Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why the Tri-Merge System is Vital for Fair Homeownership

Opinion

Why the Tri-Merge System is Vital for Fair Homeownership
white house under maple trees
Photo by Scott Webb on Unsplash

For generations, home ownership has been part of the very definition of capturing the American dream. First-time buyers face a process that can be both exciting and daunting—the right home, in the right community, and with the right financing.

As housing costs continue to rise and first-time home purchases are being delayed more than ever, securing a mortgage at a competitive rate for a homebuyer is vital to making home ownership possible, which underscores the need for an accurate and comprehensive way to analyze borrowers’ creditworthiness.


Unfortunately, nearly 1 in 10 potential homebuyers are denied a mortgage when they apply, and that number is considerably higher for young adults, lower-income individuals, and minority borrowers. For example, Hispanic applicants are denied conventional mortgage financing at more than twice the rate of non-Hispanic white applicants, even when income and credit factors are similar, resulting in Hispanic families’ homeownership rate well below the national average. This tragedy is a reality for too many American families across all demographic groups.

Homeownership builds equity and stability. It ties families to their neighborhoods and strengthens local economies. Undermining access to credit means undermining that foundation, and we must continue to find ways to help correct these inequities.

With 61% of Americans “highly concerned” about housing costs, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey, we as a nation need to explore the barriers that may limit financial prosperity and home ownership. In particular, it is imperative to ensure fair access to credit for all Americans, including those in the working class and from underserved communities.

One system that we know works is the tri-merge credit reporting model, so-named because it combines data from all three major credit bureaus to determine a borrower’s creditworthiness.

A more complete profile is helpful for millions of potential borrowers building credit for the first time. Credit histories can be fragmented. Some may have credit cards or auto loans reported to only one bureau. Others pay rent or utilities faithfully, but those payments may appear inconsistently across the system. The tri-merge model fills those gaps, rewards responsibility, and helps families qualify for affordable credit in an impartial manner that reflects their true record, not one that can easily miss important elements.

However, some are now proposing eliminating the safeguard provided by the tri-merge model in favor of a “bi-merge” or “single-pull” model that uses credit reports from two or even just one credit reporting bureau.

But a less comprehensive report would create blind spots that disproportionately harm working-class and minority borrowers. Millions could see their credit scores misrepresented and mortgage applications denied because of missing or outdated data. Fewer families would qualify for home loans that are in fact within their reach, creating an unnecessary obstacle to the dream of ownership.

Given these realities, it is encouraging to see leaders at the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) reaffirm their commitment to maintaining the tri-merge standard. Ultimately, data-driven fairness and fiscal prudence can go hand in hand and align with FHFA’s stated goal of empowering more Americans.

Still, many borrowers can relate to being frustrated by mistakes or inaccuracies in past credit reports. Yet while there may be compelling reasons to adjust some elements of the reporting process, those reasons are separate from the question of the larger system and can be addressed in much more targeted and effective ways.

There certainly is room to improve policy related to housing, construction, and finance to benefit more Americans. Simplifying for the sake of appearances may feel appealing in Washington, but in practice, it could harm millions of responsible borrowers ' access to credit.

The tri-merge system might sound technical at first, but understanding its practical benefits reveals it as a quiet success story that has enabled more Americans from diverse backgrounds to access credit. Maintaining the pillar of credit access should be paramount to a successful policy that benefits Americans across the board.

Mario H. Lopez is the President of the Hispanic Leadership Fund, a public policy advocacy organization that promotes liberty, opportunity, and prosperity for all.


Read More

A male senior stands in the shadow of a Social Security card with bite missing.

Social Security faces automatic cuts in 2032 and Medicare in 2033. New polling suggests that gives Democrats a powerful election issue. Here’s the case.

DNY59 / Getty Images

Will the Debt Crisis Engineered by Republicans Succeed in Cutting Social Security and Medicare?

Overview

The Republican Party’s long game to reduce administrative state entitlement spending centers on creating a debt crisis to provide an excuse for limiting such spending. It may soon pay off. That strategy involved a quarter-century of engineered tax cuts responsible for the stunning rise in sovereign U.S. debt, threatening an eventual economic crisis.

Social Security benefits are projected under current law to be automatically cut in 2032. And Medicare benefits are projected to be automatically cut in 2033. Congressional Republicans intend for those automatic cuts to occur, opposing new taxes to prevent cuts. And they are using the ballooning national debt as an excuse to also oppose new general revenue spending to prevent benefit cuts.

Keep ReadingShow less
A montage of dollars and yuans
assorted banknotes
Photo by Eric Prouzet on Unsplash

America’s Political Whiplash Is the World’s Problem

The rest of the world is beginning to hedge against the United States.

The New York Times recently reported that global investors are balking at U.S. bonds and that foreign governments are pulling their gold out of American vaults. This month the Dutch central bank moved much of its North American gold out of the United States. In March the Bank of France took 129 tons out of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the largest in the world, plans to cut its holdings of Treasuries. Last year Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank, said erratic policymaking in the United States was setting the stage for a “global euro moment.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Social Security card, treasury check and $100 bills

A Social Security inspector general found $1 billion in improper SSI payments tied to earnings alerts left unresolved for two years. Here’s what went wrong.

JJ Gouin/Getty Images

$1 Billion, 733 Days: Inside Social Security’s Improper-Payment Backlog

Social Security's inspector general opened its books this week and found a number that should stop any controller cold: roughly $1 billion in improper Supplemental Security Income payments, made to 333,800 recipients, sitting on top of a backlog the agency has known about for years. The cause was not a hacker, not a sophisticated fraud ring, and not a policy loophole. It was an earnings alert nobody closed out.

Here is how the mechanism actually works, and why it matters more than the headline figure. When a recipient's reported earnings change, the Social Security Administration's system generates an alert flagging that the payment amount may need adjustment. An employee is supposed to resolve that alert, verify the wage documentation, and correct the payment before the gap compounds. The inspector general's office pulled a sample of 100 such cases. Only 20 had been resolved. Sixty-three had gone untouched entirely, left pending for an average of 733 days, just over two years. Seventeen more were marked "cleared" without the wage documentation ever being fully verified, meaning the case was closed on paper while the underlying question remained open.

Keep ReadingShow less
Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism
Monopoly's mr. monopoly in a graffiti collage
Photo by Artur Ament on Unsplash

Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism

The signs are everywhere. For many Americans, buying power has improved only modestly despite decades of economic growth. Corporate profits are at an all-time high. We have reached a level of wealth inequality last seen almost a hundred years ago. By many measures, our capitalist economy seems to have failed to deliver broadly shared prosperity.

However, the failure isn’t with the free market as an economic approach. Instead, it’s our failure to regulate and moderate the free market, or more accurately, that we have spent 40 years undermining or removing the regulations of the New Deal that made our economy work for more Americans.

Keep ReadingShow less