Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Dormant, Courts Undermined: Why America’s Checks and Balances Are in Crisis

As Congress abdicates its constitutional duties and the Supreme Court erodes lower court rulings, America faces a rule‑of‑law crisis demanding citizen action.

Opinion

A gavel and a scale of justice on a table.
In this new series, "Judges on Democracy," Judge Paul R. Michel shares the critical need for an independent judiciary and the role of judges in preserving liberty.
Getty Images, OsakaWayne Studios

The new Ken Burns documentary, The American Revolution, provides a special opportunity to learn why our nation’s founders chose liberty and built a democracy based on three branches of government that would serve as a system of checks and balances on one another.

Today, that system is being challenged and is at a dangerous tipping point. One branch, Congress, has been dormant, basically ignoring its primary responsibility to enact laws that will govern us and appropriate funds that enable the government to function. In its acquiescence to the executive branch, Congress ignores its own constitutional responsibilities. And in failing to protect its own role and prerogatives, it has failed to protect us.


We elect a President to lead the administrative branch of government. A key aspect of this is to faithfully execute the laws past and present Congresses have enacted, and to use the funds as Congress appropriated and directed, not ignore or subvert the Congressional branch’s role. We also vote for State and local governments that have a sphere of operation that the Executive Branch of the federal government is – or at least was - bound to respect. Yet within the administrative branch, independent voices have been silenced, fired, and doxed for speaking out.

The lower federal courts have served as lone bulwarks against the administration’s assaults on our freedoms and unfair actions. These courts have written meticulously researched and reasoned opinions to restrain violations of the rule of law in fraught, time-sensitive situations and in the face of attacks on their character and threats to their person.

But the lower federal courts are a fragile bulwark. They are being undermined at the Supreme Court. Often, over vigorous minority dissents, the extremists on the Supreme Court have issued a score of largely unexplained orders that tolerate, if not encourage, dangerous behaviors that the lower courts—who carefully examined the actual evidence—had enjoined.

Without briefing or argument, these Justices have allowed unprecedented assertions of power to proceed while the underlying cases wind slowly through the court system. This “temporary” unwillingness to let the lower courts’ opinions stand is far from temporary to a person deported to a distant country, to a National Guard member whisked away to police duty in one of our cities, or to a person denied access to medicine, a job, and a paycheck overnight.

Moreover, our Bill of Rights has long served to protect our freedoms against authoritarian rule. If the “will of the people” argument proves anything, it is that we should expect any President to abide by the constitutional boundaries - and to be held accountable for brazenly doing otherwise.

When the institutions that we rely on to follow the rule of law are prevented from doing so, those in power forfeit our consent under the principles on which our nation was founded. A supine Congress and dogmatically myopic Supreme Court majority require us to take action to protect ourselves.

We must act to reclaim our constitutional form of government.

We can all do something. We can vote, write, and call our Congress people, protest at their offices and in our communities, write articles, and engage in our civic spaces.

We can engage in protests, local protests, and massive national protests like the March on Washington for civil rights.

We can document and oppose the harsh and cruel tactics of ICE.

We can use our dollars to stop buying from or otherwise supporting those who enable unconstitutional and illegal behaviors. If asked to carry out a patently illegal order, refuse and go public, and support those who do so vocally.

Acquiescence is not an option. Without bold and non-violent resistance, millions more will suffer grave harm in short order, in addition to those who already have. We will all pay the price if we do not get our law-abiding government back.


James B. Kobak Jr. is a former president of the New York County Lawyers Association and Chair of its Justice Center, and presently chairs the National Center for Access to Justice and prepared this article as a volunteer member of Lawyers Defending American Democracy.


Read More

Historical documents representing founding principles of United States on flag backdrop

As the US Constitution turns 250, one expert argues it was designed as an antidote to tyranny — and warns that antidote is now at risk.

photovs/Getty Images

Why the Constitution Remains Our Defense Against Tyranny

There are many analogies for constitutions, for example, a social contract, a blueprint, a roadmap. But as we mark the 250th birthday of the United States of America, I propose another: constitution as antidote.

Constitutions are always intentionally and carefully designed, more often than not as antidotes to heal and ward off ills that a country wishes - or existentially needs - to avoid. This is, and has historically been, true all around the world, although the study of how constitutions and constitutional change can address root causes of conflict and instability has evolved greatly, allowing us to harness their healing power more effectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A rose stands on the 9/11 Memorial for the North Tower in front of 3 and 4 World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

The 9/11 Town Hall That Helped Rebuild Ground Zero—and Democracy

As the nation and the world pause this week to honor and reflect on the 25th Anniversary of the terrorist attack that brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Center and killed more than 3,000 people, I am moved to share a very personal reflection.

After serving as Chief of Staff to Governor Celeste of Ohio and in the Clinton-Gore Administration, where I experienced firsthand how the major institutions in our country interact to favor the powerful over we the people, I became deeply concerned about the health of our democracy. It was clear to me that, beyond voting and national polling, the American people were not at the table to influence the decisions that most affect their lives.

Keep ReadingShow less
People casting their ballots.

Voters cast their ballots at the Buckhead Library for the primary runoff election on June 16, 2026 in Atlanta, Georgia.

Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

Bridgers in the House Face Disproportionate Headwinds in the Midterms

Congressional collaboration on Capitol Hill has become a lost art.

At Bridge Grades, we compile non-partisan 3rd party data to rank members of Congress on how collaboratively (or divisively) they govern. Our thesis is that a more collaborative and bipartisan Congress benefits Americans through a healthier Legislative Branch, stronger checks-and-balances, and more win-win legislation in our common interests.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women walks by voting booths.

People vote in New York's primary elections at an armory and YMCA in Brooklyn on June 23, 2026, in New York City.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Surging Socialists: A Warning for Democrats

Something is happening in the Democratic Party that is making party leaders and media pundits take notice. It became impossible to ignore with Zohran Mamdani’s 2025 election as mayor of New York City. Now comes Angie Nixon’s stunning victory in Florida’s Democratic Senate primary, where she defeated an establishment opponent who outspent her by more than ten to one.

Candidates challenging capitalism are finding a receptive audience, especially among younger Democrats. They are no longer easily dismissed as isolated insurgents in liberal enclaves, though their victories do not mean socialists are taking over the party.

Keep ReadingShow less