Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

An Open Letter to the Department of Education

An Open Letter to the Department of Education
Committee of Seventy Engages Over 23,000 Students in Civic Education Statewide
Getty Images, Maskot

Children—Black, white, brown, immigrant, and native-born—crowded around plastic tables, legs dangling, swapping stories, and trading pieces of their lunches. I believe that the dream of the Department of Education was to build a country where a child's start in life doesn't determine their finish, where public education flings open the doors, not just for a few, but for all.

Our story didn't begin in isolation. The Department of Education was born in 1979, forged by decades of struggle and hope; by the echoes of Brown v. Board, the promises of the Civil Rights Act, and the relentless voices of parents and educators who refused to accept that opportunity could not be representative and equitable. The mission was bold and straightforward: make real the promise that public education is a right and a shared responsibility.


When at your best, you've lived up to that charge.

You powered Title IX, asking the nation to reckon with what it means to say to girls, "You belong here, too." You built the scaffolding for Pell Grants, Head Start, IDEA, and the Every Student Succeeds Act. You pressed states to desegregate, to innovate, and to finally listen to children whose needs and dreams had gone ignored. Progress was messy and always incomplete—bureaucracy has its limits—but often, you were the conscience America needed.

In a bureaucracy, progress never comes easily. Every advance is open to resistance. The ink had barely dried on Brown v. Board when "massive resistance" swept across communities that were unwilling to embrace equality. Even so, the Department stood firm—a battered but unyielding obstacle against the backsliding of justice. Perfection was never the point; persistence was.

The legacy you carry is fragile and precious. Today, as book bans shrink the worlds our children can explore, as educators get scapegoated for the nation's fears, and as classrooms grow more diverse while budgets grow more uncertain, your work matters more than ever. The arguments have gotten louder—about curriculum, about race, about the very idea of truth—but the same old question lingers: do we settle for a cramped, fearful America, or do we keep building a nation that values all children as an asset?

Your respective work scope was never just about test scores or rankings. At its core, the Department's mission has always been about justice—about saying, through policy and action, that a kid in rural Mississippi deserves every chance afforded to a kid in Manhattan. That the janitor's son and the executive's daughter should both find in their schools not just a classroom, but a launching pad. That ability, not ancestry or family wealth, should be the ticket forward.

Please understand this is not a rebuke. Instead, I extend you an invitation: to renew your commitment. Your work is unfinished. Many children remain in crumbling schools with hand-me-down hopes. Too many families—especially families of color, families with disabilities—still have to fight for a seat at the table. Inequity in America is crafty and persistent. But history shows: when the Department of Education acts with courage and conscience, it can tip the odds toward justice.

Such is your inheritance. Such is your charge. Hold it tight.

Remember the children—always the children—whose names will not appear in history books, but whose futures will quietly reflect your choices. The democratic experiment is continually rebuilt and defended in every generation, in every school, and in every argument over what this country owes its future citizens.

You are the stewards of the American educational promise. Act like it.

With hope and expectancy,

F. Willis Johnson


Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

How Texas’ Mid-Decade Redistricting Could Affect Voters in One Houston Community

Then-U.S. Rep. Sylvester Turner addresses a crowd at Houston City Hall in October 2024. Turner died in March, and his 18th District congressional seat has been vacant since then, with a special election set for Nov. 4. The district is one of five Republicans have targeted in a mid-decade redistricting effort aimed at gaining an advantage in Congress.

Douglas Sweet Jr. for The Texas Tribune

How Texas’ Mid-Decade Redistricting Could Affect Voters in One Houston Community

Adrian Izaguirre grew up in Houston’s South Park neighborhood, a historically low-income community tucked between Interstates 610 and 45, south of downtown. He still calls that place home.

For years, he has seen his neighbors struggle to find affordable housing and access to quality education. On any given day, Izaguirre and other residents in the predominantly Latino and Black neighborhood would have a hard time quickly accessing a local hospital. There are few nearby.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Hidden Cause (and Higher Stakes) of the Gerrymandering Crisis

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks about the “Election Rigging Response Act” at a press conference at the Democracy Center, Japanese American National Museum on August 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. Newsom spoke about a possible California referendum on redistricting to counter the legislative effort to add five Republican House seats in the state of Texas.

Getty Images, Mario Tama

The Hidden Cause (and Higher Stakes) of the Gerrymandering Crisis

The first shots in the gerrymandering wars have now been fired. Texas Republicans rammed a new gerrymandered map through the legislature, forcing police escorts on Democratic lawmakers until the power grab was complete. California Governor Gavin Newsom has fired back with his “Election Rigging Response Act”— a response that will, sadly, also involve rigging elections. The Act would sideline California’s Citizens Redistricting Commission until 2031 so Democrats can oust five Republicans from California’s congressional delegation as payback.

To be clear, the actions taken by Texas and California are not equal—one’s a brazen power grab, the other a response to that power grab. But it’s still deeply concerning that California could become the first state to backtrack from independent redistricting, just when increasing polarization makes these and other independent institutions even more essential.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meet the Faces of Democracy: Dave Bjerke

Dave Bjerke spends much of his (limited) free time with his family, as a combination swim team-soccer-marching band dad.

Issue One

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Dave Bjerke

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Dave Bjerke, the nonpartisan Director of Elections and General Registrar of Voters in the City of Falls Church, VA, has been working in elections in Northern Virginia, just miles from the nation’s capital, for nearly 20 years.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering, California, and a Fight the Democrats Can Only Lose

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks about the “Election Rigging Response Act” at a press conference at the Democracy Center, Japanese American National Museum on August 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.

Getty Images, Mario Tama

Gerrymandering, California, and a Fight the Democrats Can Only Lose

California Democrats are getting ready for a fight they can’t win. And taxpayers will foot the bill for the privilege.

Governor Gavin Newsom, backed by national party operatives, appears poised to put a statewide gerrymander on the ballot under the banner of “fighting Trump.” The plan? Overturn California’s Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, redraw congressional maps, and lock in party control well into the next decade.

Keep ReadingShow less