Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The U.S. Economy: Rebounding or Breaking Down?

With official data stalled by a government shutdown, independent polls reveal growing financial strain, fading optimism, and a widening gender gap in economic confidence.

Opinion

A person in a grocery store, paying with a credit card.

With official data stalled by a government shutdown, independent polls reveal growing financial strain, fading optimism, and a widening gender gap in economic confidence.

Getty Images, Fly View Productions

Are mixed economic signals concealing a struggling economy?

Is the U.S. economy gaining momentum or losing steam? Everyone wants to know. But due to the ongoing government shutdown, the usual economic data and research published by federal agencies like the Bureau of Labor Statistics are not being released. That lack of data and information makes it more challenging to gauge where the economy is headed.

Nevertheless, a number of independent studies and opinion polls have been released in recent days that provide a glimpse of the economic outlook. Though it must be said, sometimes sifting through the mountains of conflicting data is reminiscent of the odd practices that ancient humans developed for telling the future, such as interpreting clouds (known as aeromancy), reading coffee grounds or tea leaves (tasseography), or examining animal entrails (extispicy). Making matters even more confusing, our economic predictions all too often get caught up in partisanship: my set of facts or yours?


No wonder celebrated economist John Kenneth Galbraith once observed, “The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.” Still, the new slew of independent economic reports and polls helps us get a read on the economy.

On the positive side, economic growth rebounded in recent months, expanding at a robust 3.9% annualized rate, following a contraction in the first months of the year. That growth has been a product of consumer spending remaining resilient, especially on back-to-school shopping and other retail sales. Also positive, the inflation rate has held steady, at first declining a bit from 3% in January, when President Donald Trump took office, but recently inching back up to 3%. Still, where are the predicted price increases from Trump’s double-digit tariffs? Nobody knows (more on that below). And the S&P 500 stock market is up about 14.5% since the beginning of the year, which makes the 10% of wealthiest Americans, who own 90% of stocks, extremely happy.

But do these rosy numbers reflect everyday people's reality? Most people don’t own much stock, and as President Joe Biden found out the hard way, millions of Americans can often experience a wide gap between what the official “inflation rate” measures and actual pricing levels. President Biden kept insisting that the inflation rate was going down from its pandemic high of 9% in June 2022, even as the price of a hamburger in a restaurant kept going up, up, up to $18. Biden’s successor, Kamala Harris, lost the election substantially due to dissatisfaction over the rising cost of living.

New numbers, a new economic reality

So it’s unfortunate news for President Trump that a new Harris poll recently found that 74% of Americans are reporting soaring prices in their own lives. Nearly three-quarters of Americans say that their costs have risen, with a range of between $100 and $749 per month. The price hikes were reported across the political spectrum by Democrats, Republicans, and independents. A majority (53%) think the economy is getting worse, compared with 48% who said the same last year.

Other data points indicate more red flags. For example, the New York Times recently reported that more Americans are struggling to make their monthly car-loan payments. That’s generally a sign that lower-income consumers are under growing financial pressure. Repossessions have swelled, and more indebted drivers are trading in vehicles for cash even though the vehicle is worth less than their loan, meaning they are underwater and mired in debt.

While the Trump administration has been able to boast about restrained inflation despite its high tariff policy, unfortunately, that advantage may be about to expire. The most recent Consumer Price Index shows that inflation has ticked back up on certain key goods, like coffee (prices up 19 percent for the year), and the cost of clothing and apparel, furniture, airline fares, personal care, and more all increased substantially in September. Is this the long-awaited impact of the Trump administration’s tariffs? Tariffs can especially affect the prices of goods like groceries, which 47% of Americans now say are harder to afford than a year ago, including 54% of independent voters.

The slow rise of prices from tariffs has been difficult to detect. Tariff-fueled price increases have been a little like a New York Yankees World Series championship—much promised but infrequently delivered. However, if the tariff impacts are starting to wash up on American shores, the impact could be substantial. The economists at the Yale Budget Lab have calculated that households will eventually see an average increase of $2,300 in costs per year due to Trump’s tariffs, an average of $191 per month.

What about jobs and employment? Due to the federal government shutdown, official employment data has not been released since Oct. 1. But the Federal Reserve has its own self-funded independent economic reporting, and its data points to a continuation of weak job growth and a sharp slowdown in hiring, which Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell cited in September when the central bank made its first interest rate cut of 2025. It also shows possible cracks in consumer spending, and recent business confidence surveys point to a decline, especially in manufacturing, but less so in the service sector.

And businesses are warning of coming price increases. Many companies stockpiled inventory before Trump ordered tariffs, giving them extra supply to exhaust before needing to reorder. Some businesses have resisted raising prices on their customers, for fear that it would discourage consumers from spending. But eventually, that buffer will run out.

Gender gap: Women more pessimistic than men

An interesting twist on the economic state of the nation was reported recently by the Wall Street Journal. According to WSJ, there is a 31 point difference between the percentage of women who feel that the economy is in bad shape, compared to men. That’s a huge gender gap, with possible political ramifications.

Women see the economy differently because they experience it differently. Especially since they take on different responsibilities in their households. Women still earn less of a wage than men for doing comparable work, and women also do most of the grocery shopping, so they have seen prices escalate in recent years. Also, more women do single-parenting; about 20% of U.S. children live in a single-parent household headed by a woman, and only 5% of kids are in a single-parent household headed by a man.

Consequently, more women are switching to buying less expensive groceries, and they are not confident that they will have money for a vacation or to buy a car. And they are less confident that they will have enough money for a comfortable retirement. When asked if the economy will get better over the next year, half of the women said no, and many expected the economy to get worse.

This gap between men's and women’s sentiments about the economy has been growing for about the last six years, starting just before the COVID pandemic, so this is not necessarily a factor caused by Trump or his tariffs. Nevertheless, a certain percentage of women voters, as well as men voters, tend to blame whoever is in office for the current state of the economy. Indeed, a recent AP-NORC poll reported on by Newsweek found that barely one-third of Americans—36 percent—approve of President Trump’s handling of the economy. What used to be a strength of Donald Trump and the Republicans over the Democrats, namely their economic management, appears to be becoming a liability.

Nine months after Donald Trump took office, promising to reduce prices on “day one,” a broad cross section of Americans, including Republicans, Democrats, and independents, believe prices are rising, and their overall mood is darkening. But who knows, if economic growth remains steady, the overall outlook could once again gain momentum. As Hall of Fame catcher Yogi Berra once said, “It ain't over 'til it's over.”

Steven Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

Read More

Cryptocurrency: Debunking Myths, Understanding Realities, and Exploring Economic and Social Impacts
a pile of gold and silver bitcoins
Photo by Traxer on Unsplash

Cryptocurrency: Debunking Myths, Understanding Realities, and Exploring Economic and Social Impacts

“In 2020 and 2021, there was a big crypto bubble. You couldn’t turn a corner without seeing another celebrity crypto endorsement," said Mark Hays, the Associate Director for Cryptocurrency and Financial Technology with AFR/AFREF and with Demand Progress during the NFRPP’s October 25th, 2025, panel discussion. Hilary J. Allen, a Professor of Law at the American University Washington College of Law, joined Hays. The discussion was moderated by Peter Coy, a freelance journalist covering economics, business, and finance.

Celebrities like Kevin Hart, Gwyneth Paltrow, Madonna, Justin Bieber, Serena Williams, Paris Hilton, and Snoop Dogg jumped to endorse crypto-related companies. The record of these endorsements has been poor (Bloomberg), and some are calling for people who endorse these products without doing due diligence to face legal repercussions (Boston College Law Review). The message from the NFRPP’s panel discussion was one of intense skepticism towards cryptocurrencies in general, with Professor Allen going so far as to call them a “failure as a technology.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the Tri-Merge System is Vital for Fair Homeownership
white house under maple trees
Photo by Scott Webb on Unsplash

Why the Tri-Merge System is Vital for Fair Homeownership

For generations, home ownership has been part of the very definition of capturing the American dream. First-time buyers face a process that can be both exciting and daunting—the right home, in the right community, and with the right financing.

As housing costs continue to rise and first-time home purchases are being delayed more than ever, securing a mortgage at a competitive rate for a homebuyer is vital to making home ownership possible, which underscores the need for an accurate and comprehensive way to analyze borrowers’ creditworthiness.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Welfare Queen Myth: How Racist Stereotypes Still Shape America’s War on Poverty

A powerful look at how the “welfare queen” myth—from Linda Taylor to modern AI deepfakes—racializes poverty, masks systemic corruption, and fuels political scapegoating.

Getty Images, jetcityimage

The Welfare Queen Myth: How Racist Stereotypes Still Shape America’s War on Poverty

In 1974, Linda Taylor, a 47-year-old woman in Chicago, was indicted on 31 counts of fraud involving welfare, medical assistance, food stamps, and Social Security benefits. Though few knew her name, many came to know her as the “welfare queen”—a label first coined in a Rochester, New York newspaper and later amplified by Ronald Reagan on the campaign trail in 1976. Without naming her, Reagan described a woman who used 80 aliases to collect government benefits, claiming she earned $150,000 tax-free annually. The crowd gasped. Taylor became the symbol of a racialized myth: that Black women were exploiting government handouts.

Reagan never mentioned Taylor’s race, but he didn’t need to. As Bryce Covert of The New Republic explains, the image of a fur-wearing woman in a Cadillac was unmistakably Black to many White Americans. Though 60% of AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) recipients were non-Black, media portrayals had racialized poverty. Taylor became a proxy for resentment toward Black Americans and public assistance. The stereotype mirrored that of affirmative action: the idea that Black people were gaming the system, prompting policies that harmed all poor families.

Keep ReadingShow less
Immigrant Workers Keep the U.S. Economy Running Even as Policy Turns Against Them

Electrician Gabriel Farías carries tools before starting work in San Diego, California.

Credit: Alex Segura

Immigrant Workers Keep the U.S. Economy Running Even as Policy Turns Against Them

On a cool November morning, electrician Gabriel Farías loads his tools into the back of a white van parked outside a housing complex under construction east of San Diego. He takes a sip of coffee and shakes his head. “Everywhere I work, there are immigrants,” he says. “They do the jobs no one else wants. For me, they’re essential.”

Farías came to California several years ago and now works legally for a local company. He says the construction sector, already stretched thin, would collapse without immigrant labor. But lately, something has changed. “Around midyear, you could already notice it,” he tells The Fulcrum. “Before, immigrants used to show up looking for work every day. That’s dropped a lot. Many are afraid of raids or being deported.”

Keep ReadingShow less