Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

An Open Letter to the Department of Education

Opinion

An Open Letter to the Department of Education
Committee of Seventy Engages Over 23,000 Students in Civic Education Statewide
Getty Images, Maskot

Children—Black, white, brown, immigrant, and native-born—crowded around plastic tables, legs dangling, swapping stories, and trading pieces of their lunches. I believe that the dream of the Department of Education was to build a country where a child's start in life doesn't determine their finish, where public education flings open the doors, not just for a few, but for all.

Our story didn't begin in isolation. The Department of Education was born in 1979, forged by decades of struggle and hope; by the echoes of Brown v. Board, the promises of the Civil Rights Act, and the relentless voices of parents and educators who refused to accept that opportunity could not be representative and equitable. The mission was bold and straightforward: make real the promise that public education is a right and a shared responsibility.


When at your best, you've lived up to that charge.

You powered Title IX, asking the nation to reckon with what it means to say to girls, "You belong here, too." You built the scaffolding for Pell Grants, Head Start, IDEA, and the Every Student Succeeds Act. You pressed states to desegregate, to innovate, and to finally listen to children whose needs and dreams had gone ignored. Progress was messy and always incomplete—bureaucracy has its limits—but often, you were the conscience America needed.

In a bureaucracy, progress never comes easily. Every advance is open to resistance. The ink had barely dried on Brown v. Board when "massive resistance" swept across communities that were unwilling to embrace equality. Even so, the Department stood firm—a battered but unyielding obstacle against the backsliding of justice. Perfection was never the point; persistence was.

The legacy you carry is fragile and precious. Today, as book bans shrink the worlds our children can explore, as educators get scapegoated for the nation's fears, and as classrooms grow more diverse while budgets grow more uncertain, your work matters more than ever. The arguments have gotten louder—about curriculum, about race, about the very idea of truth—but the same old question lingers: do we settle for a cramped, fearful America, or do we keep building a nation that values all children as an asset?

Your respective work scope was never just about test scores or rankings. At its core, the Department's mission has always been about justice—about saying, through policy and action, that a kid in rural Mississippi deserves every chance afforded to a kid in Manhattan. That the janitor's son and the executive's daughter should both find in their schools not just a classroom, but a launching pad. That ability, not ancestry or family wealth, should be the ticket forward.

Please understand this is not a rebuke. Instead, I extend you an invitation: to renew your commitment. Your work is unfinished. Many children remain in crumbling schools with hand-me-down hopes. Too many families—especially families of color, families with disabilities—still have to fight for a seat at the table. Inequity in America is crafty and persistent. But history shows: when the Department of Education acts with courage and conscience, it can tip the odds toward justice.

Such is your inheritance. Such is your charge. Hold it tight.

Remember the children—always the children—whose names will not appear in history books, but whose futures will quietly reflect your choices. The democratic experiment is continually rebuilt and defended in every generation, in every school, and in every argument over what this country owes its future citizens.

You are the stewards of the American educational promise. Act like it.

With hope and expectancy,

F. Willis Johnson


Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

Capitol Building.

An in-depth examination of the erosion of checks and balances in the United States, exploring Project 2025, executive overreach, and the growing strain on constitutional democracy—and the critical role of citizens in preserving it.

Getty Images, Rudy Sulgan

The Mirror Has Cracked: How the Three Branches Failed America

James Madison warned that the government would always mirror human nature — its virtues and its flaws. “What is government itself,” he asked, “but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” The United States was built on a radical promise: a participatory government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Today, that mirror is cracking in real time. What once reflected a nation striving toward freedom and equality now reflects something far more chaotic — a government drifting from its constitutional purpose and reshaped by loyalty tests, political revenge, and a blueprint designed to consolidate power.

In 2026, that reflection is unmistakable: a government shaped not by three independent branches, but by a president’s loyalists and a coordinated plan to remake American democracy from the inside out. The framers built guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, and independent institutions — to prevent the rise of authoritarian rule. Yet the country now faces a blueprint, Project 2025, that overrides those protections by placing independent agencies under presidential control, replacing civil servants with loyalists, and weaponizing the Department of Justice. This is not drift. It is design. And it has left the nation with a government that no longer reflects the people but instead reflects the ambitions of those who seek power without accountability.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independents and Republicans May Hold the Power in Los Angeles – If They Actually Vote
Image: Jamie Phamon Alamy. Image licensed obtained and used by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths

Independents and Republicans May Hold the Power in Los Angeles – If They Actually Vote

Los Angeles voters are heading into a June 2 primary that may settle far more than who advances to November.

Under the Los Angeles City Charter, any candidate who clears 50% of the primary vote wins outright. No runoff. No November election. That rule turns the June primary into the only election in several of the city's most closely watched contests.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Dr. Shaniqua Williams, assistant professor of political science

The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems—spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Below is an interview with Dr. Shaniqua Williams, Assistant Professor at West Virginia University. Her research focuses on state politics, race and ethnicity, Black political behavior, Black women’s descriptive and substantive representation, and election administration. She is also a Research Fellow with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, where her work focuses on election administration, workforce development, infrastructure, and policy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democracy Isn’t Eroding. It’s Evolving. The Question Is: Toward What?
a group of flags

Democracy Isn’t Eroding. It’s Evolving. The Question Is: Toward What?

I fell in love with democracy before I fully understood it.

In high school civics classes in the 1990s, I learned about a system that was imperfect in its origins but evolving toward something better. I believed in that evolution. I believed that democracy, if nurtured, could become more inclusive than the one it started as.

Keep ReadingShow less