Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories
Cash in a gas tak

Gas prices up again? What’s going on?

Former felon Erica Racz registering to voting

Florida top court ruling on felon voting is hardly the final word

Rumors of Project 2025’s Demise are Greatly Exaggerated

A crowd of protesters in Times Square, New York City, with one person holding a sign that reads "PROJECT 2025 is CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM" by Americans United for Separation of Church and State. The sign includes the hashtags #StopProject2025 and au.org/project2025. The background features prominent advertisements, including a Meta billboard and the Nasdaq building.

Public opinion on Project 2025 is increasingly negative, leading to news Tuesday that the Heritage Foundation is backing off of its support of the project. People participated in an anti-Project 2025 rally at Times Square on Saturday, July 27, 2024, in New York.

Photo by Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images
By Kristina Becvar,
Kristina Becvar

In her role as co-publisher of The Fulcrum, Executive Director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, and project manager for the Citizen Connect initiative, she is a driving force behind collaborative efforts to transform our democracy. Recognizing that no single idea or organization can address our complex challenges in isolation, Kristina excels in blending intuitive leadership with data-driven insights. Her extensive background in legal operations and change management, coupled with her M.S. in data analytics and research methods, equips her with a powerful skill set. Kristina’s expertise in research is rivaled only by her passion for nonviolence advocacy, amplified by her experiences as the spouse of a disabled combat veteran. Her practical knowledge of business and project management, combined with her connection to a vibrant community of changemakers, brings a focused approach to the essential work required for a thriving democratic republic.

See More Writings by author
David L. Nevins
David L. Nevins
David L. Nevins serves as co-publisher of The Fulcrum. Additionally, Nevins serves as co-founder and Board Chairman of the Bridge Alliance. Nevins brings business acumen, vision and a tireless this-must-and-can-be-done zeal to the burgeoning movement to bridge divides to transform the political process. As a business leader, Nevins excels at building bridges between people and organizations from the right, left and center for civilized conversation and then action. He co-founded the Bridge Alliance because, as he says, “No matter how well managed and how well funded anyone organization is, significant political reform will not happen without an alliance to further collaborative interactions. Together we can and will raise the collective impact of all.” He is a member of the Aspen Institute Society of Fellows, with a focus on the Aspen Rodel Fellowship in Public Leadership, he established and continues to work with The Nevins Democracy Leaders program at Penn State University. Nevins graduated with honors in economics from Penn State in 1969 and received an M.B.A. in finance from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in 1971.
See More Writings by author
Jul 31, 2024

Paul Dans, the director of the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025,has stepped down amid increasing controversy and criticism from the Trump campaign. Yesterday, the Trump campaign released a statement celebrating "Project 2025's Demise", but there is no reason to believe that the news is anything but damage control. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Robertsstated that Dans' exit came after the project had achieved its initial goals and was built for future administrations to utilize, which is precisely the point. Project 2025 remains quite relevant, given our upcoming presidential election.

There is good reason to believe that pressure from Trump's campaign, which has sought to disassociate itself from Project 2025 in recent weeks, played a role in Dans' departure. The project has faced significant backlash for its proposals, which include drastic policy changes that many view as authoritarian and detrimental to civil liberties.

Although released in April 2023, Project 2025 has gained more prominence as the 2024 election approaches. Itis the latest iteration of 40 years of conservative policy recommendations from the Heritage Foundation. Ronald Reaganadopted half of them in his first year in office, and Donald Trump,despite claims of unfamiliarity with the project,enacted 64% of that version's recommendations in his.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Regardless of the Trump campaign's desire to distance itself from a planlacking Americans' support, 31 of the 38 people responsible for Project 2025served in Trump's first administration. Trump's campaign platform, 'Agenda 47', mirrors Project 2025's economic, national security, education, and healthcare policies. Specific similarities include the call to reclassify civic service employees to strip them of labor protections. Given this track record, thoroughly examining the proposals is essential for understanding their potential impact on a potential second Trump administration.

On June 4, 2024, Fulcrum contributor Steve Corbin wrote about Project 2025, noting:

The 30 chapters are a daunting read. Project 2025 proposes, among a host of things, eliminating the Department of Education, eliminating the Department of Commerce, deploying the U.S. military whenever protests erupt, dismantling the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, removing protections against sexual and gender discrimination, and terminating diversity, equity, inclusion and affirmative action.

Additional mandates include: siphoning off billions of public school funding, funding private school choice vouchers, phasing out public education's Title 1 program, gutting the nation's free school meals program, eliminating the Head Start program, banning books and suppressing any curriculum that discusses the evils of slavery.

Project 2025 also calls for banning abortion (which makes women second-class citizens), restricting access to contraception, forcing would-be immigrants to be detained in concentration camps, eliminating Title VII and Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, recruiting 54,000 loyal MAGA Republicans to replace existing federal civil servants, and ending America's bedrock principle that separates church from state.

Corbin's article led The Fulcrum to start a series about Project 2025. Since then, we have published analyses of many sections and will end with over 35 writings. The current news of Dans' decision to step down amid increasing controversy and criticism from the Trump campaign does not deter us from our mission.

At the series' commencement, we noted that while an in-depth analysis of our democracy is laudable, Project 2025 is a biased political report designed to build a case for conservative solutions using inductive reasoning. We argued for deductive reasoning that analyzes problems and offers solutions regardless of their political mold—a "Cross-Partisan Project 2025."

Our mission is more critical than ever. We will continue to explore Project 2025 objectively, asking:

  • What's dividing Americans on these critical issues?
  • Which information presented by Project 2025 is factual and to be trusted, and what is not?
  • What is oversimplified about Project 2025's representation and perspective, and what is not? What are alternative solutions?
  • What do people from all sides of the political spectrum need to understand to critically consider Project 2025's salient points?
  • What are the questions nobody's asking?

Nothing has changed as a result of the Heritage Foundation's decision to back off of its public alignment with Project 2025, and reporting on Project 2025 is more critical than ever. The overwhelming response from our readers to our series shows that Americans yearn for something different. They want news based on critical thinking, reexamining outdated assumptions, and using reasoning, scientific evidence, and data to formulate and test public policy for 2025 and beyond.

Our reporting and analyses are based on a philosophy that drives us to seek common ground among diverse perspectives and experiences. That is what America deserves.

More articles about Project 2025


    Latest news

    Read More

    Latino attendees of the Democratic National Convention

    People cheer for the Harris-Walz ticket at the Democratic National Convention.

    Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

    Harris’ nomination ‘hit a reset button’ for Latinas supporting Democrats

    As the presidential race entered the summer months, President Joe Biden’s level of support among Latinx voters couldn’t match the winning coalition he had built in 2020. Among Latinas, a critical group of voters who tend to back Democrats at higher levels than Latinos, lagging support had begun to worry Stephanie Valencia, who studies voting patterns among Latinx voters across the country for Equis Research, a data analytics and research firm.

    Then the big shake-up happened: Biden stepped down and Vice President Kamala Harris took his place at the top of the Democratic ticket fewer than 100 days before the election.

    Valencia’s team quickly jumped to action. The goal was to figure out how the move was sitting with Latinx voters in battleground states that will play an outsized role in deciding the election. After surveying more than 2,000 Latinx voters in late July and early August, Equis found a significant jump in support for the Democratic ticket, a shift that the team is referring to as “the Latino Reset.”

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Taylor Swift on stage
    Gareth Cattermole/TAS24/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management

    Taylor Swift enters the fray

    Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

    On Feb. 4, I wrote an article for The Fulcrum with the headline “Will Taylor Swift enter the fray?” Now, seven months later and shortly after the end of the first Harris-Trump debate, Swift made her decision clear when she announced her support for the vice president on Instagram.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Abortion rights protestors

    Arizona residents rally for abortion rights in April, on the heels of the state Supreme Court decision enacting an 1864 law banning abortion.

    Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

    In swing states, R's and D's oppose criminalizing abortion before fetal viability

    While policymakers argue over whether abortion should be a right or a crime, the public has a clear policy stance on the matter. A new survey in the six swing states finds that majorities of Republicans and Democrats oppose criminalizing abortion before fetal viability.

    Furthermore, bipartisan majorities favor reducing unintended pregnancies and abortions through policies ensuring access to birth control.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Why toddlers are motivating an early school educator to vote

    Maira Gonzalez works with students in the preschool and after-school program associated with First United Methodist Church in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

    Mark Macias

    Why toddlers are motivating an early school educator to vote

    Macias, a former journalist with NBC and CBS, owns the public relations agency Macias PR. He lives in South Florida with his wife and two children, ages 4 and 1.

    The Fulcrum presents We the People, a series elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials. In this first installment, we explore the motivations of over 36 million eligible Latino voters as they prepare to make their voices heard in November.

    Florida is home to the third largest population of Hispanics, Latinos. In a recent survey of Florida Latino voters by UnidosUS 2024, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris(47%) leads Republican Donald Trump (42%).

    __________

    Maira Gonzalez vividly remembers the 2000 presidential election in Florida, and today, she sees many similarities.

    “I see a pattern between Bush and Trump,” Gonzalez said. “It’s not fair what they were doing years ago and now. I understand there is a lot of crime with immigrants, but they’re blaming it all on Latins. They’re all being lumped together. Just like we have good Americans and bad Americans, it’s the same with Latins. I’m bilingual, so I see both sides, but you can’t blame Latin immigrants for everything.”

    Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Hulk Hogan tearing off his shirt

    Hulk Hogan was part of a testosterone-fueled script for the Republican National Committee.

    Jason Almond/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

    Manhood is on the ballot, as if politics isn't crazy enough

    Page is an American journalist, syndicated columnist and senior member of the Chicago Tribune editorial board.

    In case you somehow haven’t noticed, manhood is on the ballot.

    Even before President Joe Biden stepped aside to let Vice President Kamala Harris step up to be the Democrats’ presidential nominee, insiders from both parties were calling this the “boys vs. girls election.”

    And even before the Republican National Convention opened in Milwaukee in July, spokesmen for Team Trump were telling reporters they hoped to contrast “weak vs. strong” as their social media message — and present a stage show as testosterone-fueled as a Super Bowl.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    © Copyright 2024