Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Why the Tri-Merge System is Vital for Fair Homeownership

Opinion

Why the Tri-Merge System is Vital for Fair Homeownership
white house under maple trees
Photo by Scott Webb on Unsplash

For generations, home ownership has been part of the very definition of capturing the American dream. First-time buyers face a process that can be both exciting and daunting—the right home, in the right community, and with the right financing.

As housing costs continue to rise and first-time home purchases are being delayed more than ever, securing a mortgage at a competitive rate for a homebuyer is vital to making home ownership possible, which underscores the need for an accurate and comprehensive way to analyze borrowers’ creditworthiness.


Unfortunately, nearly 1 in 10 potential homebuyers are denied a mortgage when they apply, and that number is considerably higher for young adults, lower-income individuals, and minority borrowers. For example, Hispanic applicants are denied conventional mortgage financing at more than twice the rate of non-Hispanic white applicants, even when income and credit factors are similar, resulting in Hispanic families’ homeownership rate well below the national average. This tragedy is a reality for too many American families across all demographic groups.

Homeownership builds equity and stability. It ties families to their neighborhoods and strengthens local economies. Undermining access to credit means undermining that foundation, and we must continue to find ways to help correct these inequities.

With 61% of Americans “highly concerned” about housing costs, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey, we as a nation need to explore the barriers that may limit financial prosperity and home ownership. In particular, it is imperative to ensure fair access to credit for all Americans, including those in the working class and from underserved communities.

One system that we know works is the tri-merge credit reporting model, so-named because it combines data from all three major credit bureaus to determine a borrower’s creditworthiness.

A more complete profile is helpful for millions of potential borrowers building credit for the first time. Credit histories can be fragmented. Some may have credit cards or auto loans reported to only one bureau. Others pay rent or utilities faithfully, but those payments may appear inconsistently across the system. The tri-merge model fills those gaps, rewards responsibility, and helps families qualify for affordable credit in an impartial manner that reflects their true record, not one that can easily miss important elements.

However, some are now proposing eliminating the safeguard provided by the tri-merge model in favor of a “bi-merge” or “single-pull” model that uses credit reports from two or even just one credit reporting bureau.

But a less comprehensive report would create blind spots that disproportionately harm working-class and minority borrowers. Millions could see their credit scores misrepresented and mortgage applications denied because of missing or outdated data. Fewer families would qualify for home loans that are in fact within their reach, creating an unnecessary obstacle to the dream of ownership.

Given these realities, it is encouraging to see leaders at the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) reaffirm their commitment to maintaining the tri-merge standard. Ultimately, data-driven fairness and fiscal prudence can go hand in hand and align with FHFA’s stated goal of empowering more Americans.

Still, many borrowers can relate to being frustrated by mistakes or inaccuracies in past credit reports. Yet while there may be compelling reasons to adjust some elements of the reporting process, those reasons are separate from the question of the larger system and can be addressed in much more targeted and effective ways.

There certainly is room to improve policy related to housing, construction, and finance to benefit more Americans. Simplifying for the sake of appearances may feel appealing in Washington, but in practice, it could harm millions of responsible borrowers ' access to credit.

The tri-merge system might sound technical at first, but understanding its practical benefits reveals it as a quiet success story that has enabled more Americans from diverse backgrounds to access credit. Maintaining the pillar of credit access should be paramount to a successful policy that benefits Americans across the board.

Mario H. Lopez is the President of the Hispanic Leadership Fund, a public policy advocacy organization that promotes liberty, opportunity, and prosperity for all.


Read More

A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

A take on permitting reform, deregulation, and DHS accountability—arguing for economic growth with guardrails that protect communities, health, and the environment.

Getty Images, Javier Ghersi

A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

For far too long, our national conversation has been framed around a false choice. On one side, Republicans frequently argue that the best way to strengthen the economy and improve the lives of everyday Americans is to give businesses maximum freedom by having fewer rules, fewer constraints and more incentives to grow. On the other side, Democrats have stressed the need for guardrails to protect our environment, our health, and our communities from the unintended effects of unchecked growth.

But this debate has always been too narrow. It assumes that we must choose between action and accountability, between getting things done and doing them responsibly.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of stock market chart on a glowing particle world map and trading board.

Democrats seek a post-Trump strategy, but reliance on neoliberal economic policies may deepen inequality and voter distrust.

Getty Images, Yuichiro Chino

After Trump, Democrats Confront a Deeper Economic Reckoning

For a decade, Democrats have defined themselves largely by their opposition to Donald Trump, a posture taken in response to institutional crises and a sustained effort to defend democratic norms from erosion. Whatever Trump may claim, he will not be on the 2028 presidential ballot. This moment offers Democrats an opportunity to do something they have postponed for years: move beyond resistance politics and articulate a serious, forward-looking strategy for governing. Notably, at least one emerging Democratic policy group has begun studying what governing might look like in a post-Trump era, signaling an early attempt to think beyond opposition alone.

While Democrats’ growing willingness to look past Trump is a welcome development, there is a real danger in relying too heavily on familiar policy approaches. Established frameworks offer comfort and coherence, but they also carry risks, especially when the conditions that once made them successful no longer hold.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Global Investors Are Abandoning the Dollar
1 U.S.A dollar banknotes
Photo by Alexander Grey on Unsplash

Why Global Investors Are Abandoning the Dollar

In the middle of the twentieth century, the American architect of the postwar order, Dean Acheson, famously observed that Great Britain had lost an empire but had not yet found a role. The United States is not facing a comparable eclipse. It remains the world’s dominant military power and the central node of global finance. Yet a quieter, more incremental shift is underway - one that reflects not a sudden collapse, but a strategic recalibration. Global investors are not abandoning the dollar en masse; they are hedging against a growing perception that American stewardship of the international system has become fundamentally less predictable.

That unease has surfaced most visibly in the gold market. In the opening weeks of 2026, the yellow metal has performed less like a commodity and more like a verdict, surging past $5,500 an ounce. This month, we reached a milestone that would have been unthinkable a decade ago: for the first time in thirty years, global central bank gold reserves have overtaken combined holdings of U.S. Treasuries. According to World Gold Council data, central banks now hold nearly $4 trillion in gold, nudging past their $3.9 trillion stake in American debt.

Keep ReadingShow less
Crumpled dollar bills, two coins, a wallet, book, glasses, and home phone on a table.

A new economic study shows tariffs are paid overwhelmingly by American consumers, exposing trade policy as a hidden domestic tax.

Getty Images, David Harrigan

The Tariff Receipt Americans Can No Longer Afford

For years, the American public has been told that tariffs are a sophisticated form of tribute, a way to extract wealth from foreign adversaries while shielding the domestic worker. It is a seductive narrative, painted in the bold strokes of nationalistic pride. But as a rigorous new study from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy confirms, the reality is far less heroic. The bill for these trade barriers is not being mailed to Beijing, New Delhi, or Brussels. It is being delivered, with startling efficiency, to the kitchen tables of the American family.

The findings are as clear as they are sobering. After analyzing more than 25 million shipment records totaling nearly 4 trillion dollars, researchers found that American importers and consumers have shouldered 96 percent of the cost of recent tariffs. Foreign exporters, by contrast, have felt a mere 4 percent of the sting. Despite the robust rhetoric emanating from the White House, the data suggests that tariffs function not as a foreign levy but as a domestic consumption tax. The government may have collected 200 billion dollars in customs revenue in 2025, but that money was extracted almost entirely from the pockets of the people it was ostensibly meant to protect.

Keep ReadingShow less