Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Preventing Presidential Inaugurations on MLK Day, Like Trump’s

News

Congress Bill Spotlight: Preventing Presidential Inaugurations on MLK Day, Like Trump’s

Donald Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th President of the United States.

Getty Images, Pool

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about, but that often don't get the right news coverage.

President Donald Trump falsely claimed his January 6, 2021 speech preceding the Capitol Building riot “had more people” in attendance than Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech.


What the bill does

In January, Trump's second inauguration coincidentally fell on MLK Day.

In response, the Proper Celebration of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and Inauguration Day Act would delay MLK Day by one day, to the third Tuesday in January, in years where it conflicts with a presidential inauguration.

The bill was introduced jointly by one Republican and one Democrat: Reps. Tom Barrett (R-MI7) and Gregory Meeks (D-NY5).

Why would MLK Day be moved, rather than the inauguration? The inauguration’s date is set by the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, while MLK Day is set by a 1983 federal law. So while it would take another constitutional amendment to move the inauguration, requiring higher numerical thresholds for ratification, it would only take a “regular” bill to change MLK Day.

Context

Martin Luther King Jr. Day is a federal holiday honoring the assassinated civil rights leader, Nobel Peace Prize winner, and Time Magazine 1963 Person of the Year.

Inaugurations are always held on January 20. MLK Day is always commemorated on the third Monday in January, which occasionally happens to fall on January 20. (Even though Dr. King’s actual birthday was January 15.)

Ever since MLK Day was first celebrated as a federal holiday in 1986, it’s coincided with an inauguration only twice: 1997 for Bill Clinton’s second inaugural, plus 2025 for Trump’s.

The next such occurrence won’t happen again until 2053, seven presidential elections from now. For comparison, Vice President J.D. Vance was elected last November at age 40. If the vice president (or even the president) who’s inaugurated in 2053 is the same age, they’d only be 12 now.

What supporters say

Supporters argue that both major observances should receive their respective full credit and attention, rather than cannibalizing each other.

“[MLK] Day and Inauguration Day both have profound significance in the U.S., and neither should ever overshadow the other,” Rep. Barrett said in a press release. “Our bipartisan bill makes a simple but important change to ensure the peaceful transfer of power and Dr. King’s enduring legacy both receive the full recognition they deserve. [We should] preserve these momentous occasions that undoubtedly deserve their own days of celebration as a nation.”

Nothing in that press release, from either the Republican or Democratic cosponsor, explicitly mentions Trump.

What opponents say

One surprising opponent: MLK’s daughter Bernice King. She opposes Trump, yet still found a silver lining in his inauguration’s timing.

“A Trump win could potentially set in motion a perilous and oppressive presidential administration, that would undermine and deny the hard-fought battle for civil and human rights for which my parents and so many others sacrificed,” she said in an interview with The Independent.

Yet, “I’m glad that if it was going to happen, it happened on the King holiday, because Dr. King is still speaking to us.” Simultaneously honoring her father’s ideals demonstrates how “we have to commit ourselves to continuing the mission of protecting freedom, justice, and democracy in the spirit of my father.”

Odds of passage

Besides the two aforementioned bipartisan cosponsors, the bill has not attracted a single other cosponsor since its mid-March introduction.

It awaits a potential vote in the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The Fulcrum recently covered the Honor Inauguration Day Act, another bill inspired by Trump’s 2025 inauguration. The American flag almost flew at half-staff at the Capitol Building during the ceremony, due to the government’s official 30-day mourning period for former President Jimmy Carter’s death. The bill would require the Stars and Stripes to fly at full height on inauguration days.

The difference is, while the MLK Day bill has bipartisan cosponsorship, that bill is entirely Republican.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with the Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on the Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: No Invading Allies Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Suspending Pennies and Nickels for 10 Years

Congress Bill Spotlight: Trump’s Birthday and Flag Day Holiday Establishment Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Donald J. Trump $250 Bill Act

Read More

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

President Donald Trump speaks at a White House press briefing on Jan. 30, 2025.

Credit: Jonah Elkowitz/Medill News Service

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

WASHINGTON — Paul Ingrassia withdrew his nomination to lead the Office of Special Counsel on Tuesday night after facing Republican pushback over past controversial statements.

While Ingrassia joins a growing list of President Donald Trump’s nominees who have withdrawn from consideration, many who have aired controversial beliefs or lack requisite qualifications have still been appointed or are still in the nomination process.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making
low light photography of armchairs in front of desk

A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making

The dysfunction of today’s federal government is not simply the product of political division or individual leaders; it is rooted in the internal rules of Congress itself. The Founders, in one of their few major oversights, granted Congress the authority to make its own procedural rules (Article I, Section 5) without establishing any framework for how it should operate. Over time, this blank check has produced a legislative process built to serve partisan power, not public representation.

The result is a Congress that often rewards obstruction and gridlock over compromise and action. The Founders imagined representatives closely tied to their constituents—one member for every 30,000 to 50,000 citizens. Today, that ratio has ballooned to one for every 765,000 in the House, and in the Senate, each member can represent tens of millions (e.g., California). As the population has grown, representation has become distant and impersonal, while procedural rules have tightened the grip of party leadership. Major issues can no longer reach the floor unless the majority party permits it. The link between citizens and decisions has nearly vanished.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lasting peace requires accepting Israel’s right to exist

US President Donald Trump hailed a "tremendous day for the Middle East" as he and regional leaders signed a declaration on Oct. 13, 2025, meant to cement a ceasefire in Gaza, hours after Israel and Hamas exchanged hostages and prisoners. (TNS)

Lasting peace requires accepting Israel’s right to exist

President Trump took a rhetorical victory lap in front of the Israeli parliament Monday. Ignoring his patented departures from the teleprompter, which violated all sorts of valuable norms, it was a speech Trump deserved to give. The ending of the war — even if it’s just a ceasefire — and the release of Israel’s last living hostages is, by itself, a monumental diplomatic accomplishment, and Trump deserves to take a bow.

Much of Trump’s prepared text was forward-looking, calling for a new “golden age” for the Middle East to mirror the one allegedly unfolding here in America. I’m generally skeptical about “golden ages,” here or abroad, and especially leery about any talk about “everlasting peace” in a region that has known “peace” for only a handful of years since the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

Keep ReadingShow less
A child looks into an empty fridge-freezer in a domestic kitchen.

The Trump administration’s suspension of the USDA’s Household Food Security Report halts decades of hunger data tracking.

Getty Images, Catherine Falls Commercial

Trump Gives Up the Fight Against Hunger

A Vanishing Measure of Hunger

Consider a hunger policy director at a state Department of Social Services studying food insecurity data across the state. For years, she has relied on the USDA’s annual Household Food Security Report to identify where hunger is rising, how many families are skipping meals, and how many children go to bed hungry. Those numbers help her target resources and advocate for stronger programs.

Now there is no new data. The survey has been “suspended for review,” officially to allow for a “methodological reassessment” and cost analysis. Critics say the timing and language suggest political motives. It is one of many federal data programs quietly dropped under a Trump executive order on so-called “nonessential statistics,” a phrase that almost parodies itself. Labeling hunger data “nonessential” is like turning off a fire alarm because it makes too much noise; it implies that acknowledging food insecurity is optional and reveals more about the administration’s priorities than reality.

Keep ReadingShow less