Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Dormant, Courts Undermined: Why America’s Checks and Balances Are in Crisis

As Congress abdicates its constitutional duties and the Supreme Court erodes lower court rulings, America faces a rule‑of‑law crisis demanding citizen action.

Opinion

A gavel and a scale of justice on a table.
In this new series, "Judges on Democracy," Judge Paul R. Michel shares the critical need for an independent judiciary and the role of judges in preserving liberty.
Getty Images, OsakaWayne Studios

The new Ken Burns documentary, The American Revolution, provides a special opportunity to learn why our nation’s founders chose liberty and built a democracy based on three branches of government that would serve as a system of checks and balances on one another.

Today, that system is being challenged and is at a dangerous tipping point. One branch, Congress, has been dormant, basically ignoring its primary responsibility to enact laws that will govern us and appropriate funds that enable the government to function. In its acquiescence to the executive branch, Congress ignores its own constitutional responsibilities. And in failing to protect its own role and prerogatives, it has failed to protect us.


We elect a President to lead the administrative branch of government. A key aspect of this is to faithfully execute the laws past and present Congresses have enacted, and to use the funds as Congress appropriated and directed, not ignore or subvert the Congressional branch’s role. We also vote for State and local governments that have a sphere of operation that the Executive Branch of the federal government is – or at least was - bound to respect. Yet within the administrative branch, independent voices have been silenced, fired, and doxed for speaking out.

The lower federal courts have served as lone bulwarks against the administration’s assaults on our freedoms and unfair actions. These courts have written meticulously researched and reasoned opinions to restrain violations of the rule of law in fraught, time-sensitive situations and in the face of attacks on their character and threats to their person.

But the lower federal courts are a fragile bulwark. They are being undermined at the Supreme Court. Often, over vigorous minority dissents, the extremists on the Supreme Court have issued a score of largely unexplained orders that tolerate, if not encourage, dangerous behaviors that the lower courts—who carefully examined the actual evidence—had enjoined.

Without briefing or argument, these Justices have allowed unprecedented assertions of power to proceed while the underlying cases wind slowly through the court system. This “temporary” unwillingness to let the lower courts’ opinions stand is far from temporary to a person deported to a distant country, to a National Guard member whisked away to police duty in one of our cities, or to a person denied access to medicine, a job, and a paycheck overnight.

Moreover, our Bill of Rights has long served to protect our freedoms against authoritarian rule. If the “will of the people” argument proves anything, it is that we should expect any President to abide by the constitutional boundaries - and to be held accountable for brazenly doing otherwise.

When the institutions that we rely on to follow the rule of law are prevented from doing so, those in power forfeit our consent under the principles on which our nation was founded. A supine Congress and dogmatically myopic Supreme Court majority require us to take action to protect ourselves.

We must act to reclaim our constitutional form of government.

We can all do something. We can vote, write, and call our Congress people, protest at their offices and in our communities, write articles, and engage in our civic spaces.

We can engage in protests, local protests, and massive national protests like the March on Washington for civil rights.

We can document and oppose the harsh and cruel tactics of ICE.

We can use our dollars to stop buying from or otherwise supporting those who enable unconstitutional and illegal behaviors. If asked to carry out a patently illegal order, refuse and go public, and support those who do so vocally.

Acquiescence is not an option. Without bold and non-violent resistance, millions more will suffer grave harm in short order, in addition to those who already have. We will all pay the price if we do not get our law-abiding government back.


James B. Kobak Jr. is a former president of the New York County Lawyers Association and Chair of its Justice Center, and presently chairs the National Center for Access to Justice and prepared this article as a volunteer member of Lawyers Defending American Democracy.


Read More

A Party That Seeks to Nationalize and Control Elections Has Entered Fascist Territory

Donald Trump’s call to “nationalize” elections raises constitutional alarms. A deep dive into federalism, authoritarian warning signs, and 2026 implications.

Getty Images, Boris Zhitkov

A Party That Seeks to Nationalize and Control Elections Has Entered Fascist Territory

I’m well aware that using the word fascist in the headline of an article about Donald Trump invites a predictably negative response from some folks. But before we argue about words (and which labels are accurate and which aren’t), let’s look at the most recent escalation that led me to use it.

In Trump’s latest entry in his ongoing distraction-and-intimidation saga, he publicly suggested that elections should be “nationalized,” yanking control away from the states and concentrating it at the federal level. The remarks came after yet another interview in which Trump again claimed, without evidence, that certain states are “crooked” and incapable of running fair elections, a familiar complaint from the guy who only trusts ballots after they’ve gone his way.

Keep ReadingShow less
Building Power to Advance Inclusive Democracy: The Pro-Democracy Narrative Playbook
Picture provided

Building Power to Advance Inclusive Democracy: The Pro-Democracy Narrative Playbook

Around the world, including here in the United States, evidence shows that authoritarians are dominating the information ecosystem. Orchestrated, well-resourced, and weaponized narratives are being used to justify repression and delegitimize democratic principles and institutions. At the same time, the word “democracy” has been appropriated and redefined to protect certain freedoms granted only to certain people and to legitimize unchecked power. These actors have learned from each other. They borrow from a shared authoritarian playbook to blend traditional propaganda with digital-age disinformation techniques to reshape public perception. The result is an environment in which democratic norms, institutions, and basic freedoms are under a coordinated, sustained attack.

Yet even as these threats grow, democracy advocates, journalists, election workers, civil society organizations, and everyday citizens are stepping up—often at great personal risk—to protect democratic rights and expose repression. They have been doing all of this without the benefit of a research-based narrative or the infrastructure to deploy it.

Keep ReadingShow less
As America Turns 250, It’s Time to Begin Again
selective focus photo of U.S.A. flag
Photo by Andrew Ruiz on Unsplash

As America Turns 250, It’s Time to Begin Again

I know so many people are approaching America’s 250th anniversary with a sense of trepidation, even dread. Is there really anything to celebrate given the recent chaos and uncertainty we’ve been experiencing? Is productively reckoning with our history a possibility these days? And how hopeful will we allow ourselves to be about the future of the nation, its ideals, and our sense of belonging to something larger than ourselves?

Amid the chaos and uncertainty of 2026, I find myself returning to the words of the writer and civil rights activist James Baldwin. Just as things looked darkest to Baldwin amid the struggle for civil rights, he refused to give up or submit or wallow in despair.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hotels Have a Constitutional Right Not To House ICE Agents

The Third Amendment protects against being forced to house the military. It may also apply to ICE.

Cage Rivera/Rewire News Group

Hotels Have a Constitutional Right Not To House ICE Agents

Hotels across the country are housing ICE agents as they carry out violent raids, detention operations, and street abductions.

Of course people are pushing back. Activists have been calling for boycotts of hotel chains like Marriott and Hilton that cooperate with ICE, arguing that businesses should not be providing material support for an enforcement regime built on mass detention, deportation, and brutality.

Keep ReadingShow less