Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Markets Strike Back: Why Trump’s Economic Fantasies Keep Crashing into Reality

As Trump pushes disruption, the markets push back.

Opinion

Man looking at stocks on his phone. Stock market.

As Trump pushes disruption, the markets push back.

Getty Images, Alistair Berg

Trump may have won the election, but he’s losing the markets. In just 100 days, Wall Street has erased nearly $6 trillion in global equity value, according to Bloomberg data cited in The Guardian. The S&P 500 has logged one of its worst openings to a presidential term since the Nixon years. And fund managers—the real-world referees of economic confidence—are sending a message Congress seems unwilling to deliver: enough.

While Trump’s second term has been marked by a tsunami of executive orders, tariff threats, and regulatory purges, the financial markets are refusing to play along. From panicked sell-offs to jittery consumer sentiment and retreating business investment, U.S. capital is staging its own quiet rebellion. Consumer confidence has dropped to its lowest level since 2020, with Americans’ outlook on jobs, income, and business conditions sinking to a 13-year low, according to The Conference Board.


It turns out that the stock market has sharper instincts than most of Washington. While institutions buckle and the GOP-led Congress dithers, Wall Street is stepping in as an unlikely check on executive power. Investors aren’t waiting for the courts or the next round of hearings—they’re responding in real time. Trump promised disruption. What he didn’t count on was that the disruption might start pushing back.

Populist Economics Meets Reality

Trump campaigned, as he always does, on grievance and bravado—promising to tear up trade deals, punish global freeloaders, and bring industrial jobs roaring back. It’s the kind of economic nationalism that plays well at rallies and with the base—but rattles investors and spooks consumers.

The core illusion is that you can upend global trade norms, slash taxes, and batter federal institutions without triggering economic backlash. But markets depend on stability, and consumers—already anxious about inflation, housing, and retirement—respond quickly to chaos. Trump’s second-term disruption isn’t just shaking confidence on Wall Street; it’s spreading across the economy. Investment is stalling. Sentiment is plunging. And financial markets are flashing warning signs before Congress even shows up to the fight.

Tariff Chaos and the Investor Revolt

Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs were pitched as economic self-defense. Instead, they sparked chaos. Businesses rushed to import goods before the new levies hit, driving imports up by 41% at an annualized rate—the sharpest spike in over a decade. The result was a distorted GDP report showing a 0.3% contraction in Q1 2025, which Trump tried to blame on a “Biden overhang.” However, economists quickly pointed to tariff-induced volatility, not inherited weakness, as the real culprit. Analysts widely attributed the downturn to companies scrambling to front-load imports before the tariffs hit, distorting the GDP report and creating a misleading picture of underlying demand.

Markets didn’t wait for clarification. Wall Street shed nearly $6 trillion in value during Trump’s first 100 days, with the S&P 500 suffering one of its worst openings since the 1970s. As investor panic spread, the administration quietly backpedaled—reaching out to China, softening its trade rhetoric, and restoring Ukraine aid to calm global jitters. The message was clear: Trump may thrive on conflict, but capital doesn’t. And this time, the revolt came from the boardroom, not the ballot box.

Trickle-Up Anxiety

The chaos hasn’t stopped at the trading floor. It’s made its way to kitchen tables, corner stores, and retirement accounts. Consumer confidence is cratering. Older Americans—typically the most financially stable—are expressing growing fears about healthcare, housing, and their financial future. That unease is no longer just anecdotal. It’s showing up in rising credit card delinquencies, frozen hiring, and delayed investment.

Minnesota Public Radio reports the case of Beth Benike, a Minnesota entrepreneur who founded Busy Baby, a company producing innovative placemats for infants. Her products are manufactured in China, and the recent tariffs have significantly driven up her production costs. Benike has warned that the financial strain could jeopardize not only her company but also her personal finances.

What began as a populist crusade to rebalance the economy is now dragging down the very people it claimed to champion.

The Market as a Guardrail

In an era when political institutions bend under pressure, financial markets remain one of the few forces that still say “no.” Not because they care about democratic norms—but because they care about risk. Trump can steamroll federal agencies, sideline Congress with continuing resolutions, and attack the press with impunity, but he can’t stop investors from pulling their money.

Unlike courts or legislatures, markets react in real time. They don’t wait for midterms or litigation. When policy turns reckless, capital flees—hitting portfolios, retirement accounts, and consumer confidence with speed and precision. It’s not principled resistance; it’s economic self-preservation. But the effect is the same: Trump’s second-term agenda keeps running into a wall of financial consequence.

Conclusion – When the Floorboards Creak

Financial markets aren’t defenders of democracy. But in Trump’s second term, they’re acting like the last remaining guardrail against political fantasy dressed up as economic strategy. Every tariff threat, every fiscal sleight-of-hand, every executive order that rattles stability is met, not with applause, but with retreat—from investors, consumers, and businesses alike.

This isn’t sustainable. Markets can restrain chaos, but they can’t repair institutions hollowed out by dysfunction. To alleviate the burden on small businesses like Busy Baby, policymakers could consider implementing automatic tariff exclusions for small importers, especially for products not readily available domestically. Additionally, providing financial assistance or tax relief to affected businesses could help them navigate the increased costs and maintain operations.

If Republican lawmakers don’t step up to restore balance—by asserting congressional authority, passing real budgets, and checking executive overreach—the floorboards won’t just creak. They’ll collapse. With the 2026 midterms looming and voter discontent mounting over economic instability, continued inaction will likely have consequences far beyond Wall Street.

Robert Cropf is a professor of political science at Saint Louis University. Follow on LinkedIn.

Read More

Government by Deadline: Why Shutdowns Are Killing Congressional Power

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) arrives for a news conference following a House GOP Conference Meeting at the U.S. Capitol on September 16, 2025 in Washington, DC. House Republican leadership faces a long week as they try to rally House Republicans behind a stopgap funding bill to avert a shutdown, while also navigating growing pressure to boost security for lawmakers in the wake of Charlie Kirk's killing.

Getty Images, Kent Nishimura

Government by Deadline: Why Shutdowns Are Killing Congressional Power

Every autumn brings its rituals: football, spectacular fall colors, and in Washington, the countdown to a government shutdown. Once a rare emergency, these funding standoffs have become as routine as pumpkin‑flavored beverages.

September 30 marks when federal funding will expire, a recurring cliff since the 1970s. Each year it looms larger, shaping the rhythm of Congress’s work. Lawmakers are again scrambling—not to solve problems, but merely to keep the lights on.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Jobs Report Is a Warning, Not a Blip

August’s jobs report showed just 22,000 jobs added, unemployment at 4.3%, and gold hitting record highs — signaling deeper economic troubles ahead.

Getty Images, J Studios

The Jobs Report Is a Warning, Not a Blip

The latest U.S. jobs report was more than just a miss—it was a warning. Employers added only 22,000 jobs in August, well below expectations of 75,000, and unemployment climbed to 4.3 percent, its highest level in nearly four years. June’s figures were quietly revised down to a net loss of 13,000 jobs, the first outright contraction since the pandemic’s peak. Markets reacted sharply: the dollar slid to six-week lows, while gold surged past $3,600 an ounce, setting a record for the 31st time this year.

For years, U.S. policymakers and presidents of both parties have promised resilience. Donald Trump has claimed his second term would deliver a “blue-collar boom.” But the August numbers suggest something deeper than a cooling labor market. They point to a structural weakness in an economy where job creation is slowing even as corporate profits remain strong, automation accelerates, and wage growth stagnates.

Keep ReadingShow less
President Donald Trump standing next to a chart in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Donald Trump discusses economic data with Stephen Moore (L), Senior Visiting Fellow in Economics at The Heritage Foundation, in the Oval Office on August 07, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Win McNamee

Investor-in-Chief: Trump’s Business Deals, Loyalty Scorecards, and the Rise of Neo-Socialist Capitalism

For over 100 years, the Republican Party has stood for free-market capitalism and keeping the government’s heavy hand out of the economy. Government intervention in the economy, well, that’s what leaders did in the Soviet Union and communist China, not in the land of Uncle Sam.

And then Donald Trump seized the reins of the Republican Party. Trump has dispensed with numerous federal customs and rules, so it’s not too surprising that he is now turning his administration into the most business-interventionist government ever in American history. Contrary to Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” in the economy, suddenly, the signs of the White House’s “visible hand” are everywhere.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person sits in their kitchen, holding and looking at receipts in one hand, with a calculator in their other hand.

Rising debt, stagnant wages, and soaring costs leave families living paycheck to paycheck in 2025.

Getty Images, Grace Cary

Running on Empty: America’s Fragile Middle Class

The Vanishing Middle Class

In the late 1970s, my mom worked as a nurse and became the family's breadwinner after my dad developed serious heart disease. His doctors told him to avoid stress, even driving, for fear it would be fatal. Yet on her single income, we managed what was then considered a solidly middle-class life. Stability was assumed, even if one parent couldn’t work.

That assumption has vanished. Today, surveys show that roughly half to two-thirds of Americans live paycheck to paycheck (People’s Policy Project). A stricter Bank of America analysis finds that about one in four households spends nearly all their income on essentials (Axios). Whether the number is one-in-two or one-in-four, millions of Americans are financially on the edge.

Keep ReadingShow less