Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Does Donald Trump Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize?

Does Donald Trump Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize?

Oleksandra Matviichuk, head of the Center for Civil Liberties, holds the Nobel medal at the Kyiv railway station on December 18, 2022 in Kyiv, Ukraine.

(Photo by Yevhenii Zavhorodnii/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt sparked widespread debate Thursday by calling for President Donald Trump to receive a Nobel Peace Prize.

Leavitt asserted that Trump merits the prestigious recognition, citing his role in negotiating peace deals and ceasefire agreements across six major international conflicts. However, the wars in Ukraine and the Gaza Strip are still ongoing.


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Trump last month that he recommended him for the award, handing the American leader the letter he said he sent to the Nobel committee.

Stopping Iran’s Nuclear Program

U.S. officials have long labeled Iran as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. In June 2025, intelligence reports suggested Iran was accelerating efforts to develop nuclear weapons. In response, Trump authorized targeted U.S. airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, which were described as “totally obliterated”. The strikes were followed by stern warnings against retaliation, and while Iran did launch a limited strike on a U.S. base in Qatar, no casualties were reported.

Supporters argue that Trump’s decisive action:

  • Prevented Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
  • Averted a potential regional arms race.
  • Reinforced U.S. deterrence without triggering full-scale war.

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) cited these actions in his formal nomination letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, praising Trump’s “bold, decisive actions to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions”.

Brokering Peace Between Iran and Israel

Just days after the strikes, Trump announced a ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel, ending weeks of open conflict that had threatened to engulf the Middle East. The ceasefire, brokered with U.S. involvement, was hailed as “extraordinary” by commentators and foreign leaders alike.

Netanyahu called Trump “a peacemaker in one country and one region after the other”. The ceasefire remains intact, despite early skepticism about its durability.

A Broader Peace Agenda

Trump’s recent efforts build on his earlier diplomatic initiatives:

  • The Abraham Accords (2020), which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations.
  • De-escalation of tensions between India and Pakistan.
  • Attempts to mediate ceasefires in Ukraine and Gaza.

While critics question the sustainability and motives behind these deals, proponents argue that Trump’s “peace through strength” doctrine has yielded tangible results in some of the world’s most volatile regions.

A Divisive but Impactful Nomination

Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize multiple times, but has never won. This year, however, his candidacy has gained traction, with endorsements from lawmakers, tribal nations, and foreign governments, including Pakistan.

Critics across the political and academic spectrum are voicing strong opposition, questioning both the merit and motivations behind the endorsements.

"Nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is like entering a hyena in a dog show,” said Emma Shortis, a senior fellow at RMIT University, in a panel of experts convened by The Independent. “There is no peace in Gaza, and Trump’s approach to diplomacy is transactional, not transformative.”

Even some who initially nominated him—like Ukrainian MP Oleksandr Merezhko—have withdrawn support, citing inconsistency and a lack of genuine commitment to peace.

Betting markets reflect the controversy. While Trump remains a top contender with odds as high as 32% according to some sportsbooks, critics argue that the surge in support is politically driven rather than based on substantive peacebuilding.

Nobel Peace Prize Criteria

According to Alfred Nobel’s will and the Nobel Committee’s interpretation, the Peace Prize is awarded to individuals or organizations that have made:

  • Fraternity between nations
  • Abolition or reduction of standing armies
  • Promotion of peace congresses

Over time, these have expanded to include:

  • Human rights advocacy
  • Diplomatic negotiation
  • Humanitarian work
  • Efforts toward nuclear disarmament

So while Trump’s name is in the mix, whether he “deserves” the prize is a deeply polarizing question.

Whether or not the Nobel Committee awards him the prize, Trump’s actions have reignited debate over what constitutes peace in the modern era. Is it diplomacy alone, or can military deterrence and strategic pressure also qualify?

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum, and the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

Congress Bill Spotlight: Banning Trump Administration From Renaming Naval Ship Harvey Milk

View of the United States Navy's amphibious warfare command ship "USS Mount Whitney" in the Rostock Port on June 3, 2025 in Rostock, Germany.

Getty Images, Frank Soellner

Congress Bill Spotlight: Banning Trump Administration From Renaming Naval Ship Harvey Milk

Sean Penn won the Best Actor Academy Award for 2008’s film Milk, even beating out Brad Pitt.

Context

Keep ReadingShow less
Protecting the U.S. Press: The PRESS Act and What It Could Mean for Journalists

The Protect Reporters from Excessive State Suppression (PRESS) Act aims to fill the national shield law gap by providing two protections for journalists.

Getty Images, Manu Vega

Protecting the U.S. Press: The PRESS Act and What It Could Mean for Journalists

The First Amendment protects journalists during the news-gathering and publication processes. For example, under the First Amendment, reporters cannot be forced to report on an issue. However, the press is not entitled to different legal protections compared to a general member of the public under the First Amendment.

In the United States, there are protections for journalists beyond the First Amendment, including shield laws that protect journalists from pressure to reveal sources or information during news-gathering. 48 states and the District of Columbia have shield laws, but protections vary widely. There is currently no federal shield law. As of 2019, at least 22 journalists have been jailed in the U.S. for refusing to comply with requests to reveal sources of information. Seven other journalists have been jailed and fined for the same reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats Score Strategic Wins Amid Redistricting Battles

Democrat Donkey is winning arm wrestling match against Republican elephant

AI generated image

Democrats Score Strategic Wins Amid Redistricting Battles

Democrats are quietly building momentum in the 2025 election cycle, notching two key legislative flips in special elections and gaining ground in early polling ahead of the 2026 midterms. While the victories are modest in number, they signal a potential shift in voter sentiment — and a brewing backlash against Republican-led redistricting efforts.

Out of 40 special elections held across the United States so far in 2025, only two seats have changed party control — both flipping from Republican to Democrat.

Keep ReadingShow less
Policing or Occupation? Trump’s Militarizing America’s Cities Sets a Dangerous Precedent

A DC Metropolitan Police Department car is parked near a rally against the Trump Administration's federal takeover of the District of Columbia, outside of the AFL-CIO on August 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Policing or Occupation? Trump’s Militarizing America’s Cities Sets a Dangerous Precedent

President Trump announced the activation of hundreds of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., along with the deployment of federal agents—including more than 100 from the FBI. This comes despite Justice Department data showing that violent crime in D.C. fell 35% from 2023 to 2024, reaching its lowest point in over three decades. These aren’t abstract numbers—they paint a picture of a city safer than it has been in a generation, with fewer homicides, assaults, and robberies than at any point since the early 1990s.

The contradiction could not be more glaring: the same president who, on January 6, 2021, stalled for hours as a violent uprising engulfed the Capitol is now rushing to “liberate” a city that—based on federal data—hasn’t been this safe in more than thirty years. Then, when democracy itself was under siege, urgency gave way to dithering; today, with no comparable emergency—only vague claims of lawlessness—he mobilizes troops for a mission that looks less like public safety and more like political theater. The disparity between those two moments is more than irony; it is a blueprint for how power can be selectively applied, depending on whose power is threatened.

Keep ReadingShow less