Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Project 2025: A Christo-fascist manifesto designing a theocracy

Bible on top of an American flag
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

Watkins is the best selling author of the memoir "Not Without My Father: One Woman's 444-- Mile Walk of the Natchez Trace"

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Since January, I have been writing about Project 2025, the 900-plus-page policy document spearheaded by the far-right Heritage Foundation. Unlike many who cover this work from a policy perspective, I write about it as a Christo-fascist manifesto to transform our democracy into a Christian Nationalist theocracy.


Why am I qualified to make such a claim?

I am a product of Christian Nationalism. In the 1970s and ‘80s, my parents joined a Christian Nationalist church in rural South Carolina. They enrolled me in its kindergarten, and I spent 13 years studying history and science from textbooks printed by Bob Jones University and watching my pastor affiliate our church with Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority.

During my formative years, I was indoctrinated in the Christian Nationalist belief system that underpins today’s Republican Party. Christian Nationalist Republicans like Speaker Mike Johnson (La.), Sen. Josh Hawley (Mo.) and Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito have infiltrated our legislative and judicial branches. According to the nonpartisan research firm PRRI, Christian Nationalism has solid support in all 50 states.

But what is Christian Nationalism?

Christian Nationalists operate with several core beliefs:

  1. America was founded as a white Christian nation.
  2. The founders were Christians who steeped our Constitution in the Bible.
  3. The Bible is the inerrant, infallible word of God.
  4. Because it is inerrant and infallible, the Bible is God’s perfect law and the basis for their definition of morality.
  5. Whenever a human law conflicts with God’s perfect law, it is a Christian Nationalist’s job to overrule the human law and replace it with God’s law.
  6. Many believe God cursed Black and Brown people in the story of Noah, aligning followers with white supremacists. Southern proponents of chattel slavery promoted this idea, and Southern pastors continued preaching it after the South lost the Civil War.
  7. They are indoctrinated to never compromise, making Christian Nationalists dreadful politicians. They believe everyone must follow God’s perfect law to the letter.

In my early 30s, a confrontation with a family member caused me to question my Christian Nationalist upbringing for the first time, leading me on a decade-long journey to unravel this indoctrination. Years of study, personal growth and therapy have prepared me for my current mission: To educate Americans on what Christian Nationalists mean when they use words and why so many of Project 2025’s words are coded Christo-fascist language.

Take Project 2025’s “Four Promises.”

"Restore the family as the centerpiece of American life and protect our children.
"Dismantle the administrative state and return self-governance to the American people.
"Defend our nation’s sovereignty, borders, and bounty against global threats.
"Secure our God-given individual rights to live freely — what our Constitution calls 'the Blessings of Liberty.'”

As we unpack their four promises, keep their definition of morality in mind: The Bible is God’s perfect law. Anything that violates God’s perfect law is immoral and must be destroyed.

Let’s examine what that means in the first promise.

“The next conservative president must get to work pursuing the true priority of politics — the well-being of the American family. In many ways, the entire point of centralizing political power is to subvert the family. Its purpose is to replace people’s natural loves and loyalties with unnatural ones.”

The use of the words “natural” and “ unnatural” is deliberate. It means to use the Bible as the basis for our laws and is drawn from Biblical verses (Romans 1:26-27 KJV):

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.”

Thus, the Christian Nationalist definition of family is one man married to one unrelated woman with as many children as God gives them. To them, anything else is unnatural and therefore immoral. Project 2025 honors this definition of the family throughout.

In the second promise, the authors make one thing clear: They must dismantle the administrative state to force every American to live by their Christian Nationalist interpretation of the Bible.

They own this stance in Project 2025:

“The next conservative President must possess the courage to relentlessly put the interests of the everyday American over the desires of the ruling elite. Their outrage cannot be prevented; it must simply be ignored.”

Christo-fascist Republicans do not acknowledge any law that conflicts with their interpretation of the Bible. They don’t care about an issue’s popularity with voters; they don’t pay attention to polls. They will install loyalists who will carry out Christian Nationalist directives and will ignore the will of the American people.

In many red states, this is already happening. From abortion bans to restrictions on transgender rights to book bans and more, gerrymandered red states are forcing their citizens to live in the country Project 2025 envisions.

In the third promise, many readers focus on far-right dreams to reject and deport as many immigrants as possible. But they miss this Christian Nationalist gem:

“Intellectual sophistication, advanced degrees, financial success, and all other markers of elite status have no bearing on a person’s knowledge of the one thing most necessary for governance: what it means to live well. That knowledge is available to each of us, no matter how humble our backgrounds or how unpretentious our attainments. It is open to us to read in the book of human nature, to which we are all offered the key just by merit of our shared humanity. One of the great premises of American political life is that everyone who can read in that book must have a voice in deciding the course and fate of our Republic.”

The “book of human nature” is the Bible.

For years, liberals have asked me why the right hates education and expertise. I can’t speak for everyone on the right, but I can speak for Christian Nationalists, who hate education and expertise because they believe everything humans need to know is contained in the Bible, the book of human nature.

The fourth promise is a masterclass in hidden Christian Nationalist language. It reads “Secure our God-given individual rights to live freely — what our Constitution calls ‘the Blessings of Liberty.’”

“When the Founders spoke of the ‘pursuit of Happiness,’” what they meant might be understood today as in essence “pursuit of Blessedness.” That is, an individual must be free to live as his Creator ordained—to flourish. Our Constitution grants each of us the liberty to do not what we want, but what we ought. This pursuit of the good life is found primarily in family—marriage, children, Thanksgiving dinners, and the like. Many find happiness through their work. Religious devotion and spirituality are the greatest sources of happiness around the world. Still others find themselves happiest in their local voluntary communities of friends, their neighbors, their civic or charitable work.

"The American Republic was founded on principles prioritizing and maximizing individuals’ rights to live their best life or to enjoy what the Framers called ‘the Blessings of Liberty.’”

When Christian Nationalists speak of living a good life or living one’s best life, they don’t mean career success, upgrading a home or car, work promotions, or dream vacations. Living a good life, in Christian Nationalist terms, is living a holy life, a godly life, the Christian life.

Hence, they bury a Biblical concept from Romans — to do not what we want but what we ought — into their fourth promise. This concept is based on the idea that all humans are born with flawed urges. Fighting those urges means doing what we ought, i.e. their interpretation of what God commands in the Bible, whether or not we follow their faith.

Project 2025 is packed with coded Christian Nationalists’ language. For decades, they have learned how to transform their religious zealotry into benign words and phrases that resonate with voters. Americans would be wise to learn this language and refuse to vote for those who speak it.

More articles about Project 2025



    Read More

    What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

    Charles De Ketelaere #17 of Belgium scores his team’s first goal past Unai Simon #23 of Spain during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Quarter Final match between Spain and Belgium at Los Angeles Stadium on July 10, 2026, in Inglewood, California.

    (Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images)

    What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

    As live sporting events go, nothing comes close to the World Cup. I was in the stands when South Africa, my birth country, hosted the event in 2010 after decades of exclusion from global athletics. In June of this year, I had a full-circle moment when South Africa played in the knockout rounds for the first time, and I stood with my two American sons, arms around them, singing South Africa's anthem — the only national anthem that weaves multiple languages into a single, unifying song. Later in the week, I was in the stands again, cheering Spain's win over Austria, a country to which my only connections are a brief holiday…and the fact that my mother's family fled from there during the Inquisition.

    The magic of the World Cup is that everyone in the stands wears the flags and shirts of countries that are “theirs” in some way. For some, it’s where they were born; for others, where they live or where their ancestors hailed from. For some, it is simply a country they have adopted for the afternoon. It is impossible to know how deep a person’s connection runs simply by looking at them. And next to a person waving one team’s colors is a stranger, family member, or close friend supporting the opposing team—or wearing the jersey of a team that isn’t playing that day at all.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    ​Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose together.

    Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose ahead of the dedication ceremony for the opening of the Barack Obama Presidential Center, in John Lewis Plaza, on June 18, 2026, in Chicago, Illinois.

    Pablo Martinez Monsivais - Pool / Getty Images

    America Shouldn't Need a Political Savior to Hold It Together

    America is waiting for a political savior, but the problem is structural.

    This dynamic was illustrated during two recent broadcast appearances by journalist Katy Tur. Discussing modern secessionist movements on June 15, 2026, Tur found optimism in a poll showing 54 percent of Americans still believe we share core values, and she later expressed hope that future leaders could reunite the country.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Constitution of the United State with the U.S. flag in the background.

    The Framers designed a republic with the intention to manage factionalism through deliberate compromise and institutional guardrails, whereas 21st-century polarization often treats compromise as a moral failing.

    Douglas Sacha, Getty Images

    Our Framers on 21st Century Primaries and Polarization

    The Framers would view 21st-century closed primaries and political polarization as the exact manifestation of "factionalism" they spent the 1787 Constitutional Convention trying to prevent. They would argue these systems force candidates to appeal to ideological extremes rather than the broad, moderate consensus required for stable governance.

    The Danger of Factionalism: In Federalist No. 10, James Madison defined a "faction" as a group of citizens united by a passion or interest adverse to the rights of others. He argued that while factions are inevitable, their effects must be controlled. The Framers would recognize 21st-century hyper-polarization as the dominance of unyielding factions that prioritize absolute ideological purity over democratic compromise.

    Keep ReadingShow less