Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

States Escalate Redistricting Arms Race As Texas Push Spurs National Gerrymander Surge

From Maryland to California, a retaliatory wave of out-of-cycle map redraws threatens the last guardrails of fair representation—raising questions of principle, partisanship, and the future of “One Person, One Vote.”

States Escalate Redistricting Arms Race As Texas Push Spurs National Gerrymander Surge
blue white and red flag

“[The Texas legislature] could well provoke other states to do the same. I’m sure there will be proposals for Maryland to do it, though we can only switch one district,” emailed Steve Shapiro, the original complainant in the well-known Maryland redistricting case, Shapiro v. McManus, to me on July 20.

As the first to challenge Maryland’s congressional district apportionment for the 2010 decade, I was heartened two days later (July 22) when House of Delegates Majority Leader, Del. David H. Moon (D-Montgomery Co.), announced his plan to draft legislation that would automatically redistrict Maryland if other states engage in out-of-cycle redrawing of congressional districts.


On my 81st birthday, July 16, President Donald Trump (R) urged Texas to redraw its congressional map, enabling the Republican Party to gain seats in the 2026 midterm elections during a special session. Soon afterward, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) proposed dismantling California’s voter-approved redistricting system to counter Texas’s efforts to redraw congressional districts. Ohio, with 10 Republican representatives and five Democratic representatives, is set to redraw its congressional district lines this September or October. Now, another red state, Florida, should consider overhauling its congressional districts between censuses. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) is open to redrawing House lines only if other states violate the rules. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) hosted Texas state legislators on Friday in Oakwood, IL, to respond to Republican congressional redistricting plans. Trump encouraged Missouri lawmakers to redraw their congressional map to gain one GOP seat. Oregon must redraw its congressional districts next time to prevent prison gerrymandering, but when? Washington state lawmakers believe that their Redistricting Commission won’t redraw before next year’s midterms. New Jersey Democrats will likely need to change the law to draw a new map, provided the NJ court permits it.

The Princeton Gerrymandering Project has graded the states as mentioned above: California “B” (43-to-9 Democratic advantage), Florida “F” (20-to-8 R), Illinois “F” (14-to-3 D), Maryland “B” (7-to-1 D), Missouri “A” (6-to-2 R), New Jersey “A” (9-to-3 D), New York “A” (19-to-7 D), Ohio “D” (10-to-5 R), Oregon “D” (5-to-1 D), Texas “F” (25-to-12 R with one vacancy), and Washington “A” (8-to-2 D). These grades indicate the level of fairness and transparency in each state’s redistricting process, with ‘A’ representing the highest level of fairness and ‘F’ the lowest.

That prompted Del. Moon to wave the Maryland flag, a symbolic gesture often used to attract attention or rally support for Maryland’s potential response to out-of-cycle redistricting.

In 2018, Del. Moon had to answer a Question on the Redistricting asked by the League of Women Voters of Maryland: “What changes, if any, do you support in the process for drawing congressional and legislative district lines in Maryland?” He wrote:

“When an entire legislative body can be drawn independently, we should do so. That’s why I support independent redistricting for state legislative districts. But when district lines are drawn piecemeal, as happens in Congress, I support nationwide independent redistricting. In the meantime, I’ve cosponsored bills to push Maryland into treaties with other states to adopt this reform regionally.”

Before becoming a Delegate in January 2015, Moon ran a blog called Maryland Juice 1.0.

It might be more interesting to read his 2011 blog titled “What Happens in Georgia Stays in Maryland: Trading Rep. Bartlett for Rep. Barrow.

Now, Del. Moon might trade the only Maryland Republican congressman, Andy Harris, for a different Democratic representative from another state, like Missouri’s Congressman Emanuel Cleaver.

Otherwise, how will Del. Moon’s fellow delegates redraw Rep. Harris’s 1st Congressional District to secure the last of the eight congressional districts for the Democrats? It might be simple to shift Harford County and most of Cecil County into the 2nd District. To attract more Democratic-registered voters to the 1st District, it could be redrawn across the 4.3-mile-long William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Chesapeake) Bay Bridge to include downtown Annapolis, including the State House, where the Governor’s family lives. Then, the legislators would redraw the boundaries of the other seven congressional districts based on the “Principle of Equal Population (One Person, One Vote).” As a result, the Princeton Gerrymandering Project would change Maryland’s grade from “B” to “D.”

President Trump could surpass President Barack Obama as the leading sitting advocate of gerrymandering. In 2009, the latter shocked anti-gerrymandering supporters by ignoring the redistricting reform bill proposed by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), even though the Democratic-controlled House and Senate were in session. No Maryland congressional delegation co-sponsored Rep. Lofgren’s 2009 bill.

I left my comment on Delegate Moon’s Facebook page regarding his proposal. It says, “As an expert on the hypocrisy of gerrymandering, I look forward to seeing you, Delegate, in your Judiciary Committee in the coming session.”

This writing was first published MarylandReporter.com on July 28, 2025

Howard Gorrell is an advocate for the deaf, a former Republican Party election statistician, and a longtime congressional aide. He has been advocating against partisan gerrymandering for four decades.

Read More

Executive Order on NIL Is a Symptom, Not a Cure, for College Sports Chaos
running field during daytime

Executive Order on NIL Is a Symptom, Not a Cure, for College Sports Chaos

President Trump’s executive order of July 24th targeting college athletes’ NIL rights, depending on the yet to be determined specifics, will play heavily into the future of higher education, amateurism, and the civic role of sports in America.

The White House described the order as a response to an “out-of-control, rudderless system” and emphasized the need to “restore order” and preserve the educational and developmental benefits of college athletics

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Executive Order Targets Civil Rights and Academic Freedom in Higher Education
people standing and taking photo during daytime
Photo by Colin Lloyd on Unsplash

Trump’s Executive Order Targets Civil Rights and Academic Freedom in Higher Education

This essay is part of a series by Lawyers Defending American Democracy where we demonstrate the link between the administration’s sweeping executive actions and their roots in the authoritarian blueprint, Project 2025, and show how these actions harm individuals and families throughout the country.

Trump’s Attack on Civil Rights and Academic Freedom in Higher Education

Keep ReadingShow less
Migrant Children: Political Pawns in U.S. Border Policy Debate
Crime, immigration and the peaceful transfer of power
Eskay Lim / EyeEm

Migrant Children: Political Pawns in U.S. Border Policy Debate

WASHINGTON — Republicans have warned against the sex trafficking risks migrant children face when illegally crossing the southwest border. Democrats have countered that their concerns lie in hypocrisy.

“Democrats are standing with survivors, while Republicans are shielding abusers,” said U.S. House Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa, referencing President Donald Trump’s efforts to block the full release of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Keep ReadingShow less
Is the Ban on Abortion More Important Than Democracy?
Abortion at the Dinner Table
Getty Images

Is the Ban on Abortion More Important Than Democracy?

After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, 93 prosecutors from 29 states vowed in a statement that they would not pursue abortion cases. In return, 17 states have attempted to pass laws curbing prosecutorial discretion, a legal principle that has existed since the United States’s founding.

On average, more than a quarter (28%) of cases are dismissed by prosecutors for various reasons, including insufficient evidence, constitutional violations, procedural errors, lack of resources, more pressing priorities, or negative public opinion. Prosecutors are public servants, propelled to power by the people, committed to justice. They make decisions based on the tenets of their position.

Keep ReadingShow less