Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Just the Facts: Canada-U.S. Tariff Update- What’s Changed Since March 2025?

From Steel to Dairy: What’s Changed in Canada-U.S. Trade and Why It Matters Now

Opinion

Just the Facts: Canada-U.S. Tariff Update- What’s Changed Since March 2025?

US Canada tariff battle

AI generated

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What is a tariff?

A tariff is a tax imposed by a government on imports or exports of goods, often used to protect domestic industries or respond to trade disputes.


What tariffs does Canada currently impose on U.S. products?

As of August 2025, Canada has significantly reduced its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. On September 1, Canada will lift most of the 25% counter-tariffs it imposed in March on $29.8 billion worth of U.S. imports.. However, tariffs remain in place for strategic sectors:

  • Steel and Aluminum: 25% tariffs remain on U.S. steel and aluminum imports.
  • Automobiles: Canadian tariffs on U.S. automobiles remain in effect.
  • Lumber and Copper: These sectors continue to face targeted duties.

Goods covered under the USMCA (Canada’s CUSMA) are now largely tariff-free, reflecting a renewed commitment to free trade.

What tariffs does the United States currently impose on Canadian products?

The U.S. maintains a mixed tariff regime:

  • Steel and Aluminum: In August, the U.S. raised tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum to 35% for non-USMCA-compliant goods.
  • Energy and Critical Minerals: A 10% tariff applies to Canadian exports in these categories.
  • Autos and Lumber: These remain subject to U.S. duties, pending further negotiations.

Despite these measures, over 85% of Canada-U.S. trade is now tariff-free, and the average U.S. tariff rate on Canadian goods stands at 5.6%—the lowest among U.S. trading partners.

What U.S. goods are no longer subject to Canadian tariffs?

Starting September 1, Canada will remove tariffs on a wide range of U.S. consumer and agricultural goods, including:

  • Dairy and Poultry: Milk, cheese, butter, chicken, turkey, and eggs.
  • Grains and Produce: Wheat, rice, citrus fruits, berries, and melons.
  • Beverages and Alcohol: Coffee, tea, wine, beer, and spirits.
  • Cosmetics and Toiletries: Perfumes, soaps, toothpaste, and deodorants.
  • Miscellaneous: Condiments, protein powders, plastic building materials, and more.

These removals signal a strategic pivot toward restoring trade relations and aligning with USMCA provisions.

How has the trade war impacted Canadian purchases of U.S. goods?

Canadian imports of U.S. goods have declined notably in 2025. From January to June, total imports from the U.S. fell by approximately $2.86 billion compared to the same period in 2024—a 1.5% drop. The decline is most pronounced in:

  • Automotive Parts & Vehicles: Tariffs on autos and components have disrupted supply chains, leading to procurement delays and cost volatility.
  • Steel & Aluminum: Canadian manufacturers are facing higher input costs due to U.S. tariffs, prompting some to shift sourcing to non-U.S. suppliers.
  • Consumer Electronics & Packaged Goods: Retailers report longer lead times and rising costs, with many pivoting to private-label or Canadian-made alternatives.
  • Agricultural Products: Tariffs on dairy, pork, and beef have led to reduced imports, especially outside USMCA quota limits.

Retailers and manufacturers are responding by staging inventory in the U.S., renegotiating vendor contracts, and exploring offshore sourcing to avoid tariff exposure.

Are Canadians traveling to the United States less in 2025?

Yes, and dramatically so. Canadian travel to the U.S. has plummeted in 2025, with steep declines across all modes of transportation:

  • Automobile Travel: Down 33% in June compared to June 2024, following a 38% drop in May.
  • Air Travel: Declined 22% year-over-year in June, marking the sixth consecutive month of double-digit declines.
  • Same-Day Excursions: Fell by 40.3% in May, with overnight travel down 34.3%.

Both economic and political factors drive this downturn:

  • Tariff Sentiment: Over half of Canadians who had planned U.S. trips in early 2025 changed their plans due to tariff announcements and political rhetoric.
  • Border Tensions: Reports of Canadian tourists being detained at U.S. border crossings have further dampened travel enthusiasm.
  • Economic Impact: The U.S. tourism industry is projected to lose up to $29 billion in 2025, with Canadian travelers accounting for a significant portion of that shortfall.

Canadians are increasingly choosing alternative destinations like Mexico and the Caribbean, reshaping North American tourism flows.

Do U.S. farmers still rely on exports to Canada?

Yes. In 2025, Canada remains a top destination for U.S. agricultural exports. Dairy exports alone continue to exceed $8 billion annually, with Canada and Mexico accounting for over 40% of that volume. Access to Canadian markets remains vital for U.S. farmers to manage supply, stabilize prices, and maintain profitability.

Do trade agreements favor Canada or the U.S.?

The USMCA continues to offer mutual benefits:

  • For the U.S.: Expanded access to Canada’s dairy market and strengthened auto manufacturing rules.
  • For Canada: Preserved dispute resolution mechanisms and protection for cultural industries.

Recent tariff removals and diplomatic overtures suggest a renewed effort to balance trade interests, though strategic sectors remain contentious.

What is the current trade imbalance?

In 2025, the U.S. continues to run a trade deficit with Canada:

  • 2025 (YTD): U.S. exports to Canada are projected at $178.2 billion, while imports from Canada are estimated at $211.4 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of approximately $33.2 billion.

Energy imports—especially crude oil and natural gas—remain the primary drivers of this imbalance.

Is the trade imbalance harmful to the U.S. economy?

Not necessarily. The U.S.-Canada trade relationship is deeply integrated:

  1. Supply Chains: Canadian inputs support U.S. manufacturing and energy sectors.
  2. Services Trade: The U.S. maintains a surplus in services, offsetting some goods deficits.
  3. Economic Synergy: Trade reflects consumer demand and industrial interdependence, not just competition.

While some sectors feel pressure, the overall relationship remains one of mutual benefit and strategic importance.

David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less
United States Capitol building and blurred American flag against blue sky

America’s aging Congress has no maximum age limit. Could a constitutional amendment create age limits for lawmakers and better represent younger voters?

TGI /Tetra Images

Congress Has an Age Floor and No Ceiling. That's Backwards for Gen Z.

Senator Dianne Feinstein's visible decline in her final years in office. Senator Lindsey Graham's sudden death. Senator Mitch McConnell's own recent hospitalization, and his halting explanation of it afterward. Three senators, three separate incidents, no obvious connection between them, except that the saga of these three senators is really one story about the problem of not knowing when to step down. That framing asks the right question of individual leaders. But it assumes the problem is a matter of personal judgment, each senator, in his or her own time, finding the wisdom to recognize the moment has passed. I think that gets the American version of this problem backwards. Congress's age problem is not a string of individual judgment calls. It is a structural feature of the Constitution itself, and it is quietly reshaping who gets represented in American government.

The Constitution sets a floor for federal office and no ceiling. A representative must be at least twenty-five. A senator must be at least thirty. A president must be at least thirty-five. Nothing in the document says how old is too old. Combine that asymmetry with the enormous advantages of incumbency, better name recognition, fundraising networks, committee seniority, and the result is predictable: a Congress that can start young but can never age out. It can only age up. The 119th Congress is now the third oldest in American history, with an average member age of nearly fifty-nine and a Senate averaging in the mid-sixties. This is not a temporary blip. It is the natural output of a system with a gate on one end and no gate on the other.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first
a large white building with a flag on top of it

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the third and final installment of our series on “Article the first.” Previous parts examined the history of the single inverted word that turned an intended floor into a ceiling and its impact on the amendment’s failed ratification. This concluding part outlines the path forward for enlarging the House today.

Part 3 — The Path Forward

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

Painting from 1856 by Junius Brutus Stearns of George Washington at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the second of a three-part series on the First Amendment proposed by Congress in 1789—often called “Article the first”—which was never ratified. Part 1 explained how a single inverted word in the text created a mathematical absurdity that has been misread for 237 years. This second part explores the untold history of how that defect affected the original ratification process in state legislatures.

Part 2 — The Untold History

Keep ReadingShow less