Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Teen Vogue Changed How a Generation Saw Politics and Inclusion. That Era Could Be Over.

Journalists who cover race, gender and inequality are often the first to go in layoffs, raising deeper questions about who gets to tell the news.

News

Teen Vogue Changed How a Generation Saw Politics and Inclusion. That Era Could Be Over.

Teen Vogue editors Kaitlyn McNab, left, and Aiyana Ishmael, right. Both were laid off as Condé Nast announced that Teen Vogue would be absorbed into the Vogue brand.

J. Countess, Phillip Faraone; Getty Images

For the last decade, Teen Vogue has been an unexpected source of some of the most searing progressive political analysis in American media. It’s a pivot the publication began in April 2016 when Elaine Welteroth took over as leader. She became the publication’s second editor in chief, and the second Black person ever to hold that title under the publishing giant Condé Nast.

Previously focused mostly on teen style trends and celebrity red carpet looks, the magazine’s website soon included headlines like “Trauma From Slavery Can Actually Be Passed Down Through Your Genes” and “Donald Trump Is Gaslighting America.” Readers took notice: Between January 2016 and January 2017, web traffic reportedly grew from 2.9 million U.S. visitors to 7.9 million.


But that era could be over.

On November 3, Condé Nast announced that the Vogue brand would absorb Teen Vogue, resulting in the layoffs of at least six staffers, “most of whom are BIPOC women or trans” according to a statement released by the Condé Union.

Both in 2016 and now, the changes at Teen Vogue reflect a larger political and cultural moment taking place throughout the country. Eleven years ago, conversations about race, gender and systemic inequity began to take a more prominent place in media and politics, leading to an expansion of diversity in hiring and messaging across industries. But the journalists brought in to help build trust and strengthen credibility on anti-trans legislation, grassroots activism and more, are being pushed back toward the margins.

“It sucks that it always seems to come down to the most diverse people in the room being let go,” said Aiyana Ishmael, 27, who was laid off from her position as Teen Vogue’s style editor this month. She and culture editor Kaitlyn McNab say they were the last two Black women working full time on Teen Vogue’s editorial team. Now, they are both gone.

“It just shows that we still have so much work to do when it comes to actual longstanding progression of having diverse voices in newsrooms,” she said, adding: “It’s about who deserves to stay and who doesn’t? Who gets moved around to another sector, and who do you choose to just throw away?”

Newsroom restructuring at major broadcast networks has led to the cancellation of shows this year with women of color anchors, including “The ReidOut with Joy Reid” and “Alex Wagner Tonight.” Last month, NBC cut its identity-focused platforms NBC BLK, NBC Latino, NBC Asian America and NBC Out — teams that were all led by women.

A speaker and a musician sit onstage in white armchairs at the Teen Vogue Summit, holding microphones as they talk. The stage backdrop reads “Teen Vogue Summit” and colorful graphic shapes and plants surround the set. An audience fills the foreground.Aiyana Ishmael interviews singer Tanner Adell onstage at the 2025 Teen Vogue Summit in Los Angeles. (Anna Webber/Getty Images for Teen Vogue)

There are no specific figures tracking journalism job losses among women of color; however, one survey published by the Institute for Independent Journalists found that while women represent 46 percent of the journalism workforce, they comprised 68 percent of respondents who experienced layoffs or buyouts between 2022 and 2024. Separately, 42 percent of survey respondents who experienced a buyout or layoff were people of color, though they make up about 17 percent of the journalism industry.

Reporter Hanaa’ Tameez with the Nieman Journalism Lab analyzed 169 full-time journalism jobs related to race, diversity, and equality that were posted and filled between June 2020 and December 2024. As of summer 2025, 34 percent of these positions have been eliminated.

While the news industry has long experienced financial challenges in the digital media era, the idea that journalists of color and queer journalists are simply the collateral damage of these financial trends “is an excuse that never rings right to me,” said Dr. Sherri Williams, an associate professor of journalism at American University who researches race in media and communications.

“This is really justification for newsrooms to stop doing what they never really wanted to do in the first place,” Williams said.

The news of Teen Vogue layoffs came as a complete shock to Ishmael. For her and several others she worked with, Teen Vogue was their first full-time job in journalism.

She was 18 when Teen Vogue began its transition to more inclusive and political coverage. Growing up as a tall, dark-skinned, plus-size Black woman in Florida, she did not see many women who looked like her on the pages of glossy magazines or fashion blogs.

“Usually I was very invisible, made fun of, not the one that people saw as this interesting and cool person,” Ishmael said. That reality took a turn for the better after she landed her “first big-girl job,” at Teen Vogue four years ago. Ishmael started as an editorial assistant and worked her way up to an associate editor position before being promoted to the publication’s style editor this October, just weeks before she was laid off.

But Ishmael made her mark on the organization. She created a viral series CTRL+C, replicating the style of celebrities like Zendaya and Dua Lipa for plus-size bodies. She successfully pitched putting Olympic gymnast Jordan Chiles on the July 2024 digital cover, and star Louisiana State University basketball player Flau’jae Johnson on September 2025 digital cover.

Ishmael’s North Star in this work has been to stay true to herself and her values, inspired by Welteroth’s legacy. But as time went on, Ishmael said she started to see the numbers of Black women on the editorial staff dwindle, until only she and McNab remained.

“I think in general, you just get sad, not specifically at Teen Vogue, but Condé Nast-wide. We have so many group chats between all the Black staffers and then smaller groups of cohorts. We really stuck together,” Ishmael said. “Condé Nast-wide we’ve seen in the last couple of years, Black women leaving and Black people in general leaving.”

In interviews, Welteroth explained that when she and her team took over, they wanted to better represent the diverse perspectives and interests of teens and young adults.

“There are stereotypes that exist, unfortunately, particularly around young people and young girls, and I think we need to do the work to break those stereotypes down,” Welteroth told NPR in 2019.

“The day that article — ‘Trump is Gaslighting America’ — was published, we sold, in that month, more copies of the magazine than we had that entire year,” she continued. “And that trend continued because Teen Vogue emerged as the voice of a new generation of politically engaged, socially conscious young people. And the world just wasn’t ready.”

When Welteroth took the helm in 2016, the Black Lives Matter movement was bringing renewed attention to police brutality and systemic racism in the criminal legal system. President Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign stoked preexisting racial anxieties by characterizing Brown and Black undocumented immigrants as “murderers” and “rapists,” and Black Lives Matter protesters as “thugs.”

To meet this moment, newsrooms expanded identity-related coverage between 2015 and 2022, particularly in the nonprofit news space. In addition to legacy newsrooms like the Associated Press, The Washington Post and USA Today hiring more race and identity specific reporters, new nonprofits like Prism, MLK 50, Scalawag Magazine, Capital B, The Emancipator, TransLash, El Tímpano — and The 19th — were founded with missions to report on marginalized communities. Of those eight nonprofits, all were founded or led by women, seven by women of color, five by Black women.

Nonprofit news organizations whose primary mission is serving communities of color nearly doubled from 26 to 50 organizations between 2017 and 2021, according to the Institute for Nonprofit News.

While not a nonprofit, Teen Vogue played a role in paving the way for more diversity, both through its content and its hiring behind the scenes, Williams said. The publication gave dozens of young writers from diverse backgrounds their first major bylines. In 2021, for example, Williams partnered with Teen Vogue to publish five stories written by her students marking the anniversary of George Floyd’s killing by a police officer in Minneapolis and how it sparked national protests and a so-called “racial reckoning.”

“What I think Teen Vogue showed the rest of the industry is that there is an appetite for these stories. People are actually interested in these stories,” she said. Williams noted that Welteroth got her start in journalism at Ebony Magazine, a women’s publication previously owned by the Johnson Publishing Company, which played a prominent role in documenting the Civil Rights Movement and brutality against Black people.

“I think of everything that’s happening right now in this time: corporate media is failing us, but ethnic media, queer media, women’s media is not,” Williams continued. “So, what I think that Elaine did is she took some of those sensibilities from Black media and applied it to Teen Vogue, centering marginalized people and groups and really amplifying their concerns and addressing them in a substantive way that was bold and fearless.”

Welteroth’s team did not get back to The 19th’s request for an interview, but in previous interviews she has stated that during her time at Ebony she “learned how to lift up the underdog and be the underdog.” She left Teen Vogue in 2018, and the publication’s second Black woman editor, Lindsay Peoples, took over until 2021.

In a statement posted to Teen Vogue’s social media accounts on Tuesday, the publication said, “Our mission remains the same: to offer a critical and distinctive point of view about the things that spark passion and purpose among young people today.” It’s unclear if and how the staffing changes will affect Teen Vogue’s coverage, but Ishmael and Williams both emphasized that layoffs affecting journalists of color, LGBTQ+ journalists and women journalists extend beyond one publication.

Diverse journalism roles were already on the decline prior to Trump’s second term. But the current administration’s crackdown on hiring and practices that promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) has given a green light for restrictions across industries. Nationwide, workers of color, particularly Black women, bear the brunt of job losses in 2025. In the first three months this year, an estimated 300,000 Black women lost jobs.

When places like Teen Vogue, NBC, CBS and beyond lose racial and gender diversity on their staff, they lose the ability to not only elevate stories from the Black community, for example, but they also lose the ability to capture nuances and perspectives from different Black communities, Ishmael said.

Williams said that the audience will lose out on relevant context “that helps us understand why we are where we are in our society.” There may be stories of inequality that get missed, she added, but she encourages them to be strategic by supporting the outlets that remain.

“Now it is just time for the audience — the readership — to really put its money where its mouth is,” Williams said. “Really get serious about trying to maintain the media that is still around that has a commitment for centering communities that are never going to get the kind of coverage that they deserve.”

Candice Norwood is a reporter for The 19th who covers general assignment news.

Teen Vogue Changed How a Generation Saw Politics and Inclusion. That Era Could Be Over. was originally published by The 19th and is republished with permission.


Read More

Powering the Future: Comparing U.S. Nuclear Energy Growth to French and Chinese Nuclear Successes

General view of Galileo Ferraris Ex Nuclear Power Plant on February 3, 2024 in Trino Vercellese, Italy. The former "Galileo Ferraris" thermoelectric power plant was built between 1991 and 1997 and opened in 1998.

Getty Images, Stefano Guidi

Powering the Future: Comparing U.S. Nuclear Energy Growth to French and Chinese Nuclear Successes

With the rise of artificial intelligence and a rapidly growing need for data centers, the U.S. is looking to exponentially increase its domestic energy production. One potential route is through nuclear energy—a form of clean energy that comes from splitting atoms (fission) or joining them together (fusion). Nuclear energy generates energy around the clock, making it one of the most reliable forms of clean energy. However, the U.S. has seen a decrease in nuclear energy production over the past 60 years; despite receiving 64 percent of Americans’ support in 2024, the development of nuclear energy projects has become increasingly expensive and time-consuming. Conversely, nuclear energy has achieved significant success in countries like France and China, who have heavily invested in the technology.

In the U.S., nuclear plants represent less than one percent of power stations. Despite only having 94 of them, American nuclear power plants produce nearly 20 percent of all the country’s electricity. Nuclear reactors generate enough electricity to power over 70 million homes a year, which is equivalent to about 18 percent of the electricity grid. Furthermore, its ability to withstand extreme weather conditions is vital to its longevity in the face of rising climate change-related weather events. However, certain concerns remain regarding the history of nuclear accidents, the multi-billion dollar cost of nuclear power plants, and how long they take to build.

Keep ReadingShow less
A U.S. flag flying before congress. Visual representation of technology, a glitch, artificial intelligence
As AI reshapes jobs and politics, America faces a choice: resist automation or embrace innovation. The path to prosperity lies in AI literacy and adaptability.
Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Why Should I Be Worried About AI?

For many people, the current anxiety about artificial intelligence feels overblown. They say, “We’ve been here before.” Every generation has its technological scare story. In the early days of automation, factories threatened jobs. Television was supposed to rot our brains. The internet was going to end serious thinking. Kurt Vonnegut’s Player Piano, published in 1952, imagined a world run by machines and technocrats, leaving ordinary humans purposeless and sidelined. We survived all of that.

So when people today warn that AI is different — that it poses risks to democracy, work, truth, our ability to make informed and independent choices — it’s reasonable to ask: Why should I care?

Keep ReadingShow less
A person on their phone, using a type of artificial intelligence.

AI-generated “nudification” is no longer a distant threat—it’s harming students now. As deepfake pornography spreads in schools nationwide, educators are left to confront a growing crisis that outpaces laws, platforms, and parental awareness.

Getty Images, d3sign

How AI Deepfakes in Classrooms Expose a Crisis of Accountability and Civic Trust

While public outrage flares when AI tools like Elon Musk’s Grok generate sexualized images of adults on X—often without consent—schools have been dealing with this harm for years. For school-aged children, AI-generated “nudification” is not a future threat or an abstract tech concern; it is already shaping their daily lives.

Last month, that reality became impossible to ignore in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. A father sued the school district after several middle school boys circulated AI-generated pornographic images of eight female classmates, including his 13-year-old daughter. When the girl confronted one of the boys and punched him on a school bus, she was expelled. The boy who helped create and spread the images faced no formal consequences.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democracies Don’t Collapse in Silence; They Collapse When Truth Is Distorted or Denied
a remote control sitting in front of a television
Photo by Pinho . on Unsplash

Democracies Don’t Collapse in Silence; They Collapse When Truth Is Distorted or Denied

Even with the full protection of the First Amendment, the free press in America is at risk. When a president works tirelessly to silence journalists, the question becomes unavoidable: What truth is he trying to keep the country from seeing? What is he covering up or trying to hide?

Democracies rarely fall in a single moment; they erode through a thousand small silences that go unchallenged. When citizens can no longer see or hear the truth — or when leaders manipulate what the public is allowed to know — the foundation of self‑government begins to crack long before the structure falls. When truth becomes negotiable, democracy becomes vulnerable — not because citizens stop caring, but because they stop receiving the information they need to act.

Keep ReadingShow less