Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

How comic books can help us understand this political moment

Comic book panel

A panel from "Stop Project 2025: A Comics Guide to the Republican Plan to End Democracy"

Toliver is an assistant professor of curriculum and instruction at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and a public voices fellow with The OpEd Project.

Recently, a group of comic book writers and authors published “ Stop Project 2025: A Comics Guide to the Republican Plan to End Democracy.” Free to the public, the guide aims to succinctly explain the Heritage Foundation’s 900-page blueprint for Donald Trump to overhaul the executive branch of government when he is sworn into office for the second time.

The future of democracy may seem an unlikely topic for comic book treatment, but the genre has long transcended the likes of Marvel superheroes. And in an era when civic literacy is in peril, we need them more than ever.


Indeed, comics can serve as a vital bridge between intricate policy discussions and everyday understanding. By tackling critical issues like education, health care, libraries, teachers and voting, the comic initiative transforms complex, jargon-laden policy into accessible comic narratives that bring all readers into the conversation. After all, if people can’t understand the rules of the game, how can they participate meaningfully in it?

Historically, comic books have been dismissed as children’s media, but their capacity to convey complex ideas and engage in social and political commentary has been widely underestimated. Comic books have a long history of addressing social issues. For instance, the X-Men series is an allegory for racial discrimination in the United States, illustrating the struggles of marginalized groups in a white patriarchal capitalist society. Superman, since his introduction, has fought for social justice, and his story serves as a “ metaphor for refugees and immigrants ” in the United States. Similarly, Luke Cage, as a Black superhero from Harlem, confronts systemic injustices and the challenges of urban life, highlighting the complexities of race and class disparities in America. These stories and others demonstrate that comics can be a powerful platform for social commentary.

In an era dominated by dense legal texts and political rhetoric that can alienate even the most engaged citizens, comics stand out as a powerful tool for demystifying intricate ideas and providing people the basic information they need to make informed decisions that will help them to participate meaningfully in civic life. By simplifying content and sparking interest in issues that directly affect people’s lives, comics make political discourse more relatable and engaging.

Of course, there is undeniable value in reading original documents, no matter the length. But the United States faces a reading epidemic marked by dwindling literacy rates and a society increasingly disengaged from longer narratives. We find ourselves inundated with quick, bite-sized content — memes, reels, shorts and curated social media posts — that demand little of our attention and often prioritize entertainment over education. In this context, comics offer a refreshing alternative, allowing for a deeper exploration of important topics in a format that captures attention and encourages reflection.

The visual storytelling inherent in comics can also attract diverse audiences, including young people, busy parents and those who might feel intimidated by traditional political discourse. By presenting multifaceted issues through relatable characters and narratives, comics invite readers to engage in conversations about the world around them. They break down barriers, making it easier for people to grasp the implications of policies that impact their lives.

As an example, Project 2025, if fully realized, could reshape American society, impacting everything from personal freedoms to public education. The potential consequences of such policies warrant serious attention and discussion. Yet, many citizens, even avid readers, may not have the time or inclination to wade through nearly a thousand pages of dense legalese.

By utilizing a medium that resonates with multiple audiences, the creators of the comics guide are not just educating; they are empowering. They provide readers with the tools to question, discuss and advocate for their rights by presenting information in an accessible manner.

In a media landscape dominated by rapid-fire media and soundbites, initiatives like Stop Project 2025 remind us that effective democracy relies on an informed public. Knowledge is power, and in a democratic society, an informed citizenry is the bedrock of effective governance. By encouraging critical thinking and open dialogue, we can cultivate a society where citizens actively shape their future.

Ultimately, as we face significant challenges to our democratic institutions, we must recognize that understanding the rules of the game is essential for meaningful participation. By embracing innovative approaches to communication, we can inspire a new generation of informed citizens who feel empowered to engage with the democratic process. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, we must leverage tools like comics to ensure that essential information is accessible and engaging. In doing so, we can reignite a passion for reading and foster a more critically engaged citizenry, one comic at a time.


Read More

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War
Toy soldiers in a battle formation
Photo by Saifee Art on Unsplash

The Puncher’s Illusion: Winning the First Round and Losing the War

In the Rumble in the Jungle, George Foreman came in expecting to end the fight early.

At first, it looked that way. He was stronger, faster, and landing clean punches. I watched the 1974 championship on simulcast fifty-two years ago and remember how dominant he was in the opening rounds.

Keep ReadingShow less
Calling Wealthy Benefactors!
A rusty house figure stands over a city.
Photo by Katja Ano on Unsplash

Calling Wealthy Benefactors!

My housing has been conditional on circumstances beyond my control, and the time is up; the owner is selling.

Securing affordable housing is a stressor for much of the working class. According to recent data, nearly 50% of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they spend over 30% of their take-home income on housing costs. Rental prices in California are especially high, 35% higher than the national average. Renting is routinely insecure. The lords of land need to renovate, their kids need to move in. They need to sell.

Keep ReadingShow less
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less