On a cool November morning, electrician Gabriel Farías loads his tools into the back of a white van parked outside a housing complex under construction east of San Diego. He takes a sip of coffee and shakes his head. “Everywhere I work, there are immigrants,” he says. “They do the jobs no one else wants. For me, they’re essential.”
Farías came to California several years ago and now works legally for a local company. He says the construction sector, already stretched thin, would collapse without immigrant labor. But lately, something has changed. “Around midyear, you could already notice it,” he tells The Fulcrum. “Before, immigrants used to show up looking for work every day. That’s dropped a lot. Many are afraid of raids or being deported.”
He’s not imagining things. A recent Pew Research Center analysis based on U.S. Census Bureau data shows that as of June 2025, there were about 51.9 million immigrants living in the United States, down from 53.3 million in January, a drop of roughly 1.4 million people in six months. That decline has already rippled through industries that depend heavily on immigrant workers, from construction and agriculture to food processing and caregiving.
Todd Walters, UFCW Local 135 president, in his office in San Diego.Credit: Alex Segura
At UFCW Local 135, one of Southern California’s largest unions representing grocery and food industry employees, president Todd Walters has been watching the trend with growing concern. Sitting in his office near downtown San Diego, Walters points toward a large map of the U.S.–Mexico border hanging behind his desk. “If we just close our minds and say we don’t want any type of immigration, we’re going to have holes in our economy,” he says in an interview with The Fulcrum.
He points out that thousands of people cross daily from Tijuana into San Diego to work and pay taxes. Many of them have legal work permits or visas that allow them to support both sides of the border. “They keep this economy afloat,” Walters says. “But the way the administration is handling things right now, with fear, intimidation, and uncertainty, is hurting our economy.”
His words echo across a region that depends on cross-border labor for everything from hospitality to logistics. Tighter border enforcement, more frequent workplace raids, and slower visa processing have combined to create what economists call a chilling effect. Workers who once filled open jobs are disappearing, and employers are struggling to replace them.
Three hours north, in Los Angeles, Daniel Jefferson sees the consequences every day. He works at the Pilipino Workers Center, a nonprofit that supports immigrant caregivers and service workers, many of them undocumented. “A lot of our members do not want to go out in the world,” he says. “They’re afraid to go to the grocery store. They’re afraid to just live their everyday lives.”
Jefferson says fear has become a management tool. “Employers feel emboldened to exploit them, to threaten them with deportation,” he adds. “That’s illegal, but it’s happening.”
In neighborhoods across Los Angeles, the anxiety is visible. Food delivery workers avoid police checkpoints. Home care aides travel in pairs. Some families keep children home from school after hearing rumors of immigration sweeps. Jefferson believes the government’s current approach, closing legal pathways and intensifying enforcement, only deepens the crisis. “The solution is not cutting that off,” he insists. “Then you’re just left with a worse worker shortage. We need a system where workers can be protected and not live in fear.”
Across California, labor shortages are forcing companies to slow projects, shorten business hours, and raise pay to attract workers. Industry groups and economists warn that construction and service jobs are among the hardest to fill, a problem made worse by tighter immigration rules and declining migrant labor. The California Chamber of Commerce has repeatedly called attention to the need for a stable workforce to sustain growth in these sectors.
For Farías, the San Diego electrician, that’s already a daily reality. “We can’t find people,” he says. “Sometimes I end up doing the work of two.”
Yet despite their importance, immigrants remain caught between political battles and economic dependence. Policies designed to deter illegal immigration often end up discouraging legal workers as well, especially when raids and paperwork backlogs spread fear across entire communities. Walters, the union leader, believes the debate has drifted far from economic reality. “This country’s food supply, construction, health care, all of it relies on immigrant labor,” he says. “We’ve built an economy that needs them, but we treat them like they’re disposable.”
In Washington, the White House has defended its tougher stance on border control as necessary to restore order to the immigration system. But for many workers on the ground, order feels indistinguishable from intimidation. Reports of workplace inspections and immigration checks have surged in recent months.
Back in Los Angeles, Jefferson says the emotional toll is heavy. “People are tired,” he tells The Fulcrum. “They just want to work, pay their taxes, and go home safely. But right now, they don’t feel safe anywhere.”
By late afternoon, Farías is finishing up a wiring job. He wipes the sweat from his forehead and glances at the sun setting behind the hills. “They say immigrants take jobs away,” he murmurs. “But if we left tomorrow, who would build these houses?”.
For all the heated debate in Washington, the answer on the ground remains simple and visible in every city skyline, restaurant kitchen, and hospital wing. The United States depends on immigrant labor to keep its economy alive. Yet as enforcement intensifies and legal avenues close, that backbone is weakening. Unless policymakers find a balance between control and compassion, the consequences will be felt not only by those who cross borders, but by everyone who relies on the work they do.
Alex Segura is a bilingual, multiple-platform journalist based in Southern California.



















President Donald Trump says Americans’ financial struggles matter “not even a little bit” as inflation rises, gas prices surge, and a controversial $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded compensation plan for political allies emerges.
Trump Says Americans’ Pain ‘Doesn’t Matter’ as $1.7B Aids His Allies
Perhaps the most effective ad in the 2024 campaign was “Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you.” Since that ad ran, the American people have learned that it is anything but true.
With gas prices having surged 28% in two months, inflation climbing to a three-year high of 3.8%, and the average family is spending an estimated $5,000 more this year than last due to rising costs across the board, a reporter asked Trump a simple question: To what extent are Americans’ financial situations motivating him to reach a deal to end the war in Iran?
Trump's answer was startling in its candor.
“Not even a little bit,” the President said. “The only thing that matters when I'm talking about Iran — they can't have a nuclear weapon. I don't think about Americans' financial situation. I don't think about anybody.”
But perhaps the most clarifying lens through which to view those words is what emerged just days later: Trump was suing the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for $10 billion in damages over an IRS contractor’s leak of his tax returns but is now expected to drop that $10 billion lawsuit, not because justice has been served, but in exchange for the creation of a $1.7 billion fund to compensate his political allies.
The money would come not from any congressional appropriation but from the Treasury Department's Judgment Fund, a public fund funded by taxpayers that exists to pay legitimate court judgments against the federal government.
Under the proposed terms, a five-member commission with total authority to disburse that $1.7 billion would operate with no obligation to disclose its procedures or decision-making. Trump himself would retain the power to remove commission members without cause.
The beneficiaries? Among them: the nearly 1,600 individuals charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack, some of whom pleaded guilty, and people Trump already pardoned upon returning to office, as well as allies who claim they were targets of “weaponization” of the legal system under former President Joe Biden. Entities associated with Trump himself are not explicitly barred from filing claims.
The contrast here is not subtle. When asked directly whether the financial pain of working Americans factors into his decision-making, the president answers “not even a little bit.”
Yet within the same week, a deal surfaces in which $1.7 billion in public funds could flow to Trump allies, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and potentially Trump-linked entities — all under a commission the president controls, with no transparency requirements.
While ordinary Americans are losing ground financially, the president himself is doing remarkably well — and the numbers are staggering.
According to Forbes, Trump's net worth jumped from roughly $2.3 billion when he returned to the White House in January 2025 to an estimated $6.3 billion by April 2026 — nearly tripling his fortune in little over a year.
A New York Times investigation found that he personally gained approximately $1.4 billion in 2025 alone, a single-year increase that approaches the combined net worth of every other U.S. president while in office throughout American history.
The primary engine of that growth has not been real estate, the business that built his brand over five decades, but rather cryptocurrency ventures, meme coins, and media deals, all industries he has simultaneously deregulated from the Oval Office.
The American people are not the constituency this president governs for. The data bears that out. Real wages are losing ground as energy costs surge. The personal savings rate has dropped to 4%. Small businesses have shed hundreds of thousands of jobs under the weight of tariffs. Gas sits at over $4 a gallon. And the president's answer to the question of whether your financial pain is even in his mind is: no.
There is, of course, an argument to be made that preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon is a legitimate and serious national security priority that may justify some economic disruption.
But that argument is entirely separate from whether a president should care about the daily financial suffering of the people he was elected to serve. One can hold two things in mind at once. Trump apparently cannot — or will not.
We clearly have a portrait of a president whose conception of governance begins and ends with him and his loyalists. And when ordinary Americans ask if their struggles even register, they get the most honest answer this administration has offered: not even a little bit.
Lynn Schmidt is a columnist and Editorial Board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. She holds a master's of science in political science as well as a bachelor's of science in nursing.