Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Markets Strike Back: Why Trump’s Economic Fantasies Keep Crashing into Reality

As Trump pushes disruption, the markets push back.

Opinion

Man looking at stocks on his phone. Stock market.

As Trump pushes disruption, the markets push back.

Getty Images, Alistair Berg

Trump may have won the election, but he’s losing the markets. In just 100 days, Wall Street has erased nearly $6 trillion in global equity value, according to Bloomberg data cited in The Guardian. The S&P 500 has logged one of its worst openings to a presidential term since the Nixon years. And fund managers—the real-world referees of economic confidence—are sending a message Congress seems unwilling to deliver: enough.

While Trump’s second term has been marked by a tsunami of executive orders, tariff threats, and regulatory purges, the financial markets are refusing to play along. From panicked sell-offs to jittery consumer sentiment and retreating business investment, U.S. capital is staging its own quiet rebellion. Consumer confidence has dropped to its lowest level since 2020, with Americans’ outlook on jobs, income, and business conditions sinking to a 13-year low, according to The Conference Board.


It turns out that the stock market has sharper instincts than most of Washington. While institutions buckle and the GOP-led Congress dithers, Wall Street is stepping in as an unlikely check on executive power. Investors aren’t waiting for the courts or the next round of hearings—they’re responding in real time. Trump promised disruption. What he didn’t count on was that the disruption might start pushing back.

Populist Economics Meets Reality

Trump campaigned, as he always does, on grievance and bravado—promising to tear up trade deals, punish global freeloaders, and bring industrial jobs roaring back. It’s the kind of economic nationalism that plays well at rallies and with the base—but rattles investors and spooks consumers.

The core illusion is that you can upend global trade norms, slash taxes, and batter federal institutions without triggering economic backlash. But markets depend on stability, and consumers—already anxious about inflation, housing, and retirement—respond quickly to chaos. Trump’s second-term disruption isn’t just shaking confidence on Wall Street; it’s spreading across the economy. Investment is stalling. Sentiment is plunging. And financial markets are flashing warning signs before Congress even shows up to the fight.

Tariff Chaos and the Investor Revolt

Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs were pitched as economic self-defense. Instead, they sparked chaos. Businesses rushed to import goods before the new levies hit, driving imports up by 41% at an annualized rate—the sharpest spike in over a decade. The result was a distorted GDP report showing a 0.3% contraction in Q1 2025, which Trump tried to blame on a “Biden overhang.” However, economists quickly pointed to tariff-induced volatility, not inherited weakness, as the real culprit. Analysts widely attributed the downturn to companies scrambling to front-load imports before the tariffs hit, distorting the GDP report and creating a misleading picture of underlying demand.

Markets didn’t wait for clarification. Wall Street shed nearly $6 trillion in value during Trump’s first 100 days, with the S&P 500 suffering one of its worst openings since the 1970s. As investor panic spread, the administration quietly backpedaled—reaching out to China, softening its trade rhetoric, and restoring Ukraine aid to calm global jitters. The message was clear: Trump may thrive on conflict, but capital doesn’t. And this time, the revolt came from the boardroom, not the ballot box.

Trickle-Up Anxiety

The chaos hasn’t stopped at the trading floor. It’s made its way to kitchen tables, corner stores, and retirement accounts. Consumer confidence is cratering. Older Americans—typically the most financially stable—are expressing growing fears about healthcare, housing, and their financial future. That unease is no longer just anecdotal. It’s showing up in rising credit card delinquencies, frozen hiring, and delayed investment.

Minnesota Public Radio reports the case of Beth Benike, a Minnesota entrepreneur who founded Busy Baby, a company producing innovative placemats for infants. Her products are manufactured in China, and the recent tariffs have significantly driven up her production costs. Benike has warned that the financial strain could jeopardize not only her company but also her personal finances.

What began as a populist crusade to rebalance the economy is now dragging down the very people it claimed to champion.

The Market as a Guardrail

In an era when political institutions bend under pressure, financial markets remain one of the few forces that still say “no.” Not because they care about democratic norms—but because they care about risk. Trump can steamroll federal agencies, sideline Congress with continuing resolutions, and attack the press with impunity, but he can’t stop investors from pulling their money.

Unlike courts or legislatures, markets react in real time. They don’t wait for midterms or litigation. When policy turns reckless, capital flees—hitting portfolios, retirement accounts, and consumer confidence with speed and precision. It’s not principled resistance; it’s economic self-preservation. But the effect is the same: Trump’s second-term agenda keeps running into a wall of financial consequence.

Conclusion – When the Floorboards Creak

Financial markets aren’t defenders of democracy. But in Trump’s second term, they’re acting like the last remaining guardrail against political fantasy dressed up as economic strategy. Every tariff threat, every fiscal sleight-of-hand, every executive order that rattles stability is met, not with applause, but with retreat—from investors, consumers, and businesses alike.

This isn’t sustainable. Markets can restrain chaos, but they can’t repair institutions hollowed out by dysfunction. To alleviate the burden on small businesses like Busy Baby, policymakers could consider implementing automatic tariff exclusions for small importers, especially for products not readily available domestically. Additionally, providing financial assistance or tax relief to affected businesses could help them navigate the increased costs and maintain operations.

If Republican lawmakers don’t step up to restore balance—by asserting congressional authority, passing real budgets, and checking executive overreach—the floorboards won’t just creak. They’ll collapse. With the 2026 midterms looming and voter discontent mounting over economic instability, continued inaction will likely have consequences far beyond Wall Street.

Robert Cropf is a professor of political science at Saint Louis University. Follow on LinkedIn.

Read More

A close up of a train passing by quickly.

The proposed merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern could create America’s first coast-to-coast freight rail system.

Rail Merger Holds Promise for the Economy

Boosting domestic industry and manufacturing continues to be a key economic theme. A recently proposed merger between two major railroad companies could advance those goals—and it carries particular promise for underserved communities who are often on the front lines of America’s workforce.

The merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern would create the nation’s first transcontinental freight rail system, a vision pursued since 1869, when the “golden spike” famously connected the east and west.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

"Just the Facts" on the new $100,000 H-1B visa fee, its impact on tech firms, startups, and healthcare, plus legal challenges and alternatives for skilled workers.

Getty Images, Popartic

Just the Facts: $100,000 Visa Executive Order

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What Is the $100,000 Visa Fee?

This is a new one-time $100,000 application fee for employers seeking to sponsor foreign workers under the H-1B visa program. The visa is designed for highly skilled professionals in fields like tech, medicine, and engineering.

Keep ReadingShow less
Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

Dave Anderson shares how the Fed’s rate cuts reveal misconceptions about fiscal vs. monetary policy and government intervention in U.S. free markets.

Getty Images, Royalty-free

Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy: Why Both Disrupt Free Markets—and Neither Is Inherently Conservative or Progressive

The Federal Reserve Board's move on Wednesday, Sept. 17, to lower the federal funds interest rate by one-quarter of a point signals that it is a good time to discuss a major misconception that most voters have about public policy.

It is typically assumed that Democrats stand for government intervention into free markets to counteract the inherent bias towards those who are more economically well off. It is also assumed that Republicans, in contrast, reject the idea of government intervention in free markets because it violates rights to property and the natural order of free markets, which promotes the greatest total welfare.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of a nurse's hand resting on the shoulder of an older man who's hand rests on top.

September is World Alzheimer’s Awareness Month. Dr. Dona Kim Murphey explains how systemic failures, Medicare privatization, and racial disparities are deepening the dementia care crisis.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

Profits Over Patients: Re-Examining Systems As Culprit in Dementia Care (or Lack Thereof)

September is World Alzheimer's Awareness Month. Alzheimer's is the most common kind of dementia, a disorder characterized by the progressive loss of brain cells and, in its final stages, complete dependence—the inability to remember, speak, move, or even eat or swallow unassisted. Many end up in nursing homes. Seven million people are impacted by dementia in the United States today, a number that will more than double in the next 25 years.

But awareness is not just about understanding the magnitude of the problem or content expertise on the choices we make as individuals to mitigate the enormous present and future challenges of this disease. It is about a consciousness of the role of systems, namely insurance and government, that are seriously undermining our ability to care.

Keep ReadingShow less