Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Immigrant Workers Keep the U.S. Economy Running Even as Policy Turns Against Them

News

Immigrant Workers Keep the U.S. Economy Running Even as Policy Turns Against Them

Electrician Gabriel Farías carries tools before starting work in San Diego, California.

Credit: Alex Segura

On a cool November morning, electrician Gabriel Farías loads his tools into the back of a white van parked outside a housing complex under construction east of San Diego. He takes a sip of coffee and shakes his head. “Everywhere I work, there are immigrants,” he says. “They do the jobs no one else wants. For me, they’re essential.”

Farías came to California several years ago and now works legally for a local company. He says the construction sector, already stretched thin, would collapse without immigrant labor. But lately, something has changed. “Around midyear, you could already notice it,” he tells The Fulcrum. “Before, immigrants used to show up looking for work every day. That’s dropped a lot. Many are afraid of raids or being deported.”


He’s not imagining things. A recent Pew Research Center analysis based on U.S. Census Bureau data shows that as of June 2025, there were about 51.9 million immigrants living in the United States, down from 53.3 million in January, a drop of roughly 1.4 million people in six months. That decline has already rippled through industries that depend heavily on immigrant workers, from construction and agriculture to food processing and caregiving.

Todd Walters, UFCW Local 135 president, in his office in San Diego.Credit: Alex Segura

At UFCW Local 135, one of Southern California’s largest unions representing grocery and food industry employees, president Todd Walters has been watching the trend with growing concern. Sitting in his office near downtown San Diego, Walters points toward a large map of the U.S.–Mexico border hanging behind his desk. “If we just close our minds and say we don’t want any type of immigration, we’re going to have holes in our economy,” he says in an interview with The Fulcrum.

He points out that thousands of people cross daily from Tijuana into San Diego to work and pay taxes. Many of them have legal work permits or visas that allow them to support both sides of the border. “They keep this economy afloat,” Walters says. “But the way the administration is handling things right now, with fear, intimidation, and uncertainty, is hurting our economy.”

His words echo across a region that depends on cross-border labor for everything from hospitality to logistics. Tighter border enforcement, more frequent workplace raids, and slower visa processing have combined to create what economists call a chilling effect. Workers who once filled open jobs are disappearing, and employers are struggling to replace them.

Three hours north, in Los Angeles, Daniel Jefferson sees the consequences every day. He works at the Pilipino Workers Center, a nonprofit that supports immigrant caregivers and service workers, many of them undocumented. “A lot of our members do not want to go out in the world,” he says. “They’re afraid to go to the grocery store. They’re afraid to just live their everyday lives.”

Jefferson says fear has become a management tool. “Employers feel emboldened to exploit them, to threaten them with deportation,” he adds. “That’s illegal, but it’s happening.”

In neighborhoods across Los Angeles, the anxiety is visible. Food delivery workers avoid police checkpoints. Home care aides travel in pairs. Some families keep children home from school after hearing rumors of immigration sweeps. Jefferson believes the government’s current approach, closing legal pathways and intensifying enforcement, only deepens the crisis. “The solution is not cutting that off,” he insists. “Then you’re just left with a worse worker shortage. We need a system where workers can be protected and not live in fear.”

Across California, labor shortages are forcing companies to slow projects, shorten business hours, and raise pay to attract workers. Industry groups and economists warn that construction and service jobs are among the hardest to fill, a problem made worse by tighter immigration rules and declining migrant labor. The California Chamber of Commerce has repeatedly called attention to the need for a stable workforce to sustain growth in these sectors.

For Farías, the San Diego electrician, that’s already a daily reality. “We can’t find people,” he says. “Sometimes I end up doing the work of two.”

Yet despite their importance, immigrants remain caught between political battles and economic dependence. Policies designed to deter illegal immigration often end up discouraging legal workers as well, especially when raids and paperwork backlogs spread fear across entire communities. Walters, the union leader, believes the debate has drifted far from economic reality. “This country’s food supply, construction, health care, all of it relies on immigrant labor,” he says. “We’ve built an economy that needs them, but we treat them like they’re disposable.”

In Washington, the White House has defended its tougher stance on border control as necessary to restore order to the immigration system. But for many workers on the ground, order feels indistinguishable from intimidation. Reports of workplace inspections and immigration checks have surged in recent months.

Back in Los Angeles, Jefferson says the emotional toll is heavy. “People are tired,” he tells The Fulcrum. “They just want to work, pay their taxes, and go home safely. But right now, they don’t feel safe anywhere.”

By late afternoon, Farías is finishing up a wiring job. He wipes the sweat from his forehead and glances at the sun setting behind the hills. “They say immigrants take jobs away,” he murmurs. “But if we left tomorrow, who would build these houses?”.

For all the heated debate in Washington, the answer on the ground remains simple and visible in every city skyline, restaurant kitchen, and hospital wing. The United States depends on immigrant labor to keep its economy alive. Yet as enforcement intensifies and legal avenues close, that backbone is weakening. Unless policymakers find a balance between control and compassion, the consequences will be felt not only by those who cross borders, but by everyone who relies on the work they do.

Alex Segura is a bilingual, multiple-platform journalist based in Southern California.


Read More

A gavel.

Analysis of President Donald Trump’s tariffs after a record $901.5B U.S. trade deficit in 2025. Explore the economic realities behind trade imbalances, the United States Supreme Court ruling on tariff authority, and the growing debate over executive power and trade policy.

Getty Images, Phanphen Kaewwannarat

What’s Next After the Court’s Tariffs Decision?

A Stubborn Imbalance

After a year of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs, sold as a reset of global trade, the promise was simple: the U.S. trade deficit would shrink. It did not. The Commerce Department instead reported a $70.3 billion deficit in December and a staggering $901.5 billion for all of 2025, one of the largest totals on record. The gap between imports and exports barely narrowed at all.

These figures matter because they undermine the central premise of the strategy: make imports more expensive, reduce foreign purchases, and bring production back to the United States. But that approach overlooks a key reality. Trade balances are not driven by tariffs alone. They reflect deeper forces such as consumer demand, domestic savings rates, the strength of the dollar, and global capital flows. Those forces do not yield easily to executive action.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

President Donald Trump delivered his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night.

(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)

Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump used the longest State of the Union address in U.S. history on Tuesday night to argue that Americans are already experiencing “a turnaround for the ages” thanks to his agenda. But moments of disruption inside the House chamber and reactions from lawmakers afterward suggested Democrats and even some Republicans dispute his claims.

Trump’s address offered a snapshot of how the White House is trying to frame the economy heading into an election year. The administration sought to present easing inflation, falling prices, and rising wages as settled facts.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol

A shrinking deficit doesn’t mean fiscal health. CBO projections show rising debt, Social Security insolvency, and trillions added under the 2025 tax law.

Getty Images, Dmitry Vinogradov

The Deficit Mirage

The False Comfort of a Good Headline

A mirage can look real from a distance. The closer you get, the less substance you find. That is increasingly how Washington talks about the federal deficit.

Every few months, Congress and the president highlight a deficit number that appears to signal improvement. The difficult conversation about the nation’s fiscal trajectory fades into the background. But a shrinking deficit is not necessarily a sign of fiscal health. It measures one year’s gap between revenue and spending. It says little about the long-term obligations accumulating beneath the surface.

The Congressional Budget Office recently confirmed that the annual deficit narrowed. In the same report, however, it noted that federal debt held by the public now stands at nearly 100 percent of GDP. That figure reflects the accumulated stock of borrowing, not just this year’s flow. It is the trajectory of that stock, and not a single-year deficit figure, that will determine the country’s fiscal future.

What the Deficit Doesn’t Show

The deficit is politically attractive because it is simple and headline-friendly. It appears manageable on paper. Both parties have invoked it selectively for decades, celebrating short-term improvements while downplaying long-term drift. But the deeper fiscal story lies elsewhere.

Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the debt now account for roughly half of federal outlays, and their share rises automatically each year. These commitments do not pause for election cycles. They grow with demographics, health costs, and compounding interest.

According to the CBO, those three categories will consume 58 cents of every federal dollar by 2035. Social Security’s trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2033, triggering an automatic benefit reduction of roughly 21 percent unless Congress intervenes. Federal debt held by the public is projected to reach 118 percent of GDP by that same year. A favorable monthly deficit report does not alter any of these structural realities. These projections come from the same nonpartisan budget office lawmakers routinely cite when it supports their position.

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

A take on permitting reform, deregulation, and DHS accountability—arguing for economic growth with guardrails that protect communities, health, and the environment.

Getty Images, Javier Ghersi

A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

For far too long, our national conversation has been framed around a false choice. On one side, Republicans frequently argue that the best way to strengthen the economy and improve the lives of everyday Americans is to give businesses maximum freedom by having fewer rules, fewer constraints and more incentives to grow. On the other side, Democrats have stressed the need for guardrails to protect our environment, our health, and our communities from the unintended effects of unchecked growth.

But this debate has always been too narrow. It assumes that we must choose between action and accountability, between getting things done and doing them responsibly.

Keep ReadingShow less