Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Canada-U.S. Tariff Update- What’s Changed Since March 2025?

From Steel to Dairy: What’s Changed in Canada-U.S. Trade and Why It Matters Now

Opinion

Just the Facts: Canada-U.S. Tariff Update- What’s Changed Since March 2025?

US Canada tariff battle

AI generated

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What is a tariff?

A tariff is a tax imposed by a government on imports or exports of goods, often used to protect domestic industries or respond to trade disputes.


What tariffs does Canada currently impose on U.S. products?

As of August 2025, Canada has significantly reduced its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. On September 1, Canada will lift most of the 25% counter-tariffs it imposed in March on $29.8 billion worth of U.S. imports.. However, tariffs remain in place for strategic sectors:

  • Steel and Aluminum: 25% tariffs remain on U.S. steel and aluminum imports.
  • Automobiles: Canadian tariffs on U.S. automobiles remain in effect.
  • Lumber and Copper: These sectors continue to face targeted duties.

Goods covered under the USMCA (Canada’s CUSMA) are now largely tariff-free, reflecting a renewed commitment to free trade.

What tariffs does the United States currently impose on Canadian products?

The U.S. maintains a mixed tariff regime:

  • Steel and Aluminum: In August, the U.S. raised tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum to 35% for non-USMCA-compliant goods.
  • Energy and Critical Minerals: A 10% tariff applies to Canadian exports in these categories.
  • Autos and Lumber: These remain subject to U.S. duties, pending further negotiations.

Despite these measures, over 85% of Canada-U.S. trade is now tariff-free, and the average U.S. tariff rate on Canadian goods stands at 5.6%—the lowest among U.S. trading partners.

What U.S. goods are no longer subject to Canadian tariffs?

Starting September 1, Canada will remove tariffs on a wide range of U.S. consumer and agricultural goods, including:

  • Dairy and Poultry: Milk, cheese, butter, chicken, turkey, and eggs.
  • Grains and Produce: Wheat, rice, citrus fruits, berries, and melons.
  • Beverages and Alcohol: Coffee, tea, wine, beer, and spirits.
  • Cosmetics and Toiletries: Perfumes, soaps, toothpaste, and deodorants.
  • Miscellaneous: Condiments, protein powders, plastic building materials, and more.

These removals signal a strategic pivot toward restoring trade relations and aligning with USMCA provisions.

How has the trade war impacted Canadian purchases of U.S. goods?

Canadian imports of U.S. goods have declined notably in 2025. From January to June, total imports from the U.S. fell by approximately $2.86 billion compared to the same period in 2024—a 1.5% drop. The decline is most pronounced in:

  • Automotive Parts & Vehicles: Tariffs on autos and components have disrupted supply chains, leading to procurement delays and cost volatility.
  • Steel & Aluminum: Canadian manufacturers are facing higher input costs due to U.S. tariffs, prompting some to shift sourcing to non-U.S. suppliers.
  • Consumer Electronics & Packaged Goods: Retailers report longer lead times and rising costs, with many pivoting to private-label or Canadian-made alternatives.
  • Agricultural Products: Tariffs on dairy, pork, and beef have led to reduced imports, especially outside USMCA quota limits.

Retailers and manufacturers are responding by staging inventory in the U.S., renegotiating vendor contracts, and exploring offshore sourcing to avoid tariff exposure.

Are Canadians traveling to the United States less in 2025?

Yes, and dramatically so. Canadian travel to the U.S. has plummeted in 2025, with steep declines across all modes of transportation:

  • Automobile Travel: Down 33% in June compared to June 2024, following a 38% drop in May.
  • Air Travel: Declined 22% year-over-year in June, marking the sixth consecutive month of double-digit declines.
  • Same-Day Excursions: Fell by 40.3% in May, with overnight travel down 34.3%.

Both economic and political factors drive this downturn:

  • Tariff Sentiment: Over half of Canadians who had planned U.S. trips in early 2025 changed their plans due to tariff announcements and political rhetoric.
  • Border Tensions: Reports of Canadian tourists being detained at U.S. border crossings have further dampened travel enthusiasm.
  • Economic Impact: The U.S. tourism industry is projected to lose up to $29 billion in 2025, with Canadian travelers accounting for a significant portion of that shortfall.

Canadians are increasingly choosing alternative destinations like Mexico and the Caribbean, reshaping North American tourism flows.

Do U.S. farmers still rely on exports to Canada?

Yes. In 2025, Canada remains a top destination for U.S. agricultural exports. Dairy exports alone continue to exceed $8 billion annually, with Canada and Mexico accounting for over 40% of that volume. Access to Canadian markets remains vital for U.S. farmers to manage supply, stabilize prices, and maintain profitability.

Do trade agreements favor Canada or the U.S.?

The USMCA continues to offer mutual benefits:

  • For the U.S.: Expanded access to Canada’s dairy market and strengthened auto manufacturing rules.
  • For Canada: Preserved dispute resolution mechanisms and protection for cultural industries.

Recent tariff removals and diplomatic overtures suggest a renewed effort to balance trade interests, though strategic sectors remain contentious.

What is the current trade imbalance?

In 2025, the U.S. continues to run a trade deficit with Canada:

  • 2025 (YTD): U.S. exports to Canada are projected at $178.2 billion, while imports from Canada are estimated at $211.4 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of approximately $33.2 billion.

Energy imports—especially crude oil and natural gas—remain the primary drivers of this imbalance.

Is the trade imbalance harmful to the U.S. economy?

Not necessarily. The U.S.-Canada trade relationship is deeply integrated:

  1. Supply Chains: Canadian inputs support U.S. manufacturing and energy sectors.
  2. Services Trade: The U.S. maintains a surplus in services, offsetting some goods deficits.
  3. Economic Synergy: Trade reflects consumer demand and industrial interdependence, not just competition.

While some sectors feel pressure, the overall relationship remains one of mutual benefit and strategic importance.

David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less