top destination for U.S. agricultural exports. Dairy exports alone continue to exceed $8 billion annually, with Canada and Mexico accounting for over 40% of that volume. Access to Canadian markets remains vital for U.S. farmers to manage supply, stabilize prices, and maintain profitability.

Do trade agreements favor Canada or the U.S.?

The USMCA continues to offer mutual benefits:

  • For the U.S.: Expanded access to Canada’s dairy market and strengthened auto manufacturing rules.
  • For Canada: Preserved dispute resolution mechanisms and protection for cultural industries.

Recent tariff removals and diplomatic overtures suggest a renewed effort to balance trade interests, though strategic sectors remain contentious.

What is the current trade imbalance?

In 2025, the U.S. continues to run a trade deficit with Canada:

  • 2025 (YTD): U.S. exports to Canada are projected at $178.2 billion, while imports from Canada are estimated at $211.4 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of approximately $33.2 billion.

Energy imports—especially crude oil and natural gas—remain the primary drivers of this imbalance.

Is the trade imbalance harmful to the U.S. economy?

Not necessarily. The U.S.-Canada trade relationship is deeply integrated:

  1. Supply Chains: Canadian inputs support U.S. manufacturing and energy sectors.
  2. Services Trade: The U.S. maintains a surplus in services, offsetting some goods deficits.
  3. Economic Synergy: Trade reflects consumer demand and industrial interdependence, not just competition.

While some sectors feel pressure, the overall relationship remains one of mutual benefit and strategic importance.

David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Trump-Era Budget Cuts Suspend UCLA Professor’s Mental Health Research Grant

Professor Carrie Bearden (on the left) at a Stand Up for Science rally in spring 2025.

Photo Provided

Trump-Era Budget Cuts Suspend UCLA Professor’s Mental Health Research Grant

UC Los Angeles Psychology professor Carrie Bearden is among many whose work has been stalled due to the Trump administration’s grant suspensions to universities across the country.

“I just feel this constant whiplash every single day,” Bearden said. “The bedrock, the foundation of everything that we're doing, is really being shaken on a daily basis … To see that at an institutional level is really shocking. Yes, we saw it coming with these other institutions, but I think everybody's still sort of in a state of shock.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Border Patrol in Texas
"Our communities fear that the police and deportation agents are one and the same," the authors write.
John Moore/Getty Images

Who deported more migrants? Obama or Trump? We checked the numbers

We received a question through our Instagram account asking "if it's true what people say" that President Barack Obama deported more immigrants than Donald Trump. To answer our follower, Factchequeado reviewed the public deportation data available from 1993 to June 2025, to compare the policies of both presidents and other administrations.

Deportation statistics ("removals") are not available in a single repository, updated information is lacking, and there are limitations that we note at the end of this text in the methodology section.

Keep ReadingShow less
RFK Jr. Vowed To Find the Environmental Causes of Autism. Then He Shut Down Research Trying To Do Just That.

Erin McCanlies spent almost two decades at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health studying how parents’ exposure to chemicals affects the chance that they will have a child with autism. This spring, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. eliminated her entire division.

Nate Smallwood for ProPublica

RFK Jr. Vowed To Find the Environmental Causes of Autism. Then He Shut Down Research Trying To Do Just That.

Erin McCanlies was listening to the radio one morning in April when she heard Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promising to find the cause of autism by September. The secretary of Health and Human Services said he believed an environmental toxin was responsible for the dramatic increase in the condition and vowed to gather “the most credible scientists from all over the world” to solve the mystery.

Nothing like that has ever been done before, he told an interviewer.

Keep ReadingShow less
When Politicians Draw Their Own Victories: Why and How To End Gerrymandering

Alyssa West from Austin holds up a sign during the Fight the Trump Takeover rally at the Texas Capitol on Saturday, August. 16, 2025.

(Aaron E. Martinez/Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images)

When Politicians Draw Their Own Victories: Why and How To End Gerrymandering

From MAGA Republicans to progressive Democrats to those of us in the middle, Americans want real change – and they’re tired of politics as usual. They’re craving authenticity, real reform, and an end to the status quo. More and more, voters seem to be embracing disruption over the empty promises of establishment politicians, who too often live by the creed that “one bad idea deserves a bigger one.” Just look at how both parties are handling gerrymandering in Texas and California, and it’s difficult to see it as anything other than both parties trying to rig elections in their favor.

Instead of fixing the system, politicians are fueling a turbocharged redistricting arms race ahead of high-stakes midterm 2026 elections that will determine control of the U.S. Congress. In Texas, Republicans just redrew congressional lines, likely guaranteeing five new Republican seats, which has sparked Democratic strongholds like California and New York to threaten their own gerrymandered counterattacks.

Keep ReadingShow less